Background: Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a common complication of uremia that may improve after transplantation. Its frequency might not be as low as expected, as some uremic disturbances may continue even after a successful graft. Our aim was to investigate the prevalence and related conditions for RLS in renal transplant patients. Methods: We carried out a cross-sectional, observational study. A self-administered questionnaire following the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group diagnostic criteria was administered to 129 patients (82 men and 47 women) aged 57 ± 12.8 years followed up for at least 1 year, with stable renal function (Cr 1.5 ± 0.54 mg/dL). Patients with probable RLS according to the screening questionnaire underwent comprehensive neurological examination to exclude RLS mimics. Results: The frequency of RLS according to questionnaires was 29.5% (18 men/20 women). After neurological exam, RLS was confirmed in 19 patients providing an overall frequency of 14.8% (higher than the prevalence in the general population). A definitive diagnosis of RLS was established for 6 men (7.3%) and 13 women (27.7%), indicating a positive predictive value for the screening questionnaire of 65% for women and 33% for men. There were fewer patients under renin-angiotensin aldosterone system (RAAS) blocking treatment in the RLS group (21.1 vs. 47.3%). Women with RLS had poorer renal function (52 ± 17.5 vs. 42 ± 13.9 mL/min) and phosphate-reabsorption rate (75 ± 10.5 vs. 65 ± 9.2). There was no difference in age, comorbidities, anticalcineurin therapy, renal function, anemia and time since transplantation between transplant patients with and without RLS. Conclusion: The prevalence of RLS after transplantation remains high (14.8%). This condition is twice more prevalent for females. Contribution of RAAS, graft function and phosphate overload requires further investigation.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.