Although coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines exhibit diverse side effects, taste and saliva secretory disorders have remained poorly understood despite their negative impact on the overall quality of life. The present study aimed to characterize oral adverse effects following COVID-19 vaccination and assess their similarities with oral symptoms in COVID-19 patients. A literature search was conducted in databases, including PubMed, LitCovid, and Google Scholar, to retrieve relevant studies. The narrative review indicated that a certain number of vaccinated people develop ageusia, dysgeusia, hypogeusia, xerostomia, and dry mouth, while they are rare compared with COVID-19 oral symptoms. The prevalence of oral adverse effects varies by country/region and such geographical differences may be related to the type of vaccine used. Similar to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, COVID-19 vaccination adversely affects taste perception and salivary secretion in females and older subjects more frequently than in males and younger subjects. Their impairments mostly appear within 3 days of vaccination, and bitter taste is specifically impaired in some cases. Considering that oral adverse effects following COVID-19 vaccination share some characteristics with oral symptoms in COVID-19 patients, it is speculated that the spike protein derived from COVID-19 vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 infection may be pathophysiologically responsible for taste and saliva secretory disorders. This is because such spike protein has the potential to interact with ACE2 expressed on the relevant cells, produce proinflammatory cytokines, and form antiphospholipid antibodies. Our results do not deny the advantages of COVID-19 vaccination, but attention should be paid to post-vaccination oral effects in addition to COVID-19 oral symptoms.

Highlights of the Study

  • Oral adverse effects following coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination occur in a certain number of vaccinated people.

  • Post-vaccination ageusia, dysgeusia, hypogeusia, xerostomia, and dry mouth share some characteristics with oral symptoms in COVID-19 patients.

  • Spike protein derived from COVID-19 vaccination and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection may be pathophysiologically responsible for taste and saliva secretory disorders.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which first emerged in Wuhan, China, in December 2019, had spread rapidly around the world. Since then, several COVID-19 waves occurred with appearance of different variants of SARS-CoV-2, resulting in SARS-CoV-2 infections of more than 704 million people worldwide and more than 7 million deaths as of 13 April 2024 [1]. Mass vaccination is one of the primary measures to be free from the threat of deadly infection with SARS-CoV-2 and keep the spread of COVID-19 under control. Immediately after the global pandemic, energetic efforts were made to develop COVID-19 vaccines throughout the world [2]. As of 2 December 2022, there were 242 vaccine candidates and 50 approved vaccines [3]. In early December 2020, BNT162b2 vaccine was first authorized for emergency use in the UK, with the subsequent approvals or authorizations in Bahrain, Canada, Mexico, Saudi Arabia, and the USA [4]. Representative COVID-19 vaccines are mRNA vaccine from Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2, Comirnaty®) and Moderna (CX‐024414, Spikevax®), adenoviral vector vaccine from AstraZeneca (ChAdOx1-S, Vaxzervria®), Johnson & Johnson/Janssen (Ad26.COV2.S, Jcovden®), and CanSinoBIO (AD5-nCOV, Convidecia®), spike protein subunit vaccine from Novavax (NVX‐CoV2373, Nuvaxovid®), and inactivated virus vaccine from Sinovac (CoronaVac) and Sinopharm (BBIBP-CorV).

The advantage of vaccines outweighs the risk of their adverse events or side effects. However, there is increasing evidence that COVID-19 vaccines exhibit a variety of adverse effects, possibly leading to an increase in vaccination hesitancy. Besides pain at the injection site, vaccinated people suffer from fatigue, headache, myalgia, fever, nausea, vomiting, arthralgia, and chills [5], and rarely from serious events like anaphylaxis, myocarditis, thrombocytopenia, and Guillain Barré syndrome [6]. COVID-19 vaccination also has orofacial adverse effects such as Bell’s palsy, facial paralysis, face/tongue/palate swelling, and oral mucosal ulceration [7]. Drugs and medications, including vaccines, adversely affect taste perception [8] and salivary secretion [9], in which saliva secretory disorders frequently coincide with taste disorders. While oral adverse effects are rare in non-orally administered vaccines, COVID-19 vaccine recipients who are negative for reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) complained of taste alterations [10] and oral dryness [11].

Patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 develop fever, headache, cough, dyspnea, myalgia, arthralgia, fatigue, myocarditis, arrhythmia, and chemosensory disorders. Interestingly, some of them have also been observed after receiving COVID-19 vaccines. Post-vaccination adverse effects have been related to COVID-19 symptoms as reported for headache, fever, fatigue, myalgia, and arthralgia [12‒14].

Although neither taste disorders nor saliva secretory disorders are life-threatening, both of these disorders have a negative impact on the overall quality of life and can cause other health complications. However, oral adverse effects following COVID-19 vaccination have been poorly understood in contrast to post-vaccination systemic and serious events [15‒17]. Oral side effects of COVID-19 vaccines were recently investigated by two different research groups, Arabzadeh Bahri et al. [18] and Riad et al. [19‒21]. Arabzadeh Bahri et al. [18] systematically reviewed anosmia or ageusia caused by COVID-19 vaccines, but their review was limited to only 11 cases and did not include saliva secretory disorders. Riad et al. [19‒21] performed a series of excellent studies to analyze adverse events within the oral cavity following COVID-19 vaccination. It was suggested that chemosensory disorders are not limited to the course of COVID-19 but also occur after COVID-19 vaccination [18] and their pathophysiological causes may be similar to those of COVID-19 symptoms [10]. However, there have been no reports that focus on similarities and/or differences between oral adverse effects following COVID-19 vaccination and oral symptoms in COVID-19 patients.

Taste disorders (taste impairments caused by gustatory dysfunction) are composed of ageusia (complete loss of taste sense), dysgeusia (distortion or alteration of taste sense), and hypogeusia (reduced sense of taste), and saliva secretory disorders (intraoral dry conditions caused by salivary dysfunction), of xerostomia (complaint of oral dryness) and dry mouth (feeling and objective finding of oral dryness). The aim of the present study was to characterize ageusia, dysgeusia, hypogeusia, xerostomia, and dry mouth following COVID-19 vaccination, and assess their similarities with oral symptoms in COVID-19 patients which may provide some clues to speculation of the underlying pathophysiology.

A literature search was conducted in databases, including PubMed, LitCovid, and Google Scholar. There have been inconsistencies in the description of taste disorders and saliva secretory disorders in the literature. In order to avoid ambiguity in expressing oral adverse effects, “ageusia,” “dysgeusia,” “hypogeusia,” “xerostomia,” and “dry mouth” were used as keywords for retrieving relevant articles in addition to “COVID-19,” “vaccination,” and “vaccine.” Keyword combinations were categorized into two groups, the COVID-19 vaccination and taste disorder group and the COVID-19 vaccination and saliva secretory disorder group. The keywords were combined with “OR” in each group and with “AND” for oral adverse effects following COVID-19 vaccination. The articles published since January 2021 were retrieved with a cutoff date of 31 July 2024 because COVID-19 vaccine was first authorized for emergency use in December 2020. The exclusion criteria were articles not published in English, non-peer-reviewed articles, case reports, studies recruiting participants not diagnosed by RT-PCR, and studies including patients with Sjögren’s syndrome. Cited articles in the retrieved articles were further searched for additional references. Collected articles were reviewed by title, abstract, and text for relevance.

In the evaluation of the vaccine type-dependence of taste and saliva secretory disorders, their prevalence after using different types of vaccines was analyzed by one-way ANOVA and the results were expressed as mean ± SD (values of *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 considered statistically significant). Oral adverse effects associated with spike protein subunit vaccines were not subjected to the statistical analysis because their prevalence data were reported by only one study.

Taste and Saliva Secretory Disorders following COVID-19 Vaccination

COVID-19 patients are symptomatically characterized by ageusia, dysgeusia, hypogeusia, xerostomia, and/or dry mouth [22, 23], which have been referred to as one of the diagnostic criteria for COVID-19. While their prevalence is variable across studies, these oral symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 infection have a prevalence of 1–96% for taste disorders [24‒27] and 13–62% for saliva secretory disorders [25‒28].

Regarding post-vaccination oral adverse effects, the literature search yielded 374 and 75 articles for taste disorders and saliva secretory disorders, respectively. After removing duplicate articles, 243 and 41 articles remained for the initial screening of their titles and abstracts. After excluding articles meeting the exclusion criteria and not meeting the present study subject, 37 and 34 articles were selected and enrolled for evaluation of their full texts. After evaluation, 17 studies [19‒21, 29‒42] on ageusia, dysgeusia, and/or hypogeusia with a total of 108,988,864 vaccine recipients and 12 studies [19‒21, 32, 39, 41‒47] on xerostomia and/or dry mouth with a total of 2,814,320 vaccine recipients were used to characterize oral adverse effects following COVID-19 vaccination.

The narrative review indicated that COVID-19 vaccination can cause taste disorders and saliva secretory disorders, as shown in Figure 1, which was prepared by aggregating the prevalence data from the retrieved studies [19‒21, 29‒47]. Overall mean prevalence (±SD) was calculated to be 0.310 ± 0.355% for ageusia, 0.288 ± 3.984% for dysgeusia, 0.022 ± 1.307% for hypogeusia, 2.058 ± 4.448% for xerostomia, and 0.239 ± 2.399% for dry mouth. Oral adverse effects following COVID-19 vaccination are considered to occur in a certain number of vaccinated people, while they are rare compared with oral symptoms in COVID-19 patients. Vaccine recipients in the same cohort develop both taste disorders (a total of 5,732 reports by the recipients) and saliva secretory disorders (2,487), both dysgeusia (98) and xerostomia (69), or both dysgeusia (5,273) and dry mouth (2,418) [19, 21, 32, 39, 41, 42], indicating that impairments of taste perception and salivary secretion occur almost simultaneously after COVID-19 vaccination. High standard deviation values in the calculated prevalence suggest the possibility that the occurrence of taste and saliva secretory disorders is determined by some factors associated with COVID-19 vaccines and/or vaccine recipients. As observed in seasonal influenza vaccines [48], oral adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccines are presumed to differ by country/region, gender/sex, age (younger or older), vaccine type, vaccine manufacturer/brand, and vaccine dose [49, 50].

Fig. 1.

Prevalence of taste disorders and saliva secretory disorders following COVID-19 vaccination.

Fig. 1.

Prevalence of taste disorders and saliva secretory disorders following COVID-19 vaccination.

Close modal

Geographical Difference

Oral adverse effects following COVID-19 vaccination were found to vary by country or region as shown by their prevalence in individual countries or regions in Figure 2, which was prepared as a box-and-whisker plot by using the available data on ageusia, dysgeusia, and/or hypogeusia [19‒21, 29‒42] and on xerostomia and/or dry mouth [19‒21, 32, 39, 41‒47]. Compared with the European region, the prevalence of ageusia is higher in Saudi Arabia and India (Fig. 2a). Dysgeusia is most prevalent in Pakistan, followed by India, Poland, Germany, and Turkey (Fig. 2b). India has a high prevalence of hypogeusia (Fig. 2c). Xerostomia and dry mouth are particularly prevalent in Pakistan (Fig. 2d) and China (Fig. 2e), respectively.

Fig. 2.

Prevalence of post-vaccination taste and saliva secretory disorders varying by country or region. Ageusia (a), dysgeusia (b), hypogeusia (c), xerostomia (d), and dry mouth (e).

Fig. 2.

Prevalence of post-vaccination taste and saliva secretory disorders varying by country or region. Ageusia (a), dysgeusia (b), hypogeusia (c), xerostomia (d), and dry mouth (e).

