The parasellar region, located around the sella turcica, is an anatomically complex area representing a crossroads for important adjacent structures. Several lesions, including tumoral, inflammatory vascular, and infectious diseases may affect this area. Although invasive pituitary tumors are the most common neoplasms encountered within the parasellar region, other tumoral (and cystic) lesions can also be detected. Craniopharyngiomas, meningiomas, as well as Rathke’s cleft cysts, chordomas, and ectopic pituitary tumors can primarily originate from the parasellar region. Except for hormone-producing ectopic pituitary tumors, signs and symptoms of these lesions are usually nonspecific, due to a mass effect on the surrounding anatomical structures (i.e., headache, visual defects), while a clinically relevant impairment of endocrine function (mainly anterior hypopituitarism and/or diabetes insipidus) can be present if the pituitary gland is displaced or compressed. Differential diagnosis of parasellar lesions mainly relies on magnetic resonance imaging, which should be interpreted by neuroradiologists skilled in base skull imaging. Neurosurgery is the main treatment, alone or in combination with radiotherapy. Of note, recent studies have identified gene mutations or signaling pathway modulators that represent potential candidates for the development of targeted therapies, particularly for craniopharyngiomas and meningiomas. In summary, parasellar lesions still represent a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. A deeper knowledge of this complex anatomical site, the improvement of imaging tools, as well as novel insights into the pathophysiology of presenting lesions are strongly needed to improve the management of parasellar lesions.

The parasellar region, located immediately around the sella turcica, is an anatomically complex area representing a crucial crossroads for important adjacent structures [1]. In a simplified representation, parasellar region is limited laterally by the cavernous sinuses (CS) on both sides of the sella turcica, above by the optic chiasm and below by the sphenoidal sinus. Other structures, such as the meninges, blood vessels, and the hypothalamic-pituitary system can be considered part of this wide area, which is not clearly delineated, and could therefore be affected by all the different lesions possibly developing from these structures [2]. Consequently, signs and symptoms of parasellar lesions are mainly related to a mass effect on the surrounding anatomical structures (i.e., headache, visual defects) but, if the pituitary gland is affected, endocrine functions can be severely impaired as well.

In the present article, we aim to provide an overview of the lesions encountered in the parasellar region, with a particular description of the key clinical and radiological features that characterized them. Finally, the recent advances on the new molecular actors playing a role in the pathophysiology of parasellar lesions will be discussed.

The parasellar region defines a complex anatomical area because of its small size while containing an impressive amount of neural and vascular structures, such as the CS. The CS are paired, symmetric, trabeculated venous sinuses, delimitated by dural walls and containing the sympathic plexus, the cranial nerves, and the intracavernous portion of the internal carotid artery (Fig. 1) [3]. The sinus is the site of a venous confluence that receives the terminal end of multiple veins draining the orbit, the sylvian fissure as well as the middle and anterior fossae. Furthermore, the CS has free communication with the basilar, superior, inferior petrosal, and intercavernous sinuses [4].

Fig. 1.

Schematic representation of the sellar region. Coronal section showing the pituitary gland (1), the sphenoidal sinus (2), and the parasellar region containing the cavernous sinus (3). In the cavernous sinus, the oculomotor nerve (III) (5) lies superiorly followed by the trochlear nerve (IV) (6) and the ophthalmic branch (8) and the maxillary branch of trigeminal nerve (V) (9). The abducens nerve (VI) (7) lies in the cavernous sinus abutting the lateral wall of the intracavernous carotid artery (4).

Fig. 1.

Schematic representation of the sellar region. Coronal section showing the pituitary gland (1), the sphenoidal sinus (2), and the parasellar region containing the cavernous sinus (3). In the cavernous sinus, the oculomotor nerve (III) (5) lies superiorly followed by the trochlear nerve (IV) (6) and the ophthalmic branch (8) and the maxillary branch of trigeminal nerve (V) (9). The abducens nerve (VI) (7) lies in the cavernous sinus abutting the lateral wall of the intracavernous carotid artery (4).

Close modal

The oculomotor nerve lies superiorly between the two dural leaves of the lateral sinus wall, and the trochlear nerve and the ophthalmic branch of the trigeminal nerve are successively found from the top to the bottom of CS. The abducens nerve lies in the CS abutting the lateral wall of the carotid artery and the medial side of the ophthalmic nerve. Whether the maxillary branch of the trigeminal nerve is intracavernous or extracavernous is a source of debate; however, its close proximity results in its compression in many parasellar pathologies. The lateral dural reflection of these sinuses is easily visualized on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), but a clear visualization of the thin medial dural wall that separates the sinus from the outer periosteal layer of the pituitary gland is often problematic. The intracavernous carotid artery (ICA) has a C-shaped curve as it traverses the CS and carries with it the sympathetic carotid plexus that usually sends fibers to the abducens nerve. It is possible to visualize the meningohypophyseal artery and its branches by displacing the carotid artery laterally [5].

Due to their anatomical complexity, CS are difficult to approach by surgery, and an a priori decision with regard to the radicality of the tumor resection that takes into account both the risks and the benefits for the patient is needed.

MRI represents the exam of choice to investigate the sellar region. In spite of its high spatial resolution, it cannot systematically provide the accurate origin of a lesion, making sometimes the etiological diagnosis unsure, and so even more the therapeutic strategy. A step-by-step analysis is therefore mandatory and consists, first, in identification of the pituitary gland, stalk, and the sella turcica [6]. Afterwards, the epicenter of the lesion has to be determined (cranial, distal, or lateral to the sella). An enlargement of the sella can help to specify the pituitary origin of the lesion. In a third step, the analysis of signal intensity is determinant to clarify the nature of the lesion (i.e., cystic or solid) and identify the different structures contained in the CS (fat, vessels, and nerves). ICAs present a hyposignal in T1 and T2 related to fast flow (also known as the “flow void”). Of note, CS invasive pituitary tumors (PTs) usually do not exert a mass effect on the lumen of the ICA, while tumors that primarily originate from the CS and invade the pituitary sella can collapse the lumen of the ICA as observed in CS meningioma (Fig. 2). Moreover, a tissue that has identical MR signals and enhancement as those of the intrasellar component of the tumor is highly indicative of a primary tumor originating from the sella (i.e., invasive PT). In this scenario, it has to be underlined that the PT will rather lead to a monolateral CS invasion with the normal pituitary gland displaced on the opposite site of the sella and thus “protecting” the contralateral CS. Arterial aneurysms represent lesions that can be found in the parasellar region possibly mimicking a PT. However, they are usually characterized by a strong T2-hypointensity aspect, as well as the presence of circumferential layers if coexisting thrombus of different ages is present (Fig. 3) [7]. Overall, numerous lesions can develop within or invade the CS (Table 1) and have been extensively described in their imaging features by Bonneville et al. [8].

Table 1.

Overview of the lesions in the cavernous sinus

Overview of the lesions in the cavernous sinus
Overview of the lesions in the cavernous sinus
Fig. 2.

