Background: The place of residence has been linked to cognitive function among adults in developed countries. This study examined how urban and rural residence was associated with cognitive function among adults in India. Methods: The World Health Organization Study on Global AGEing and Adult Health data was used to examine cognition among 6,244 community-residing adults age 50+ in 6 states in India. Residential status was categorized as urban, rural, urban-to-urban, rural-to-urban, rural-to-rural, and urban-to-rural. Cognition was assessed by immediate and delayed recall tests, digit span test, and verbal fluency test. Multilevel models were used to account for state-level differences and adjusted for individual-level sociodemographic, psychosocial, and health-related factors. Results: Urban residents and urban-to-urban migrants had the highest levels of cognition, whereas rural residents and those who migrated to (or within) rural areas had the lowest cognition. The differences largely persisted after adjustment for multiple covariates; however, rural-to-urban migrants had no difference in cognition from urban residents once socioeconomic factors were taken into account. Conclusion: Cognition among adults in India differed significantly according to their current and past place of residence. Socioeconomic factors played an important role in the cognitive function of adults in urban areas.

Keywords:
Cognition, India, Social determinants of health, Aging
1.
United Nations: World Population Prospects: The 2012 Revision. World Population Prospect 2012 Revision, 2013; 1.
2.
World Health Organization: World Report on Ageing and Health. World Health Organization Published Online First, 2015.
3.
Prince M, Bryce R, Albanese E, et al: The global prevalence of dementia: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Alzheimers Dement 2013; 9: 63–75.
4.
Sousa RM, Ferri CP, Acosta D, et al: The contribution of chronic diseases to the prevalence of dependence among older people in Latin America, China and India: a 10/66 Dementia Research Group population-based survey. BMC Geriatr 2010; 10: 53.
5.
Lee J, Smith JP: Regional disparities in adult height, educational attainment and gender difference in late- life cognition: findings from the longitudinal aging study in India (LASI). J Econ ageing 2014; 4: 26–34.
6.
Lee J, Shih R, Feeney K, et al: Gender disparity in late-life cognitive functioning in India: findings from the longitudinal aging study in India. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2014; 69: 603–611.
7.
Raina SK, Raina S, Chander V, et al: Is dementia differentially distributed? A study on the prevalence of dementia in migrant, urban, rural, and tribal elderly population of Himalayan region in Northern India. N Am J Med Sci 2014; 6: 172–177.
8.
Raina SK, Razdan S, Pandita KK: Prevalence of dementia in ethnic Dogra population of Jammu district, North India: a comparison survey. Neurol Asia 2010; 15: 65–69.
9.
Xu H, Dupre ME, Gu D, et al: The impact of residential status on cognitive decline among older adults in China: results from a longitudinal study. BMC Geriatr 2017; 17: 107.
10.
Bhagat RB: Urban Migration Trends, Challenges and Opportunities in India. Geveva, International Organization for Migration, 2015.
11.
Bhagat RB: Changing Pattern of Internal Migration in India. Demographic Transformations in China, India. Springer International Publishing, 2016, pp 239–254. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-24783-0_15 (accessed July 3, 2017).
12.
Deshingkar P, Grimm S: Internal migration and development: a global perspective. IOM Migr Res Ser 2004; 84.
13.
Bhugra D: Migration, distress and cultural identity. Br Med Bull 2004; 69: 129–141.
14.
Oyebode O, Pape UJ, Laverty AA, et al: Rural, urban and migrant differences in non--communicable disease risk-factors in middle income countries: a cross-sectional study of WHO-SAGE data. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0122747.
15.
Lu Y, Qin L: Healthy migrant and salmon bias hypotheses: a study of health and internal migration in China. Soc Sci Med 2014; 102: 41–48.
16.
Koster A, Penninx BW, Bosma H, et al: Socioeconomic differences in cognitive decline and the role of biomedical factors. Ann Epidemiol 2005; 15: 564–571.
17.
Tuligenga RH, Dugravot A, Tabák AG, et al: Midlife type 2 diabetes and poor glycaemic control as risk factors for cognitive decline in early old age: a post-hoc analysis of the Whitehall II cohort study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2014; 2: 228–235.
18.
Sabia S, Elbaz A, Dugravot A, et al: Impact of smoking on cognitive decline in early old age: the Whitehall II cohort study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2012; 69: 627–635.
19.
Shankar A, Hamer M: Social isolation and loneliness: relationships with cognitive function during 4 years of follow-up in the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. Psychosom med 2013; 75: 161–170.
20.
Gow AJ, Avlund K, Mortensen EL: Occupational characteristics and cognitive aging in the Glostrup 1914 cohort. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2014; 69: 228–236.
