This is the second of three papers investigating the legislative history concerning infanticide. It compares the efforts of various states to protect the newborn infant between 534 and 1532 CE. When the Roman Empire collapsed in the 5th century, the jurisdiction of infanticide was relegated to the church, which regarded carnal delicts a sin rather than a crime. The punishment - public penance of the mother for 7-15 years - was milder than that which the murder of an adult would incur. The Council of Florence decreed in 1439 that the souls of children who died without having been baptized descend to hell. This turned infanticide from a penitential sin to the most heinous of all crimes. The states passed laws that abominated infanticide even more than the murder of older humans and punished women with ever more cruel forms of execution. Towards the men, however, who usually abandoned the women they had impregnated, the laws were lenient. Churches and society continued to vilify illegitimate birth, thus enhancing rather than preventing infanticide. The Habsburg-German legislation of 1532 ordained to torture any woman who had concealed pregnancy and birth and claimed the infant was stillborn. Legislation developed similarly in other countries, albeit at a different speed. French (1556) and British (1623) legislation reversed the burden of proof and demanded the death penalty for concealing pregnancy and birth when a dead infant was found.

Keywords:
Newborn infant, Infanticide, History, Legislation, Foundling hospitals
1.
Obladen M: From right to sin: laws on infanticide in antiquity. Neonatology 2016;109:56-61.
2.
Bulst N: Der schwarze Tod. Demographische, wirtschafts- und kulturgeschichtliche Aspekte der Pest-Katastrophe von 1347-1352. Saeculum 1979;30:45-67.
3.
Dwork D: War Is Good for Babies and Other Young Children: A History of the Infants and Child Welfare Movement in England 1898-1918. London, Travistock, 1987.
4.
Trexler RC: Infanticide in Florence: new sources and first results. Hist Child Q 1973;1:98-116.
5.
Schannat JF, Hartzheim J: Conciliae Germaniae. Coloniae Agrippinensium, Joannes Wilhelm Krakamp, 1759, vol 1, p 148.
6.
Munier C: Concilia Galliae: A.314-A.506; in Corpus Christianorum, Series Latina 148. Turnholti, Brepols, 1963, pp 100-101.
7.
Thomas Aquinas: On evil. Question 5, article 3 (translated by Jean Oesterle). Notre Dame, University of Notre Dame Press, 1995, p 220.
8.
Tanner NP: Decrees of the Ecumenical Councils. Washington, Georgetown University Press, 1990, pp 528, 666.
9.
Buckley TA: Canons and Decrees of the Council of Trent. London, Routledge, 1851, pp 21-24.
10.
Peignot G: Notice sur vingt-deux grandes miniatures ou tableaux en couleur, réunis an tete d'un manuscrit du XVe siecle. Mémoires de l'Académie des sciences, arts, et belles-lettres de Dijon. Dijon, Académie des sciences, arts, et belles-lettres de Dijon, 1832, pp 39-78.
11.
De Angelis P: L'Ospedale Apostolico di Santo Spirito in Saxia nella Mente e nel Cuore dei Papi. Collana di studi storici sull'Ospedale di Santo Spirito in Saxia. Rome, Tipografia Editrice Italia, 1956, p 19.
12.
Altfridi: Die Vitae Sancti Liudgeri (ca. 840 CE), lib. I, cap. 6; in Diekamp W (ed): Die Geschichtsquellen des Bistums Münster. Münster, Theissing'sche Buchhandlung, 1881, vol 4, pp 10-11.
13.
von Lassberg FLA: Der Schwabenspiegel: oder Schwäbisches Land- und Lehen-Rechtbuch, nach einer Handschrift vom Jahr 1287. Tübingen, Ludwig Friedrich Fues, 1840, pp 149, 152.
14.
Coleman E: Infanticide in the Early Middle Ages; in Stuard SM (ed): Women in Medieval Society. Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press, 1976, pp 47-70.
15.
Hoffer PC, Hull NEH: Murdering Mothers: Infanticide in England and New England, 1558-1803. New York, New York University Press, 1981, pp 13-21.
16.
Peters R: Der Schutz des neugeborenen, insbesondere des missgebildeten Kindes; in: Medizin in Recht und Ethik. Stuttgart, Enke, 1988, vol 18.
