Background: There is growing evidence for extramotor dysfunction (EMd) in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), with a reported prevalence of up to 52%. Objective: In the present study, we explore the clinical utility of a brief neuropsychological battery for the investigation of cognitive, behavioral, and language deficits in patients with ALS. Methods: Thirty-four consecutive ALS patients aged 44-89 years were tested with a brief neuropsychological battery, including executive, behavioral, and language measures. Patients were initially classified as EMd or non-EMd based on their scores on the frontal assessment battery (FAB). Results: Between-group comparisons revealed significant differences in all measures (p < 0.01). Discriminant analysis resulted in a single canonical function, with all tests serving as significant predictors. This function agreed with the FAB in 13 of 17 patients screened as EMd and identified extramotor deficits in 2 additional patients. Overall sensitivity and specificity estimates against FAB were 88.2%. Conclusions: We stress the importance of discriminant function analysis in clinical neuropsychological assessment and argue that the proposed neuropsychological battery may be of clinical value, especially when the option of extensive and comprehensive neuropsychological testing is limited. The psychometric validity of an ALS-frontotemporal dementia diagnosis using neuropsychological tests is also discussed.

1.
Hudson AJ: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and its association with dementia, Parkinsonism and other neurological disorders: a review. Brain 1981;104:217-247.
2.
Strong MJ, Grace GM, Orange JB, Leeper HA, Menon RS, Aere C: A prospective study of cognitive impairment in ALS. Neurology 1999;53:1665-1670.
3.
McCluskey LF, Elman LB, Martinez-Lage M, Van Deerlin V, Yuan W, Clay D, et al: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-plus syndrome with TAR DNA-binding protein-43 pathology. Arch Neurol 2009;66:121-124.
4.
Lomen-Hoerth C, Murphy J, Langmore S, Kramer JH, Olney RK, Miller B: Are amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients cognitively normal? Neurology 2003;60:1094-1097.
5.
Ringholz GM, Appel SH, Bradshaw M, Cooke NA, Mosnik DM, Schulz PE: Prevalence and patterns of cognitive impairment in sporadic ALS. Neurology 2005;65:586-590.
6.
Murphy JM, Henry RG, Langmore S, Kramer JH, Miller BL, Lomen-Hoerth C: Continuum of frontal lobe impairment in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Arch Neurol 2007;64:530-534.
7.
Ferrari R, Kapogiannis D, Huey ED, Momeni P: FTD and ALS: a tale of two diseases. Curr Alzheimer Res 2011;8:273-294.
8.
Zago S, Poletti B, Morelli C, Doretti A, Silani V: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia (ALS-FTD). Arch Ital Biol 2011;149:39-56.
9.
Elamin M, Phukan J, Bede P, Jordan N, Byrne S, Pender N, et al: Executive dysfunction is a negative prognostic indicator in patients with ALS without dementia. Neurology 2011;76:1263-1269.
10.
Olney RK, Murphy J, Forshew D, Garwood E, Miller BL, Langmore S, et al: The effects of executive and behavioral dysfunction on the course of ALS. Neurology 2005;65:1774-1777.
11.
Hu WT, Seelaar H, Josephs KA, Knopman DS, Boeve BF, Sorenson EJ, et al: Survival profiles of patients with frontotemporal dementia and motor neuron disease. Arch Neurol 2009;66:1359-1364.
12.
Moretti R, Torre P, Antonello RM, Carraro N, Cazzato G, Bava A: Complex cognitive disruption in motor neuron disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2002;14:141-150.
13.
Kilani M, Micallef J, Soubrouillard C, Rey-Lardiller D, Demattei C, Dib M, et al: A longitudinal study of the evolution of cognitive function and affective state in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Other Motor Neuron Disord 2004;5:46-54.
14.
Abrahams S, Leigh PN, Goldstein LH: Cognitive change in ALS: a prospective study. Neurology 2005;64:1222-1226.
15.
Schreiber H, Gaigalat T, Wiedemuth-Catrinescu U, Graf M, Uttner I, Muche R, et al: Cognitive function in bulbar- and spinal-onset amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a longitudinal study in 52 patients. J Neurol 2005;252:772-781.
16.
Hu WT, Shelnutt M, Wilson A, Yarab N, Kelly C, Grossman M, et al: Behavior matters - cognitive predictors of survival in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. PLoS One 2013;8:e57584.
17.
Woolley SC, York MK, Moore DH, Strutt AM, Murphy J, Schulz PE, et al: Detecting frontotemporal dysfunction in ALS: utility of the ALS Cognitive Behavioral Screen (ALS-CBS). Amyotroph Lateral Scler 2010;11:303-311.
18.
Rascovsky K, Hodges JR, Knopman D, Mendez MF, Kramer JH, Neuhaus J, et al: Sensitivity of revised diagnostic criteria for the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia. Brain 2011;134:2456-2477.
19.
Gorno-Tempini ML, Hillis AE, Weintraub S, Kertesz A, Mendez M, Cappa SF, et al: Classification of primary progressive aphasia and its variants. Neurology 2011;76:1006-1014.
20.
Grossman M: Frontotemporal dementia: a review. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2002;8:566-583.
21.
Strong MJ: The syndromes of frontotemporal dysfunction in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotroph Lateral Scler 2008;9:323-338.
22.
Neary D, Snowden JS, Mann DM, Northen B, Goulding PJ, Macdermott N: Frontal lobe dementia and motor neuron disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1990;53:23-32.
23.
