Background: Higher patient-to-nurse ratios and nursing workload are associated with increased mortality in the adult intensive care unit (ICU). Most neonatal ICUs (NICUs) in the United Kingdom do not meet national staffing recommendations. The impact of staffing on outcomes in the NICU is unknown. Objective: To determine how nurse-to-patient ratios or nursing workload affects outcomes in the NICU. Methods: Two authors (M.S., S.S.) searched PubMed, Medline, and EMBASE for eligible studies. Included studies reported on both the outcomes of infants admitted to a NICU and nurse-to-patient ratios or workload, and were published between 1/1990 and 4/2010 in any language. The primary outcome was mortality before discharge, relative to nurse-to-patient ratios. Secondary outcomes were intraventricular hemorrhage, daily weight gain, days on assisted ventilation, days on oxygen and nosocomial infection. Study quality was assessed with the STROBE checklist. Results: Seven studies met the inclusion criteria. Three reported on the same group of patients. Only four studies reported death before discharge from the NICU relative to nurse-to-patient ratios. Three reported an association between lower nurse-to-patient ratios and higher mortality, and one reported just the opposite. Because each study used a different definition of nurse staffing, a meta-analysis could not be performed. Conclusions: Nurse-to-patient ratios appear to affect outcomes of neonatal intensive care, but limitations of the existing literature prevent clear conclusions about optimal staffing strategies. Evidence-based standards for staffing could impact public policy and lead to improvements in patient safety and decreased rates of adverse outcomes. More research on this subject, including a standard and valid measure of nursing workload, is urgently needed.

Keywords:
Infant, Newborn, Health services research, Systematic review, Nurse staffing, Workload
1.
Needleman J, Buerhaus P, Mattke S, Stewart M, Zelevinsky K: Nurse-staffing levels and the quality of care in hospitals. N Engl J Med 2002;346:1715-1722.
2.
Needleman J, Buerhaus P, Pankratz VS, Leibson CL, Stevens SR, Harris M: Nurse staffing and inpatient hospital mortality. N Engl J Med 2011;364:1037-1045.
3.
Tarnow-Mordi WO, Hau C, Warden A, Shearer AJ: Hospital mortality in relation to staff workload: a 4-year study in an adult intensive-care unit. Lancet 2000;356:185-189.
4.
Aiken LH, Clarke SP, Sloane DM, Sochalski J, Silber JH: Hospital nurse staffing and patient mortality, nurse burnout, and job dissatisfaction. JAMA 2002;288:1987-1993.
5.
Redshaw M, Hamilton K: A Survey of current neonatal unit organisation and policy; in National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit. Oxford, University of Oxford, 2005.
6.
Tucker J, Tarnow-Mordi W, Gould C, Parry G, Marlow N: UK neonatal intensive care services in 1996. On behalf of the UK Neonatal Staffing Study Collaborative Group. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1999;80:F233-F234.
7.
Sink DW, Hope SAE, Hagardorn JI: Nurse:patient ratio and achievement of oxygen saturation goals in premature infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2011;96:F93-F98.
8.
Hamilton KE, Redshaw ME, Tarnow-Mordi W: Nurse staffing in relation to risk-adjusted mortality in neonatal care. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2007;92:F99-F103.
9.
Grandi C, Gonzalez A, Meritano J: Patient volume, medical and nursing staffing and its relationship with risk-adjusted outcomes of VLBW infants in 15 Neocosur neonatal network NICUs (in Spanish). Arch Argent Pediatr 2010;108:499-510.
10.
Cimiotti JP, Haas J, Saiman L, Larson EL: Impact of staffing on bloodstream infections in the neonatal intensive care unit. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2006;160:832-836.
11.
Callaghan LA, Cartwright DW, O'Rourke P, Davies MW: Infant to staff ratios and risk of mortality in very low birthweight infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2003;88:F94-F97.
12.
Tucker J: Patient volume, staffing, and workload in relation to risk-adjusted outcomes in a random stratified sample of UK neonatal intensive care units: a prospective evaluation. Lancet 2002;359:99-107.
13.
Pillay T, Nightingale P, Owen S, Kirby D, Spencer A: Neonatal nurse staffing and delivery of clinical care in the SSBC Newborn Network. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2012;97:F174-F178.
14.
Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP: The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol 2008;61:344-349.
15.
Profit J, Petersen LA, McCormick MC, Escobar GJ, Coleman-Phox K, Zheng Z, et al: Patient-to-nurse ratios and outcomes of moderately preterm infants. Pediatrics 2010;125:320-326.
16.
Tarnow-Mordi W, Parry G, McCabe C, Nicolson P, Baumer H, Tucker J: UK Neonatal Staffing Study Final Report: A prospective evaluation of risk-adjusted outcomes of neonatal intensive care in relation to volume, staffing and workload in UK neonatal intensive care units. NHS Executive Mother and Child Health Initiative, 2000.
© 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel
2013
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.