Objective: The aim of this study was to determine whether or not lingual arches in subjects with anterior or posterior mandible rotation can produce different effects in the prevention of first permanent molar mesial migration. Subjects and Methods: Forty-two patients with a mean age of 9 ± 0.8 years were selected from the Department of Orthodontics, University of Catania, Italy. These subjects were treated with a passive mandibular fixed lingual arch. The sample was divided into 3 groups according to the gonial angle in order to establish the pattern of mandible growth: mandibular posterior rotation (MPR), mandibular growth in straight-downward direction (MSD) and mandibular anterior rotation (MAR). Lateral cephalograms and study models of the patients before and after treatment were examined to determine any positional changes of the mandibular first molars and incisors. Results: Statistically significant differences between the MPR group and the other 2 (MSD and MAR) were found as regards mandibular first molar and incisor positional changes. No significant differences were found between the MSD and MAR groups. Conclusion: The results indicate that the effect of lingual arch is influenced by mandibular growth patterns. In patients with MPR, the lingual arch preserves arch length but the mesial migration of first permanent molars is not completely blocked.

Keywords:
Molar drift, Mandible growth patterns, Arch length
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel
2011
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.