Dubois B, Slachevsky A, Litvan I, Pillon B: The FAB: a frontal assessment battery at bedside. Neurology 2000;55:1621-1626.
24.
Oskarsson B, Quan D, Rollins YD, Neville HE, Ringel SP, Arciniegas DB: Using the frontal assessment battery to identify executive function impairments in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a preliminary experience. Amyotroph Lateral Scler 2010;11:244-247.
25.
Kosmidis MH, Vlahou CH, Panagiotaki P, Kiosseoglou G: The verbal fluency task in the Greek population: normative data, and clustering and switching strategies. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2004;10:164-172.
26.
Kaplan E, Goodglass H, Weintraub S: Boston Naming Test. Philadelphia, Lea & Febiger, 1983.
27.
Simos PG, Kasselimis D, Mouzaki A: Effects of demographic variables and health status on brief vocabulary measures in Greek. Aphasiology 2011;25:492-504.
28.
Simos PG, Kasselimis D, Potagas C, Evdokimidis I: Verbal comprehension ability in aphasia: demographic and lexical knowledge effects. Behav Neurol 2014;2014:258303.
29.
Dunn LM, Dunn DE: Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test - Revised. Circle Pines, American Guidance Service, 1981.
30.
Simos PG, Kasselimis D, Mouzaki A: Age, gender, and education effects on vocabulary measures in Greek. Aphasiology 2011;25:475-491.
31.
Simos PG, Kasselimis D, Mouzaki A: Effects of demographic variables and health status on brief vocabulary measures in Greek. Aphasiology 2011;25:492-504.
32.
Zoccolella S, Beghi E, Palagano G, Fraddosio A, Guerra V, Samarelli V, et al: Predictors of long survival in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a population-based study. J Neurol Sci 2008;268:28-32.
33.
Kihira T, Yoshida S, Okamoto K, Kazimoto Y, Ookawa M, Hama K, et al: Survival rate of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in Wakayama Prefecture, Japan, 1966 to 2005. J Neurol Sci 2008;268:95-101.
34.
Schreiber H, Gaigalat T, Wiedemuth-Catrinescu U, Graf M, Uttner I, Muche R, et al: Cognitive function in bulbar- and spinal- onset amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a longitudinal study in 52 patients. J Neurol 2005;252:772-781.
35.
Lillo P, Hodges JR: Cognition and behaviour in motor neurone disease. Curr Opin Neurol 2010;23:638-642.
36.
Oh SI, Park A, Kim HJ, Oh KW, Choi H, Kwon MJ, et al: Spectrum of cognitive impairment in Korean ALS patients without known genetic mutations. PLoS One 2014;9:e87163.
37.
Hu WT, Shelnutt M, Wilson A, Yarab N, Kelly C, Grossman M, et al: Behavior matters-cognitive predictors of survival in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. PLoS One 2013;8:e57584.
38.
Menke RAL, Körner S, Filippini N, Douaud G, Knight S, Talbot K, et al: Widespread grey matter pathology dominates the longitudinal cerebral MRI and clinical landscape of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Brain 2014;137:2546-2555.
39.
Byrne S, Elamin M, Bede P, Shatunov A, Walsh C, Corr B, et al: Cognitive and clinical characteristics of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis carrying a C9orf72 repeat expansion: a population-based cohort study. Lancet Neurol 2012;11:232-240.
40.
Mendez MF, Cummings JL: Dementia: A Clinical Approach. Philadelphia, Butterworth-Heinemann, 2003.
41.
Neary D, Snowden JS, Gustafson L, Passant U, Stuss D, Black S, et al: Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a consensus on clinical diagnostic criteria. Neurology 1998;51:1546-1554.
42.
Neary D, Snowden J, Mann D: Frontotemporal dementia. Lancet Neurol 2005;4:771-780.
43.
Huey ED, Goveia EN, Paviol S, Pardini M, Krueger F, Zamboni G, et al: Executive dysfunction in frontotemporal dementia and corticobasal syndrome. Neurology 2009;72:453-459.
44.
Johnson JK, Diehl J, Mendez MF, Neuhaus J, Shapira JS, Forman M, et al: Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: demographic characteristics of 353 patients. Arch Neurol 2005;62:925-930.
45.
Gorno-Tempini ML, Dronkers NF, Rankin KP, Ogar JM, Phengrasamy L, Rosen HJ, et al: Cognition and anatomy in three variants of primary progressive aphasia. Ann Neurol 2004;55:335-346.
46.
Wilson SM, Dronkers NF, Ogar JM, Jang J, Growdon ME, Agosta F, et al: Neural correlates of syntactic processing in the non-fluent variant of primary progressive aphasia. J Neurosci 2010;30:16845-16854.
47.
Bracco LTA, Lippi A, Amaducci L: Staging of mental impairment by means of discriminant analysis. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 1986;1:99-106.
48.
Maroco J, Silva D, Rodrigues A, Guerreiro M, Santana I, de Mendonca A: Data mining methods in the prediction of dementia: a real-data comparison of the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of linear discriminant analysis, logistic regression, neural networks, support vector machines, classification trees and random forests. BMC Res Notes 2011;4:299.
49.
Milan G, Lamenza F, Iavarone A, Galeone F, Lore E, de Falco C, et al: Frontal behavioural inventory in the differential diagnosis of dementia. Acta Neurol Scand 2008;117:260-265.
50.
Raaphorst J, Beeldman E, Schmand B, Berkhout J, Linssen WH, van den Berg LH, et al: The ALS-FTD-Q: a new screening tool for behavioral disturbances in ALS. Neurology 2012;79:1377-1383.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.