Background: With an aging population, it behooves physicians and scientists to gain an understanding of the intersections between aging and human disease. Here, the author reviews the intersections between age, aging, and essential tremor (ET), particularly as these relate to disease epidemiology. Summary: The prevalence and incidence of ET both increase with age, and the former, in an exponential fashion with advanced aging. There is evidence that age may independently drive several features of the natural history of ET (e.g., the increase in tremor severity with time, the appearance of head tremor with time). Epidemiological studies clearly show that ET is associated with several conditions of advanced age, including Parkinson’s disease, mild cognitive impairment and dementia. Aside from age, age of onset has several important clinical correlates – familial forms of ET are more likely to have younger ages of onset, and older ages of onset are associated with more rapid disease progression. Key Messages: Overall, there are several important intersection points between age, aging, and ET. Potential biological explanations for these observations are discussed. Further knowledge about the basis for these observations will enhance our understanding of this disease and inform our care of patients.

All humans are aging. Furthermore, with advances in life expectancy, the number of humans who are entering advanced age has been rising considerably [1, 2]. For example, in 2050, the population in the United States aged 65 and over is projected to be 83.7 million, which is almost double its estimated population of 43.1 million in 2012 [1]. As aging is associated with a variety of medical conditions, and the costs of these conditions are considerable [3-5], it behooves us to gain an understanding of the intersections between aging and human disease.

Movement disorders are common neurological disorders that are characterized by either an excess or a paucity of movements. Among the most common of these is essential tremor (ET) [6-8], a disease whose hallmark feature is action tremor of the arms and hands [9, 10]. As it is with many movement disorders, the prevalence of ET increases with age [6]. In this paper, I review the points of intersections between age and aging and ET, particularly as these relate to aspects of disease epidemiology.

Literature Search

In March 2018, the author used PubMed to search relevant literature using the term “essential tremor” with additional search terms (e.g., “age,” “aging”; Table 1). These terms were restricted to the title of the article. Duplicates were removed and all articles published in English language (n = 25) were reviewed (Table 1). Additional articles of relevance were identified through the reference list of these 25.

Table 1.

Results of search for articles from PubMed using various key words and their combinations

Results of search for articles from PubMed using various key words and their combinations
Results of search for articles from PubMed using various key words and their combinations

Definitions

As I will be using a variety of related and intersecting terms, it is important to define these terms from the start (Table 2). “Age” refers to a length of time, whereas “aging” refers to a process. Children have an age and they are aging; hence, the term “advanced age” brings us into the sphere of older adults who are near the end of the human life cycle. “Age of onset” refers to the age at which a disease commences.

Table 2.

Definition of terms that relate to age and aging

Definition of terms that relate to age and aging
Definition of terms that relate to age and aging

Population-based prevalence studies have consistently demonstrated that the prevalence of ET increases markedly with age [6] (Table 3). This is easily understandable given the fact that the incidence of ET increases with age (see further below) and mortality in ET is only modestly increased relative to that of age-matched controls (see further below).

Table 3.

Roles of age and aging with respect to different features of ET

Roles of age and aging with respect to different features of ET
Roles of age and aging with respect to different features of ET

Although results vary across studies, most report a crude prevalence of 4% or higher in persons age 60 and older, with some reporting values considerably higher (see Table 2 in [6]). With advanced age, the prevalence appears to increase in an exponential manner (Fig. 1) [6, 11, 12], with values in the oldest old (e.g., 95 and older) in excess of 20% in some studies [6]. Both the increase in prevalence with age as well as the exponential manner of that increase, are consistent with the view that the disease is neurodegenerative [13-17]; such increases in prevalence are similarly found in patients with Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease and other degenerative diseases of the nervous system [18, 19].

Fig. 1.

Exponential increase in prevalence of ET with advancing age. a Data from a study in India [11] and (b), from a study in the United States [12]. Data from each study have been modified slightly for the purposes of graphing (e.g., age stratum 65–74 is plotted as 70 years). The regression line in each study shows the exponential rise in prevalence with age.

Fig. 1.

