Regardless of the recent advancements in the understanding of the pathophysiology of acute kidney injury (AKI), its diagnosis remains fundamentally dependent on the serum creatinine (sCr) level and urine output (UO), both of which are considered late markers of AKI, offering only a vague idea of the actual creatinine clearance (CrCl). Although not ideal, CrCl is still the most common alternative of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in clinical practice. It is generally accepted that early diagnosis of AKI must reveal kidney impairment before sCr increases. Much effort has been made to find tubular and glomerular markers of injury which increase (in blood and/or in urine) before the ‘official' diagnosis of AKI. Most of these markers are expensive and not widely available, especially in developing countries. Urine creatinine (CrU), the major link between sCr and UO, has been systematically ignored and clinicians are usually unaware of its value. The reasons for this are unclear, but it may be related to the lack of a reference range, dependence of its concentration value on the urine flow (which in turn is only adequately assessed with an indwelling urinary catheter) and the clinical unavailability of its counterbalance part - creatinine production. Changes in urine tend to precede changes in blood in the course of AKI development and recovery. Hence, it is important to bear in mind that changes in sCr signal renal dysfunction with a significant delay. The search for a more dynamic, ‘real-time' but pragmatic assessment of renal function, especially in patients at risk of abrupt decrease in GFR is certainly one of the most relevant focus of research in the field of AKI monitoring. Systematic CrU assessment may be highly relevant in this case.

1.
Endre ZH, Pianta TJ, Pickering JW: Timely diagnosis of acute kidney injury using kinetic eGFR and the creatinine excretion to production ratio, E/eG - creatinine can be useful! Nephron 2016;132:312-316.
2.
Mehta RL, Kellum JA, Shah SV, Molitoris BA, Ronco C, Warnock DG, et al: Acute kidney injury network: report of an initiative to improve outcomes in acute kidney injury. Crit Care 2007;11:R31.
3.
Macedo E, Malhotra R, Bouchard J, Wynn SK, Mehta RL: Oliguria is an early predictor of higher mortality in critically ill patients. Kidney Int 2011;80:760-767.
4.
Macedo E: Urine output assessment as a clinical quality measure. Nephron 2015;131:252-254.
5.
Waikar SS, Sabbisetti VS, Bonventre JV: Normalization of urinary biomarkers to creatinine during changes in glomerular filtration rate. Kidney Int 2010;78:486-494.
6.
Ralib AM, Pickering JW, Shaw GM, Devarajan P, Edelstein CL, Bonventre JV, et al: Test characteristics of urinary biomarkers depend on quantitation method in acute kidney injury. J Am Soc Nephrol 2012;23:322-333.
7.
Lam NP, Kuk JM, Franson KL, Lau AH: Effect of diuretic drugs on creatinine clearance determination. Ther Drug Monit 1995;17:142-144.
8.
Bagshaw SM, Delaney A, Haase M, Ghali WA, Bellomo R: Loop diuretics in the management of acute renal failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care Resusc 2007;9:60-68.
9.
Chawla LS, Davison DL, Brasha-Mitchell E, Koyner JL, Arthur JM, Shaw AD, et al: Development and standardization of a furosemide stress test to predict the severity of acute kidney injury. Crit Care 2013;17:R207.
10.
van der Voort PH, Boerma EC, Pickkers P: The furosemide stress test to predict renal function after continuous renal replacement therapy. Crit Care 2014;18:429.
11.
Maciel AT, Park M, Macedo E: Physicochemical analysis of blood and urine in the course of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: a prospective, observational study. BMC Anesthesiol 2013;13:31.
12.
Caironi P, Langer T, Taccone P, Bruzzone P, De Chiara S, Vagginelli F, et al: Kidney instant monitoring (K.IN.G): a new analyzer to monitor kidney function. Minerva Anestesiol 2010;76:316-324.
13.
Maciel AT, Park M, Macedo E: Fractional excretion of potassium in the course of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: potential monitoring tool? Rev Bras Ter Intensiva 2014;26:143-147.
14.
Maciel AT, Vitorio D: Urine biochemistry assessment in critically ill patients: controversies and future perspectives. J Clin Monit Comput 2016, Epub ahead of print.
15.
Maciel AT, Nassar AP Jr, Vitorio DL: Very transient cases of acute kidney injury in the early postoperative period after cardiac surgery: the relevance of more frequent serum creatinine assessment and concomitant urinary biochemistry evaluation. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2016;30:56-63.
16.
Macedo E, Malhotra R, Claure-Del Granado R, Fedullo P, Mehta RL: Defining urine output criterion for acute kidney injury in critically ill patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2011;26:509-515.
17.
Macedo E, Bouchard J, Soroko SH, Chertow GM, Himmelfarb J, Ikizler TA, et al: Fluid accumulation, recognition and staging of acute kidney injury in critically-ill patients. Crit Care 2010;14:R82.
18.
Chen S: Retooling the creatinine clearance equation to estimate kinetic GFR when the plasma creatinine is changing acutely. J Am Soc Nephrol 2013;24:877-888.
19.
Pickering JW, Mellas J: A simple method to detect recovery of glomerular filtration rate following acute kidney injury. Biomed Res Int 2014;2014:542069.
20.
Bjornsson TD: Use of serum creatinine concentrations to determine renal function. Clin Pharmacokinet 1979;4:200-222.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.