21.
Sullivan R, Kinra S, Ekelund U, et al: Socio-demographic patterning of physical activity across migrant groups in India: results from the Indian migration study. PLoS One 2011; 6:e24898.
22.
Mohan I, Gupta R, Misra A, et al: Disparities in prevalence of cardiometablic risk factors in rural, urban-poor, and urban-middle class women in India. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0149437.
23.
Zheng Y, Lamoureux EL, Ikram MK, et al: Impact of migration and acculturation on prevalence of type 2 diabetes and related eye complications in Indians living in a newly urbanised society. PLoS One 2012; 7:e34829.
24.
Ebrahim S, Kinra S, Bowen L, et al: The effect of rural-to-urban migration on obesity and diabetes in India: a cross-sectional study. PLoS Med 2010; 7:e1000268.
25.
Kinra S, Andersen E, Ben-Shlomo Y, et al: Association between urban life-years and cardiometabolic risk: the Indian migration study. Am J Epidemiol 2011; 174: 154–164.
26.
Kowal P, Chatterji S, Naidoo N, et al: Data resource profile: the World Health Organization Study on global AGEing and adult health (SAGE). Int J Epidemiol 2012; 41: 1639–1649.
27.
World Health Organization: Global Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2010, p 60.
28.
American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR), 2000.
29.
Kowal P, Ng N, Chatterji S: Social networks, health and wellbeing: evidence from SAGE. Ageing and Health: from Evidence to Policy. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2010.
30.
WHO Expert Consultation: Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet 2004; 363: 157–163.
31.
Arokiasamy P, Uttamacharya U, Jain K, et al: The impact of multimorbidity on adult physical and mental health in low- and middle-income countries: what does the study on global ageing and adult health (SAGE) reveal? BMC Med 2015; 13: 178.
32.
Lee J, McGovern ME, Bloom DE, et al: Education, gender, and state-level disparities in the health of older Indians: evidence from biomarker data. Econ Hum Biol 2015; 19: 145–156.
33.
Cagney KA, Lauderdale DS: Education, wealth, and cognitive function in later life. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2002; 57:P163–P172.
34.
Lee S, Buring JE, Cook NR, et al: The relation of education and income to cognitive function among professional women. Neuroepidemiology 2006; 26: 93–101.
35.
Fratiglioni L, Paillard-Borg S, Winblad B: An active and socially integrated lifestyle in late life might protect against dementia. Lancet Neurol 2004; 3: 343–353.
36.
Deary IJ, Corley J, Gow AJ, et al: Age-associated cognitive decline. Br Med Bull 2009; 92: 135–152.
37.
DiNapoli EA, Wu B, Scogin F: Social isolation and cognitive function in appalachian older adults. Res Aging 2014; 36: 161–179.
38.
Nguyen TT, Rist PM, Glymour MM: Are self-reported neighbourhood characteristics associated with onset of functional limitations in older adults with or without memory impairment? J Epidemiol Community Health 2016; 70: 1017–1023.
39.
Zhang Z, Gu D, Hayward MD: Early life influences on cognitive impairment among oldest old chinese. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2008; 63:S25–S33.
40.
Insel KC, Palmer RF, Stroup-Benham CA, et al: Association between change in systolic blood pressure and cognitive decline among elderly Mexican Americans: data from the Hispanic established population for epidemiology study of the elderly. Exp Aging Res 2005; 31: 35–54.
41.
Rosano C, Simonsick EM, Harris TB, et al: Association between physical and cognitive function in healthy elderly: the health, aging and body composition study. Neuroepidemiology 2005; 24: 8–14.
42.
Feng L, Ng XT, Yap P, et al: Marital status and cognitive impairment among community-dwelling Chinese older adults: the role of gender and social engagement. Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra 2014; 4: 375–384.
43.
Håkansson K, Rovio S, Helkala EL, et al: Association between mid-life marital status and cognitive function in later life: population based cohort study. BMJ 2009; 339:b2462.
44.
Bowen L, Ebrahim S, De Stavola B, et al: Dietary intake and rural-urban migration in India: a cross-sectional study. PLoS One 2011; 6:e14822.
45.
Hu FB, Li TY, Colditz GA, et al: Television watching and other sedentary behaviors in relation to risk of obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus in women. JAMA 2003; 289: 1785–1791.
46.
Mathuranath PS, Cherian PJ, Mathew R, et al: Dementia in Kerala, South India: prevalence and influence of age, education and gender. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2010; 25: 290–297.
47.
Kalaria RN, Maestre GE, Arizaga R, et al: Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia in developing countries: prevalence, management, and risk factors. Lancet Neurol 2008; 7: 812–826.
© 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel
2018
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.