Exponential increase in prevalence of ET with advancing age. a Data from a study in India [11] and (b), from a study in the United States [12]. Data from each study have been modified slightly for the purposes of graphing (e.g., age stratum 65–74 is plotted as 70 years). The regression line in each study shows the exponential rise in prevalence with age.

Close modal

There are 2 published studies of the incidence of ET [20, 21], and both demonstrated an increase in the incidence of disease with age (Table 3). One of these was a retrospective medical record review that utilized the records linkage system of the Rochester Epidemiology Project in the United States; it encompassed all age groups [20]. The other was a prospective, population-based study of individuals age 65 and older in Spain [21]. In the first study, the incidence per 100,000 increased consistently with each 10- or 20-year age stratum (e.g., 2.9 [ages 0–19], 6.3 [ages 20–39], 19.2 [ages 40–49], 46.8 [ages 50–59]), with the highest value in those age 80 and above (135.7 per 100,000) [20]. In the second study [21], the incidence per 100,000 increased in each 5-year age stratum (e.g., 568 [ages 65–69], 583 [ages 70–74], 754 [ages 75–79]) until the final stratum (age 85 and older), for which the sample size was small and the estimate unstable.

There is some evidence that age influences the clinical expression of ET. For example, head tremor may eventually develop in as many as 30–60% of ET patients, yet it is unclear why some individuals develop this type of tremor and others do not [22]. One possibility is that it is merely a function of advancing disease duration. Alternatively, age could be a primary factor. In a cross-sectional study, 363 ET patients underwent a detailed neurological examination that included an assessment of the presence or absence of head tremor [22]. Head tremor was present on examination in 38.6% of patients. Young patients, even with longer-duration tremor, rarely had head tremor: 2/27 (7.4%) patients < 40 years old with tremor duration ≥10 years had head tremor versus 121/283 (42.8%) older patients (> 60 years old) with tremor duration ≥10 years (p < 0.001) [22]. In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, head tremor was associated with age (p < 0.001), but it was not independently associated with tremor duration (p = 0.26). With the exception of 1 patient, head tremor did not begin before the age of 36 years. The data from this study raise the possibility that the appearance of head tremor in ET depends on a biological factor that is intrinsic to the patient (i.e., their age) and is not a clear consequence of advancing disease duration.

Another study, with a cross-sectional design, enrolled 55 community-based ET cases [23]. Disease duration was associated with the total tremor score, a measure of tremor severity (p = 0.02). Similarly, age was associated with the total tremor score (p = 0.025) [23]. In a linear regression analysis, duration (p = 0.02) and age (p = 0.02) were independently associated with the total tremor score. In the same study, results were similar in 79 ET cases enrolled from a tertiary referral center [23]. One interpretation of these data is that the reported increase in tremor severity in ET may be related not only to the inherent worsening of the disease pathophysiology with increasing duration but also with age and age-related processes such as neuronal attrition [23, 24]. This will be discussed further below.

Other studies have noted that older ET patients, when compared to age-matched controls, are more likely to have certain clinical deficits (e.g., deficits in gait and balance [25, 26]) than are younger ET patients when similarly compared with respective age-matched controls; however, it is not clear from these studies whether the authors adequately adjusted for the effects of disease duration.

Age of onset refers to the age at which an individual acquires a disease. The onset age of first symptoms or signs is often used as a close surrogate. Age of onset of symptoms can be difficult for patients to precisely recall, as the disease often has an insidious onset and initial presentation. This should be kept in mind when interpreting data that involve age of onset. In ET, age of onset has several important epidemiological and clinical correlates (Table 3). The first is that familial forms of the disease are more likely to have a younger age of onset [27]. In one study, investigators used a carefully characterized sample of 376 ET cases (61.7% familial and 38.3% sporadic) enrolled in a clinical-epidemiological study in order to contrast the age of onset distributions in familial ET versus sporadic ET [28]. The majority (71/82, 86.6%) of ET cases that appeared during childhood were familial rather than sporadic. Additionally, although the onset of ET occurred after age 40 in a majority of cases, the proportion was 125 out of 232 (53.9%) in familial ET and even more (118/144, 81.9%) in sporadic ET [28].