Meningioma of the right cavernous sinus with intrasellar extension. a Coronal T2. Bulging of the lateral wall of the right cavernous sinus and convexity of the upper pole of the sellar component (blue arrow). The meningioma is discretely hyperintense as compared to the grey matter of the temporal lobe (yellow arrow). b Coronal contrast-enhanced T1 showing a severe reduction of the right ICA lumen (blue arrow) as compared to the other side. Courtesy of Prof. Jean-François Bonneville.

Fig. 2.

Meningioma of the right cavernous sinus with intrasellar extension. a Coronal T2. Bulging of the lateral wall of the right cavernous sinus and convexity of the upper pole of the sellar component (blue arrow). The meningioma is discretely hyperintense as compared to the grey matter of the temporal lobe (yellow arrow). b Coronal contrast-enhanced T1 showing a severe reduction of the right ICA lumen (blue arrow) as compared to the other side. Courtesy of Prof. Jean-François Bonneville.

Close modal
Fig. 3.

Right internal carotid artery thrombosed aneurysm in its supraclinoid segment. a Coronal T2 showing a well-circumscribed, strong hypointense lesion (yellow arrow), which can mimic a tumor of the parasellar and/or suprasellar region. b Coronal contrast-enhanced T1 with peripheral unenhanced layers of thrombus (blue arrow) and a patent enhanced portion of the lumen of the aneurysm in the center. c 3D rendering reformatted MR angiogram. Courtesy of Prof. Jean-François Bonneville.

Fig. 3.

Right internal carotid artery thrombosed aneurysm in its supraclinoid segment. a Coronal T2 showing a well-circumscribed, strong hypointense lesion (yellow arrow), which can mimic a tumor of the parasellar and/or suprasellar region. b Coronal contrast-enhanced T1 with peripheral unenhanced layers of thrombus (blue arrow) and a patent enhanced portion of the lumen of the aneurysm in the center. c 3D rendering reformatted MR angiogram. Courtesy of Prof. Jean-François Bonneville.

Close modal

Last, it is crucial to determine if a PT invades the CS. In MRI sequences, bulging of the lateral wall of the CS and lack of normal enhancement of the venous extrasellar spaces are suggestive of CS invasion but can be absent in case of a simple compression of the CS. Different anatomical classifications, based on MRI findings, have been proposed to specify if the CS is invaded by a PT. As an example, Knosp et al. [9] proposed that the CS is invaded if the tumor extends laterally and passes a line drawn between the cross-sectional center of the supra- and intracavernous segments of the ICA (≥grade 2, Fig. 4). Cottier et al. [10] suggested that an encasement of the ICA greater than 67% makes invasion certain, while Bonneville et al. [11] suggested that an ICA remote from the sphenoid carotid sulcus is highly suggestive of CS invasion. The scenario becomes more complex when the invasion appears to be limited and when the high-quality and high-resolution MRI (i.e., 3.0 T) is used. In this case, MR sequences could identify the thin internal dural membrane separating the sellar content from the CS, which usually appears as T2-hypointense line floating as a curtain between CS and the pituitary fossa.

Fig. 4.

Knosp classification. a Grade 0. The adenoma does not pass the medial tangent (dotted line), which passes between the medial aspects of the supra- and intracavernous portions of the ICA. b Grade 1. The adenoma passes the medial tangent but does not cross the line drawn between the cross-sectional centers of the supra- and intracavernous segments of the ICA (dotted line). c Grade 2. The adenoma extends beyond the cross-sectional line but does not pass the lateral tangent (dotted line) drawn between the lateral aspects of the supra- and intracavernous ICA. d Grade 3A. The adenoma extends beyond the lateral tangent (dotted line) and into the superior cavernous sinus compartment. e Grade 3B. The adenoma extends beyond the lateral tangent (dotted line) and into the inferior cavernous sinus compartment. f Grade 4. The adenoma completely encases the intracavernous ICA (circle).

Fig. 4.

Knosp classification. a Grade 0. The adenoma does not pass the medial tangent (dotted line), which passes between the medial aspects of the supra- and intracavernous portions of the ICA. b Grade 1. The adenoma passes the medial tangent but does not cross the line drawn between the cross-sectional centers of the supra- and intracavernous segments of the ICA (dotted line). c Grade 2. The adenoma extends beyond the cross-sectional line but does not pass the lateral tangent (dotted line) drawn between the lateral aspects of the supra- and intracavernous ICA. d Grade 3A. The adenoma extends beyond the lateral tangent (dotted line) and into the superior cavernous sinus compartment. e Grade 3B. The adenoma extends beyond the lateral tangent (dotted line) and into the inferior cavernous sinus compartment. f Grade 4. The adenoma completely encases the intracavernous ICA (circle).

Close modal

Craniopharyngiomas

Craniopharyngiomas (CPs) are rare tumors, generally showing low histological malignancy, developed from the Rathke’s pouch, an invagination of the ectoderm that gives rise to the anterior pituitary gland during embryogenesis. Therefore, CPs may be located either in the sella turcica or above it (suprasellar CPs) [12]. Rarely, CPs can be ectopic, occurring in different sites such as the cerebellopontine angle, associated in a high percentage of cases with Gardner’s syndrome (an autosomal dominant polyposis) [13].

As mentioned above, CPs are usually low-grade tumors (grade I WHO) burdened by low mortality, but considerable morbidity [14], currently defined into two clinicopathological variants with different phenotypes and distinctive mutations (adamantinomatous and papillary). Adamantinomatous CPs (ACPs) are composed of well-differentiated epithelium, organized in different architectural patterns: cords, lobules, nodular whorls, and irregular trabeculae surrounded by palisading columnar epithelium. Papillary CPs (PCPs) include solid, monomorphic areas of well-differentiated squamous epithelium lacking keratinization [15]. Both histological subtypes differ in their age distribution and genesis. ACPs are diagnosed with a bimodal peak of incidence (5–15 years and 45–60 years), whereas PCPs are found only in adults, mainly in the fifth and sixth decade [12].

