An increased risk for first-degree relatives (FDR) of glioma patients has previously been observed. The novel objective of this study was to investigate differences in familial risk among FDR of low-grade glioma (LGG) and high-grade glioma (HGG) cases, respectively. Two cohorts were constructed, one from 15,321 FDR of LGG cases and the other from 26,635 FDR of HGG cases calculating standardised incidence ratios (SIR). The risk for LGG among FDR of LGG cases was significantly increased, SIR 3.65 (95% CI 2.31–5.47). The risk was even higher in the cohort of siblings, SIR 7.00 (95% CI 3.35–12.87), and especially in the younger siblings (<40 years), SIR 9.01 (95% CI 4.31–16.57). When calculating the risk for HGG in the LGG cohort and the risk for HGG in the HGG cohort, there was a generally twofold increased risk, but no trends of increased risk in relatives of younger probands. Two different methods calculating familial risk displayed similar results. LGG families apparently have features manifesting a distinct pedigree pattern with sibpairs affected at a young age. These families could provide new insights into the aetiology of glioma.

Keywords:
Familial glioma, Sibling risk, Autosomal recessive, Cohort, Primary brain tumors
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel
2002
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.