Abstract
The mechanism whereby undernutrition enhances the ability of estradiol (E) to inhibit reproductive activity is unknown. This study aimed to determine the effect of feed restriction on E receptor (ER)-containing cell numbers in the female sheep hypothalamus. Ovariectomized lambs at 7 months of age received either ad libitum (AL; n = 5) or restricted (FR; n = 10) levels of feed intake. Lambs were weighted weekly and FR lambs fed to lose approximately 15% of their initial body weights over 7 weeks, at the end of which jugular blood samples were collected at 10-min intervals for 5 h to assess the patterns of LH release. After blood collection, lambs were euthanized and hypothalami collected for immunocytochemical detection of ER. Based on LH secretory profiles, FR lambs were subdivided into two groups. The first group (FR + LH; n = 5) exhibited patterns of LH release similar to AL controls. LH secretion in the second group (FR-LH; n = 5) was obviously suppressed. Numbers of ER-containing cells did not differ significantly (p > 0.10) among treatment groups in the bed nucleus stria terminalis, anterior hypothalamic area and arcuate nucleus. ER-containing cell numbers were greater (p < 0.05) in the preoptic area (POA) but less (p < 0.05) in the ventromedial/ventrolateral hypothalamus (VMH/VLH) for FR-LH lambs compared to AL animals. Notably, for both the POA and VMH/VLH, ER-containing cell numbers in the FR + LH animals were intermediate and did not differ (p > 0.10) from either FR-LH or AL lambs. These results suggest that feed restriction differentially alters ER-containing cell numbers in specific regions of the ovine hypothalamus (numbers increased in the POA but decreased in the VMH/VLH). These changes may, at least in part, represent a mechanism whereby undernutrition enhances the ability of E to inhibit reproduction.
References
1.
Hamilton GD, Bronson FH: Food restriction and reproductive development in wild house mice. Biol Reprod 1985;32:773–778.
2.
Gambell R: Some effects of exploitation on reproduction in whales. J Reprod Fert 1973;19(suppl):533–553.
3.
Schillo KK: Effects of dietary energy on control of luteinizing hormone secretion in cattle and sheep. J Anim Sci 1992;70:1271–1282.
4.
Dickerman RW, Li H-Y, Wade GN: Decreased availability of metabolic fuels suppresses estrous behavior in Syrian hamsters. Am J Physiol 1993;264:R568–R572.
5.
Li H-Y, Wade GN, Blaustein JD: Manipulations of metabolic fuel availability alter estrous behavior and neural estrogen receptor immunoreactivity in Syrian hamsters. Endocrinology 1994;135:240–247.
6.
Foster DL, Bucholtz DC, Herbosa CG: Metabolic signals and the timing of puberty in sheep; in Plant TM, Lee PA (eds): The Neurobiology of Puberty. Bristol, 1997, pp 243–257.
7.
Berriman SJ, Wade GN, Blaustein JD: Expression of Fos-like proteins in gonadotropin-releasing hormone neurons of Syrian hamsters: Effects of estrous cycles and metabolic fuels. Endocrinology 1992;131:2222–2228.
8.
Ebling FJP, Wood RI, Karsch FJ, Vannerson LA, Suttie JM, Bucholtz DC, Schall RE, Foster DL: Metabolic interfaces between growth and reproduction. III. Central mechanisms controlling pulsatile luteinizing hormone secretion in the nutritionally growth-limited female lamb. Endocrinology 1990;126:2719–2727.
9.
Bronson FH: Effect of food manipulation on the GnRH-LH-estradiol axis of young female rats. Am J Physiol 1988;254:R616–R621.
10.
Foster DL, Olster DH: Effect of restricted nutrition on puberty in the lamb: patterns of tonic luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion and the competency of the LH surge system. Endocrinology 1985;116:375–381.
11.
Howland BE, Ibraham EA: Increased LH-suppressing effect of oestrogen in ovariectomized rats as a result of underfeeding. J Reprod Fertil 1973;35:545–548.
12.
Glass AR, Steinberger A, Swerdloff R, Vigersky RA: Pituitary-testicular function in protein-deficient rats: Follicle stimulating hormone hyperresponse to castration and hypersensitivity of gonadotropin secretion to androgen negative feedback. Endocrinology 1982;110:1542–1546.
13.
