Computerized tomography (CT) has the advantage of allowing the isolation of trabecular bone of the axial skeleton, which is the more sensitive to metabolic changes. By means of single-energy X-ray CT we have devised a method for assessing trabecular bone mass (TBM) at L-4 vertebral body, which has an acceptable reproductibility (CV = 2.76%). Normal values where obtained after studying 29 normal individuals from both sexes and different ages. In order to know if the method is accurate, TBM was assessed in 17 patients (6 with creatinine clearance < 6 ml/min and 11 on chronic hemodialysis), and in all of them the results were compared with the histomorphometry of the iliac crest bone biopsy. TBM assessed by CT correlated with trabecular bone volume (TBV; mineralized bone + osteoid) (r = 0.82; p < 0.001) and this correlation was not improved after adding the volume of marrow fibrosis to TBV. TBM assessed by CT also correlated with mineralized bone volume but at a lower level of significance (r = 0.72 ;p = 0.001), and no correlation was found with relative osteoid volume alone. These findings suggest that final CT value is an integral of mineralized bone and osteoid but with a higher influence of mineralized bone. Osteomalacia and osteitis fibrosa were seen in situations of normal, decreased, or increased TBM assessed by CT, although the 2 patients with severe osteosclerosis suffered osteomalacia. We conclude that the assessment of TBM by CT at the axial skeleton of uremic patients has an acceptable reproducibility and accuracy. Its potential role in the management of renal osteodystrophy by noninvasive means must be stablished with repetitive studies in the same subjects, as is suggested by preliminary reports.

Keywords:
Trabecular bone mass, Computed tomography, Histomorphometry
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1986 S. Karger AG, Basel
1986
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.