Abstract
Background: Benzodiazepines are a widely used medication in developed countries, particularly among elderly patients. However, benzodiazepines are known to affect memory and cognition and might thus enhance the risk of dementia. The objective of this review is to synthesize evidence from observational studies that evaluated the association between benzodiazepines use and dementia risk. Summary: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled observational studies to evaluate the risk of benzodiazepines use on dementia outcome. All control observational studies that compared dementia outcome in patients with benzodiazepine use with a control group were included. We calculated pooled ORs using a random-effects model. Ten studies (of 3,696 studies identified) were included in the systematic review, of which 8 studies were included in random-effects meta-analysis and sensitivity analyses. Odds of dementia were 78% higher in those who used benzodiazepines compared with those who did not use benzodiazepines (OR 1.78; 95% CI 1.33-2.38). In subgroup analysis, the higher association was still found in the studies from Asia (OR 2.40; 95% CI 1.66-3.47) whereas a moderate association was observed in the studies from North America and Europe (OR 1.49; 95% CI 1.34-1.65 and OR 1.43; 95% CI 1.16-1.75). Also, diabetics, hypertension, cardiac disease, and statin drugs were associated with increased risk of dementia but negative association was observed in the case of body mass index. There was significant statistical and clinical heterogeneity among studies for the main analysis and most of the sensitivity analyses. There was significant statistical and clinical heterogeneity among the studies for the main analysis and most of the sensitivity analyses. Key Messages: Our results suggest that benzodiazepine use is significantly associated with dementia risk. However, observational studies cannot clarify whether the observed epidemiologic association is a causal effect or the result of some unmeasured confounding variable. Therefore, more research is needed.
Introduction
The prevalence of dementia is increasing dramatically worldwide, but the types of dementia vary between countries [1]. Alzheimer disease is the most common type of dementia in Western countries, whereas vascular dementia is more common in Asia [2]. Up to 35.6 million people were afflicted with dementia in 2012, and this number is expected to double by 2030 [3]. The prevalence of dementia varies considerably by age group; a higher prevalence in patients above the age of 85 years was found than in patients above the age of 65 years [4]. Alzheimer disease remains the most common cause of dementia, and several risk factors are associated with dementia, such as age, gender, education [5,] hormonal effects, head trauma [6], depression [7], stroke [8], and blood pressure [9].
Benzodiazepines are a type of medication acting on the central nervous system and enhance the effect of the neurotransmitter gamma-aminobutyric acid. Benzodiazepines are a popular medication in the treatment of anxiety, depression, and insomnia patients around the world [10]. In 2007, nearly 85 million benzodiazepine prescriptions were provided in United States to outpatients with anxiety and depression [11] which was a little less than the 2001 account of 90 million [12]. In Germany and Canada, the percentage of benzodiazepine prescription is 18.9% [10] and 15.0% [13,] respectively, of the total of described depression drugs; furthermore, women were prescribed more benzodiazepine compared to men, and prescription was higher in the older population as compared with the younger population [14]. However, among older users, the use of benzodiazepine causes serious adverse effects including impaired cognitive function.
To our knowledge, no systematic review of the association between the use of benzodiazepines and the risk of dementia among elderly patients has been published so far. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies to determine whether the long-term use of benzodiazepines is associated with an increased risk of dementia among older patients when compared to non-benzodiazepine users. In our review, we only included studies that mentioned patients having exposure to benzodiazepine for ≥30 days and included patients over the age of 55 years. To identify patients of particularly high risk, we conducted an additional analysis to determine whether dementia risk is associated with gender, geographical area, smoking status, comorbidity, and co-medication.
Methods
This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) [15]. A review written protocol was not drafted.
Eligibility Criteria
We included only those studies that met the following criteria: (1) the study reported separately the relevant risk of benzodiazepine use and dementia diagnosis based on an observational study design, (2) one of the exposure outcomes of interest was benzodiazepine, (3) the outcome of interest was dementia, and (4) the study provided an OR or a risk ratio with a 95% CI or provided sufficient information to calculate them.
We excluded any study that met the following criteria: (1) the study was a case-report, editorial, review, or clinical trial; and (2) the outcome of interest was not dementia.