Sprangers SA, Piascek BE: Increased suppression of luteinizing hormone secretion by chronic and acute estradiol administration in underfed adult female rats. Biol Reprod 1988;39:81–87.
14.
Cagampang FRA, Maeda K-I, Tsukamura H, Ohkura S, Ota K: Involvement of ovarian steroids and endogenous opioids in the fasting-induced suppression of pulsatile LH release in ovariectomized rats. J Endocrinol 1991;129:321–328.
15.
Beckett JL, Sakurai H, Famula TR, Adams TE: Negative feedback potency of estradiol is increased in orchidectomized sheep during chronic nutrient restriction. Biol Reprod 1997;57:408–414.
16.
Schanbacher BD: Regulation of luteinizing hormone secretion in male sheep by endogenous estrogen. Endocrinology 1984;115:944–950.
17.
Karsch FJ, Dahl GE, Evans NP, Manning JM, Mayfield KP, Moenter SM, Foster DL: Seasonal changes in gonadotropin-releasing hormone secretion in the ewe: Alteration in the response to the negative feedback action of estradiol. Biol Reprod 1993;49:1377–1383.
18.
Foster DL, Olster DH: Endocrine mechanisms governing transition into adulthood: A marked decrease in inhibitory feedback action of estradiol on tonic secretion of luteinizing hormone in the lamb during puberty. Endocrinology 1979;105:896–904.
19.
Legan SJ, Karsch FJ, Foster DL: The endocrine control of seasonal reproductive function in the ewe: A marked change in response to the negative feedback action of estradiol on luteinizing hormone. Endocrinology 1977;101:818–824.
20.
Barfield RJ, Rubin BS, Glaser JH, Davis PG: Sites of action of ovarian hormones in the regulation of oestrus responsiveness in rats; in Balthazart J, Prove E, Gilles R (eds): Hormones and Behavior in Higher Vertebrates. Berlin, Springer, 1983, pp 2–17.
21.
Takahashi LK: Hormonal regulation of sociosexual behavior in female mammals. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 1990;14:403–413.
22.
Roemich JN, Xia L, Rogol AD, Rissman EF: Food availability affects neural estrogen receptor immunoreactivity in prepubertal mice. Endocrinology 1997;138:5366–5373.
23.
Estachio MAC, Tsukamura H, Yamada S, Tsukahara S, Hirunagi K, Maeda K-I: Vagus nerve mediates the increase in estrogen receptors in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus and nucleus of the solitary tract during fasting in ovariectomized rats. Neurosci Lett 1996;208:25–28.
24.
Lehman MN, Ebling FJP, Moenter SM, Karsch FJ: Distribution of estrogen receptor-immunoreactive cells in the sheep brain. Endocrinology 1993;133:876–886.
25.
Watson RE, Weigand SJ, Clough RW, Hoffman GE: Use of a cryoprotectant to maintain long-term peptide immunoreactivity and tissue morphology. Peptides 1986;7:155–159.
26.
Skinner DC, Herbison AE: Effects of photoperiod on estrogen receptor, tyrosine hydroxylase, neuropeptide Y, and β-endorphin immunoreactivity in the ewe hypothalamus. Endocrinology 1997;138:2585–2595.
27.
Adams JC: Heavy metal intensification of DAB-based HRP reaction product. J Histochem Cytochem 1981;29:775.
28.
Jackson GL, Kuehl DE, Rhim TJ: Testosterone inhibits gonadotropin-releasing hormone pulse frequency in the male sheep. Biol Reprod 1991;45:188–194.
29.
Merriam GR, Wachter KW: Algorithms for study of episodic hormone secretion. Am J Physiol 1982;243:E310–E318.
30.
Wade GN, Schneider JE, Li H-Y: Control of fertility by metabolic cues. Am J Physiol 1996;270:E1–E19.
31.
Lehman MN, Robinson JE, Karsch FJ, Silverman AJ: Immunocytochemical localization of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) pathways in the sheep brain during anestrus and the mid-luteal phase of the estrous cycle. J Comp Neurol 1986;244:19–35.
32.
Caraty A, Fabre-Nys C, Delaleu B, Locatelli A, Bruneau G, Karsch FJ, Herbison A: Evidence that the mediobasal hypothalamus is the primary site of action of estradiol in inducing the preovulatory gonadotropin-releasing hormone surge in the ewe. Endocrinology 1998;139:1752–1760.
33.