Second, the age of onset seems to run in ET families. In a family study, data from 26 probands and 52 relatives were analyzed [29]. The probands’ age of onset correlated significantly with their relatives’ age of onset (r = 0.50, p = 0.001), and in 57.7% of cases, the relative’s age of onset was within 10 years of the proband’s onset (i.e., a 20-year age range) [29].

Third, age of onset may be associated with the natural history of ET. As in several neurodegenerative disorders, in older onset cases, it seems that the disease may advance more rapidly [30-35]. For example, in one cross-sectional study, 60 ET cases from a community and 55 from a tertiary referral clinic underwent an interview and videotaped tremor examination [36]. The rate of progression was estimated based on the tremor severity and reported disease duration at the time of evaluation [36]. The authors reported an association between age of onset and rate of progression; cases with older age of onset (> 60 years) progressed more rapidly (p < 0.001) [36]. In another cross-sectional study, the investigators quantified the rate of tremor progression (i.e., tremor severity/duration) in 348 ET cases enrolled in an epidemiological study and characterized the relationship between age of tremor onset and rate of tremor progression in that sample [30]. Furthermore, they characterized the relationship between age of tremor onset, rate of tremor progression, and severity of underlying brain (i.e., cerebellar degenerative) changes in 9 ET cases from a brain repository [30]. The degeneration index was the number of abnormal Purkinje cell swellings (i.e., torpedoes) per section/Purkinje cell linear density [30]. In the epidemiological study, older age of tremor onset was associated with a faster rate of tremor progression (p < 0.001) [30]. In the brain repository, older age of tremor onset was associated with higher degeneration index (p = 0.037) [30].

Further data on age of onset and its associations with the natural history of ET relate to the literature on cognitive issues in ET. In several of these studies, cognitive impairment was found to be more a feature of older-onset ET cases than younger-onset cases [37-39]. However, whether the driving force in this difference was older age of onset or advanced age is not clear.

Finally, older thinking was that the penetrance of ET was considered complete by age 65 years. In other words, it was thought that by age 65, all individuals who were genetically predisposed to develop ET would manifest it (i.e., age of onset was always prior to 65) [40]. More recent data indicate that this is not likely to be the case. Studies have shown that relatives of ET cases are more likely than relatives of controls to exhibit mild, subclinical forms of tremor [41-43]. For example, in one study, the investigators enrolled more than 200 relatives of ET cases and a similar number of relatives of controls [41]. Relatives with ET were excluded from the analysis. In all age groups, including older relatives (i.e., ≥60 years of age), there was an increased prevalence of individuals with higher tremor scores among case relatives than control relatives, suggesting that even into advanced ages, subclinical ET seems to be present and penetrance still may not be complete [41].

The intersection points between ET and aging are numerous. One other example is that there is considerable evidence that ET is associated with several conditions of aging [44]. These include Parkinson’s disease, mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia [44] (Table 3). First, it is well known from clinical practice settings that patients with ET often later develop Parkinson’s disease [45-47]. Indeed, family studies have shown an increased co-occurrence of the 2 diseases within the same families above that expected by chance alone [48, 49], and case-control studies have demonstrated an increased co-occurrence of the 2 disorders within the same individuals above that expected by chance alone, with increased odds being at 5 times [50]. A prospective analysis similarly indicated that patients with ET have a more than fourfold increased risk of developing incident Parkinson’s disease [51].