Data Sources
A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Database of Systematic Reviews from the earliest available online year of indexing up to June 2016 was conducted. Our search strategies included controlled vocabulary and related keywords for 2 concepts: “dementia” and “benzodiazepines use.” We included all study designs, publication years, languages, and inclusion of human participants in our search. Furthermore, the authors of potentially eligible abstracts, posters, or manuscripts were contacted via email to possibly obtain published information, and thus additional data was obtained. No unpublished data were included in our analysis.
Data Collection and Analysis
Study Selection
Two of our authors (Md.M.I. and P.-A.N.) independently conducted the article selection, data extraction, and assessment of risk of bias, and they also followed guidance from the Cochrane Collaboration to include observational studies to maximize study, participant, and event inclusion into our analysis which allowed us to also conduct sensitivity and subgroup analyses. All disagreements between these 2 authors were resolved by consensus.
Data Extraction
Ten studies that fulfilled all of our criteria as stated above were then independently entered into our database by the same 2 authors, with the following entries: first author's last name, publication year, country source of study, participants' characteristics, method of ascertainment of dementia, sample size, variable adjustment, and the dementia risk estimated with 95% CI. We also screened the title, abstract, and full text in a similar fashion; however, specific exclusion reasons were documented only during full text screening. Upon selection of the final group of studies, the same 2 authors independently extracted the qualitative and quantitative data using a standardized data extraction form adjudicated by a third author (S.-A.S).
Assessment of Methodological Quality
The main outcome of this meta-analysis was the possible association of benzodiazepine use and dementia risk among the elderly population. We assessed the methodological quality of the included observational studies based on a modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). In the case of a case-control study, NOS consists of 8 items with 3 subscales, and the total maximum score of these 3 subsets is 9. We considered a study which scored ≥7 a high-quality study since a standard criterion for what constitutes a high-quality study has not yet been universally established. The mean value for the 8 studies assessed by us was 8.25.
Statistical Analysis
To test for the association between benzodiazepine use and the risk of dementia, we analyzed our data with the Review Manager program (version 5.3). We also reported measures of association extracted from the included studies using the ORs with a 95% CI. For studies that did not report a measure of association between benzodiazepine exposure and dementia but did include the required information, we calculated an unadjusted OR using the Peto method. In the case of a systematic analysis, we examined study countries, study design, study period, number of cases, and control and adjustments. To resolve the proportion of variability in the effect estimates due to heterogeneity, we used the Cochrane's Q test (reported with a λ2 and p value) and the I2 statistic [16]. We then used the accepted cutoff of 50% to define significant heterogeneity and additionally calculated the associated p value (via a χ2 test).
To explore the heterogeneity between studies, we conducted an analysis stratified by gender, age, geographical location, body mass index (BMI), comorbidity, and co-medication. Furthermore, we evaluated the impact of adjustment for smoking and drinking status on the association between benzodiazepine use and the risk of dementia. We performed subgroup analysis by excluding each study individually to assess its influence on the overall result of our meta-analysis.
Finally, we generated forest plots for each of our exposure-outcome comparisons, and we used a random-effects-based model to calculate the weighted mean, OR, associated 95% CI, and p value due to significant clinical, methodological, and statistical heterogeneity across the included studies. Thus, all effect estimates were assumed to approximate the OR and were pooled in the meta-analysis.
Results
Study Selection
We identified 1,318 unique titles and abstracts, of which 1,295 studies were excluded based on our predetermined eligibility criteria described above. The remaining 23 studies underwent full-text screening but only 10 studies ultimately met all of our criteria for inclusion in our systematic review; furthermore, 8 of out these 10 studies were included in our meta-analysis. The most common reason for exclusion of the 13 excluded studies was the impossibility to extract data (n = 5), followed by dementia not being measured (n = 3), and full-text duplication (n = 2). Figure 1 summarizes our selection process.
Systematic Review
A qualitative synthesis of the 10 studies meeting all of our inclusion criteria is summarized in Table 1. Six studies were case-control design studies [17,18,19,20,21,22] and 4 were cohort studies [23,24,25,26]. The included studies were published between 1983 and 2013, thus spanning 31 years. Five studies were conducted in Europe [18,19,24,25,26], 3 in Asia [17,21,22,] and the remaining 2 in North America [20,23]. Eight studies reported that the age at the onset of dementia was over 65 years but 2 studies reported an age of onset below 60 years [24,25].