Leranth C, MacLusky NJ, Sakamoto H, Shanabrough M, Naftolin F: Glutamic acid decarboxylase-containing axons synapse on LHRH neurons in the rat medial preoptic area. Neuroendocrinology 1985;40:536–539.
34.
Herbison AE, Robinson JE, Skinner DC: Distribution of estrogen receptor-immunoreactive cells in the preoptic area of the ewe: Co-localization with glutamic acid decarboxylase but not luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone. Neuroendocrinology 1993;57:751–759.
35.
Flugge G, Oertel WH, Wuttke W: Evidence for estrogen receptive GABAergic neurons in the preoptic/anterior hypothalamic area of the rat brain. Neuroendocrinology 1986;43:1–5.
36.
Leranth C, Sakamoto H, MacLusky NJ, Shanabrough M, Naftolin F: Estrogen responsive cells in the arcuate nucleus of the rat contain glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD): An electron microscope immunocytochemical study. Brain Res 1985;331:376–381.
37.
Ferriera SA, Scott CJ, Kuehl DE, Jackson GL: Differential regulation of luteinizing hormone release by γ-aminobutyric acid receptor subtypes in the arcuate-ventromedial region of the castrated ram. Endocrinology 1996;137:3453–3460.
38.
Beverly JL, Beverly MF, Meguid MM: Alterations in extracellular GABA in the ventral hypothalamus of rats in response to acute glucoprivation. Am J Physiol 1995;38:R1174–R1178.
39.
Beverly JL, Martin RJ: Effect of glucoprivation on glutamate decarboxylase activity in the ventromedial nucleus. Physiol Behav 1991;49:295–299.
40.
Simerly RB, Swanson LW: The distribution of neurotransmitter-specific cells and fibers in the anteroventral periventricular nucleus: implications for control of gonadotropin secretion in the rat. Brain Res 1987;400:11–34.
41.
Blache D, Fabre-Nys CJ, Venier G: Ventromedial hypothalamus as target for oestradiol action on proceptivity, receptivity and luteinizing hormone surge of the ewe. Brain Res 1991;546:241–249.
42.
Elmquist JK, Ahima RS, Maratos-Flier E, Flier JS, Saper CB: Leptin activates neurons in the ventrobasal hypothalamus and brainstem. Endocrinology 1997;138:839–842.
43.
Elmquist JK, Ahima RS, Elias CS, Flier JS, Saper CB: Leptin activates distinct projections from the dorsomedial and ventromedial hypothalamic nuclei. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998;95:741–748.
44.
Tarrtelin MF, Gorski RA: The effects of ovarian steroids on food and water intake and body weight in the female rat. Acta Endocrinol 1973;72:551–568.
45.
Blaustein JD, Gentry RT, Roy EJ, Wade GN: Effects of ovariectomy and estradiol on body weight and food intake in gold thioglucose-treated mice. Physiol Behav 1976;17:1027–1030.
46.
Dulawa SC, Vanderweele DA: Cholecystokinin and estradiol synergistically potentiate satiety in rats. Peptides 1994;15:913–918.
47.
Butera PC, Xiong M, Davis RJ, Platania SP: Central implants of dilute estradiol enhance the satiety effect of CCK-8. Behav Neurosci 1996;110:823–830.
48.
Smith ER, Davidson JM: Location of feedback receptors: Effects of intracranially implanted steroids on plasma LH and LHRH response. Endocrinology 1974;95:1566–1573.
49.
Ferin M, Carmel PW, Zimmerman EA, Warren M, Perez R, Vande Wiele RL: Location of intrahypothalamic estrogen-responsive sites influencing LH secretion in the female rhesus monkey. Endocrinology 1974;95:1059–1068.
50.
Scott CJ, Kuehl DE, Ferriera SA, Jackson GL: Hypothalamic sites of action for testosterone, dihydrotestosterone, and estrogen in the regulation of luteinizing hormone secretion in male sheep. Endocrinology 1997;138:3686–3694.
51.
McShane TM, Keisler DH: Effects of dietary energy on ovarian function, estrogen suppression of luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone, and competency of the gonadotropin surge. Biol Repord 1991;45:486–492.
52.
Chowen-Breed JA, Clifton DK, Steiner RA: Regional specificity of testosterone regulation of proopiomelanocortin gene expression in the arcuate nucleus of the male rat brain. Endocrinology 1989;124:2875–2881.
1999
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.