Second, several epidemiological studies have demonstrated an association between ET, and especially that which begins after age 65 years, and cognitive impairment and dementia [44, 52]. Although the clinical diagnosis in many of the ET cases with dementia was Alzheimer’s disease, in the absence of postmortem studies, the pathophysiological basis for the dementia in these cases remains unelucidated. A series of papers from the Neurological Disorders in Central Spain study examined the associations between ET and cognitive dysfunction [53, 54], prevalent MCI [38], and both prevalent and incident dementia [55, 56]. In Neurological Disorders in Central Spain, ET cases were ascertained from 3 communities in Spain and all were 65 years of age or older. Investigators used a population-based case-control study design and matched ET cases and controls based on age, gender, education, depressive symptoms and medications that could potentially affect cognition. The neuropsychological battery tested global cognitive performance, executive function, memory and pre-morbid intelligence. Participants were further asked whether they suffered from forgetfulness or depression. The investigators demonstrated that ET cases performed less well than controls on neuropsychological testing, particularly on tests of memory and executive abilities; furthermore, a larger proportion of cases reported forgetfulness [53, 54]. In addition, cross-sectional analyses revealed that ET cases whose tremor began after age 65 years had increased odds of MCI (adjusted OR 1.57, p = 0.03), whereas cases with tremor onset prior to age 65 years and controls were equally likely to have MCI (adjusted OR 0.73, p = 0.43) [38]. These same study subjects were then followed longitudinally for a mean of 3.2 years, and the rate of cognitive decline appeared to be faster in the ET cases with tremor onset after 65 years of age than controls [57]. The same study demonstrated an association between ET with onset after 65 years of age and prevalent dementia [55] (adjusted OR 1.70, p = 0.03) and incident dementia [56] over a mean follow-up duration of 3.2 years (relative risk [RR] 1.98, p = 0.01). A second prospective, population-based study of older individuals (study enrollment age ≥65 years but ET age of onset unknown) was conducted in northern Manhattan, New York [58] and it demonstrated similar results. In cross-sectional analyses, 25.0% of ET cases had prevalent dementia versus 9.2% of controls (adjusted OR 1.84, p = 0.01). In prospective analyses, 18.3% of ET cases versus 8.7% of controls developed incident dementia (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.64, p = 0.055). Thus, in a second population-based study of elders, ET was associated with increased odds of prevalent dementia and increased risk of incident dementia [52]. Additional longitudinal data support an association between older onset ET cases and risk of dementia [39].

Older ET patients are less able to tolerate the side effects of pharmacotherapy than are younger patients [59]. Both the cognitive side effects of primidone and the cardiac effects of propranolol (i.e., its effects on heart rate) are more difficult for older patients to tolerate. Hence, the age of the patient limits tolerance to the front-line medications (i.e., it creates a narrower therapeutic window) [59].

The biological basis for the observed associations between ET and age/aging is not entirely clear. One possible explanation for the increase in disease incidence with age as well as the reported increase in tremor severity with age may be neuronal attrition [23, 24]. The pathophysiology of ET is not completely understood, although there is considerable evidence that it involves a mild form of cerebellar degeneration centered on and around the Purkinje cell population [17, 60-62]. It is well known that aging is associated with progressive Purkinje cell loss [63, 64]. It is possible that the rate at which new cases arise as well as the progression of symptoms in existing cases could be impacted upon by age-associated deficits in the Purkinje cell population. The observation that older age of onset is associated with more rapid progression may similarly be based in differences in the substrate of the older versus younger brain; in the former, disease-linked pathology develops on top of age-associated changes (e.g., neuronal loss), leaving less of a reserve to cushion the effects of the disease. The associations between ET and degenerative conditions of aging are not clear, although they have been discussed elsewhere [44]. In essence, the issue is whether Lewy body pathology and tau pathology is more prevalent in ET cases than controls [65, 66]. Alternatively, there is a sizable literature demonstrating that neurodegenerative diseases may be associated with one another, with the notion being that the development of one such disorder is a marker of a biological propensity/vulnerability for the development of others [44].

