Objective: The aim of this study was to demonstrate the improvement of anal canal function after overlap sphincter repair and confirm that this treatment option is superior in patients with nonobstetric sphincter damage. Subjects and Methods: From 1998 to 2003, 44 women who underwent overlapping sphincter repair were enrolled in this study. The women were allocated to one of two groups, obstetric trauma (n = 31) and nonobstetric (perineal) trauma (n = 13). Both groups were compared in terms of age, operation time, number of deliveries, hospital stay, need for analgesics, complication rate, pre- and postoperative outcomes of anal manometry and quality of life, using the fecal incontinence severity index and a questionnaire for fecal disorders. Results: Anal canal length was significantly extended postoperatively in both groups compared to preoperative length. Eight-week postoperative resting and squeeze pressures were significantly higher than preoperative pressures in both patients with nonobstetric and obstetric sphincter injury. Although significant increase was seen in both groups, the mean postoperative resting and squeeze pressures at 1 year were rather high in patients with nonobstetric sphincter injury. At the end of a year of follow-up, overall satisfaction of the repair was about 82%. Conclusion: Overlap sphincter repair was feasible, although patient satisfaction was slightly less in the obstetric than in the nonobstetric trauma group. The improvement of anal function at 20- to 24-month follow-up is attributed to both high squeeze pressure and broad anal canal.

Keywords:
Anal sphincter injury, Fecal incontinence, Overlap sphincter repair
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel
2008
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.