Overall, CPs have an incidence of 0.5–2.5 cases per 1 million person years, representing 1.2–4.6% of all intracranial tumors [16]. Remarkably, 30–50% of CPs are diagnosed during childhood and adolescence, wherein they represent the most common non-​neuroepithelial intracerebral neoplasm, accounting for 5–11% of intracranial tumors in this specific age group [17]. In general, the overall survival in mixed pediatric and adult patient cohorts is considerably high, ranging between 54 and 96% at 5 years, 40 and 93% at 10 years, and 66 and 85% at 20 years [18, 19]. In this context, whether age at diagnosis is a prognostic factor for survival is still a matter of debate. However, CPs are associated with long-term morbidity, mainly due to the peculiar area occupied by the lesion (parasellar region) and to tumor- and treatment-related risk factors such as progressive disease with multiple recurrences, cerebrovascular injuries, and chronic neuroendocrine deficiencies [20]. In children, a combination of symptoms, including headache, growth retardation, visual impairment and polyuria-polydipsia due to central diabetes insipidus, is highly suggestive of CP. In adults, endocrine deficiencies such as impaired sexual function, hypothalamic syndrome (i.e., disruptions in body temperature regulation and water unbalance), and clinical manifestations of increased intracranial pressure are common symptoms. MRI and computed tomography are the gold standard for the diagnosis of CP and can even guide the surgical decision according to the system developed by Puget et al. [21] (Fig. 5). However, histological confirmation is often required to set a proper treatment strategy [12]. The treatment of newly diagnosed CPs may include a combination of surgery, radiotherapy, cyst drainage, and/or intracystic interferon alpha treatment [12, 22]. The management of recurrent CPs depends on the previous therapies used. Rarely, tumors may spread to the posterior fossa, causing headache, diplopia, ataxia, and hearing loss. However, incomplete resection of the tumors or regrowth of remnants result in a high recurrence rate, which translates to a high number of surgical reinterventions (21%), additional radiotherapy (33%), and/or hypothalamic alterations (48%) [23].

Fig. 5.

Preoperative grading of craniopharyngiomas (CP) based on MRI according to Puget’s system. a Grade 0. Sagittal T2-weighted MRI of a cystic CP with no hypothalamic involvement. The third ventricle floor is normal, and the CP lies entirely below the sellar diaphragm (arrows). b Grade 1. Sagittal T2-weighted MRI showing a CP which pushes the hypothalamus that can still be identified. c Grade 2. Sagittal T2-weighted MRI of CP in which the hypothalamus is unidentifiable.

Fig. 5.

Preoperative grading of craniopharyngiomas (CP) based on MRI according to Puget’s system. a Grade 0. Sagittal T2-weighted MRI of a cystic CP with no hypothalamic involvement. The third ventricle floor is normal, and the CP lies entirely below the sellar diaphragm (arrows). b Grade 1. Sagittal T2-weighted MRI showing a CP which pushes the hypothalamus that can still be identified. c Grade 2. Sagittal T2-weighted MRI of CP in which the hypothalamus is unidentifiable.

Close modal

Cystic Lesions

Cystic lesions represent a group of nosological entities, including Rathke’s cleft and arachnoid, epidermoid, and dermoid cysts. Due to their peculiar location, a variety of nonspecific symptoms can be encountered, such as headache, visual field impairment, and eventually endocrine dysfunction. However, none of these symptoms is related to a particular type of cyst.

To date, MRI is the gold standard for the diagnosis of a cyst.

Rathke’s cleft cysts (RCCs)represent the most frequent pituitary lesion revealedon MRI (30% diagnosed incidentally), with a usual peak of incidence observed between 30 and 50 years of age. Since they originate from remnants of Rathke’s pouch, RCCs are usually located on the midline, generally as lesion between 5 and 10 mm as maximum diameter [24, 25]. On MRI, RCCs can appear as T1-hyperintense (if protein enriched RCC) or T1-hypointense lesions (if CSF-like cysts), depending on their content. A specific sign is the presence of high-protein nodules, enriched in cholesterol, that appear strongly hypointense on T2 sequences [26]. Of note, complicated RCCs generally appear as T2-hyperintense sellar mass with an increased size and more specifically a ring enhancement [27]. RCCs are typically made up of vascularized stroma of connective tissue and three types of epithelial cells: ciliated, nonciliated, and mucus-secreting epithelium. The epithelium may contain ciliated, goblet, and squamous cells. Over time, RCC can remain stable in size, enlarge slowly, shrink, or even disappear (and eventually recur). When present, the clinical picture is usually made of the combination of the following symptoms: headaches, visual disturbances and/or pituitary hormone dysfunction [27]. In cases of clinically relevant symptoms, a surgical approach is actively discussed and often performed.

Arachnoid cysts (ACs) are intra-arachnoid cystic lesions containing a liquid similar to the CSF. They are the most common type of brain cysts, representing up to 10–15% of all the parasellar lesions. Two main types of ACs are detected: primary (congenital) and secondary (posttraumatic, postinfectious). Nearby the sella turcica, we can find intrasellar ACs, which often demonstrate a suprasellar extension that displaces the pituitary stalk posteriorly, and suprasellar ACs pushing the floor of the third ventricle upward and the pituitary stalk forward [28]. ACs have similar MRI characteristics as the CSF, with spontaneous hypointense and hyperintense signal on T1 and T2 sequences, respectively. There are no solid components, absence of calcifications, and no contrast enhancement. The therapeutic strategy depends on the symptoms presented by the patient, and surgery represents a first-line treatment, if action is needed.

Epidermoid cysts (ECs) are benign lesions consisting of neuroectodermal epithelial cells, characterized by the presence of a white, pearl-like capsule, lined with stratified squamous epithelium, filled with white debris, keratin, water, and cholesterol crystals [29]. ECs are ubiquitous, but about half of intracranial ECs are located in the cerebellopontine angle. On MRI, they are T1-hypointense and show a high-T2 signal intensity (if the lipid content is not too high) [30]. As compared to ACs, ECs present with a unique irregular lobulated cauliflower-like surface [30]. The content of the dermoid cysts is a soft white material that originates from the progressive desquamation of keratin from the epithelial membrane of the cyst, sebaceous material, and dermal appendages. The presence of hair follicles and sebaceous and sweat glands in the cyst wall distinguishes dermoid cysts from epidermoid ones [31]. Dermoid cysts appear on MRI as hyperintense T1 lesions and hypointense T2 images. If the cyst is small and there are no clinical symptoms, a dynamic observation of the patient is possible. However, overall and if indicated, surgery is the only treatment.

Meningiomas and Chordomas

Meningiomas are tumors originating from arachnoid cap cells in the leptomeninges. They are considered the most common brain tumors [32] and the second most frequent parasellar neoplasms after CPs [33]. About 15% of them develop from the parasellar region: in the CS, tuberculum sellae, diaphragm, dorsum sella, anterior and posterior clinoid processes, and the clivus. Most meningiomas are slow-growing tumors, but many of them exhibit a broad dural attachment and can encase vessels and cranial nerves, causing stenosis and nerve palsies [34]. Meningiomas are more prevalent in female patients, and their incidence increases with the age; malignant tumors are, however, more common in men and children [35, 36]. They can also occur secondary to radiotherapy performed for other malignancies [37, 38].