One final biological consideration should be discussed. In recent literature, the term “aging-related tremor” has been introduced to deal with some variability in clinical features of ET cases with different ages of onset [67] (Table 3). The proposal was to label individuals whose tremor began after age 70 as “aging-related tremor” rather than ET [67]. This was because of limited data that these individuals might show worse aging parameters and mortality than controls and ET cases whose tremor began prior to that age cut-off [67]. However, the notion of age-related tremor is problematic for several reasons [68]. First, when Parkinson’s disease begins after age 70 years, one does not refer to it as “age-related tremor, bradykinesia, and rigidity” and when Alzheimer’s disease begins after age 70 years, one does not refer to it as “age-related cognitive dysfunction” [68]. In a related point, in Parkinson’s disease, older age of onset is associated with poor survival, akin to what is seen with ET, yet one does not remove the diagnostic label “Parkinson’s disease” from cases whose onset is older [68]. Second, even if it were conceptually of merit, the cutoff point for such an age-related tremor is arbitrary [68]. Even the authors who suggested this term have defined “late-onset” differently in various papers (e.g., defining it as ≥46 years in another paper) [69]. Finally, postmortem studies of humans suggest that the same degenerative pathology is found in both younger onset and older onset ET cases to the same extent [70]. In summary, there is little current evidence to support the notion that age of onset is the basis for distinct and separable subtypes of ET or that cases whose disease begins after a certain age cutoff do not have ET [68].

Here, I reviewed the intersections between age, aging, and ET, particularly as they relate to disease epidemiology. More specifically, I focused on the related but separable entities of “age,” “aging,” “advanced age,” and “age of onset.” Overall, there were several important intersection points between age, aging, and ET. The prevalence and incidence of ET both increase with age, and age may independently drive several features of the natural history of ET, including the increase in tremor severity with time and the appearance of head tremor with time. Epidemiological studies were reviewed, which have shown that ET is associated with several conditions of advanced age, including Parkinson’s disease, MCI, and dementia. Aside from age, age of onset has several important clinical correlates, and these were discussed. For example, familial forms of ET are more likely to have younger ages of onset, and older ages of onset are associated with more rapid disease progression. The biological basis for the observed associations between ET and age/aging is not entirely clear. One possible explanation may be neuronal attrition (i.e., age-associated deficits in the Purkinje cell population). More work is needed, and further knowledge about the basis for these observations will enhance our understanding of this disease and inform our care of patients.

Dr. Elan D. Louis has received research support from the National Institutes of Health: NINDS #R01 NS094607 (principal investigator), NINDS #R01 NS085136 (principal investigator), NINDS #R01 NS073872 (principal investigator), NINDS #R01 NS085136 (principal investigator) and NINDS #R01 NS088257 (principal investigator). The author does not have any conflicts of interest to discloses.