Close modal

Similar to post-vaccination oral effects, oral symptoms in COVID-19 patients show a geographical difference in taste disorders that their prevalence is 48–62% in Europe (Italy, France, Spain, Germany, Switzerland, the UK, Denmark, Sweden, and Poland), 59–63% in North America (the USA and Canada), 76% in South America (Brazil), 4–13% in East Asia (China, Japan, South Korea, and Singapore), and 39–40% in the Middle East (Iran, Israel, Turkey, and Qatar) [24, 51]. In the European region, the prevalence of dysgeusia is highest in Belgium, followed by the UK, Italy, Germany, Poland, and France [51]. When comparing chemosensory dysfunction between different countries, the rates of ageusia and anosmia in Western countries, including the UK, Italy, France, Spain, Germany, and the USA, were higher than those in East Asian countries including China, Japan, South Korea, Singapore, and India (60.9% vs. 15.8%) [52]. A systematic review and meta-analysis indicated an ethnic difference in COVID-19 symptoms that Caucasians have three times the higher prevalence of gustatory and olfactory dysfunctions than Asians (54.8% vs. 17.7%) [53]. During the acute phase of SARS-CoV-2 infection, xerostomia and dry mouth were reported in 46% of Chinese patients, 30–46% of Italian patients, 56–62% of Israeli patients, and 60% of Iranian patients [28], respectively. Such geographical differences have been speculated to occur due to genetic variation in the patients [22]. There is variability in genes encoding angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) and transmembrane serine protease 2 (TMPRSS2) responsible for the entry of SARS-CoV-2 into host cells [54] as distinguished between European and Asian populations [55, 56]. However, geographical characteristics of oral symptoms in COVID-19 patients are not necessarily consistent with those of oral adverse effects following COVID-19 vaccination, which are not attributable to an ethnic or racial difference, but to other factors relating to vaccination.

Vaccine Type Difference

Different types of COVID-19 vaccines have been used in the world, including mRNA vaccine, adenoviral vector vaccine, spike protein subunit vaccine, and inactivated virus vaccine. The incidence and risk of side effects following COVID-19 vaccination have been suggested to depend on the type of vaccine [57, 58], which is associated with the severity of side effects of vaccines [59]. Oral adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccines are related to their types as shown in Figure 3, which was prepared by statistically processing the prevalence data of each vaccine type on ageusia, dysgeusia, and/or hypogeusia [19‒21, 29‒42] and on xerostomia and/or dry mouth [19‒21, 32, 39, 41‒47]. Taste disorders, particularly dysgeusia, occur depending on the type of vaccine (Fig. 3a). The prevalence of dysgeusia is highest in inactivated virus vaccine, followed by adenoviral vector vaccine and mRNA vaccine. Saliva secretory disorders also depend on the type of vaccine (Fig. 3b). The prevalence of xerostomia is highest in inactivated virus vaccine, followed by adenoviral vector vaccine and mRNA vaccine. Dry mouth is more prevalent in adenoviral vector vaccines than other types of vaccines. Therefore, it is considered that inactivated virus vaccine and adenoviral vector vaccine cause taste and saliva secretory disorders more frequently compared with mRNA vaccine.

Fig. 3.

Prevalence of post-vaccination taste disorders (a) and saliva secretory disorders (b) compared between different types of COVID-19 vaccines. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 compared with a different type of vaccine. mRNA, mRNA vaccine; Vector, adenoviral vector vaccine; Subunit, spike protein subunit vaccine; Inactivated, inactivated virus vaccine.

Fig. 3.

Prevalence of post-vaccination taste disorders (a) and saliva secretory disorders (b) compared between different types of COVID-19 vaccines. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 compared with a different type of vaccine. mRNA, mRNA vaccine; Vector, adenoviral vector vaccine; Subunit, spike protein subunit vaccine; Inactivated, inactivated virus vaccine.

Close modal

Usage rates (in percentage) of different types of COVID-19 vaccines in individual countries are shown in Figure 4 with those in the world (Fig. 4a) and Europe (Fig. 4b), which was prepared by using the rate reported for each country or region [19‒21, 29‒47]. The mRNA vaccines have been exclusively used in Czech (Fig. 4f), Slovakia (Fig. 4g), and Mexico (Fig. 4i). These countries show lower prevalence of dysgeusia and xerostomia (Fig. 2). Among other countries, the usage rate of mRNA vaccines is 93.12% in the USA (Fig. 4h), 79.13% in Germany (Fig. 4d), 75.71% in Poland (Fig. 4e), 64.33% in Australia (Fig. 4j), and 46.85% in the UK (Fig. 4c). Taste and saliva secretory disorders are not necessarily prevalent in the USA and Australia (Fig. 2). Besides mRNA vaccines, adenoviral vector vaccines have been used in Germany (Fig. 4d), Poland (Fig. 4e), and Saudi Arabia (Fig. 4k). Dysgeusia is more prevalent in Germany and Poland than in the UK, and ageusia is most prevalent in Saudi Arabia (Fig. 2). The usage rate of inactivated virus vaccines is 90.81% in China (Fig. 4o) and 69.63% in Pakistan (Fig. 4m). Adenoviral vector vaccines have been additionally used in these countries. Dry mouth is particularly prevalent in China and dysgeusia and xerostomia are most prevalent in Pakistan (Fig. 2). Inactivated virus vaccines have been exclusively used in Turkey (Fig. 4l), where the prevalence of dysgeusia is relatively high (Fig. 2). The usage rate of adenoviral vector vaccines and inactivated virus vaccines in India is 95.26% and 4.40%, respectively (Fig. 4n). India is characterized by the most prevalent hypogeusia and by considerably prevalent ageusia and dysgeusia (Fig. 2).

Fig. 4.

Usage rates (in percentage) of different types of COVID-19 vaccines in individual countries. World (a), Europe (b), the UK (c), Germany (d), Poland (e), Czech (f), Slovakia (g), the USA (h), Mexico (i), Australia (j), Saudi Arabia (k), Turkey (l), Pakistan (m), India (n), and China (o). mRNA, mRNA vaccine; Vector, adenoviral vector vaccine; Subunit, spike protein subunit vaccine; Inactivated, inactivated virus vaccine.

Fig. 4.

Usage rates (in percentage) of different types of COVID-19 vaccines in individual countries. World (a), Europe (b), the UK (c), Germany (d), Poland (e), Czech (f), Slovakia (g), the USA (h), Mexico (i), Australia (j), Saudi Arabia (k), Turkey (l), Pakistan (m), India (n), and China (o). mRNA, mRNA vaccine; Vector, adenoviral vector vaccine; Subunit, spike protein subunit vaccine; Inactivated, inactivated virus vaccine.

Close modal

The occurrence of post-vaccination taste and saliva secretory disorders is influenced by the type of vaccine as shown in Figure 5, which was prepared based on their prevalence data for Europe [20], the UK [30], Germany [41], and Poland [39]. Dysgeusia and xerostomia are more prevalent in adenoviral vector vaccines compared with mRNA vaccines, supporting the vaccine type-dependence of oral adverse effects following COVID-19 vaccination.

Fig. 5.

Comparison of prevalence of post-vaccination taste and saliva secretory disorders between different types of COVID-19 vaccines used in Europe, the UK, Germany, and Poland. mRNA, mRNA vaccine; Vector, adenoviral vector vaccine; Subunit, spike protein subunit vaccine; Inactivated, inactivated virus vaccine.

Fig. 5.

Comparison of prevalence of post-vaccination taste and saliva secretory disorders between different types of COVID-19 vaccines used in Europe, the UK, Germany, and Poland. mRNA, mRNA vaccine; Vector, adenoviral vector vaccine; Subunit, spike protein subunit vaccine; Inactivated, inactivated virus vaccine.

Close modal

Not only the type but also the manufacture or brand of COVID-19 vaccines may be related to post-vaccination oral adverse effects. The mRNA vaccines and adenoviral vector vaccines were compared between Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna and between AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson/Janssen, respectively, by using the available prevalence data on taste and saliva secretory disorders in the world [38], Europe [20], the USA [19], and Australia [21]. Ageusia, dysgeusia, and dry mouth were reported by 0.381%, 0.500%, and 0.212% of Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine recipients (a total of 1,562,325), whereas reported by 0.443%, 0.386%, and 0.220% of Moderna vaccine recipients (685,303). Ageusia, dysgeusia, and dry mouth were reported by 0.360%, 0.436%, and 0.311% of AstraZeneca vaccine recipients (525,833), whereas reported by 0.270%, 0.241%, and 0.153% of Johnson & Johnson/Janssen vaccine recipients (69,259). The brand of vaccines seems to influence the incident rates of oral adverse effects following COVID-19 vaccination.

Gender Difference

Chemosensory dysfunction of COVID-19 patients depends on whether they are male or female [53]. A gender difference is observed in oral symptoms in COVID-19 patients as the pooled prevalence of taste disorders is 53–64% in female patients but 25–40% in male patients [22]. Regarding COVID-19 saliva secretory disorders, xerostomia and dry mouth were reported by 63% of female patients but by 48% of male patients [24]. A cross-sectional analysis of COVID-19 patients indicated that the relative prevalence in females and males is 59% vs. 48% for ageusia and 24% vs. 18% for xerostomia [60].

Gender differences in oral adverse effects following COVID-19 vaccination and in oral symptoms in COVID-19 patients are shown in Figure 6. Relative prevalence of post-vaccination taste and saliva secretory disorders is higher in female vaccine recipients than in male vaccine recipients, as shown in Figure 6a, which was prepared by using the available data on mRNA or adenoviral vector vaccine administration in various countries [19‒21, 31, 39]. Vaccinated women mostly develop ageusia, dysgeusia, xerostomia, and dry mouth more frequently compared with vaccinated men. Relative prevalence of oral symptoms is higher in female COVID-19 patients than male COVID-19 patients as shown in Figure 4b, which was prepared by using the available data of various countries [60‒70]. When infected with SARS-CoV-2, women are more likely to develop ageusia, dysgeusia, xerostomia, and dry mouth than men. Similar to oral symptoms in COVID-19 patients, a gender difference is referred to as one of the characteristics of oral adverse effects following COVID-19 vaccination.

Fig. 6.

Relative prevalence (in percentage) of taste and saliva secretory disorders in female and male COVID-19 vaccine recipients of various countries (a) and in female and male COVID-19 patients of various countries (b).

Fig. 6.

Relative prevalence (in percentage) of taste and saliva secretory disorders in female and male COVID-19 vaccine recipients of various countries (a) and in female and male COVID-19 patients of various countries (b).

Close modal

It has been suggested that women have a higher expression of ACE2 responsible for the cellular entry of SARS-CoV-2 than men, which may be related to either the sex hormones or the sex chromosomes [71]. Different prevalence of taste and saliva secretory disorders between females and males may be due to a gender difference in ACE2 expression in addition to that in the perception of taste [72] and the incidence of xerostomia [73].

Age-Related Difference

Neurological and otolaryngological symptoms associated with COVID-19 depend on the age of patients [62, 74]. Age-related differences in oral adverse effects following COVID-19 vaccination and in oral symptoms in COVID-19 patients are shown in Figure 7. Vaccine recipients and patients were divided into two groups: the younger group (mostly ≤17 years old) and the older group (mostly ≥18 years old). Relative prevalence of post-vaccination taste and saliva secretory disorders is higher in older vaccine recipients than in younger vaccine recipients, as shown in Figure 7a, which was prepared by using the available data on mRNA or adenoviral vector vaccine administration of various countries [19‒21, 39]. Ageusia, dysgeusia, hypogeusia, xerostomia, and dry mouth are mostly more prevalent with increasing age. Relative prevalence of oral symptoms is higher in older COVID-19 patients than younger COVID-19 patients as shown in Figure 4b, which was prepared by using the available data from various countries [61, 62, 64, 65, 75‒77]. When infected with SARS-CoV-2, older patients mostly develop ageusia, dysgeusia, and dry mouth more frequently than younger patients. Similar to oral symptoms in COVID-19 patients, an age-related difference is referred to as one of the characteristics of oral adverse effects following COVID-19 vaccination.