Most of the studies mentioned benzodiazepines exposure but they did not evaluate risk according to individual drugs in the benzodiazepine group. However, one case-control study mentioned zolpidem [17]. Two studies included exposed participants who were treated with both benzodiazepine and psychotropic medicine. Eight studies used pharmacy and prescription records (80%) to identify benzodiazepine exposure while 2 studies used diagnosis code (20%) to identify dementia.
A total of 101,659 study subjects were included in our quantitative synthesis of which 23,773 and 48,773 were men and women, respectively; the discrepancy in numbers is due to 2 studies which did not mention gender information. The total number of dementia patients in the included studies was 35,482. All studies controlled for age and gender; each study also adjusted for multiple other potential confounding factors, including medications and comorbidities, but the precise extent of statistical adjustment varied by study as noted in Table 1. Furthermore, 3 studies mentioned dose-response relationship, and 2 studies recorded long- and short-life benzodiazepine association.
Meta-Analyses
Our meta-analysis pooled data from 8 of the 10 studies included in the systematic review. These 8 studies included 66,177 participants and 30,914 cases of dementia; the remaining 2 studies were not included because of their study design and substantially overlapping study population.
Our primary meta-analysis of the 8 observational studies found that benzodiazepine use significantly increased dementia risk (Fig. 2). The pooled summary OR was 1.78 (95% CI 1.33-2.38) in a random-effects model for benzodiazepine users as compared to benzodiazepine non-users. There was significant heterogeneity among the studies (Q = 534.13, p < 0.00001, I2 = 99%). For the association between benzodiazepine use and dementia risk, subgroup analysis was adopted according to stratification on gender, geographical location, BMI, smoking and drinking status, comorbidity, and co-medication (Table 2). We also found that women had a significantly higher risk of developing dementia than men; the pooled summary for female patients was OR 1.16 (95% CI 1.00-1.36). The 6 case-control studies (OR 1.89; 95% CI 1.34-2.68) and the 2 population-based studies (OR 1.47; 95% CI 1.28-1.69) demonstrated the significant relationship between benzodiazepine use and dementia risk, although the numbers differed somewhat. In patients whose BMI was greater than 30, benzodiazepine use was associated with a lower dementia risk (OR 0.96; 95% CI 0.84-1.09); however, since the CI included no effect, this association was not significant. Concerning the geographical location, benzodiazepine use significantly increased dementia risk in European populations (OR 1.43; 95% CI 1.16-1.75), and this association was even stronger in North American (OR 1.49; 95% CI 1.34-1.65) and Asian (OR 2.40; 95% CI 1.66-3.47) populations. Only 2 studies considered smoking status; while we found a negative relationship for past smokers (OR 0.89; 95% CI 0.63-1.27), we found a positive relationship for non-smokers (OR 1.08; 95% CI 0.71-1.65) and current smokers (OR 1.13; 95% CI 0.80-1.60). However, none of these 3 relationships were significant. Likewise, drinking alcohol was not significantly associated with dementia risk (OR 1.06; 95% CI 0.61-1.86) but wine consumption significantly decreased dementia risk (OR 0.81; 95% CI 0.70-0.93). We also investigated the impact of 4 comorbidities (namely, hypertension, diabetics, dyslipidemia, and cardiac disease). Hypertension and diabetics were positively associated with dementia risk (OR 1.30; 95% CI 0.84-2.00 and OR 1.30; 95% CI 0.98-1.72, respectively). Likewise, dyslipidemia was moderately associated with dementia risk (OR 1.29; 95% CI 1.18-1.41), and cardiac disease was also slightly associated with dementia risk (OR 1.13; 95% CI 0.82-1.55). In addition, we also found a significant association in the case of hypocholesterolemia, arterial fibrillation, epilepsy, Parkinson disease, and cerebrovascular condition.
As for the adjustment of other dementia risk factors, the use of statin drugs significantly increased dementia risk (OR 1.41; 95% CI 1.32-1.50). Similarly, the use of anti-hypertensive medicine, platelets aggregation, anticoagulant, and platelets inhibitors were also considered as risk factors. Furthermore, psychiatric patients who took benzodiazepine were highly associated with dementia risk (OR 4.14; 95% CI 0.55-30.84). Likewise, depression, anxiety, and insomnia patients were also significantly associated with dementia risk (Table 2). In the subgroup meta-analysis, we also found a significant positive association of benzodiazepine use and dementia risk. Taken together, our results suggest that the long-term use of benzodiazepines under most circumstances increases a patient's risk of developing dementia.