1.
Ortman JM, Velkoff VA, Hogan H: The Aging Nation: The Older Population in the United States. US Census Bureau: https://wwwcensusgov/prod/2014pubs/p25–1140pdf (May 2014).
2.
Olshansky SJ, Goldman DP, Zheng Y, Rowe JW: Aging in America in the twenty-first century: demographic forecasts from the MacArthur Foundation Research Network on an Aging Society. Milbank Q 2009; 87: 842–862.
3.
Shumway-Cook A, Ciol MA, Hoffman J, Dudgeon BJ, Yorkston K, Chan L: Falls in the Medicare population: incidence, associated factors, and impact on health care. Phys Ther 2009; 89: 324–332.
4.
Jutkowitz E, Kane RL, Gaugler JE, MacLehose RF, Dowd B, Kuntz KM: Societal and family lifetime cost of dementia: implications for policy. J Am Geriatr Soc 2017; 65: 2169–2175.
5.
Mukherjee S, Wu H, Jones J: Healthcare data analytics for Parkinson’s disease patients: a study of hospital cost and utilization in the United States. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2016; 2016: 1950–1958.
6.
Louis ED, Ferreira JJ: How common is the most common adult movement disorder? Update on the worldwide prevalence of essential tremor. Mov Disord 2010; 25: 534–541.
7.
Seijo-Martinez M, Del Rio MC, Alvarez JR, Prado RS, Salgado ET, Esquete JP, Sobrido-Gomez MJ: Prevalence of essential tremor on Arosa Island, Spain: a community-based, door-to-door survey. Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y) 20133; 3. pii:tre-03–192–4299–1.
8.
Louis ED, Ottman R: How many people in the USA have essential tremor? Deriving a population estimate based on epidemiological data. Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov 2014; 4: 259.
9.
Louis ED: The primary type of tremor in essential tremor is kinetic rather than postural: cross-sectional observation of tremor phenomenology in 369 cases. Eur J Neurol 2013; 20: 725–727.
10.
Louis ED: Clinical practice. Essential tremor. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 887–891.
11.
Das SK, Banerjee TK, Roy T, Raut DK, Chaudhuri A, Hazra A: Prevalence of essential tremor in the city of Kolkata, India: a house-to-house survey. Eur J Neurol 2009; 16: 801–807.
12.
Louis ED, Thawani SP, Andrews HF: Prevalence of essential tremor in a multiethnic, community-based study in northern Manhattan, New York, N.Y. Neuroepidemiology 2009; 32: 208–214.
13.
Benito-Leon J: Essential tremor: a neurodegenerative disease? Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y) 2014; 4: 252.
14.
Bonuccelli U: Essential tremor is a neurodegenerative disease. J Neural Transm 2012; 119: 1383–1387.
15.
Bermejo-Pareja F: Essential tremor–a neurodegenerative disorder associated with cognitive defects? Nat Rev Neurol 2011; 7: 273–282.
16.
Grimaldi G, Manto M: Is essential tremor a Purkinjopathy? The role of the cerebellar cortex in its pathogenesis. Mov Disord 2013; 28: 1759–1761.
17.
Louis ED: Re-thinking the biology of essential tremor: from models to morphology. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2014; 20(suppl 1):S88–S93.
18.
Benito-Leon J, Bermejo-Pareja F, Rodriguez J, Molina JA, Gabriel R, Morales JM: Prevalence of PD and other types of parkinsonism in three elderly populations of central Spain. Mov Disord 2003; 18: 267–274.
19.
Evans DA, Funkenstein HH, Albert MS, Scherr PA, Cook NR, Chown MJ, Hebert LE, Hennekens CH, Taylor JO: Prevalence of Alzheimer’s disease in a community population of older persons. Higher than previously reported. JAMA 1989; 262: 2551–2556.
20.
Rajput AH, Offord KP, Beard CM, Kurland LT: Essential tremor in Rochester, Minnesota: a 45-year study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1984; 47: 466–470.
21.
Benito-Leon J, Bermejo-Pareja F, Louis ED: Incidence of essential tremor in three elderly populations of central Spain. Neurology 2005; 64: 1721–1725.
22.
Louis ED: When do essential tremor patients develop head tremor? Influences of age and duration and evidence of a biological clock. Neuroepidemiology 2013; 41: 110–115.
23.
Louis ED, Jurewicz EC, Watner D: Community-based data on associations of disease duration and age with severity of essential tremor: implications for disease pathophysiology. Mov Disord 2003; 18: 90–93.
24.
Elble RJ: The role of aging in the clinical expression of essential tremor. Exp Gerontol 1995; 30: 337–347.