Diagnosis is made mainly based on both neurological and radiological evaluation, although the pituitary function can be affected as well. By imaging, meningiomas appear usually as homogenous masses, hyper- or isodense compared with grey matter in CT, presenting diffuse calcification in many cases. They are isointense or occasionally hypointense on T1-weighted MRI, brightly homogeneously enhanced after gadolinium and variable in T2-weighted MRI, from isointense to hyperintense. A typical dura “tail” (an adjacent dural contrast enhancement) is frequently observed by imaging, although it is not considered a pathognomonic feature specific for meningiomas [39, 40]. Histological examination allows confirmatory diagnosis, grading, and classification. The WHO classifies meningiomas into benign (68–80%, grade I), atypical (30–18%, grade II), and anaplastic/malignant (2%, grade III) [15]. Follow-up is recommended for asymptomatic patients, and surgery and radiotherapy for those presenting with mass effect symptoms. Recurrence depends on the grade and the extent of the resection, with a 5-year relapse rate ranging from ∼5% for grade I and ∼57% for grade III tumors [41, 42].

Chordomas are rare tumors originating from embryonic remnants of the primitive notochord. Most parasellar chordomas arise from the clivus. Because of their osteolytic activity, parasellar chordomas can invade and extend along the entire skull base, destroying the sellar space and causing visual, neurological, and endocrine problems [43]. Chordomas can be seen on CT with occasional calcifications, but MR scanning is the recommended imaging modality. On MRI, tumors are less intense than the clivus in T1 sequences, display heterogeneous enhancement after gadolinium contrast, and an hyperintense signal in T2-weighted images [44]. Even though most chordomas are low-grade tumors with local invasion, many patients are diagnosed in advanced stage, and metastases and long-term recurrences are not infrequent. The WHO classification consists of three groups: conventional, chondroid, and dedifferentiated. Dedifferentiation is a sign of malignancy [45]. The main treatment of chordomas is radical surgical resection, recommended together with adjuvant radiotherapy if residual tumor is detected or even suspected [46]. Long-term follow-up is needed to assess locoregional recurrence. Alternatively, radiotherapy can be applied instead of surgery. In case of confirmed skull base recurrence, high-dose radiotherapy is recommended [47]. Chordomas do not respond to conventional chemotherapy and, so far, there is no effective medical treatment [48].

Ectopic (Parasellar) PTs

Ectopic PTs (EPTs) are extremely rare entities, represented by PTs found outside the sella turcica, without any continuity with the intrasellar normal pituitary gland [49]. To date, approximately one hundred EPTs have been described in the literature, and available data come from single case reports or small case series. Therefore, it is extremely difficult to define a clear incidence and prevalence of these peculiar lesions among the general population.

The origin of EPTs has not been demonstrated yet. The currently accepted hypothesis suggests that these tumors originate from the proliferation of pituitary cells located along the embryological path of the pituitary development, during Rathke’s pouch migration in embryogenesis [50]. The most reported locations for parasellar EPTs are sphenoid sinus, suprasellar cistern, clivus, nasopharynx, and CS [51]. Some authors suggested that EPTs are predominantly expressed in the suprasellar cistern, although most suprasellar adenomas previously considered as ectopic could have been misclassified, being “true” pituitary adenomas originating from the pars distalis or pars tuberalis of the pituitary gland (type I and type II suprasellar pituitary adenomas, respectively) [52].

Despite recent advances in imaging techniques, diagnosis of EPTs is challenging, and the great majority of cases still requires pathology validation after surgery.

Like typical intrasellar PTs, EPTs can secrete all the different hormones represented in the anterior pituitary [51], and mixed tumors (i.e., GH/PRL-secreting adenomas) have been described, as well [53].

Of note, ACTH-secreting adenomas represent the most common phenotype among the hormonally active EPTs [54, 55], followed by PRL-secreting tumors [50]. GH- and TSH-secreting tumors have been also described, the latter being relatively more common in EPTs compared to typical intrasellar PTs (15 vs. 1–2%).

Clinical presentation of EPTs depends on tumor location and hormonal activity. Indeed, the peculiar hormone hypersecretion results in a specific clinical syndrome (i.e., ACTH-secreting EPTs cause Cushing’s disease), while the different anatomical structures affected by the tumor mass elicit different symptoms. As an example, clival tumors most commonly present with headache and cranial neuropathy such as visual disturbances and facial paresthesia, whereas nasopharyngeal EPTs most commonly cause epistaxis and nasal congestion [56].

Interestingly, EPTs seem to exhibit a more aggressive behavior than sellar-located PTs, since a high prevalence of bone invasion and the presence of foci of necrosis at pathology evaluation are often observed [51].

To date, surgery (mainly via transsphenoidal approach) represents the treatment of choice for the majority of EPTs described in the literature. However, a preoperative hormonal assessment was not performed in most cases, and the final diagnosis was done only after the pathology report. In this light, some authors suggest to routinely perform hormone evaluation in the presence of a parasellar lesion, since this may facilitate an early diagnosis and potentially avert an unnecessary biopsy and/or surgical intervention. Indeed, in recent years, some cases of PRL-secreting EPTs have been successfully treated using medical therapy with dopamine-agonists [50], and both GH- and TSH-secreting ETPs are supposed to benefit from treatment with somatostatin receptor ligands [57-59].

Over the past years, substantial progress has been made in the understanding of parasellar lesions, especially in the field of CPs and meningiomas/chordomas. ACPs have been proposed to be of embryonic origin based on molecular and histological features [60], and recent genomic studies demonstrated that ∼90% of ACPs harbor somatic mutations in the CTNNB1 gene, which increases β-catenin stability and activation of the WNT pathway [61]. In contrast, PCPs are typically noncalcified, solid tumors that frequently harbor somatic BRAFV600E mutations that result in the activation of the MAPK signaling pathway [61]. To date, only few case reports demonstrated a sustained efficacy of the combination treatment with trametinib (MEK inhibitor) and dabrafenib (BRAF inhibitor) in patients with recurrent PCPs [62]. This significant progress has paved the way for a phase II clinical trial using a combination of vemurafenib and cometinib in patients with PCP (NCT03224767). Recent experimental data suggest that the MAP kinase pathway could also play a key role in the development of ACPs, particularly affecting tumor invasiveness (the so-called “palisaded epithelium” compartment of ACPs) [63].

Meningiomas occasionally occur in the context of familial diseases, such as neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) and multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. In sporadic cases, about 50% harbor mutations in NF2 or loss of this locus at chromosome 22q, and they are enriched in high-grade meningiomas [64]. In contrast, low-grade meningiomas are commonly mutated in TRAF7 (∼20% cases), AKT1 (∼10%), PIK3CA (∼7%), SMO(∼6%), POLR2A (6%), SUFU, SMARCB1, KLF4, AKT3 and BAP1 (all of them <1%) [65, 66], with TRAF7, AKT1, and KLF4 mutations being common in meningiomas of the parasellar region. Of interest, some of these genes are therapeutic targets of drugs such as alpelisib, vismodegib, or ipatasertib. In addition, genetic variants in the promoter region of the telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) gene have been suggested as markers of malignant progression and shorter progression-free survival in meningiomas [67-69].

