Proteinuria in 13 patients with IgA nephritis with nephrotic syndrome (IgANS) was analysed by isoelectric focusing (IEF) and compared with 12 patients with minimal change nephrotic syndrome (MCNS) (n = 8) or focal global sclerosis nephrotic syndrome (FGS) (n = 4) to determine the pattern of proteinuria on IEF and to assess the value of IEF and protein selectivity index (SI) as predictors of response to therapy with predisolone or cyclophosphamide. Steroid/cyclophosphamide responsive patients with IgANS had SC:UA (cationic serum albumin with anionic urine albumin) or SA:UC (anionic serum albumin with cationic urine albumin) IEF patterns and steroid/cyclophosphamide unresponsive patients with IgANS had an SC:UC (cationic serum albumin with cationic urine albumin) IEF pattern. The majority of patients with MCNS or FGS who had an SA:UC IEF pattern were steroid responsive. SI was a better predictor of steroid/cyclophosphamide responsiveness in patients with IgANS (r = 0.78, p < 0.002 compared to IEF, r = 0.64, p < 0.02).

Keywords:
IgA nephritis, Nephrotic syndrome, Response to therapy, Isoelectric focusing Selectivity index
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1994 S. Karger AG, Basel
1994
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.