Sensitivity Analysis
To assess whether a single study had a substantial influence on the main results, we excluded each study and evaluated its effect on the summary estimates and heterogeneity of the main analysis. We performed sensitivity analysis to evaluate permanent use and current use of benzodiazepine use and dementia risk. For the association of short half-life (≤20 h) and long half-life benzodiazepine drugs, we also found significant risk of developing dementia.
Publication Bias
When the number of studies is small, the visual interpretation and test for asymmetry of the funnel plot of the publications are not very reliable [27]. Figure 3 shows the funnel plot which indicates the existence of some publication bias. The Egger's regression test of the funnel asymmetry showed a highly significant publication bias (p value <0.05).
Discussion
Main Findings
This systematic review of 10 studies and meta-analysis of 8 studies demonstrated a 1.78-fold increased risk of developing dementia in patients who used benzodiazepines for >30 days, and usually considerably longer. However, we interpret these results with caution for 2 reasons: (1) we found significant statistical and clinical heterogeneity among the studies, and (2) the inability of this type of study to distinguish between causal relationships or mere statistical association, with the possibility of confounding variables causing the observed relationship. Nevertheless, our results indicate an increased risk of the development of dementia in patients who use benzodiazepines, no matter what the ultimate causal relationship is. Furthermore, this relationship holds for benzodiazepine use alone, or in association with other diseases, such as diabetics, dyslipidemia, arterial fibrillation, hypertension, stroke, cardiac disease, hyperlipidemia, hypocholesterolemia, epilepsy, insomnia, and anxiety (Table 3). This relationship is further associated with other factors, such as age, gender, smoking and drinking status, long- and short-acting benzodiazepine drugs, statin drugs, platelets aggregation, anti-coagulant and anti-hypertensive drugs. Our result is further supported by one previous meta-analysis from China which also found that long-term benzodiazepine users have an increased risk of developing dementia when compared with non-users [28].
The etiology of dementia is heterogeneous. There is no clear potential pathological hypothesis that could explain how benzodiazepines could facilitate or trigger the onset of dementia, by either some lasting neurochemical or neurotoxic effect, or by their negative cognitive effects. However, some studies suggested that benzodiazepines could precipitate the onset of dementia or mental decline by altering or impairing higher mental activities. Along these lines, Saczynski et al. [7] mentioned that depressive symptoms were associated with an increased risk of subsequent cognitive decline, and Lara et al. [29] found that high levels of cortisol may be associated with depression and stress and may thus cause neural death. Furthermore, a study reported an increased risk of stroke and coronary heart disease in patients with the ApoE polymorphism, a known genetic risk factor for dementia [30].
In the subgroup analysis, we found diabetes and hypertension were significantly associated with dementia risk. Yamada et al. [31] pointed out that hypertension is a primary risk factor for dementia but not a risk factor for Alzheimer disease [32]. Type 2 diabetics are associated with insulin resistance; because of this, it is related to the formation of Aβ and inflammatory agents in the brain [33,] which leads to an increased dementia risk. Likewise, patients with a history of depression, psychotic disorder, and head injury are also at risk of developing dementia in later life [7].
Included studies suggested that sleep disturbance was common in the prodromal phase of dementia, and therefore, benzodiazepines were prescribed for such early symptoms of dementia. Studies also mentioned that the length of time between the initial prescription and index diagnosis (i.e., the onset of dementia) was relatively long (meaning, 4 years). However, it might be difficult to determine whether, and to what extent, the prescription of benzodiazepines might be a consequence of prodromal symptoms of dementia. Johansson et al. [34] mentioned that persistent mid-life anxiety and depression could be associated with a higher chance of dementia in older people. Future research should therefore consider a long follow-up of at least 15-20 years because then it would be possible to evaluate the risk of long-term use of benzodiazepines in younger adults as well as to better assess the exact role of anxiety, sleep disorders, and depression as early risk factors of future dementia development.