Expression of the transcription factor Brachyury (T) is a hallmark of chordomas and represents a useful marker to discriminate between these tumors and other skull base lesions. Indeed, T is overexpressed and duplicated in ∼20–30% of sporadic cases of chordomas [70, 71]. Recurrent somatic mutations are rare in chondromas. A recent report has shown truncating mutations in the lysosomal trafficking regulator LYST in 5/67 (6%) cases [71]. CDKN2A deletions (with or without loss of CDKN2B) account for ∼30–80% cases, mainly homozygosis [72], providing the rationale for clinical trials with palbociclib, a CDK4/6 inhibitor (www.clinicaltrials.gov; NCT-PMO-1601). Mutations in the SWI/SNF, TP53, and PIK3CA pathways are frequent as well [71, 73] and are under consideration for targeted treatments.

The parasellar region can be the preferential site for the development of several lesions of different origins. Therefore, clinicians will have to deal with two major concerns: does the lesion develop from the sella turcica and extend laterally to the parasellar region or does it primarily arise from parasellar anatomical structures (this latter point already providing some information about the potential nature of the lesion)? Furthermore, in case of a sellar lesion, can we assume, based on MR imaging, that CS is invaded? Biochemical and hormonal evaluation as well as visual assessment will help to clarify the nature of the lesion, especially if an overt hypersecretion of an anterior pituitary hormone is detected. The features of the lesion on MRI have to be evaluated and described with a systematic approach, requiring a skilled neuroradiology team. The role of the neuroradiologist appears of upmost importance given the complexity of the parasellar region and the existence of several imaging pitfalls such as partial volume artefacts (which occur when a thick MRI section includes different anatomical structure and the computer calculates the intensity average of the different components which can simulate a PT), magnetic susceptibility artefacts (i.e., localized signal intensity changes at the interface of anatomical structures of different signal intensities, responsible for geometrical distortions), chemical shifts artefacts (consequence of the high signal of fat, which can be avoided by fat saturation sequences), and eventually flow artefacts [8]. Among all the lesions that can be found in the parasellar region, invading PTs and meningiomas are those most commonly encountered in clinical practice. Different treatment strategies need to be actively discussed, since surgery (usually the first-line treatment) can be limited due to the proximity of vital structures (i.e., ICA or cranial nerves within the CS). Recent studies have identified gene mutations or signaling pathway modulations that can confer parasellar lesions a more aggressive behavior (i.e., higher invasiveness of the surrounding structures) [63, 74-76] and, therefore, could represent potential candidates for the development of targeted therapies.

The authors acknowledge Prof. Jean-François Bonneville for providing illustrations in the article.

All patients gave their written consent for images used in the article.

We declare no competing interests.

There was no funding supporting this article.

All coauthors contributed equally to the redaction of the manuscript. F.G. and T.C. reviewed and revised it. All coauthors approved the final submitted version.