Fig. 7.

Relative prevalence (in percentage) of taste and saliva secretory disorders in younger and older COVID-19 vaccine recipients of various countries (a) and in younger and older COVID-19 patients of various countries (b).

Fig. 7.

Relative prevalence (in percentage) of taste and saliva secretory disorders in younger and older COVID-19 vaccine recipients of various countries (a) and in younger and older COVID-19 patients of various countries (b).

Close modal

Old age per se is closely associated with alterations in taste sense because taste detection thresholds increase with age and taste perception at supra-threshold levels is reduced in older adults [78]. Salivary secretin decreases with age and xerostomia occurs more frequently with increasing age [73]. A comparative study indicated that age is a risk factor for causing xerostomia [79]. Decreased salivary secretion not only produces oral dryness but also impairs taste perception [80]. These age-dependent features are consistent with age-related characteristics of oral adverse effects following COVID-19 vaccination.

Onset and Persistence

Onset and persistence time of ageusia or dysgeusia are shown in Figure 8, which was prepared by aggregating the available data on taste disorders following COVID-19 vaccination [31, 33‒35] and in COVID-19 patients [60, 76, 81‒92]. Onset time (mean ± SD) was estimated to be 3.91 ± 2.12 days for vaccination and 3.58 ± 0.83 days for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Post-vaccination side effects mostly appear within the first week after injections of mRNA vaccines and adenoviral vector vaccines [41]. COVID-19 vaccine recipients experience taste alterations within 3 days after receiving vaccines [35] and most of them develop ageusia and dysgeusia within 1 week [18]. Persistence time (mean ± SD) was estimated to be 9.28 ± 10.47 days for vaccination and 28.83 ± 41.28 days for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Taste disorders are likely to last for a longer time in COVID-19 patients compared with vaccinated people. It was previously reported that ageusia and dysgeusia persist in 1–45% of COVID-19 survivors at follow-ups of 21–365 days [27]. In contrast to taste disorders, there have been no studies on the onset and persistence of saliva secretory disorders following COVID-19 vaccination in the literature.

Fig. 8.

Onset and persistence time of ageusia or dysgeusia following COVID-19 vaccination and in COVID-19 patients.

Fig. 8.

Onset and persistence time of ageusia or dysgeusia following COVID-19 vaccination and in COVID-19 patients.

Close modal

Specific Taste Disorder

Five basic tastes (sweet, bitter, umami, sour, and salty taste) are perceived by distinct taste-receptor cells within taste buds that are embedded in the epithelia of the tongue, palate, and epiglottis. Because taste receptors specifically interact with salty, sweet, sour, bitter and umami tastants [93], gustatory dysfunction qualitatively includes more severe impairment of specific taste. The specific taste disorder following COVID-19 vaccination has been suggested by a study by Mythri et al. [33] to investigate adverse oral effects in Indian people who received AstraZeneca vaccines. While taste disorders occurred in vaccine recipients, the prevalence of bitter and salty taste impairment was 20.0% and 15.0%, respectively.

Rogn et al. [94] objectively assessed specific taste disorders in Norwegian COVID-19 patients by using taste strips impregnated with solutions of four different taste qualities. They demonstrated that ageusia of bitter taste has the highest prevalence (66.7%), followed by ageusia of salty taste (37.0%), sour taste (33.3%), and sweet taste (3.7%). In a comparative study of Abalo-Lojo et al. [95], 75.7% of Spanish COVID-19 patients reported complete taste loss, in which the prevalence of ageusia of bitter, salty, and sweet taste was 8.1%, 4.1%, and 1.4%, respectively. However, Jordanian COVID-19 patients reported that salty taste is most frequently distorted, followed by sour, sweet, and bitter tastes [96]. Japanese COVID-19 patients developed multiple types of taste disorders, in which ageusia/hypogeusia of salty and umami taste had higher prevalence [97]. Although the number of relevant studies is limited, taste disorders following COVID-19 vaccination [33] and in COVID-19 patients [94, 95] may be characterized by bitter taste impaired more severely.

Vaccine Dose

Adverse events of COVID-19 vaccines are related to the dose of vaccination [49]. When Korean healthcare workers received both doses of Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines, the rates of myalgia, fatigue, headache, chills, and fever were higher after the second dose than the first dose [98]. In Italian healthcare workers who received mRNA vaccines, pain at the injection site, fever, fatigue, and headache appeared more frequently after the second dose compared with the first dose [99]. Japanese people vaccinated with mRNA vaccines developed fever, headache, and chills that were more prevalent after the second dose than after the first dose [100]. When Taiwanese people received AstraZeneca and Moderna vaccines, 79% of them reported at least one adverse effect after the first dose, 50% after the second dose, and 84% after the third dose [101].

Riad et al. [19] retrospectively analyzed the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) to assess oral adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination. It was demonstrated that their prevalence after the first, the second, and the third dose were 0.687%, 0.826%, and 0.429% for ageusia; 0.736%, 0.476%, and 0.228% for dysgeusia; and 0.346%, 0.255%, and 0.127% for dry mouth; respectively. In an online survey-based cross-sectional study conducted in Pakistan, inactivated virus vaccines caused adverse effects (including dysgeusia) more frequently after the first dose than the second dose [32]. Although taste and saliva secretory disorders are likely to depend on the COVID-19 vaccine dose, whether their occurrence increases or decreases in the second and the third dose remains inconclusive.

Comorbidity and Prior SARS-CoV-2 Infection

COVID-19 patients with clinical manifestations frequently have hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and chronic pulmonary, thyroid, and/or kidney disease [24, 102‒104]. When having diabetes mellitus or hypertension, the patients develop not only more severe respiratory and constitutional symptoms but also more prevalent ageusia, hypogeusia, and xerostomia [105, 106].

After receiving Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines [107], AstraZeneca vaccines [108], and CanSinoBIO vaccines [109], the vaccine recipients with diabetes mellitus and hypertension suffered from systemic and local adverse effects more frequently than ones without any comorbidities. The occurrence of oral adverse effects following COVID-19 vaccination may be influenced by whether comorbid diseases are present or absent. In the literature, however, there have been no studies to compare post-vaccination taste and saliva secretory disorders between vaccinated people with and without comorbidity.

Having had COVID-19 before vaccination is a risk factor for increasing side effects of vaccines [59]. Alsaiari et al. [31] compared COVID-19 vaccine-induced adverse effects between vaccine recipients with different medical histories in a cross-sectional study including 2,718 Saidi Arabian participants. The prevalence of ageusia was 1.679% and 0.377% in vaccinated subjects with and without prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, respectively, suggesting that COVID-19 before vaccination enhances the risk of taste disorders following vaccination. Such enhancement may be explained as follows. COVID-19 taste disorders last for a long time in patients who have recovered from COVID-19 [110], and ageusia and dysgeusia can persist in COVID-19 survivors up to 1 year after recovery from the disease [27]. Viral shedding has been observed for an extended period after SARS-CoV-2 infection [111]. COVID-19 patients show viral RNA-positivity during and after the recovery period [112]. The virus remaining in vaccinated people who were previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 would contribute to oral adverse effects following COVID-19 vaccination. COVID-19 patients are symptomatically characterized by gustatory dysfunction [22, 23], which has been closely related to the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection and prediction of PCR swab positivity [113]. The increased awareness of ageusia or dysgeusia as COVID-19 symptoms may also make it easier to recognize taste alterations after receiving COVID-19 vaccines, possibly resulting in an increase in the prevalence of taste disorders.

Comparison between COVID-19 and Non-COVID-19 Vaccines

Post-vaccination oral adverse effects raise the question of whether their prevalence is different between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 vaccines. Riad et al. [19] evaluated more than 100 adverse events within the oral cavity following COVID-19 or seasonal influenza vaccination. The events reported by recipients of different vaccines in the USA were cross-tabulated to assess their relative prevalence. Although the distribution pattern of the most reported events was similar for both vaccines, the prevalence of taste and saliva secretory disorders were higher in COVID-19 vaccination than influenza vaccination. Riad et al. [21] also analyzed 84 oral adverse events associated with COVID-19 and influenza vaccines by using the Australian Database of Adverse Event Notifications. Their results revealed that taste and saliva secretory disorders are more common after COVID-19 vaccination compared with influenza vaccination, while most oral adverse events were shared by COVID-19 and influenza vaccine recipients. Gallagher et al. [114] recently compared the rates of smell and taste changes after receiving COVID-19 vaccines with those after receiving several other vaccines. In contrast to the studies of Riad et al. [19, 21], smell and taste were less likely to be disturbed by COVID-19 vaccination (first and booster) than influenza, tetanus, diphtheria, pertussis, and pneumococcal vaccination.

Overview of Oral Adverse Effects following COVID-19 Vaccination

Characteristics of ageusia, dysgeusia, hypogeusia, xerostomia, and dry mouth following COVID-19 vaccination are summarized in Table 1. They have some similarities to oral symptoms in COVID-19 patients.

Table 1.

Characteristics of oral adverse effects following COVID-19 vaccination

Oral adverse effectsRelative prevalenceTo oral symptoms in COVID-19 patients
Ageusia Saudi Arabia > India > European countries  
Dysgeusia Pakistan > India > Poland > Germany > Turkey  
Hypogeusia Most prevalent in India  
Xerostomia Most prevalent in Pakistan  
Dry mouth Particularly prevalent in China  
Dysgeusia Inactivated > Vector > mRNA, Subunit  
Xerostomia Inactivated > Vector > mRNA  
Dry mouth Vector > mRNA, Inactivated, Subunit  
Ageusia Female > male Similar 
Dysgeusia Female > male Similar 
Xerostomia Female > male Similar 
Dry mouth Female > male Similar 
Ageusia Older > younger Similar 
Dysgeusia Older > younger Similar 
Dry mouth Older > younger Similar 
Onset time of ageusia or dysgeusia 3.91±2.12 days Similar 
Persistence time of ageusia or dysgeusia 9.28±10.47 days  
Specific taste disorder Bitter > salty Similar in some cases 
Ageusia The 2nd dose > the 1st dose > the 3rd dose  
Dysgeusia The 1st dose > the 2nd dose > the 3rd dose  
Dry mouth The 1st dose > the 2nd dose > the 3rd dose  
Ageusia With prior SARS-CoV-2 infection > without prior SARS-CoV-2 infection  
Oral adverse effectsRelative prevalenceTo oral symptoms in COVID-19 patients
Ageusia Saudi Arabia > India > European countries  
Dysgeusia Pakistan > India > Poland > Germany > Turkey  
Hypogeusia Most prevalent in India  
Xerostomia Most prevalent in Pakistan  
Dry mouth Particularly prevalent in China  
Dysgeusia Inactivated > Vector > mRNA, Subunit  
Xerostomia Inactivated > Vector > mRNA  
Dry mouth Vector > mRNA, Inactivated, Subunit  
Ageusia Female > male Similar 
Dysgeusia Female > male Similar 
Xerostomia Female > male Similar 
Dry mouth Female > male Similar 
Ageusia Older > younger Similar 
Dysgeusia Older > younger Similar 
Dry mouth Older > younger Similar 
Onset time of ageusia or dysgeusia 3.91±2.12 days Similar 
Persistence time of ageusia or dysgeusia 9.28±10.47 days  
Specific taste disorder Bitter > salty Similar in some cases 
Ageusia The 2nd dose > the 1st dose > the 3rd dose  
Dysgeusia The 1st dose > the 2nd dose > the 3rd dose  
Dry mouth The 1st dose > the 2nd dose > the 3rd dose  
Ageusia With prior SARS-CoV-2 infection > without prior SARS-CoV-2 infection  

mRNA, mRNA vaccine; Vector, adenoviral vector vaccine; Subunit, spike protein subunit vaccine; Inactivated, inactivated virus vaccine.