Limitations
Our systematic review and meta-analysis have some limitations, which we address below. First, all included observational studies of our meta-analysis relied on the diagnosis criteria of primary studies included to identify dementia but there was substantial heterogeneity across the studies in the main analysis of dementia. Although this could be partly explained by different study design, dose, and duration of benzodiazepine use, we could not thoroughly explore other possible sources of variability due to the small number of included studies. Therefore, the pooled effect and heterogeneity assessment may be imprecise, and the publication bias of these studies could not be adequately addressed [35]. Second, our overall estimates displayed significant heterogeneity, so that any conclusion drawn has to be taken with caution. Heterogeneity was found for gender, geographical location, BMI, smoking status, comorbidity and co-medication, and dementia assessment methods. Although we used the appropriate meta-analysis technique with random-effects model, it cannot account for these differences. Also, we were not able to test for methodological variation. Third, our results were based on the analysis of observational studies. Therefore, it is impossible to exclude the possibility of potential confounding by various factors, which also associated with dementia among the elderly population. Finally, the possibility of publication bias is inherent in any meta-analysis of published data, because of the fact that often studies with null results tend not to be published [36]. Publication bias may have resulted in an overestimation of the relationship between benzodiazepine use and the risk of dementia.
Public Health Implication
Vascular dementia accounts for 24-48% of dementing illness in the older patients, an incidence of 6-10 in 10,000 per year in those older than 70 years [1]. The prevalence of dementia increased exponentially with age from 12.7% per year in the 90-94 years of age, to 21.2% per year in the 95-99 years of age, to 40.7% per year in the 100+ years of age [37]. Age is the proverbial effect modifier of increasing dementia prevalence but age was not stratified by subgroup in the current review. Some studies found an association between parental age at birth and the risk of dementia, and mentioned that this might occur because of chromosomal abnormities [38,39]. Similarly, BMI and obesity are also associated with diabetics and dementia [40]. Fitzpatrick et al. [41] demonstrated an increased risk of dementia among the obese (BMI >30) as compared to people with normal weight (BMI 20-25) at 50 years of age. They also reported a reverse association between BMI and the risk of dementia at >65 years of age [41]. This meta-analysis also found an inverse association between BMI of >30 and the risk of dementia among the elderly population. Several studies also found a positive association between smoking status and dementia risk [42,43,] which was also supported by our sensitivity analysis. Therefore, smoking could be a potential confounder for the association of cerebrovascular disease with dementia. In the case of drinking status, O'Keefe et al. [44] mentioned that alcohol consumption seemed to protect older people from dementia. To support this view, Luchsinger et al. [45] found an inverse association between wine consumption and dementia among individual age >65 years without the APOEe4 allele. In our meta-analysis, we found a positive relationship between alcohol consumption and the risk of dementia, which is also supported by some research [46].
Recommendation
There is currently no treatment for dementia although some drugs and non-drug treatments can improve both cognitive and behavioral symptoms. While factors such as age and genetics cannot be changed, other factors such as physical activity, diet, social engagement, and the cessation of tobacco and alcohol consumption may improve the situation. Not only younger but also elder people should exercise as much as they can because it may directly benefit the brain by increasing blood and oxygen flow into the brain. Accordingly, a report demonstrated an inverse association between physical activities and cognitive decline [47] and also mentioned that an increase level of physical activity is associated with a subsequently decreased incidence of dementia [48]. To reduce the chance of dementia, people should quit smoking because when compared with non-smokers, smokers were found to have decreased grey matter density in the posterior cingulate and presumes, right thalamus, and frontal cortex [49]. Foods such as red meats, grains, fruits, vegetables, fish, shellfish, and nuts which have an impact on brain health through their effect on cardiovascular health may also prevent dementia. Social engagement could improve cognitive functioning although Fratiglioni et al. [50] reported mixed results for the association between social networks and cognitive decline. To consider the increasing evidence of the potential adverse effects of benzodiazepines, regulatory agencies should provide guidelines for prescription, and physicians and other care givers should perform cognitive tests before prescribing this drug class for the general population.
Conclusion
The present study was designed to determine the effect of benzodiazepine use in the elderly population. On the basis of our systematic review and meta-analysis, we suggest that long-term use of benzodiazepines is associated with a higher dementia risk albeit with significant heterogeneity. To confirm or refute the results of our meta-analysis, a larger long-term prospective randomized controlled trial specifically designed to assess the effect of benzodiazepine use on the risk of developing dementia is needed.
Disclosure Statement
None.
Acknowledgment
This research is sponsored in part by Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) under grant MOST 103-2221-E-038-014-, MOST 103-2221-E-038-016-, MOST 104-2221-E-038-013, MOST 104-3011-E-038-001, Health and Welfare Surcharge of Tobacco Products grant MOHW104-TDU-B-212-124-001, Ministry of Education, Taiwan, under grant TMUTOP103006-6.