1.
Ruscalleda
J
.
Imaging of parasellar lesions
.
Eur Radiol
.
2005
Mar
;
15
(
3
):
549
59
.
[PubMed]
0938-7994
2.
Kaltsas
GA
,
Evanson
J
,
Chrisoulidou
A
,
Grossman
AB
.
The diagnosis and management of parasellar tumours of the pituitary
.
Endocr Relat Cancer
.
2008
Dec
;
15
(
4
):
885
903
.
[PubMed]
1351-0088
3.
Choe
CH
,
Cornblath
WT
.
Orbital signs of parasellar syndromes
. 3rd ed.
Smith and Nesi’s Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
;
2012
.
4.
Rhoton
AL
 Jr
.
The cavernous sinus, the cavernous venous plexus, and the carotid collar
.
Neurosurgery
.
2002
Oct
;
51
(
4
Suppl
):
S375
410
.
[PubMed]
0148-396X
5.
Cappabianca
P
,
Cavallo
LM
,
Esposito
F
,
De Divitiis
O
,
Messina
A
,
De Divitiis
E
.
Extended endoscopic endonasal approach to the midline skull base: the evolving role of transsphenoidal surgery
.
Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg
.
2008
;
33
:
151
99
.
[PubMed]
0095-4829
6.
Go
JL
,
Rajamohan
AG
.
Imaging of the Sella and Parasellar Region
.
Radiol Clin North Am
.
2017
Jan
;
55
(
1
):
83
101
.
[PubMed]
0033-8389
7.
Hanak
BW
,
Zada
G
,
Nayar
VV
,
Thiex
R
,
Du
R
,
Day
AL
, et al
Cerebral aneurysms with intrasellar extension: a systematic review of clinical, anatomical, and treatment characteristics
.
J Neurosurg
.
2012
Jan
;
116
(
1
):
164
78
.
[PubMed]
0022-3085
8.
Bonneville
JF
,
Bonneville
F
,
Cattin
F
,
Nagi
S
.
MRI of the Pituitary Gland.
2016
. DOI:
9.
Knosp
E
,
Steiner
E
,
Kitz
K
,
Matula
C
.
Pituitary adenomas with invasion of the cavernous sinus space: a magnetic resonance imaging classification compared with surgical findings
.
Neurosurgery
.
1993
Oct
;
33
(
4
):
610
7
.
[PubMed]
0148-396X
10.
Cottier
JP
,
Destrieux
C
,
Brunereau
L
,
Bertrand
P
,
Moreau
L
,
Jan
M
, et al
Cavernous sinus invasion by pituitary adenoma: MR imaging
.
Radiology
.
2000
May
;
215
(
2
):
463
9
.
[PubMed]
0033-8419
11.
Bonneville
JF
,
Cattin
F
,
Racle
A
,
Bouchareb
M
,
Boulard
D
,
Potelon
P
, et al
Dynamic CT of the laterosellar extradural venous spaces
.
[Internet]
.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol
.
1989
May-Jun
;
10
(
3
):
535
42
. [cited 2020 Jan 29].
[PubMed]
0195-6108
12.
Müller
HL
,
Merchant
TE
,
Warmuth-Metz
M
,
Martinez-Barbera
JP
,
Puget
S
.
Craniopharyngioma
.
Nat Rev Dis Primers
.
2019
Nov
;
5
(
1
):
75
.
[PubMed]
2056-676X
13.
Gabel
BC
,
Cleary
DR
,
Martin
JR
,
Khan
U
,
Snyder
V
,
Sang U
H
.
Unusual and Rare Locations for Craniopharyngiomas: Clinical Significance and Review of the Literature
.
World Neurosurg
.
2017
Feb
;
98
:
381
7
.
[PubMed]
1878-8750
14.
Mende
KC
,
Kellner
T
,
Petersenn
S
,
Honegger
J
,
Evangelista-Zamora
R
,
Droste
M
, et al
Clinical Situation, Therapy, and Follow-Up of Adult Craniopharyngioma
.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
.
2020
Jan
;
105
(
1
):
dgz043
.
[PubMed]
0021-972X
15.
Louis
DN
,
Perry
A
,
Reifenberger
G
,
von Deimling
A
,
Figarella-Branger
D
,
Cavenee
WK
, et al
The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary
.
Acta Neuropathol
.
2016
Jun
;
131
(
6
):
803
20
.
[PubMed]
0001-6322
16.
Zacharia
BE
,
Bruce
SS
,
Goldstein
H
,
Malone
HR
,
Neugut
AI
,
Bruce
JN
.
Incidence, treatment and survival of patients with craniopharyngioma in the surveillance, epidemiology and end results program
.
Neuro-oncol
.
2012
Aug
;
14
(
8
):
1070
8
.
[PubMed]
1522-8517
17.
Olsson
DS
,
Andersson
E
,
Bryngelsson
IL
,
Nilsson
AG
,
Johannsson
G
.
Excess mortality and morbidity in patients with craniopharyngioma, especially in patients with childhood onset: a population-based study in Sweden
.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
.
2015
Feb
;
100
(
2
):
467
74
.
[PubMed]
0021-972X
18.
Karavitaki
N
,
Brufani
C
,
Warner
JT
,
Adams
CB
,
Richards
P
,
Ansorge
O
, et al
Craniopharyngiomas in children and adults: systematic analysis of 121 cases with long-term follow-up
.
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)
.
2005
Apr
;
62
(
4
):
397
409
.
[PubMed]
0300-0664
19.
Pemberton
LS
,
Dougal
M
,
Magee
B
,
Gattamaneni
HR
.
Experience of external beam radiotherapy given adjuvantly or at relapse following surgery for craniopharyngioma
.
Radiother Oncol
.
2005
Oct
;
77
(
1
):
99
104
.
[PubMed]
0167-8140
20.
Wijnen
M
,
van den Heuvel-Eibrink
MM
,
Janssen
JA
,
Catsman-Berrevoets
CE
,
Michiels
EM
,
van Veelen-Vincent
MC
, et al
Very long-term sequelae of craniopharyngioma
.
Eur J Endocrinol
.
2017
Jun
;
176
(
6
):
755
67
.
[PubMed]
0804-4643
21.
Puget
S
,
Garnett
M
,
Wray
A
,
Grill
J
,
Habrand
JL
,
Bodaert
N
, et al
Pediatric craniopharyngiomas: classification and treatment according to the degree of hypothalamic involvement
.
J Neurosurg
.
2007
Jan
;
106
(
1
Suppl
):
3
12
.
[PubMed]
0022-3085
22.
Müller
HL
.
Craniopharyngioma
.
Endocr Rev
.
2014
Jun
;
35
(
3
):
513
43
.
[PubMed]
0163-769X
23.
Sterkenburg
AS
,
Hoffmann
A
,
Gebhardt
U
,
Warmuth-Metz
M
,
Daubenbüchel
AM
,
Müller
HL
.
Survival, hypothalamic obesity, and neuropsychological/psychosocial status after childhood-onset craniopharyngioma: newly reported long-term outcomes
.
Neuro-oncol
.
2015
Jul
;
17
(
7
):
1029
38
.
[PubMed]
1522-8517
24.
Larkin
S
,
Karavitaki
N
,
Ansorge
O
.
Rathke’s cleft cyst
.
Handb Clin Neurol
.
2014
;
124
:
255
69
.
[PubMed]
0072-9752
25.
Osborn
AG
,
Preece
MT
.
Intracranial cysts: radiologic-pathologic correlation and imaging approach
.
Radiology
.
2006
Jun
;
239
(
3
):
650
64
.
[PubMed]
0033-8419
26.
Wang
S
,
Nie
Q
,
Wu
Z
,
Zhang
J
,
Wei
L
.
MRI and pathological features of Rathke cleft cysts in the sellar region
.
Exp Ther Med
.
2020
Jan
;
19
(
1
):
611
8
.
[PubMed]
1792-0981
27.
Trifanescu
R
,
Ansorge
O
,
Wass
JA
,
Grossman
AB
,
Karavitaki
N
.
Rathke’s cleft cysts
.
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)
.
2012
Feb
;
76
(
2
):
151
60
.
[PubMed]
