Background: The clinical and pathological heterogeneity of progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) is well established. Recent clinicopathological studies showed much more severe and more widespread tau pathology in Richardson’s syndrome (RS), clinically manifest by early onset, falls, supranuclear gaze palsy, dementia and shorter disease duration than in atypical PSP-parkinsonism (PSP-P) often mimicking Parkinson’s disease, in which tau pathology is relatively restricted to substantia nigra, subthalamic nucleus and internal globus pallidus. Objective: To perform a comparative clinicopathological study of 30 autopsy-proven cases of PSP. Methods: Retrospective assessment of major clinical signs in 18 patients referred to as RS and 12 PSP-P, and semiquantitative assessment of the severity and distribution pattern of tau pathology in both phenotypes using routine stains and immunohistochemistry. Results: RS (61% males) and PSP-P (33% males) showed significant differences in clinical symptomatology and course (RS mean duration 4.2 years, PSP-P 13.8 years) and significant differences in histopathology: widespread tau pathology and related multisystem degeneration in RS and more restricted lesions in PSP-P, which, however, were not only involving predominantly the subthalamo-nigral-pallidal system. Cortical tau pathology in both groups was usually restricted to limbic areas, and neocortical Alzheimer-type pathology was only seen in very old or demented PSP patients. Conclusions: The present study confirmed the recently reported existence of two distinct clinical phenotypes in patients with pathologically proven PSP-P and RS, showing significant differences in severity and distribution of tau pathology, the latter more severe and more widely distributed than in PSP-P.

Keywords:
Progressive supranuclear palsy, Typical/atypical phenotypes, PSP-parkinsonism, Richardson’s syndrome, Regional tau pathologies
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel
2008
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.