Background and Objective: Neonatal autopsy rates were in decline internationally at the end of the last century. Our objective was to assess the current value of neonatal autopsy in providing additional information to families and healthcare professionals. Methods: We conducted a review of neonatal autopsies performed in a tertiary perinatal centre over an 11-year period. Primary outcomes measured were the annual neonatal autopsy rates and concordance rates between clinical and autopsy diagnoses of the primary cause of death. Secondary outcomes were the clinical, genetic and audit value of the examinations. Findings were used to inform the consent process, and the effect this had on institutional post-mortem rates was assessed over the subsequent 5-year period. Results: There was a marked decline in the annual neonatal autopsy rate from 73% in 1994 to 48% in 2004. 164 cases met the inclusion criteria for review. Complete concordance for cause of death was reached in 91% of cases. Previously unsuspected or unconfirmed clinical conditions, other than the primary cause of death, were uncovered at autopsy in 85 cases. Detailed information on inheritable conditions was obtained in 45 cases. Findings with perceived ‘audit value’ for clinical practice were identified in 29 cases. The dissemination of this information to staff and families contributed to the stabilisation of the consent rate in the following 5-year period. Conclusion: Neonatal autopsy remains a valuable diagnostic tool as it provides critical clinical and audit information for healthcare professionals and families.

Keywords:
Autopsy rates, Neonatal autopsy, Perinatal autopsy, Post-mortem examination
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel
2011
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.