0300-0664
28.
Dubuisson
AS
,
Stevenaert
A
,
Martin
DH
,
Flandroy
PP
.
Intrasellar arachnoid cysts
.
Neurosurgery
.
2007
Sep
;
61
(
3
):
505
13
.
[PubMed]
0148-396X
29.
Ravindran
K
,
Rogers
TW
,
Yuen
T
,
Gaillard
F
.
Intracranial white epidermoid cyst with dystrophic calcification - A case report and literature review
.
J Clin Neurosci
.
2017
Aug
;
42
:
43
7
.
[PubMed]
0967-5868
30.
Ren
X
,
Lin
S
,
Wang
Z
,
Luo
L
,
Jiang
Z
,
Sui
D
, et al
Clinical, radiological, and pathological features of 24 atypical intracranial epidermoid cysts
.
J Neurosurg
.
2012
Mar
;
116
(
3
):
611
21
.
[PubMed]
0022-3085
31.
Choi
JS
,
Bae
YC
,
Lee
JW
,
Kang
GB
.
Dermoid cysts: epidemiology and diagnostic approach based on clinical experiences
.
Arch Plast Surg
.
2018
Nov
;
45
(
6
):
512
6
.
[PubMed]
2234-6163
32.
Ostrom
QT
,
Gittleman
H
,
Truitt
G
,
Boscia
A
,
Kruchko
C
,
Barnholtz-Sloan
JS
.
CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and other central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2011-2015
.
Neuro-oncol
.
2018
Oct
;
20
suppl_4
:
iv1
86
.
[PubMed]
1522-8517
33.
Famini
P
,
Maya
MM
,
Melmed
S
.
Pituitary magnetic resonance imaging for sellar and parasellar masses: ten-year experience in 2598 patients
.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
.
2011
Jun
;
96
(
6
):
1633
41
.
[PubMed]
0021-972X
34.
Zada
G
,
Lopes
MB
,
Mukundan
S
,
Laws
E
.
Meningioma of the Sellar and Parasellar Region. Atlas of Sellar and Parasellar Lesions
.
Cham
:
Springer International Publishing
;
2016
. pp.
259
69
.
35.
Islim
AI
,
Mohan
M
,
Moon
RD
,
Srikandarajah
N
,
Mills
SJ
,
Brodbelt
AR
, et al
Incidental intracranial meningiomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic factors and outcomes
.
J Neurooncol
.
2019
Apr
;
142
(
2
):
211
21
.
[PubMed]
0167-594X
36.
Grossbach
AJ
,
Mahaney
KB
,
Menezes
AH
.
Pediatric meningiomas: 65-year experience at a single institution
.
J Neurosurg Pediatr
.
2017
Jul
;
20
(
1
):
42
50
.
[PubMed]
1933-0707
37.
Lee
JW
,
Wernicke
AG
.
Risk and survival outcomes of radiation-induced CNS tumors
.
J Neurooncol
.
2016
Aug
;
129
(
1
):
15
22
.
[PubMed]
0167-594X
38.
Agnihotri
S
,
Suppiah
S
,
Tonge
PD
,
Jalali
S
,
Danesh
A
,
Bruce
JP
, et al
Therapeutic radiation for childhood cancer drives structural aberrations of NF2 in meningiomas
.
Nat Commun
.
2017
Aug
;
8
(
1
):
186
.
[PubMed]
2041-1723
39.
Huang
RY
,
Bi
WL
,
Griffith
B
,
Kaufmann
TJ
,
la Fougère
C
,
Schmidt
NO
, et al
Imaging and diagnostic advances for intracranial meningiomas.
Neuro Oncol.
2019
Jan;21(Supplement_1):i44–61.
40.
Huang
RY
,
Bi
WL
,
Griffith
B
,
Kaufmann
TJ
,
la Fougère
C
,
Schmidt
NO
, et al;
International Consortium on Meningiomas
.
Imaging and diagnostic advances for intracranial meningiomas
.
Neuro-oncol
.
2019
Jan
;
21
Supplement_1
:
i44
61
.
[PubMed]
1522-8517
41.
Pessina
F
,
Navarria
P
,
Clerici
E
,
Soffietti
R
,
Nibali
MC
,
Rudà
R
, et al
Intracranial Meningiomas: A Systematic Analysis of Prognostic Factors for Recurrence in a Large Single Institution Surgical Series
.
World Neurosurg
.
2019
Mar
;
123
:
e273
9
.
[PubMed]
1878-8750
42.
Goldbrunner
R
,
Minniti
G
,
Preusser
M
,
Jenkinson
MD
,
Sallabanda
K
,
Houdart
E
, et al
EANO guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of meningiomas
.
Lancet Oncol
.
2016
Sep
;
17
(
9
):
e383
91
.
[PubMed]
1470-2045
43.
Zoli
M
,
Milanese
L
,
Bonfatti
R
,
Faustini-Fustini
M
,
Marucci
G
,
Tallini
G
, et al
Clival chordomas: considerations after 16 years of endoscopic endonasal surgery
.
J Neurosurg
.
2018
Feb
;
128
(
2
):
329
38
.
[PubMed]
0022-3085
44.
Asioli
S
,
Zoli
M
,
Guaraldi
F
,
Sollini
G
,
Bacci
A
,
Gibertoni
D
, et al
Peculiar pathological, radiological and clinical features of skull base dedifferentiated chordomas. Results from a referral Center case series and literature review
.
Histopathology
.
2019
Oct
;
•••
:
his.14024
.
[PubMed]
0309-0167
45.
Shih
AR
,
Chebib
I
,
Deshpande
V
,
Dickson
BC
,
Iafrate
AJ
,
Nielsen
GP
.
Molecular characteristics of poorly differentiated chordoma
.
Genes Chromosom Cancer
;
2019
.
46.
Stacchiotti
S
,
Sommer
J
;
Chordoma Global Consensus Group
.
Building a global consensus approach to chordoma: a position paper from the medical and patient community
.
Lancet Oncol
.
2015
Feb
;
16
(
2
):
e71
83
.
[PubMed]
1470-2045
47.
Stacchiotti
S
,
Gronchi
A
,
Fossati
P
,
Akiyama
T
,
Alapetite
C
,
Baumann
M
, et al
Best practices for the management of local-regional recurrent chordoma: a position paper by the Chordoma Global Consensus Group
.
Ann Oncol
.
2017
Jun
;
28
(
6
):
1230
42
.
[PubMed]
0923-7534
48.
Colia
V
,
Stacchiotti
S
.
Medical treatment of advanced chordomas
.
Eur J Cancer
.
2017
Sep
;
83
:
220
8
.
[PubMed]
0959-8049
49.
Guerrero
CA
,
Krayenbühl
N
,
Husain
M
,
Krisht
AF
.
Ectopic suprasellar growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenoma: case report
.
Neurosurgery
.
2007
Oct
;
61
(
4
):
E879
.
[PubMed]
0148-396X
50.
Agely
A
,
Okromelidze
L
,
Vilanilam
GK
,
Chaichana
KL
,
Middlebrooks
EH
,
Gupta
V
.
Ectopic pituitary adenomas: common presentations of a rare entity
.
Pituitary
.
2019
Aug
;
22
(
4
):
339
43
.
[PubMed]
1386-341X
51.
Shuman
W
,
Loewenstern
J
,
Pai
A
,
Bederson
J
,
Shrivastava
R
.
Variability in Clinical Presentation and Pathologic Implications of Ectopic Pituitary Tumors: Critical Review of Literature
.
World Neurosurg
.
2019
Feb
;
122
:
397
403
.
[PubMed]
1878-8750
52.
Zhou
HJ
,
Pan
DS
,
Ba
XQ
,
Zhan
RY
,
Zheng
XJ
,
Ma
YH
.
‘Ectopic’ suprasellar type IIa PRL-secreting pituitary adenoma
.
Pituitary
.
2017
Aug
;
20
(
4
):
477
84
.
[PubMed]
1386-341X
53.
Bobeff
EJ
,
Wiśniewski
K
,
Papierz
W
,
Stefańczyk
L
,
Jaskólski
DJ
.
Three cases of ectopic sphenoid sinus pituitary adenoma
.
Folia Neuropathol
.
2017
;
55
(
1
):
60
6
.
[PubMed]
1641-4640
54.
Pluta