It is important for discussing oral adverse effects following COVID-19 vaccination to know their general incidence rate. Post-vaccination taste and saliva secretory disorders occur depending on many factors such as geographical difference, the type of vaccine, gender, age, vaccine dose, and medical history. Their prevalence in the general population is unlikely to be obtained from single-country or small cohort studies with a limited number of vaccinated subjects. A large-scale population-based survey or a worldwide cohort study may provide an estimate of the population-level prevalence. In a retrospective analysis using the VAERS data [19], a total of 690,853 reports from COVID-19 vaccine recipients in the USA indicated an overall prevalence of 0.722% for ageusia, 0.617% for dysgeusia, 0.020% for hypogeusia, and 0.301% for dry mouth. As a result of analysis of the European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Pharmacovigilance database [20], oral adverse effects following a total of 895,572,629 COVID-19 vaccinations in 32 European countries showed an overall prevalence of 0.296% for ageusia, 0.381% for dysgeusia, and 0.215% for dry mouth.

Spike Protein Derived from COVID-19 Vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 Infection

For SARS-CoV-2 to enter human cells, its spike protein binds to the cellular receptor ACE2 through a receptor-binding domain (RBD), followed by fusion between viral and cellular membranes mediated by TMPRSS2. The spike protein consists of two subunits, S1 subunit containing RBD and S2 subunit responsible for the membrane fusion [115]. Whole spike protein, S1 and S2 subunits, and RBD play critical roles as multiple antigens in the antibody responses induced by SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 vaccination.

Spike protein-encoding mRNA vaccines produce the spike protein in immunocompetent cells to enhance anti-SARS-CoV-2 immune responses. Tissue-resident and blood circulating immune cells, which are attracted to the injection site and regional lymph nodes, translate the vaccine-derived mRNA into the recombinant spike protein [116]. Adenoviral vector vaccines offer a platform to deliver the viral antigen, in which non-replicating adenovirus carries DNA encoding the spike protein into the nucleus [117]. Spike protein subunit vaccines contain the recombinant SARS-CoV-2 spike protein to elicit humoral and cellular immunity [118]. They can be a platform with high immunogenicity to neutralize SARS-CoV-2 variants. For inactivated virus vaccines, RBD on SARS-CoV-2 spike protein is an antigenic determinant for neutralizing antibodies. They are able to induce high titers of antibodies specific for the spike protein [119].

No matter whether it is derived from SARS-CoV-2 infection or COVID-19 vaccination, the spike protein could be a pathogenic factor for taste and saliva secretory disorders. Trougakos et al. [120] hypothesized that COVID-19 vaccine-mediating adverse effects are due to the vaccination-induced antigenic spike protein that has functionality as a ligand for ACE2 receptors and the molecular mimicry with human proteins. The following pathophysiological speculations focus on the spike protein’s potential to interact with ACE2, produce proinflammatory cytokines, and form antiphospholipid antibodies.

Spike Protein to Interact with ACE2

If vaccination-derived spike proteins enter the circulation to be distributed to cells and tissues of interest, they may participate in functional impairments of the susceptible target cells. Ogata et al. [121] measured SARS-CoV-2 proteins in blood collected from subjects without prior SARS-CoV-2 infection who received two doses of mRNA vaccines. They confirmed that S1 subunit antigen and spike protein antigen are produced by vaccination and that the S1 antigen is detected as early as 1 day after the first vaccine injection and the spike protein is detectable for 15 days. Free-floating spike proteins and their subunits are expected to interact with ACE2 receptors expressed in various cells and tissues [119]. When spike peptides (including S1 full length subunit) were intravenously injected into mice, the S1 subunit was found to co-localize in the endothelial cells of brain microvessels with ACE2, interleukin-6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) [122].

Each taste bud is composed of 50–100 taste receptor cells that have three distinct types to perceive five basic tastes: type I cells for salty taste, type II cells for sweet, bitter, and umami taste, and type III cells for sour taste. ACE2 is abundantly distributed in human taste buds containing taste receptor cells [123]. It was found that not only ACE2 is expressed on the type II taste receptor cells within the taste buds of COVID-19 patients with taste disorders but also replicating SARS-CoV-2 is present in taste buds and type II taste receptor cells of COVID-19 patients [124]. In addition, ACE2 was reported to be distributed in ductal, acinar, and myoepithelial cells of human salivary glands [123] and co-localizes with TMPRSS2 [125]. ACE2 is also expressed in human major and minor salivary glands [126]. Matuck et al. [127] conducted postmortem biopsies of the salivary glands of patients who died of COVID-19 and the following RT-PCR, ultrastructural, and immunochemical analyses. They demonstrated not only the infection and replication of SARS-CoV-2 in parotid, submandibular, and minor salivary glands, but also the high expression of ACE2 in ductal epithelial cells and serous acinar cells of these salivary glands.

Given the fact that ACE2 is expressed in taste buds and salivary glands and SARS-CoV-2 is able to replicate in both of them, the virus could target taste receptor cells and salivary gland cells to impair their physiological functions by cytopathic effects [128]. ACE2 has also been suggested to regulate taste perception as exemplified in gustatory side effects of ACE2 inhibitors [129]. As well as SARS-CoV-2 infection-derived spike protein, COVID-19 vaccination-derived spike protein (and subunits) is considered to interact with ACE2 expressed on cells relevant to taste perception and salivary secretion to affect them adversely. The co-localization of ACE2 in taste buds and salivary glands is consistent with the simultaneous occurrence of taste disorders and saliva secretory disorders following COVID-19 vaccination.

Females have higher expression of ACE2 in different tissues compared with males [130]. Because ACE2 expression is upregulated by estrogen and the gene encoding ACE2 is located on X chromosome, ACE2 should be over-expressed in females [131]. The interaction between spike protein and ACE2 would be greater in vaccinated women than vaccinated men, producing a gender difference in taste and saliva secretory disorders.

Expression levels of ACE2 in oral mucosal tissues are higher in elderly COVID-19 patients than younger COVID-19 patients [132]. ACE2 is expressed in oral tissues (tongue and salivary gland) more highly in the elderly group (41–70 years old) than the younger group (18–40 years old) [133]. The interaction between spike protein and ACE2 would be greater with aging, being consistent with an age-related difference in taste and saliva secretory disorders.

In some cases, the impairment of bitter taste is more prevalent in both vaccine recipients [33] and COVID-19 patients [94, 95]. Bitter taste is mediated by type II taste cells, in which not only ACE2 is expressed but also SARS-CoV-2 can replicate [124]. The vaccination-derived spike protein is presumed to preferentially affect ACE2-expressing type II taste receptor cells to produce the disorder specific to bitter taste.

If spike protein and subunits are closely associated with the impairment of taste perception, their post-vaccination appearance and presence should correlate with the onset and persistence of taste disorders. Antigenic spike protein and S1 subunit are detected in the blood as early as 1 day after the first vaccine dose and are detectable for at least 15 days [121]. Ageusia and dysgeusia appear within 3 days following COVID-19 vaccination, and they last for more than 1 week.

Spike Protein to Produce Proinflammatory Cytokines

Taste disorders [134] and saliva secretory disorders [135] are commonly due to inflammation. Cytokines are detected in the blood of patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 and the cytokine storm is associated with COVID-19 severity [136]. Proinflammatory cytokines are also over-expressed in COVID-19 patients [137]. Because taste receptor cells are vulnerable to inflammation, their functions can be adversely affected by IL-6 and TNF-α [138]. When mice were experimentally infected with SARS-CoV-2, strong immunoreactions of TNF-α and IL-1β were detected in salivary glands [139], suggesting the possibility that excessive inflammatory responses cause saliva secretory disorders.

Nakayama et al. [140] administered mRNA vaccines to mice and collected muscle tissues on days 0–7 and 2–4 weeks after the first dose, and found the production of TNF-α and IL‐6 in tissue samples on day 1. Ostrowski et al. [141] determined proinflammatory cytokines in human blood 8–16 days after COVID-19 vaccination. Both mRNA and adenoviral vector vaccines increased IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, and TNF-α immediately after their injections, while adenoviral vector vaccines produced a larger increase in these cytokines than mRNA vaccines. These results are consistent with the vaccine type-dependent characteristics of oral adverse effects that dysgeusia, xerostomia, and dry mouth are more prevalent in adenoviral vector vaccine recipients than mRNA vaccine recipients.

SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins interact with ACE2 receptors to trigger several molecular processes in the virally infected cells with the resultant production of IL-6 and other proinflammatory cytokines [142]. Human lung epithelial cells produce IL-6, IL-1β, and TNF-α in response to SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins [143]. Montezano et al. [144] addressed the question of whether the interaction between SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and ACE2 receptor causes inflammation by exposing human endothelial cells to the spike protein and S1 subunit. They confirmed that the S1 subunit enhances IL-6 production and causes endothelial inflammation via ACE2. The spike protein and subunits derived from COVID-19 vaccination are considered to produce proinflammatory cytokines with the subsequent inflammation in taste receptor cells and salivary gland cells, resulting in their functional impairments.

Spike Protein to Form Antiphospholipid Antibodies

Infections with human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis virus, and adenovirus are accompanied by an increase in antiphospholipid antibodies [145]. Xiao et al. [146] reported that antiphospholipid antibodies are detected in the blood of patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. COVID-19 patients show positivity for antiphospholipid antibodies, which is variable depending on the severity of the disease [147]. Interestingly, antiphospholipid antibodies are closely associated with not only viral infection but also vaccination [148, 149]. Anti-cardiolipin IgG antibodies are increased in the blood by both COVID-19 vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 infection [150]. When serum antiphospholipid antibody titers were measured before and after administration of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, post-vaccination antibody titers targeting phosphatidylethanolamine were significantly increased compared with pre-vaccination [151].

Antiphospholipid syndrome characterized by the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies shares pathophysiological features with COVID-19 symptoms [152]. Ageusia was reported to occur in antiphospholipid syndrome [153] and dry mouth is included in the clinical presentations of antiphospholipid antibodies [154]. SARS-CoV-2 spike protein S1 and S2 subunits form a phospholipid-like epitope and the cross-reactivity between the spike protein and phospholipids has been presumed for antiphospholipid antibody development [151]. It is hypothesized that antiphospholipid antibodies formed through the intermediary of the spike protein are partly responsible for taste and saliva secretory disorders following COVID-19 vaccination.

The present study has several limitations. The number of enrolled vaccinated subjects differs among retrieved studies. Due to a variation in the sample size and the used methodology, the prevalence shown in the present study may not necessarily reflect that of post-vaccination taste and saliva secretory disorders in the general population. The number of retrieved studies on oral adverse effects following COVID-19 vaccination is much smaller compared with that on oral symptoms in COVID-19 patients. In addition, because of heterogeneity in the designs and data of post-vaccination studies, a statistical analysis could not be performed for assessing the characteristics of oral adverse effects. The prevalence of ageusia, dysgeusia, hypogeusia, xerostomia, and dry mouth should be referred to as indicative rather than definitive values. In all the retrieved studies, taste and saliva secretory disorders following COVID-19 vaccination were analyzed based on subjective (self-reported) impressions or feelings of taste abnormality and oral dryness, whereas those in COVID-19 patients were at least partly analyzed by objective tests. Consequently, oral adverse effects reported by vaccinated people are potentially biased.

