Background: In a phase 2a clinical trial of AN1792 (Study 201), a potential immunotherapeutic agent for use in Alzheimer’s disease (AD), approximately 6% of the treated AD patients (18/300) developed meningoencephalitis (ME). Objective: To elucidate potential immune mechanisms of treatment-induced ME. Methods: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells obtained from patients who received AN1792 were stimulated in vitro either with β-amyloid (Aβ) or various overlapping peptides of Aβ1–42, followed by quantification of cytokine-secreting cells by enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot assay. Results: A significant difference in the quality of the T-cell responses between patients in Study 201 and those in earlier studies of AN1792 was noted. T-cell responses specific to the carboxy terminus of Aβ elicited from patients’ peripheral blood mononuclear cells in an earlier multiple dose study (Study 102) were Th2 biased, while those from Study 201 were biased toward a proinflammatory Th1 response. Antibody responses in both studies were quantitatively and qualitatively similar (as determined by epitope mapping). The addition of polysorbate 80 to the formulation used in Study 201 is the most likely explanation for the difference in the T-cell response. Conclusion: ME following injection of AN1792 may be related to immune response differences driven by a formulation change. To address this, a novel peptide-carrier protein conjugate using an amino-terminal fragment of Aβ (ACC-001) has been developed to avoid potentially harmful T-cell responses, while maintaining a similar antibody response to that of AN1792. Immunotherapeutic trials using this treatment approach in AD patients are in progress.

Keywords:
Alzheimer’s disease, β-Amyloid protein, Experimental therapies, Immunotherapy, Neuroinflammation, T-cells
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel
2008
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.