17.
Urban P: Die Kindesaussetzung, Rechtsgeschichtliche Entwicklung, Dogmatik und Bekämpfung. Unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Findelhausakten der Stadt Köln. Inaug Diss. Bonn/Düsseldorf, Nolte, 1936.
18.
Wächtershäuser W: Das Verbrechen des Kindsmordes im Zeitalter der Aufklärung. Eine rechtsgeschichtliche Untersuchung. Berlin, Erich Schmidt, 1973, p 67.
19.
Feucht D: Grube und Pfahl. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der deutschen Hinrichtungsbräuche. Inaug Diss. Tübingen, JCB Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1967.
20.
Schwarzenberg J, Bauer H: Bambergische Peinliche Halsgerichtsordnung: Constitutio criminalis Bambergensis, 1507. Dettelbach, Röll, 2009.
21.
Karl V: Des allerdurchleuchtigsten grossmechtigste unüberwindtlichsten Keyser Karls des fünften: und des heyligen Römischen Reichs peinlich Gerichtsordnung. Mainz, Ivo Schöffer, 1533.
22.
von Dülmen R: Frauen vor Gericht: Kindsmord in der frühen Neuzeit. Frankfurt, Fischer-Taschenbuch, 1991, pp 30, 49-51.
23.
Bode G: Die Kindstötung und ihre Bestrafung im Nürnberg des Mittelalters. Arch Strafrecht Strafprozess 1914;61:430-481.
24.
von Dülmen R: Theater des Schreckens. Gerichtspraxis und Strafrituale in der frühen Neuzeit, ed 3. München, CH Beck, 1988, p 174.
25.
Drew KF: The Laws of the Salian Franks. Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press, 1991, p 106.
26.
McNeill JR, Gamer HM: Medieval Handbooks of Penance. New York, Columbia University Press, 1938, p 304.
27.
Seresia A: De l'acte de naissance de l'enfant naturel. Bruxelles, Th Lesigne, 1869, p 10.
28.
Beck TR, Dunlop W: Elements of Medical Jurisprudence, ed 2. London, John Anderson, 1825, pp 132-155.
29.
Stöber A: Merkwürdige Strafarten welche in ältern Zeiten im Elsass angewandt wurden; in Alsatia - Jahrbuch für elsässische Geschichte. Mülhausen, JP Rissler, 1851, pp 46-45.
30.
Osenbrüggen E: Das Alamannische Strafrecht im deutschen Mittelalter. Schaffhausen, Hurter'sche Buchhandlung, 1860, pp 229-230.
31.
Bieler L: Penitentialis Vinniani, Canon XLVII; in: The Irish Penitentials. Dublin, Institute for Advanced Studies, 1963, pp 92-93.
32.
Verstegan R: A Restitution of Decayed Intelligence, in Antiquities, Concerning the Most Noble, and Renowned English Nation (ed 1, 1606), ed 3. London, Newcomb (for Joshua Kirton), 1653, p 45.
33.
Moseley KL: The history of infanticide in western society. Issues Law Med 1986;1:345-361.
34.
Damme C: Infanticide: the worth of an infant under law. Med Hist 1978;22:1-24.
35.
Levittan M: The history of infanticide: exposure, sacrifice, and femicide; in Browne-Miller A (ed): Violence and Abuse in Society. Understanding a Global Crisis. Santa Barbara, ABC-CLIO, 2012, pp 83-130.
36.
Payne GH: The Child in Human Progress. New York/London, GP Putnam's Sons, 1916, pp 56-58.
37.
Palatre G: L'Infanticide et l'oeuvre de la Sainte-Enfance en Chine (first published Shanghai 1878). Ann Oeuvre Sainte-Enfance 1913;65:214-216.
38.
Nicholson RA: A Literary History of the Arabs. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1930, p 243.
39.
Unknown Artist: Hinrichtung der Kindsmörderin Maria Elisabetha Beckensteiner im Jahre 1742 (Copper etching). Augsburg, Staats- und Stadtbibliothek, Cat. Graphic, Criminals etc. Inv. 29/123, 1742.
© 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel
2015
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.