To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first comprehensive report of oral adverse effects following COVID-19 vaccination to compare with oral symptoms in COVID-19 patients. Taste and saliva secretory disorders have previously been considered one of the symptoms specific to SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, ageusia, dysgeusia, hypogeusia, xerostomia, and dry mouth can also occur in a certain number of vaccinated people as the consequences of COVID-19 vaccination, while they are rare compared with oral symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Post-vaccination adverse oral effects share some characteristics with COVID-19 oral symptoms, such as higher prevalence in females and older subjects, onset time, and specific taste disorder in some cases. Antigenic spike protein is produced by COVID-19 vaccination and pathogenic spike protein is introduced by SARS-CoV-2 infection. The spike protein may be responsible for the pathophysiology underlying taste and saliva secretory disorders. Although neither taste disorders nor saliva secretory disorders are life-threatening, both of these disorders have a negative impact on the overall quality of life and can cause other health complications. The present results do not deny the advantage and efficacy of vaccination against COVID-19, but attention should be paid to oral adverse effects following COVID-19 vaccination as well as oral symptoms in COVID-19 patients.

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

The present study was supported by JSPS KAKENHI (Grant No. 20K10152) and JSPS KAKENHI (Grant No. 24K12106).

Hironori Tsuchiya designed and conducted the present study. Hironori Tsuchiya and Maki Mizogami reviewed the retrieved articles, analyzed the data, and prepared the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript.

All data generated by the present study are included in this article.

