Background: Guidelines published by the International Liaison Committee for Resuscitation and by the World Health Organization recommend delaying cord clamping at birth as part of routine care for infants. Objective: To study the use of milking of the cord 4 times as an alternative to enhance the redistribution of placental blood into the baby. Methods: This is a prospective cohort study of neurodevelopmental assessment by the Bayley III method of very preterm infants who had participated in a trial of delayed cord clamping versus cord milking at birth that was conducted in a neonatal tertiary care hospital. The primary outcomes were differences in cognitive, motor and language development at 2 and 3.5 years. Two-tailed analyses were performed with the χ2 test, Fisher's exact test, t test, Mann-Whitney U test and ANCOVA. Results: Out of the 58 infants enrolled in the original study, 39 infants (67%) were assessed at 2 years and 29 (50%) at 3.5 years of age. Neurodevelopmental outcomes at 2 and 3.5 years did not significantly differ between the two groups for the three Bayley III composite scores. At 3.5 years there was a trend towards higher scores for girls in the language composite scores (girls: mean = 121.6, SD = 15.22; boys: mean = 101.07, SD = 19.84) and on the motor scale (girls: mean = 124.60, SD = 18.15; boys: mean = 97.86, SD = 17.23). Conclusions: In this small number of participants followed up at 2 and 3.5 years of age, milking of the cord 4 times did not have any long-term adverse effect on neurodevelopmental outcome, suggesting that cord milking could be used as an alternative to delayed cord clamping.

1.
Rabe H, Diaz-Rossello JL, Duley L, Dowswell T: Effect of timing of umbilical cord clamping and other strategies to influence placental transfusion at preterm birth on maternal and infant outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;8:CD003248.
2.
Rabe H, Reynolds G, Diaz-Rossello J: A systematic review and meta-analysis of a brief delay in clamping the umbilical cord of preterm infants. Neonatology 2008;93:138-144.
3.
Hosono S, Mugishima H, Fujita H, Hosono A, Minato M, Okada T, et al: Umbilical cord milking reduces the need for red cell transfusions and improves neonatal adaptation in infants born less than 29 weeks‘ gestation: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2008;93:F14-F19.
4.
Rabe H, Jewison A, Alvarez RF, Crook D, Stilton D, Bradley R, Holden D; Brighton Perinatal Study Group: Milking compared with delayed cord clamping to increase placental transfusion in preterm neonates: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2011;117:205-211.
5.
Mercer JS, Vohr BR, Erickson-Owens DA, Padbury JF, Oh W: Seven-month developmental outcomes of very low birth weight infants enrolled in a randomized controlled trial of delayed versus immediate cord clamping. J Perinatol 2010;30:11-16.
6.
Bayley N: Bayley Scales of Infant Development III, ed 3. San Antonio, Psych Corp/Harcourt Assessment, 2006.
7.
Johnson S, Moore T, Marlow N: Using the Bayley-III to assess neurodevelopmental delay: which cut-off should be used? Pediatr Res 2014;75:670-674.
8.
Richards M, Hardy R, Kuh D, Wadsworth MEJ: Birth weight and cognitive function in the British 1946 birth cohort: longitudinal population based study. BMJ 2001;322:199-203.
9.
Craig WY, Palomaki, GE, Neveux, LM, Haddow JE: Maternal body mass index during pregnancy and offspring neurocognitive development. Oral Biosci Med 2013;1:20-25.
10.
Wood NS, Marlow N, Costeloe K, Gibson AT, Wilkinson AR; EPICure Study Group: Neurologic and developmental disability after extremely preterm birth. N Engl J Med 2000;343:378-384.
11.
Raju TNK: Timing of umbilical cord clamping for optimizing placental transfusion. Curr Opin Pediatr 2013;25:180-187.
12.
Sweet DG, Carnielli V, Greisen G, Hallman M, Ozek E, Plavka R, Saugstad OD, Simeoni U, Speer CP, Vento M, Halliday HL; European Association of Perinatal Medicine: European consensus guidelines on the management of respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants - 2013 update. Neonatology 2013;103:353-368.
13.
American Academy of Pediatrics: Timing of umbilical cord clamping after birth. Pediatrics 2013;131;e1323.
14.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists: Timing of umbilical cord clamping after birth. Obstet Gynecol 2012;1208:1522-1526.
15.
WHO, UNICEF: Every Newborn: An Action Plan to End Preventable Deaths. Geneva, WHO, 2015.
16.
WHO: Early Essential Newborn Care: Clinical Practice Pocket Guide. Geneva, WHO, 2014.
17.
Bhatt S, Alison BJ, Wallace EM, Crossely KJ, Gill AW, Kluckow M, te Pas AB, Morley CJ, Polglase GR, Hooper SB: Delaying cord clamping until ventilation onset improves cardiovascular function at birth in preterm lambs. J Physiol 2013;591:2113-2126.
18.
Boere I, Smit M, Roest AA, Lopriore E, van Lith JM, te Pas AB: Current practice of cord clamping in the Netherlands: a questionnaire study. Neonatology 2015;107:50-55.
19.
Christensen RD, Carroll PD, Josephson CD: Evidence-based advances in transfusion practices in neonatal intensive care units. Neonatology 2014;106:245-253.
20.
Al-Wassia H, Shah PS: Efficacy and safety of umbilical cord milking at birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr 2015;169:18-25.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.