RM
,
Nieman
L
,
Doppman
JL
,
Watson
JC
,
Tresser
N
,
Katz
DA
, et al
Extrapituitary parasellar microadenoma in Cushing’s disease
.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
.
1999
Aug
;
84
(
8
):
2912
23
.
[PubMed]
0021-972X
55.
Zhu
J
,
Lu
L
,
Yao
Y
,
Chen
S
,
Li
W
,
You
H
, et al
Long-term follow-up for ectopic ACTH-secreting pituitary adenoma in a single tertiary medical center and a literature review
.
Pituitary
.
2019
Dec
;
•••
:
[PubMed]
1386-341X
56.
Thompson
LD
,
Seethala
RR
,
Müller
S
.
Ectopic sphenoid sinus pituitary adenoma (ESSPA) with normal anterior pituitary gland: a clinicopathologic and immunophenotypic study of 32 cases with a comprehensive review of the english literature
.
Head Neck Pathol
.
2012
Mar
;
6
(
1
):
75
100
.
[PubMed]
1936-055X
57.
Ortiz
E
,
Peldoza
M
,
Monnier
E
,
Gejman
R
,
Henriquez
M
,
Barra
MI
, et al
Ectopic pituitary adenoma of the TSH-secreting sphenoidal sinus with excellent response to somatostatin analogs. Theory of the embryogenesis and literature review from a clinical case
.
Steroids
.
2020
Feb
;
154
:
108535
.
[PubMed]
0039-128X
58.
Tong
A
,
Xia
W
,
Qi
F
,
Jin
Z
,
Yang
D
,
Zhang
Z
, et al
Hyperthyroidism caused by an ectopic thyrotropin-secreting tumor of the nasopharynx: a case report and review of the literature
.
Thyroid
.
2013
Sep
;
23
(
9
):
1172
7
.
[PubMed]
1050-7256
59.
Ramírez
C
,
Hernández-Ramirez
LC
,
Espinosa-de-los-Monteros
AL
,
Franco
JM
,
Guinto
G
,
Mercado
M
.
Ectopic acromegaly due to a GH-secreting pituitary adenoma in the sphenoid sinus: a case report and review of the literature
.
BMC Res Notes
.
2013
Oct
;
6
(
1
):
411
.
[PubMed]
1756-0500
60.
Buslei
R
,
Nolde
M
,
Hofmann
B
,
Meissner
S
,
Eyupoglu
IY
,
Siebzehnrübl
F
, et al
Common mutations of β-catenin in adamantinomatous craniopharyngiomas but not in other tumours originating from the sellar region
.
Acta Neuropathol
.
2005
Jun
;
109
(
6
):
589
97
.
[PubMed]
0001-6322
61.
Brastianos
PK
,
Taylor-Weiner
A
,
Manley
PE
,
Jones
RT
,
Dias-Santagata
D
,
Thorner
AR
, et al
Exome sequencing identifies BRAF mutations in papillary craniopharyngiomas
.
Nat Genet
.
2014
Feb
;
46
(
2
):
161
5
.
[PubMed]
1061-4036
62.
Gupta
S
,
Bi
WL
,
Giantini Larsen
A
,
Al-Abdulmohsen
S
,
Abedalthagafi
M
,
Dunn
IF
.
Craniopharyngioma: a roadmap for scientific translation
.
Neurosurg Focus
.
2018
Jun
;
44
(
6
):
E12
.
[PubMed]
1092-0684
63.
Apps
JR
,
Carreno
G
,
Gonzalez-Meljem
JM
,
Haston
S
,
Guiho
R
,
Cooper
JE
, et al
Tumour compartment transcriptomics demonstrates the activation of inflammatory and odontogenic programmes in human adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma and identifies the MAPK/ERK pathway as a novel therapeutic target
.
Acta Neuropathol
.
2018
May
;
135
(
5
):
757
77
.
[PubMed]
0001-6322
64.
Bi
WL
,
Mei
Y
,
Agarwalla
PK
,
Beroukhim
R
,
Dunn
IF
.
Genomic and Epigenomic Landscape in Meningioma
.
Neurosurg Clin N Am
.
2016
Apr
;
27
(
2
):
167
79
.
[PubMed]
1042-3680
65.
Clark
VE
,
Erson-Omay
EZ
,
Serin
A
,
Yin
J
,
Cotney
J
,
Özduman
K
, et al
Genomic analysis of non-NF2 meningiomas reveals mutations in TRAF7, KLF4, AKT1, and SMO. Science (80-) .
2013
DOI:
66.
Clark
VE
,
Harmancı
AS
,
Bai
H
,
Youngblood
MW
,
Lee
TI
,
Baranoski
JF
, et al
Recurrent somatic mutations in POLR2A define a distinct subset of meningiomas
.
Nat Genet
.
2016
Oct
;
48
(
10
):
1253
9
.
[PubMed]
1061-4036
67.
Biczok
A
,
Jungk
C
,
Egensperger
R
,
von Deimling
A
,
Suchorska
B
,
Tonn
JC
, et al
Microscopic brain invasion in meningiomas previously classified as WHO grade I is not associated with patient outcome
.
J Neurooncol
.
2019
Dec
;
145
(
3
):
469
77
.
[PubMed]
0167-594X
68.
Goutagny
S
,
Nault
JC
,
Mallet
M
,
Henin
D
,
Rossi
JZ
,
Kalamarides
M
.
High incidence of activating TERT promoter mutations in meningiomas undergoing malignant progression
.
Brain Pathol
.
2014
Mar
;
24
(
2
):
184
9
.
[PubMed]
1015-6305
69.
Brastianos
PK
,
Horowitz
PM
,
Santagata
S
,
Jones
RT
,
McKenna
A
,
Getz
G
, et al
Genomic sequencing of meningiomas identifies oncogenic SMO and AKT1 mutations
.
Nat Genet
.
2013
Mar
;
45
(
3
):
285
9
.
[PubMed]
1061-4036
70.
Bell
D
,
Raza
SM
,
Bell
AH
,
Fuller
GN
,
DeMonte
F
.
Whole-transcriptome analysis of chordoma of the skull base
.
Virchows Arch
.
2016
Oct
;
469
(
4
):
439
49
.
[PubMed]
0945-6317
71.
Tarpey
PS
,
Behjati
S
,
Young
MD
,
Martincorena
I
,
Alexandrov
LB
,
Farndon
SJ
, et al
The driver landscape of sporadic chordoma
.
Nat Commun
.
2017
Oct
;
8
(
1
):
890
.
[PubMed]
2041-1723
72.
Hallor
KH
,
Staaf
J
,
Jönsson
G
,
Heidenblad
M
,
Vult von Steyern
F
,
Bauer
HC
, et al
Frequent deletion of the CDKN2A locus in chordoma: analysis of chromosomal imbalances using array comparative genomic hybridisation
.
Br J Cancer
.
2008
Jan
;
98
(
2
):
434
42
.
[PubMed]
0007-0920
73.
Le
LP
,
Nielsen
GP
,
Rosenberg
AE
,
Thomas
D
,
Batten
JM
,
Deshpande
V
, et al
Recurrent chromosomal copy number alterations in sporadic chordomas
.
PLoS One
.
2011
;
6
(
5
):
e18846
.
[PubMed]
1932-6203
74.
Zubeldía-Brenner
L
,
De Winne
C
,
Perrone
S
,
Rodríguez-Seguí
SA
,
Willems
C
,
Ornstein
AM
, et al
Inhibition of Notch signaling attenuates pituitary adenoma growth in Nude mice
.
Endocr Relat Cancer
.
2019
Jan
;
26
(
1
):
13
29
.
[PubMed]
1351-0088
75.
Barry
S
,
Carlsen
E
,
Marques
P
,
Stiles
CE
,
Gadaleta
E
,
Berney
DM
, et al
Tumor microenvironment defines the invasive phenotype of AIP-mutation-positive pituitary tumors
.
Oncogene
.
2019
Jul
;
38
(
27
):
5381
95
.
[PubMed]
0950-9232
76.
Marques
P
,
Barry
S
,
Carlsen
E
,
Collier
D
,
Ronaldson
A
,
Awad
S
, et al
Chemokines modulate the tumour microenvironment in pituitary neuroendocrine tumours
.
Acta Neuropathol Commun
.
2019
Nov
;
7
(
1
):
172
.
[PubMed]
2051-5960
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.