1.
Worldometer, a reference website of live world statistics
. Available from: www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/ (accessed on 1 August 2024).
2.
Soraci
L
,
Lattanzio
F
,
Soraci
G
,
Gambuzza
ME
,
Pulvirenti
C
,
Cozza
A
, et al
.
COVID-19 vaccines: current and future perspectives
.
Vaccines
.
2022
;
10
(
4
):
608
.
3.
COVID-19 Vaccine Tracker
.
COVID19 Vaccine Tracker (wpcomstaging.com). No longer being updated
(accessed on 1 August 2024).
4.
Lamb
YN
.
BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine: first approval
.
Drugs
.
2021
;
81
(
4
):
495
501
.
5.
Patel
R
,
Kaki
M
,
Potluri
VS
,
Kahar
P
,
Khanna
D
.
A comprehensive review of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines: Pfizer, Moderna & Johnson & Johnson
.
Hum Vaccin Immunother
.
2022
;
18
(
1
):
2002083
.
6.
Padilla-Flores
T
,
Sampieri
A
,
Vaca
L
.
Incidence and management of the main serious adverse events reported after COVID-19 vaccination
.
Pharmacol Res Perspect
.
2024
;
12
(
3
):
e1224
.
7.
Cirillo
N
.
Reported orofacial adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccines: the knowns and the unknowns
.
J Oral Pathol Med
.
2021
;
50
(
4
):
424
7
.
8.
Rademacher
WMH
,
Aziz
Y
,
Hielema
A
,
Cheung
KC
,
de Lange
J
,
Vissink
A
, et al
.
Oral adverse effects of drugs: taste disorders
.
Oral Dis
.
2020
;
26
(
1
):
213
23
.
9.
Einhorn
OM
,
Georgiou
K
,
Tompa
A
.
Salivary dysfunction caused by medication usage
.
Physiol Int
.
2020
;
107
(
2
):
195
208
.
10.
Lechien
JR
,
Diallo
AO
,
Dachy
B
,
Le Bon
SD
,
Maniaci
A
,
Vaira
LA
, et al
.
COVID-19: post-vaccine smell and taste disorders: report of 6 cases
.
Ear Nose Throat J
.
2024
;
103
(
2
):
NP104
7
.
11.
Tan
E
,
Salman
S
.
Unusual case of painful glossitis and xerostomia following vaccination with Pfizer-BioNTech SARS-CoV-2 (BNT162b2)
.
Am J Case Rep
.
2022
;
23
:
e937212
.
12.
Mitsikostas
DD
,
Caronna
E
,
De Tommaso
M
,
Deligianni
CI
,
Ekizoglu
E
,
Bolay
H
, et al
.
Headaches and facial pain attributed to SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination: a systematic review
.
Eur J Neurol
.
2024
;
31
(
6
):
e16251
.
13.
Ekizoglu
E
,
Gezegen
H
,
Yalınay Dikmen
P
,
Orhan
EK
,
Ertaş
M
,
Baykan
B
.
The characteristics of COVID-19 vaccine-related headache: clues gathered from the healthcare personnel in the pandemic
.
Cephalalgia
.
2022
;
42
(
4–5
):
366
75
.
14.
González-Celestino
A
,
González-Osorio
Y
,
García-Iglesias
C
,
Echavarría-Iñiguez
A
,
Sierra-Mencía
A
,
Recio-García
A
, et al
.
Differences and similarities between COVID-19 related-headache and COVID-19 vaccine related-headache. A case-control study
.
Rev Neurol
.
2023
;
77
(
10
):
229
39
.
15.
Glover
C
,
Deng
L
,
Larter
C
,
Brogan
C
,
Richardson
O
,
Huang
YA
, et al
.
Surveillance of adverse events following immunisation in Australia, COVID-19 vaccines, 2021
.
Commun Dis Intell
.
2024
;
48
.
16.
Lu
X
,
Masuda
S
,
Horlad
H
,
Katoh
T
.
Safety and adverse effects of the coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine among the general Japanese adult population
.
Vaccine
.
2023
;
41
(
35
):
5090
6
.
17.
Li
HJ
,
Yang
QC
,
Yao
YY
,
Huang
CY
,
Yin
FQ
,
Xian-Yu
CY
, et al
.
COVID-19 vaccination effectiveness and safety in vulnerable populations: a meta-analysis of 33 observational studies
.
Front Pharmacol
.
2023
;
14
:
1144824
.
18.
Arabzadeh Bahri
R
,
Esmaeilpur Abianeh
F
,
Peisepar
M
,
Hadi
R
,
Basti
FA
,
Maleki
S
, et al
.
Anosmia or ageusia following COVID-19 vaccination: a systematic review
.
Ear Nose Throat J
.
2024
;
103
(
1_Suppl l
):
164S
70S
.
19.
Riad
A
,
Põld
A
,
Kateeb
E
,
Attia
S
.
Oral adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination: analysis of VAERS reports
.
Front Public Health
.
2022
;
10
:
952781
.
20.
Riad
A
,
Schulz-Weidner
N
,
Dziedzic
A
,
Howaldt
HP
,
Attia
S
.
Oral side effects of COVID-19 vaccines in 32 European countries: analysis of EudraVigilance reports
.
J Med Virol
.
2023
;
95
(
5
):
e28771
.
21.
Riad
A
,
Issa
J
,
Attia
S
,
Dušek
L
,
Klugar
M
.
Oral adverse events following COVID-19 and influenza vaccination in Australia
.
Hum Vaccin Immunother
.
2023
;
19
(
2
):
2253589
.
22.
Tsuchiya
H
.
Oral symptoms associated with COVID-19 and their pathogenic mechanisms: a literature review
.
Dent J
.
2021
;
9
(
3
):
32
.
23.
Aragoneses
J
,
Suárez
A
,
Algar
J
,
Rodríguez
C
,
López-Valverde
N
,
Aragoneses
JM
.
Oral manifestations of COVID-19: updated systematic review with meta-analysis
.
Front Med
.
2021
;
8
:
726753
.
24.
Tsuchiya
H
.
Gustatory and saliva secretory dysfunctions in COVID-19 patients with zinc deficiency
.
Life
.
2022
;
12
(
3
):
353
.
25.
El Tantawi
M
,
Sabbagh
HJ
,
Alkhateeb
NA
,
Quritum
M
,
Abourdan
J
,
Qureshi
N
, et al
.
Oral manifestations in young adults infected with COVID-19 and impact of smoking: a multi-country cross-sectional study
.
PeerJ
.
2022
;
10
:
e13555
.
26.
Gupta
A
,
Shrivastav
K
,
Agrawal
A
,
Purohit
A
,
Chanchlani
R
.
Estimating the prevalence of oral manifestations in COVID-19 patients: a systematic review
.
Osong Public Health Res Perspect
.
2023
;
14
(
5
):
388
417
.
27.
Tsuchiya
H
.
COVID-19 oral sequelae: persistent gustatory and saliva secretory dysfunctions after recovery from COVID-19
.
Med Princ Pract
.
2023
;
32
(
3
):
166
77
.
28.
Tsuchiya
H
.
Characterization and pathogenic speculation of xerostomia associated with COVID-19: a narrative review
.
Dent J
.
2021
;
9
(
11
):
130
.
29.
Ahsanuddin
S
,
Jin
R
,
Dhanda
AK
,
Georges
K
,
Baredes
S
,
Eloy
JA
, et al
.
Otolaryngologic side effects after COVID-19 vaccination
.
Laryngoscope
.
2024
;
134
(
3
):
1163
8
.
30.
Otero-Losada
M
,
Petrovsky
N
,
Alami
A
,
Crispo
JA
,
Mattison
D
,
Capani
F
, et al
.
Disproportionality analysis of adverse neurological and psychiatric reactions with the ChAdOx1 (Oxford-AstraZeneca) and BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) COVID-19 vaccines in the United Kingdom
.
Expert Opin Drug Saf
.
2023
;
22
(
4
):
343
9
.
31.
Alsaiari
AA
,
Allahyani
M
,
Aljuaid
A
,
Shafie
A
,
Al-Hazmi
A
,
Dahlawi
HA
, et al
.
Assessing the adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccine in different scenarios in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study
.
Saudi Med J
.
2023
;
44
(
2
):
194
201
.
32.
Yasmin
F
,
Najeeb
H
,
Siddiqui
HF
,
Asghar
MS
,
Awan
HA
,
Usama
RM
, et al
.
Frequency of COVID-19 vaccine side effects and its associated factors among the vaccinated population of Pakistan: a cross-sectional study
.
Health Sci Rep
.
2023
;
6
(
1
):
e1071
.
33.
Mythri
G
,
Prashanth Kumar
M
,
Pooja
S
,
Anil Kumar
H
.
Coronavirus disease-19 vaccination and chemosensory dysfunction
.
Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol
.
2022
;
12
(
3
):
296
300
.
34.
Velhal
GD
,
Kamath
YV
,
Agrawal
AS
,
Vora
DS
,
Dwivedi
VR
.
Incidence of early adverse events following Covishield (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) vaccination: a prospective study
.
Indian J Community Med
.
2022
;
47
(
4
):
613
7
.
35.
Shrestha
Y
,
Venkataraman
R
.
The prevalence of inverse health consequences of COVID-19 vaccines: a post-vaccination study
.
Vacunas
.
2022
;
23
:
S67
S76
.
36.
Said
KB
,
Al-Otaibi
A
,
Aljaloud
L
,
Al-Anazi
B
,
Alsolami
A
,
Alreshidi
FS
, et al
.
The frequency and patterns of post-COVID-19 vaccination syndrome reveal initially mild and potentially immunocytopenic signs in primarily young Saudi women
.
Vaccines
.
2022
;
10
(
7
):
1015
.
37.
Alzarea
AI
,
Khan
YH
,
Alatawi
AD
,
Alanazi
AS
,
Alzarea
SI
,
Butt
MH
, et al
.
Surveillance of post-vaccination side effects of COVID-19 vaccines among Saudi population: a real-world estimation of safety profile
.
Vaccines
.
2022
;
10
(
6
):
924
.
38.
Dutta
S
,
Kaur
R
,
Charan
J
,
Bhardwaj
P
,
Ambwani
SR
,
Babu
S
, et al
.
Analysis of neurological adverse events reported in VigiBase from COVID-19 vaccines
.
Cureus
.
2022
;
14
(
1
):
e21376
.
39.
Dziedzic
A
,
Riad
A
,
Attia
S
,
Klugar
M
,
Tanasiewicz
M
.
Self-reported adverse events of COVID-19 vaccines in Polish healthcare workers and medical students. Cross-sectional study and pooled analysis of CoVaST project results in central Europe
.
J Clin Med
.
2021
;
10
(
22
):
5338
.
40.
Riad
A
,
Hocková
B
,
Kantorová
L
,
Slávik
R
,
Spurná
L
,
Stebel
A
, et al
.
Side effects of mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine: nationwide phase IV study among healthcare workers in Slovakia
.
Pharmaceuticals
.
2021
;
14
(
9
):
873
.
41.
Klugar
M
,
Riad
A
,
Mekhemar
M
,
Conrad
J
,
Buchbender
M
,
Howaldt
HP
, et al
.
Side effects of mRNA-based and viral vector-based COVID-19 vaccines among German healthcare workers
.
Biology
.
2021
;
10
(
8
):
752
.
42.
Riad
A
,
Sağıroğlu
D
,
Üstün
B
,
Pokorná
A
,
Klugarová
J
,
Attia
S
, et al
.
Prevalence and risk factors of CoronaVac side effects: an independent cross-sectional study among healthcare workers in Turkey
.
J Clin Med
.
2021
;
10
(
12
):
2629
.
43.
Xu
JW
,
Wang
BS
,
Gao
P
,
Huang
HT
,
Wang
FY
,
Qiu
W
, et al
.
Safety and immunogenicity of heterologous boosting with orally administered aerosolized bivalent adenovirus type-5 vectored COVID-19 vaccine and B.1.1.529 variant adenovirus type-5 vectored COVID-19 vaccine in adults 18 years and older: a randomized, double blinded, parallel controlled trial
.
Emerg Microbes Infect
.
2024
;
13
(
1
):
2281355
.
44.
Pérez-Nieto
OR
,
Alonso-Bello
CD
,
Deloya-Tomas
E
,
Del Carpio-Orantes
L
,
Maya-Mejía
ML
,
Medina
Ú
, et al
.
Adverse effects associated with the first dose of the Pfizer–BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine in healthcare workers from Mexico: a case serie from passive surveillance
.
COVID
.
2023
;
3
(
8
):
1209
19
.
45.
Wang
G
,
Zhu
L
,
Zhu
Y
,
Ye
Q
,
Yu
X
,
Fu
M
, et al
.
Safety survey by clinical pharmacists on COVID-19 vaccination from a single center in China
.
Hum Vaccin Immunother
.
2021
;
17
(
9
):
2863
7
.
46.
Mazur
M
,
Duś-Ilnicka
I
,
Jedliński
M
,
Ndokaj
A
,
Janiszewska-Olszowska
J
,
Ardan
R
, et al
.
Facial and oral manifestations following COVID-19 vaccination: a survey-based study and a first perspective
.
Int J Environ Res Public Health
.
2021
;
18
(
9
):
4965
.
47.
Riad
A
,
Pokorná
A
,
Attia
S
,
Klugarová
J
,
Koščík
M
,
Klugar
M
.
Prevalence of COVID-19 vaccine side effects among healthcare workers in the Czech Republic
.
J Clin Med
.
2021
;
10
(
7
):
1428
.
48.
Kini
A
,
Morgan
R
,
Kuo
H
,
Shea
P
,
Shapiro
J
,
Leng
SX
, et al
.
Differences and disparities in seasonal influenza vaccine, acceptance, adverse reactions, and coverage by age, sex, gender, and race
.
Vaccine
.
2022
;
40
(
11
):
1643
54
.
49.
Cheon
S
,
Methiyothin
T
,
Ahn
I
.
Analysis of COVID-19 vaccine adverse event using language model and unsupervised machine learning
.
PLoS One
.
2023
;
18
(
2
):
e0282119
.
50.
Nachtigall
I
,
Bonsignore
M
,
Hohenstein
S
,
Bollmann
A
,
Günther
R
,
Kodde
C
, et al
.
Effect of gender, age and vaccine on reactogenicity and incapacity to work after COVID-19 vaccination: a survey among health care workers
.
BMC Infect Dis
.
2022
;
22
(
1
):
291
.
51.
Cirillo
N
,
Bizzoca
ME
,
Lo Muzio
E
,
Cazzolla
AP
,
Lo Muzio
L
.
Gustatory dysfunction in COVID-19 patients: a rapid systematic review on 27,687 cases