25.
Lim ES, Seo MW, Woo SR, Jeong SY, Jeong SK: Relationship between essential tremor and cerebellar dysfunction according to age. J Clin Neurol 2005; 1: 76–80.
26.
Hubble JP, Busenbark KL, Pahwa R, Lyons K, Koller WC: Clinical expression of essential tremor: effects of gender and age. Mov Disord 1997; 12: 969–972.
27.
Louis ED, Ottman R: Study of possible factors associated with age of onset in essential tremor. Mov Disord 2006; 21: 1980–1986.
28.
Louis ED, Clark LN, Ottman R: Familial versus sporadic essential tremor: what patterns can one decipher in age of onset? Neuroepidemiology 2015; 44: 166–172.
29.
Louis ED, Hernandez N, Rabinowitz D, Ottman R, Clark LN: Predicting age of onset in familial essential tremor: how much does age of onset run in families? Neuroepidemiology 2013; 40: 269–273.
30.
Louis ED, Faust PL, Vonsattel JP, Honig LS, Henchcliffe C, Pahwa R, Lyons KE, Rios E, Erickson-Davis C, Moskowitz CB, Lawton A: Older onset essential tremor: more rapid progression and more degenerative pathology. Mov Disord 2009; 24: 1606–1612.
31.
Alves G, Wentzel-Larsen T, Aarsland D, Larsen JP: Progression of motor impairment and disability in Parkinson disease: a population-based study. Neurology 2005; 65: 1436–1441.
32.
Gasparoli E, Delibori D, Polesello G, Santelli L, Ermani M, Battistin L, Bracco F: Clinical predictors in Parkinson’s disease. Neurol Sci 2002; 23(suppl 2):S77–S78.
33.
Kempster PA, Williams DR, Selikhova M, Holton J, Revesz T, Lees AJ: Patterns of levodopa response in Parkinson’s disease: a clinico-pathological study. Brain 2007; 130: 2123–2128.
34.
Klockgether T, Ludtke R, Kramer B, Abele M, Burk K, Schols L, Riess O, Laccone F, Boesch S, Lopes-Cendes I, Brice A, Inzelberg R, Zilber N, Dichgans J: The natural history of degenerative ataxia: a retrospective study in 466 patients. Brain 1998; 121(Pt 4): 589–600.
35.
Norris F, Shepherd R, Denys E, U K, Mukai E, Elias L, Holden D, Norris H: Onset, natural history and outcome in idiopathic adult motor neuron disease. J Neurol Sci 1993; 118: 48–55.
36.
Louis ED, Ford B, Barnes LF: Clinical subtypes of essential tremor. Arch Neurol 2000; 57: 1194–1198.
37.
Pauletti C, Mannarelli D, Locuratolo N, Vanacore N, De Lucia MC, Fattapposta F: Mismatch negativity in essential tremor: role of age at onset in pre-attentive auditory discrimination. Clin Neurophysiol 2014; 125: 708–714.
38.
Benito-Leon J, Louis ED, Mitchell AJ, Bermejo-Pareja F: Elderly-onset essential tremor and mild cognitive impairment: a population-based study (NEDICES). J Alzheimers Dis 2011; 23: 727–735.
39.
Shill HA, Hentz JG, Jacobson SA, Belden C, Sabbagh MN, Beach TG, Driver-Dunckley E, Adler CH: Essential tremor in the elderly and risk for dementia. J Neurodegener Dis 2014; 2014: 328765.
40.
Bain PG, Findley LJ, Thompson PD, Gresty MA, Rothwell JC, Harding AE, Marsden CD: A study of hereditary essential tremor. Brain 1994; 117(Pt 4): 805–824.
41.
Louis ED, Ford B, Frucht S, Ottman R: Mild tremor in relatives of patients with essential tremor: what does this tell us about the penetrance of the disease? Arch Neurol 2001; 58: 1584–1589.
42.
Louis ED, Meyers JH, Badejo OM, Cristal AD, Hickman R, Factor-Litvak P: Comparative burden of subclinical tremor in a cohort of normal individuals stratified by familial risk for essential tremor. Neuroepidemiology 2018; 50: 41–46.
43.
Louis ED, Dogu O, Ottman R: Subclinical tremor in normal controls with versus without a family history of essential tremor: data from the United States and Turkey. Eur J Neurol 2010; 17: 607–611.
44.
LaRoia H, Louis ED: Association between essential tremor and other neurodegenerative diseases: what is the epidemiological evidence? Neuroepidemiology 2011; 37: 1–10.
45.
Shahed J, Jankovic J: Exploring the relationship between essential tremor and Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2007; 13: 67–76.
46.
Minen MT, Louis ED: Emergence of Parkinson’s disease in essential tremor: a study of the clinical correlates in 53 patients. Mov Disord 2008; 23: 1602–1605.
47.