.
Acta Odontol Scand
.
2021
;
79
(
6
):
418
25
.
52.
Kumar
AA
,
Lee
SWY
,
Lock
C
,
Keong
NC
.
Geographical variations in host predisposition to COVID-19 related anosmia, ageusia, and neurological syndromes
.
Front Med
.
2021
;
8
:
661359
.
53.
von Bartheld
CS
,
Hagen
MM
,
Butowt
R
.
Prevalence of chemosensory dysfunction in COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis reveals significant ethnic differences
.
ACS Chem Neurosci
.
2020
;
11
(
19
):
2944
61
.
54.
Vargas-Alarcón
G
,
Posadas-Sánchez
R
,
Ramírez-Bello
J
.
Variability in genes related to SARS-CoV-2 entry into host cells (ACE2, TMPRSS2, TMPRSS11A, ELANE, and CTSL) and its potential use in association studies
.
Life Sci
.
2020
;
260
:
118313
.
55.
Cao
Y
,
Li
L
,
Feng
Z
,
Wan
S
,
Huang
P
,
Sun
X
, et al
.
Comparative genetic analysis of the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV/SARS-CoV-2) receptor ACE2 in different populations
.
Cell Discov
.
2020
;
6
:
11
.
56.
Asselta
R
,
Paraboschi
EM
,
Mantovani
A
,
Duga
S
.
ACE2 and TMPRSS2 variants and expression as candidates to sex and country differences in COVID-19 severity in Italy
.
Aging
.
2020
;
12
(
11
):
10087
98
.
57.
Villanueva
P
,
McDonald
E
,
Croda
J
,
Croda
MG
,
Dalcolmo
M
,
Dos Santos
G
, et al
.
Factors influencing adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination
.
Hum Vaccin Immunother
.
2024
;
20
(
1
):
2323853
.
58.
Amer
SA
,
Al-Zahrani
A
,
Imam
EA
,
Ishteiwy
EM
,
Djelleb
IF
,
Abdullh
LR
, et al
.
Exploring the reported adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccines among vaccinated Arab populations: a multi-national survey study
.
Sci Rep
.
2024
;
14
(
1
):
4785
.
59.
Beatty
AL
,
Peyser
ND
,
Butcher
XE
,
Cocohoba
JM
,
Lin
F
,
Olgin
JE
, et al
.
Analysis of COVID-19 vaccine type and adverse effects following vaccination
.
JAMA Netw Open
.
2021
;
4
(
12
):
e2140364
.
60.
Lewek
P
,
Banaś
I
,
Witkowski
K
,
Lewek
J
,
Kardas
P
.
The prevalence of symptoms and its correlation with sex in polish COVID-19 adult patients: cross-sectional online open survey
.
Front Med
.
2023
;
10
:
1121558
.
61.
Mohammad
NH
,
Hameed
AY
,
Mahmood
AN
.
Oro-facial manifestations of COVID-19 infection in a sample of Iraqi people
.
J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol
.
2023
;
30
(
2
):
e131
44
.
62.
Pereira
DN
,
Bicalho
MAC
,
Jorge
AO
,
Gomes
AGDR
,
Schwarzbold
AV
,
Araújo
ALH
, et al
.
Neurological manifestations by sex and age group in COVID-19 inhospital patients
.
eNeurologicalSci
.
2022
;
28
:
100419
.
63.
Binmadi
NO
,
Aljohani
S
,
Alsharif
MT
,
Almazrooa
SA
,
Sindi
AM
.
Oral manifestations of COVID-19: a cross-sectional study of their prevalence and association with disease severity
.
J Clin Med
.
2022
;
11
(
15
):
4461
.
64.
Martínez
C
,
Serrano-Coll
H
,
Faccini
Á
,
Contreras
V
,
Galeano
K
,
Botero
Y
, et al
.
SARS-CoV-2 in a tropical area of Colombia, a remarkable conversion of presymptomatic to symptomatic people impacts public health
.
BMC Infect Dis
.
2022
;
22
(
1
):
644
.
65.
Hans
M
,
Hans
VM
,
Kahlon
N
,
Sagar
M
,
Pandey
AK
,
Das
A
.
Gustatory dysfunction and oral ulceration in COVID-19 patients: a cross sectional study
.
Dent Res J
.
2022
;
19
(
1
):
43
.
66.
Algahtani
SN
,
Alzarroug
AF
,
Alghamdi
HK
,
Algahtani
HK
,
Alsywina
NB
,
Bin Abdulrahman
KA
.
Investigation on the factors associated with the persistence of anosmia and ageusia in Saudi COVID-19 patients
.
Int J Environ Res Public Health
.
2022
;
19
(
3
):
1047
.
67.
Sehanobish
E
,
Barbi
M
,
Fong
V
,
Kravitz
M
,
Sanchez Tejera
D
,
Asad
M
, et al
.
COVID-19-induced anosmia and ageusia are associated with younger age and lower blood eosinophil counts
.
Am J Rhinol Allergy
.
2021
;
35
(
6
):
830
9
.
68.
Bulut
DG
,
Turker
N
,
Serin
S
,
Ustaoglu
G
.
The effect of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 on the health of oral tissue: a survey-based study
.
J Oral Health Oral Epidemiol
.
2021
;
10
:
43
9
. Special Issue of COVID-19.
69.
Rojas-Lechuga
MJ
,
Izquierdo-Domínguez
A
,
Chiesa-Estomba
C
,
Calvo-Henríquez
C
,
Villarreal
IM
,
Cuesta-Chasco
G
, et al
.
Chemosensory dysfunction in COVID-19 out-patients
.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol
.
2021
;
278
(
3
):
695
702
.
70.
Tuter
G
,
Yerebakan
M
,
Celik
B
,
Kara
G
.
Oral manifestations in SARS-CoV-2 infection
.
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal
.
2022
;
27
(
4
):
e330
9
.
71.
Foresta
C
,
Rocca
MS
,
Di Nisio
A
.
Gender susceptibility to COVID-19: a review of the putative role of sex hormones and X chromosome
.
J Endocrinol Invest
.
2021
;
44
(
5
):
951
6
.
72.
Gemousakakis
T
,
Kotini
A
,
Anninos
P
,
Zissimopoulos
A
,
Prassopoulos
P
.
MEG evaluation of taste by gender difference
.
J Integr Neurosci
.
2011
;
10
(
4
):
537
45
.
73.
Niklander
S
,
Veas
L
,
Barrera
C
,
Fuentes
F
,
Chiappini
G
,
Marshall
M
.
Risk factors, hyposalivation and impact of xerostomia on oral health-related quality of life
.
Braz Oral Res
.
2017
;
31
:
e14
.
74.
Elibol
E
.
Otolaryngological symptoms in COVID-19
.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol
.
2021
;
278
(
4
):
1233
6
.
75.
Sompa
AW
,
Harun
H
,
Mimika
RA
,
Riksanto
R
.
Neurological manifestations of COVID-19 in Indonesia: assessment of the role of sex and age
.
Narra J
.
2023
;
3
(
3
):
e277
.
76.
Al-Magsoosi
MJN
,
Al-Asadi
OKB
,
Al-Quraine
NT
,
Sami
SM
,
Haider
J
.
Oral manifestations associated with COVID-19 infection: a cross-sectional study of recovered Iraqi patients
.
Int J Dent
.
2023
;
2023
:
4288182
.
77.
Somekh
I
,
Yakub Hanna
H
,
Heller
E
,
Bibi
H
,
Somekh
E
.
Age-dependent sensory impairment in COVID-19 infection and its correlation with ACE2 expression
.
Pediatr Infect Dis J
.
2020
;
39
(
9
):
e270
2
.
78.
Methven
L
,
Allen
VJ
,
Withers
CA
,
Gosney
MA
.
Ageing and taste
.
Proc Nutr Soc
.
2012
;
71
(
4
):
556
65
.
79.
Field
EA
,
Fear
S
,
Higham
SM
,
Ireland
RS
,
Rostron
J
,
Willetts
RM
, et al
.
Age and medication are significant risk factors for xerostomia in an English population, attending general dental practice
.
Gerodontology
.
2001
;
18
(
1
):
21
4
.
80.
Xu
F
,
Laguna
L
,
Sarkar
A
.
Aging-related changes in quantity and quality of saliva: where do we stand in our understanding
.
J Texture Stud
.
2019
;
50
(
1
):
27
35
.
81.
Shaheen
MH
,
Alghamdi
A
,
Alrajhi
A
,
Khan
MF
,
Babkour
A
.
Prevalence, patterns, prognosis, and psychosocial impact of olfactory and gustative dysfunctions among Saudi COVID-19 patients
.
Cureus
.
2022
;
14
(
11
):
e31743
.
82.
Silva
FTD
,
Sperandio
M
,
Suzuki
SS
,
Silva
HPV
,
de Oliveira
DG
,
Stefenon
L
, et al
.
Self-reported taste and smell impairment among patients diagnosed with COVID-19 in Brazil
.
Oral Dis
.
2022
;
28
(
Suppl 2
):
2559
62
.
83.
Al-Ani
RM
,
Acharya
D
.
Prevalence of anosmia and ageusia in patients with COVID-19 at a primary health center, doha, Qatar
.
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
.
2022
;
74
(
Suppl 2
):
2703
9
.
84.
Kandakure
VT
,
Valvi
HR
,
Khokle
P
,
More
MS
,
Chouhan
R
.
Prevalence and recovery from newly onset anosmia and ageusia in Covid 19 patients at our Teritary Care Centre
.
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
.
2022
;
74
(
Suppl 2
):
3399
406
.
85.
Ferdeghini
C
,
Mirabelli
L
,
Bianco
E
,
Hari
S
,
Maddalone
M
.
Oral manifestations in hospitalized COVID patients
.
World J Dent
.
2022
;
13
(
5
):
434
40
.
86.
Elvan-Tuz
A
,
Karadag-Oncel
E
,
Kiran
S
,
Kanik-Yuksek
S
,
Gulhan
B
,
Hacimustafaoglu
M
, et al
.
Prevalence of anosmia in 10.157 pediatric COVID-19 cases: multicenter study from Turkey
.
Pediatr Infect Dis J
.
2022
;
41
(
6
):
473
7
.
87.
Shrestha
S
,
Paudel
A
,
Shrestha
S
,
Gautam
A
,
Bhurtel
M
,
Adhikari
P
.
Prevalence of loss of smell and loss of taste in COVID-19 infected patients
.
J Nepal Health Res Counc
.
2022
;
20
(
1
):
84
8
.
88.
AlRadini
FA
,
Alamri
F
,
Aljahany
MS
,
Almuzaini
Y
,
Alsofayan
Y
,
Khan
A
, et al
.
Post-acute COVID-19 condition in Saudi Arabia: a national representative study
.
J Infect Public Health
.
2022
;
15
(
5
):
526
32
.
89.
Natto
ZS
,
Afeef
M
,
Khalil
D
,
Kutubaldin
D
,
Dehaithem
M
,
Alzahrani
A
, et al
.
Characteristics of oral manifestations in symptomatic non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients: a cross-sectional study on a sample of the Saudi population
.
Int J Gen Med
.
2021
;
14
:
9547
53
.
90.
Cousyn
L
,
Sellem
B
,
Palich
R
,
Bendetowicz
D
,
Agher
R
,
Delorme
C
, et al
.
Olfactory and gustatory dysfunctions in COVID-19 outpatients: a prospective cohort study
.
Infect Dis Now
.
2021
;
51
(
5
):
440
4
.
91.
Vahey
GM
,
Marshall
KE
,
McDonald
E
,
Martin
SW
,
Tate
JE
,
Midgley
CM
, et al
.
Symptom profiles and progression in hospitalized and nonhospitalized patients with coronavirus disease, Colorado, USA, 2020
.
Emerg Infect Dis
.
2021
;
27
(
2
):
385
95
.
92.
Kacem
I
,
Gharbi
A
,
Harizi
C
,
Souissi
E
,
Safer
M
,
Nasri
A
, et al
.
Characteristics, onset, and evolution of neurological symptoms in patients with COVID-19
.
Neurol Sci
.
2021
;
42
(
1
):
39
46
.
93.
Pandurangan
M
,
Hwang
I
.
Systemic mechanism of taste, flavour and palatability in brain
.
Appl Biochem Biotechnol
.
2015
;
175
(
6
):
3133
47
.
94.
Rogn
Å
,
Jensen
JL
,
Iversen
PO
,
Singh
PB
.
Post-COVID-19 patients suffer from chemosensory, trigeminal, and salivary dysfunctions
.
Sci Rep
.
2024
;
14
(
1
):
3455
. Erratum in: Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):9213.
95.
Abalo-Lojo
JM
,
Pouso-Diz
JM
,
Gonzalez
F
.
Taste and smell dysfunction in COVID-19 patients
.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol
.
2020
;
129
(
10
):
1041
2
.
96.
Sawan
HM
,
Khalifeh
AH
,
Ahmed
M
,
Khalil
MM
,
Al Omari
SM
,
Binsuwaidan
R
.
Post-COVID syndrome: analysis of the prevalence of chemosensory dysfunction and predictive factors of recovery in COVID-19 long-haulers in Jordan
.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci
.
2024
;
28
(
6
):
2593
604
.
97.
Nanjo
Y
,
Okuma
T
,
Kuroda
Y
,
Hayakawa
E
,
Shibayama
K
,
Akimoto
T
, et al
.
Multiple types of taste disorders among patients with COVID-19
.
Intern Med
.
2022
;
61
(
14
):
2127
34
.
98.
Lee
YW
,
Lim
SY
,
Lee
JH
,
Lim
JS
,
Kim
M
,
Kwon
S
, et al
.
Adverse reactions of the second dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in healthcare workers in Korea
.
J Korean Med Sci
.
2021
;
36
(
21
):
e153
.
99.
Ossato
A
,
Tessari
R
,
Trabucchi
C
,
Zuppini
T
,
Realdon
N
,
Marchesini
F
.
Comparison of medium-term adverse reactions induced by the first and second dose of mRNA BNT162b2 (Comirnaty, Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccine: a post-marketing Italian study conducted between 1 January and 28 February 2021
.
Eur J Hosp Pharm
.
2023
;
30
(
4
):
e15
.
100.
Ogawa
T
,
Yamada
T
,
Matsumoto
Y
,
Minami
K
,
Kawanishi
F
,
Nakano
T
, et al
.
Adverse events after administration of the first and second doses of messenger RNA-based COVID-19 vaccines in Japanese subjects aged 12-18 years
.
J Int Med Res
.
2022
;
50
(
10
):
3000605221127518
.
101.
Pai
MF
,
Tung
KT
,
Hsu
SP
,
Peng
YS
,
Lin
WY
,
Yang
JY
, et al
.
Adverse events following the first, second and third doses of a COVID-19 vaccine in hemodialysis patients
.
Ren Fail
.
2023
;