Ghika A, Kyrozis A, Potagas C, Louis ED: Motor and non-motor features: differences between patients with isolated essential tremor and patients with both essential tremor and Parkinson’s disease. Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y) 2015; 5: 335.
48.
Rocca WA, Bower JH, Ahlskog JE, Elbaz A, Grossardt BR, McDonnell SK, Schaid DJ, Maraganore DM: Increased risk of essential tremor in first-degree relatives of patients with Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2007; 22: 1607–1614.
49.
Louis ED, Clark L, Ottman R: Familial aggregation and co-aggregation of essential tremor and Parkinson’s disease. Neuroepidemiology 2016; 46: 31–36.
50.
Tan EK, Lee SS, S FC, Lum SY: Evidence of increased odds of essential tremor in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2008; 23: 993–997.
51.
Benito-Leon J, Louis ED, Bermejo-Pareja F: Risk of incident Parkinson’s disease and parkinsonism in essential tremor: a population based study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2009; 80: 423–425.
52.
Janicki SC, Cosentino S, Louis ED: The cognitive side of essential tremor: what are the therapeutic implications? Ther Adv Neurol Disord 2013; 6: 353–368.
53.
Benito-Leon J, Louis ED, Bermejo-Pareja F: Population-based case-control study of cognitive function in essential tremor. Neurology 2006; 66: 69–74.
54.
Louis ED, Benito-Leon J, Vega-Quiroga S, Bermejo-Pareja F: Cognitive and motor functional activity in non-demented community-dwelling essential tremor cases. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 81: 997–1001.
55.
Benito-Leon J, Louis ED, Bermejo-Pareja F: Elderly-onset essential tremor is associated with dementia. Neurology 2006; 66: 1500–1505.
56.
Bermejo-Pareja F, Louis ED, Benito-Leon J: Risk of incident dementia in essential tremor: a population-based study. Mov Disord 2007 22: 1573–1580.
57.
Louis ED, Benito-Leon J, Vega-Quiroga S, Bermejo-Pareja F; Neurological Disorders in Central Spain Study Group: Faster rate of cognitive decline in essential tremor cases than controls: a prospective study. Eur J Neurol 2010; 17: 1291–1297.
58.
Thawani SP, Schupf N, Louis ED: Essential tremor is associated with dementia: prospective population-based study in New York. Neurology 2009; 73: 621–625.
59.
Louis ED: Essential tremor. Clin Geriatr Med 2006; 22: 843–857, vii.
60.
Louis ED, Huang CC, Dyke JP, Long Z, Dydak U: Neuroimaging studies of essential tremor: how well do these studies support/refute the neurodegenerative hypothesis? Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y) 2014; 4: 235.
61.
Louis ED: Linking essential tremor to the cerebellum: neuropathological evidence. Cerebellum 2016; 15: 235–242.
62.
Cerasa A, Quattrone A: Linking essential tremor to the cerebellum-neuroimaging evidence. Cerebellum 2016; 15: 263–275.
63.
Andersen BB, Gundersen HJ, Pakkenberg B: Aging of the human cerebellum: a stereological study. J Comp Neurol 2003; 466: 356–365.
64.
Hall TC, MILLER AKH, Corsellis JAN: Variations in the human Purkinje cell population according to age and sex. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 1975; 1: 267–292.
65.
Pan JJ, Lee M, Honig LS, Vonsattel JP, Faust PL, Louis ED: Alzheimer’s-related changes in non-demented essential tremor patients vs. controls: links between tau and tremor? Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2014; 20: 655–658.
66.
Louis ED, Honig LS, Vonsattel JP, Maraganore DM, Borden S, Moskowitz CB: Essential tremor associated with focal nonnigral Lewy bodies: a clinicopathologic study. Arch Neurol 2005; 62: 1004–1007.
67.
Deuschl G, Petersen I, Lorenz D, Christensen K: Tremor in the elderly: essential and aging-related tremor. Mov Disord 2015; 30: 1327–1334.
68.
Louis ED: The evolving definition of essential tremor: what are we dealing with? Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2018; 46(suppl 1):S87–S91.
69.
Hopfner F, Ahlf A, Lorenz D, Klebe S, Zeuner KE, Kuhlenbaumer G, Deuschl G: Early- and late-onset essential tremor patients represent clinically distinct subgroups. Mov Disord 2016; 31: 1560–1566.
70.
Kuo SH, Wang J, Tate WJ, Pan MK, Kelly GC, Gutierrez J, Cortes EP, Vonsattel JG, Louis ED, Faust PL: Cerebellar pathology in early onset and late onset essential tremor. Cerebellum 2017; 16: 473–482.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.