45
(
1
):
2172432
.
102.
Htun
YM
,
Win
TT
,
Aung
A
,
Latt
TZ
,
Phyo
YN
,
Tun
TM
, et al
.
Initial presenting symptoms, comorbidities and severity of COVID-19 patients during the second wave of epidemic in Myanmar
.
Trop Med Health
.
2021
;
49
(
1
):
62
.
103.
Sinjari
B
,
D’Ardes
D
,
Santilli
M
,
Rexhepi
I
,
D’Addazio
G
,
Di Carlo
P
, et al
.
SARS-CoV-2 and oral manifestation: an observational, human study
.
J Clin Med
.
2020
;
9
(
10
):
3218
.
104.
Fantozzi
PJ
,
Pampena
E
,
Di Vanna
D
,
Pellegrino
E
,
Corbi
D
,
Mammucari
S
, et al
.
Xerostomia, gustatory and olfactory dysfunctions in patients with COVID-19
.
Am J Otolaryngol
.
2020
;
41
(
6
):
102721
.
105.
Zhou
XY
,
Huang
SF
,
Lin
JX
,
Zhi
HN
,
Xiao
L
,
Wang
XZ
, et al
.
Clinical characteristics and acute complication of COVID-19 patients with diabetes: a multicenter, retrospective study in Southern China
.
Front Endocrinol
.
2023
;
14
:
1237832
.
106.
Cremaschi
RC
,
Bahi
CAS
,
Paola
AAV
,
Arakaki
JSO
,
Ferreira
PRA
,
Bellei
NCJ
, et al
.
Neurological symptoms and comorbidity profile of hospitalized patients with COVID-19
.
Arq Neuropsiquiatr
.
2023
;
81
(
2
):
146
54
.
107.
Akhtar
SM
,
Gazzaz
ZJ
,
Baig
M
,
Majeed
R
,
Hashmi
AA
.
Association between Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine adverse effects and diabetes mellitus: a prospective multicenter study
.
Cureus
.
2023
;
15
(
11
):
e48263
.
108.
Rasheed
N
,
Khan
J
,
Yusuf
A
,
Khan
AS
,
Mustajab
A
,
Majeed
R
, et al
.
AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine and diabetes mellitus: a prospective clinical study regarding vaccine side effects
.
Cureus
.
2024
;
16
(
1
):
e51583
.
109.
Abualhamael
SA
,
Hashmi
AA
.
CanSino COVID-19 vaccine: comparison of vaccine adverse effects among diabetic and non-diabetic recipients
.
Cureus
.
2023
;
15
(
10
):
e47391
.
110.
Srinivasan
M
.
Taste dysfunction and long COVID-19
.
Front Cell Infect Microbiol
.
2021
;
11
:
716563
.
111.
Park
SY
,
Yun
SG
,
Shin
JW
,
Lee
BY
,
Son
HJ
,
Lee
S
, et al
.
Persistent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 detection after resolution of coronavirus disease 2019-associated symptoms/signs
.
Korean J Intern Med
.
2020
;
35
(
4
):
793
6
.
112.
Yang
JR
,
Deng
DT
,
Wu
N
,
Yang
B
,
Li
HJ
,
Pan
XB
.
Persistent viral RNA positivity during the recovery period of a patient with SARS-CoV-2 infection
.
J Med Virol
.
2020
;
92
(
9
):
1681
3
.
113.
Bird
O
,
Galiza
EP
,
Baxter
DN
,
Boffito
M
,
Browne
D
,
Burns
F
, et al
.
The predictive role of symptoms in COVID-19 diagnostic models: a longitudinal insight
.
Epidemiol Infect
.
2024
;
152
:
e37
.
114.
Gallagher
TJ
,
Parikh
M
,
Herrera
K
,
Lin
ME
,
Hur
K
.
Association of COVID-19 vaccination with changes in smell and taste
.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
.
2024
;
171
(
4
):
1240
4
.
115.
Huang
Y
,
Yang
C
,
Xu
XF
,
Xu
W
,
Liu
SW
.
Structural and functional properties of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein: potential antivirus drug development for COVID-19
.
Acta Pharmacol Sin
.
2020
;
41
(
9
):
1141
9
.
116.
Boros
LG
,
Kyriakopoulos
AM
,
Brogna
C
,
Piscopo
M
,
McCullough
PA
,
Seneff
S
.
Long-lasting, biochemically modified mRNA, and its frameshifted recombinant spike proteins in human tissues and circulation after COVID-19 vaccination
.
Pharmacol Res Perspect
.
2024
;
12
(
3
):
e1218
.
117.
Watanabe
Y
,
Mendonça
L
,
Allen
ER
,
Howe
A
,
Lee
M
,
Allen
JD
, et al
.
Native-like SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein expressed by ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/AZD1222 vaccine
.
ACS Cent Sci
.
2021
;
7
(
4
):
594
602
.
118.
Heidary
M
,
Kaviar
VH
,
Shirani
M
,
Ghanavati
R
,
Motahar
M
,
Sholeh
M
, et al
.
A comprehensive review of the protein subunit vaccines against COVID-19
.
Front Microbiol
.
2022
;
13
:
927306
.
119.
He
Y
,
Zhou
Y
,
Siddiqui
P
,
Jiang
S
.
Inactivated SARS-CoV vaccine elicits high titers of spike protein-specific antibodies that block receptor binding and virus entry
.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun
.
2004
;
325
(
2
):
445
52
.
120.
Trougakos
IP
,
Terpos
E
,
Alexopoulos
H
,
Politou
M
,
Paraskevis
D
,
Scorilas
A
, et al
.
Adverse effects of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines: the spike hypothesis
.
Trends Mol Med
.
2022
;
28
(
7
):
542
54
.
121.
Ogata
AF
,
Cheng
CA
,
Desjardins
M
,
Senussi
Y
,
Sherman
AC
,
Powell
M
, et al
.
Circulating severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine antigen detected in the plasma of mRNA-1273 vaccine recipients
.
Clin Infect Dis
.
2022
;
74
(
4
):
715
8
.
122.
Nuovo
GJ
,
Magro
C
,
Shaffer
T
,
Awad
H
,
Suster
D
,
Mikhail
S
, et al
.
Endothelial cell damage is the central part of COVID-19 and a mouse model induced by injection of the S1 subunit of the spike protein
.
Ann Diagn Pathol
.
2021
;
51
:
151682
.
123.
Sakaguchi
W
,
Kubota
N
,
Shimizu
T
,
Saruta
J
,
Fuchida
S
,
Kawata
A
, et al
.
Existence of SARS-CoV-2 entry molecules in the oral cavity
.
Int J Mol Sci
.
2020
;
21
(
17
):
6000
.
124.
Doyle
ME
,
Appleton
A
,
Liu
QR
,
Yao
Q
,
Mazucanti
CH
,
Egan
JM
.
Human type II taste cells express angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 and are infected by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)
.
Am J Pathol
.
2021
;
191
(
9
):
1511
9
.
125.
Huang
N
,
Pérez
P
,
Kato
T
,
Mikami
Y
,
Okuda
K
,
Gilmore
RC
, et al
.
SARS-CoV-2 infection of the oral cavity and saliva
.
Nat Med
.
2021
;
27
(
5
):
892
903
.
126.
Usami
Y
,
Hirose
K
,
Okumura
M
,
Toyosawa
S
,
Sakai
T
.
Brief communication: immunohistochemical detection of ACE2 in human salivary gland
.
Oral Sci Int
.
2021
;
18
(
2
):
101
4
.
127.
Matuck
BF
,
Dolhnikoff
M
,
Duarte-Neto
AN
,
Maia
G
,
Gomes
SC
,
Sendyk
DI
, et al
.
Salivary glands are a target for SARS-CoV-2: a source for saliva contamination
.
J Pathol
.
2021
;
254
(
3
):
239
43
.
128.
Nguyen
HT
,
Zhang
S
,
Wang
Q
,
Anang
S
,
Wang
J
,
Ding
H
, et al
.
Spike glycoprotein and host cell determinants of SARS-CoV-2 entry and cytopathic effects
.
J Virol
.
2021
;
95
(
5
):
e02304-20
.
129.
Krishnakumar
HN
,
Momtaz
DA
,
Sherwani
A
,
Mhapankar
A
,
Gonuguntla
RK
,
Maleki
A
, et al
.
Pathogenesis and progression of anosmia and dysgeusia during the COVID-19 pandemic
.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol
.
2023
;
280
(
2
):
505
9
.
130.
Chen
J
,
Jiang
Q
,
Xia
X
,
Liu
K
,
Yu
Z
,
Tao
W
, et al
.
Individual variation of the SARS-CoV-2 receptor ACE2 gene expression and regulation
.
Aging Cell
.
2020
;
19
(
7
):
e13168
.
131.
Gagliardi
MC
,
Tieri
P
,
Ortona
E
,
Ruggieri
A
.
ACE2 expression and sex disparity in COVID-19
.
Cell Death Discov
.
2020
;
6
:
37
.
132.
Peng
J
,
Sun
J
,
Zhao
J
,
Deng
X
,
Guo
F
,
Chen
L
.
Age and gender differences in ACE2 and TMPRSS2 expressions in oral epithelial cells
.
J Transl Med
.
2021
;
19
(
1
):
358
.
133.
Kanthaswamy
V
,
Kumar
VV
,
Annasamy
RK
,
Ramadoss
R
,
Krishnan
R
.
Comparative immunohistochemical evaluation of variable expression of ACE2 and TMPRSS2 in different age groups
.
AsPac J Mol Biol Biotechnol
.
2023
;
31
(
4
):
59
70
.
134.
Wang
H
,
Zhou
M
,
Brand
J
,
Huang
L
.
Inflammation and taste disorders: mechanisms in taste buds
.
Ann N Y Acad Sci
.
2009
;
1170
:
596
603
.
135.
Sluijpers
NRF
,
Pringle
S
,
Bootsma
H
,
Spijkervet
FKL
,
Vissink
A
,
Delli
K
.
Connecting salivary gland inflammation to specific symptoms in Sjögren’s disease
.
Expert Rev Clin Immunol
.
2024
;
20
(
10
):
1169
78
.
136.
Huang
C
,
Wang
Y
,
Li
X
,
Ren
L
,
Zhao
J
,
Hu
Y
, et al
.
Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China
.
Lancet
.
2020
;
395
(
10223
):
497
506
. Erratum in: Lancet. 2020;395(10223):496.
137.
Hao
M
,
Wang
D
,
Xia
Q
,
Kan
S
,
Chang
L
,
Liu
H
, et al
.
Pathogenic mechanism and multi-omics analysis of oral manifestations in COVID-19
.
Front Immunol
.
2022
;
13
:
879792
.
138.
Cazzolla
AP
,
Lovero
R
,
Spirito
F
,
Di Cosola
M
,
Santacroce
L
,
Lo Muzio
E
, et al
.
Evaluation of qualitative and quantitative taste alterations in COVID-19
.
Biomol Biomed
.
2023
;
23
(
2
):
344
50
.
139.
Sasso-Cerri
E
,
Martinelli
VD
,
de Oliveira
SA
,
da Silva
AAS
,
de Moraes
JCG
,
Cerri
PS
.
Submandibular gland pathogenesis following SARS-CoV-2 infection and implications for xerostomia
.
Int J Mol Sci
.
2024
;
25
(
13
):
6820
.
140.
Nakayama
T
,
Sawada
A
,
Ito
T
.
Comparison of cytokine production in mice inoculated with messenger RNA vaccines BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273
.
Microbiol Immunol
.
2023
;
67
(
3
):
120
8
.
141.
Ostrowski
SR
,
Søgaard
OS
,
Tolstrup
M
,
Stærke
NB
,
Lundgren
J
,
Østergaard
L
, et al
.
Inflammation and platelet activation after COVID-19 vaccines - possible mechanisms behind vaccine-induced immune thrombocytopenia and thrombosis
.
Front Immunol
.
2021
;
12
:
779453
.
142.
Patra
T
,
Meyer
K
,
Geerling
L
,
Isbell
TS
,
Hoft
DF
,
Brien
J
, et al
.
SARS-CoV-2 spike protein promotes IL-6 trans-signaling by activation of angiotensin II receptor signaling in epithelial cells
.
PLoS Pathog
.
2020
;
16
(
12
):
e1009128
.
143.
Khan
S
,
Shafiei
MS
,
Longoria
C
,
Schoggins
JW
,
Savani
RC
,
Zaki
H
.
SARS-CoV-2 spike protein induces inflammation via TLR2-dependent activation of the NF-κB pathway
.
Elife
.
2021
;
10
:
e68563
.
144.
Montezano
AC
,
Camargo
LL
,
Mary
S
,
Neves
KB
,
Rios
FJ
,
Stein
R
, et al
.
SARS-CoV-2 spike protein induces endothelial inflammation via ACE2 independently of viral replication
.
Sci Rep
.
2023
;
13
(
1
):
14086
.
145.
Asherson
RA
,
Cervera
R
.
Antiphospholipid antibodies and infections
.
Ann Rheum Dis
.
2003
;
62
(
5
):
388
93
.
146.
Xiao
M
,
Zhang
Y
,
Zhang
S
,
Qin
X
,
Xia
P
,
Cao
W
, et al
.
Antiphospholipid antibodies in critically ill patients with COVID-19
.
Arthritis Rheumatol
.
2020
;
72
(
12
):
1998
2004
.
147.
Serrano
M
,
Espinosa
G
,
Serrano
A
,
Cervera
R
.
COVID-19 and the antiphospholipid syndrome
.
Autoimmun Rev
.
2022
;
21
(
12
):
103206
.
148.
Talotta
R
,
Robertson
ES
.
Antiphospholipid antibodies and risk of post-COVID-19 vaccination thrombophilia: the straw that breaks the camel’s back
.
Cytokine Growth Factor Rev
.
2021
;
60
:
52
60
.
149.
Sciascia
S
,
Costanzo
P
,
Radin
M
,
Schreiber
K
,
Pini
M
,
Vaccarino
A
, et al
.
Safety and tolerability of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in people with antiphospholipid antibodies
.
Lancet Rheumatol
.
2021
;
3
(
12
):
e832
.
150.
Krashias
G
,
Pafiti
A
,
Deeba
E
,
Christodoulou
C
,
Pantzaris
M
,
Lambrianides
A
.
SARS CoV- 2 vaccination induces antibodies against cardiolipin
.
BMC Res Notes
.
2022
;
15
(
1
):
292
.
151.
Hisano
M
,
Morisaki
N
,
Sampei
M
,
Obikane
E
,
Yamaguchi
K
.
Comparison of anti-phospholipid antibody titers before and after SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination in hospital staff
.
Vaccin X
.
2024
;
20
:
100539
.
152.
Butt
A
,
Erkan
D
,
Lee
AI
.
COVID-19 and antiphospholipid antibodies
.
Best Pract Res Clin Haematol
.
2022
;
35
(
3
):
101402
.
153.
Hepburn
AL
,
Lanham
JG
.
Sudden-onset ageusia in the antiphospholipid syndrome
.
J R Soc Med
.
1998
;
91
(
12
):
640
1
.
154.
Misita
CP
,
Moll
S
.
Antiphospholipid antibodies
.
Circulation
.
2005
;
112
(
3
):
e39
44
.