Poultry contamination can be largely attributed to the presence of chicken feces during the production process. Fecal contamination is often found in raw chicken products sold for human consumption. Quantitative analysis of the fecal microbial community of chickens using next-generation sequencing techniques is the focus of this study. Fecal samples were collected from 30 broiler chickens at two time points: days 1 and 35 of development. 454 pyrosequencing was conducted on 16S rRNA extracted from each sample, and microbial population dynamics were investigated using various automated bioinformatics pipelines. Diversity of the microbial community at the genus level increased during the 5-week growth period. Despite this growth, only a few dominant bacteria groups (over 80%) were identified in each fecal sample, with most groups being unique and only a few were shared between samples. Population analysis at the genus level showed that microbial diversity increased with chicken growth and development. Classification and phylogenetic analysis of highly represented microbes (over 1%) clearly showed high levels of sequence similarity between groups such as Firmicutes and Proteobacteria. These results suggest that the chicken fecal excreted microbiome is a dynamic system with a differentiated population structure that harbors a highly restricted number of higher taxa.

Becker AA, Hesta M, Hollants J, Janssens GP, Huys G: Phylogenetic analysis of faecal microbiota from captive cheetahs reveals underrepresentation of Bacteroidetes and Bifidobacteriaceae. BMC Microbiol 2014;14:43.
Chun J, Kim KY, Lee JH, Choi Y: The analysis of oral microbial communities of wild-type and Toll-like receptor 2-deficient mice using a 454 GS FLX titanium pyrosequencer. BMC Microbiol 2010;10:101.
Danzeisen JL, Kim HB, Isaacson RE, Tu ZJ, Johnson TJ: Modulations of the chicken cecal microbiome and metagenome in response to anticoccidial and growth promoter treatment. PloS One 2011;6:e27949.
Eeckhaut V, Van Immerseel F, Croubels S, De Baere S, Haesebrouck F, Ducatelle R, Louis P, Vandamme P: Butyrate production in phylogenetically diverse Firmicutes isolated from the chicken caecum. Microb Biotechnol 2011;4:503-512.
Fuller R: The chicken gut microflora and probiotic supplements. J Poult Sci 2001;38:189-196.
Griggs J, Jacob J: Alternatives to antibiotics for organic poultry production. J Appl Poult Res 2005;14:750-756.
Guo X, Xia X, Tang R, Zhou J, Zhao H, Wang K: Development of a real-time PCR method for Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes in faeces and its application to quantify intestinal population of obese and lean pigs. Lett Appl Microbiol 2008;47:367-373.
Gupta SS, Mohammed MH, Ghosh TS, Kanungo S, Nair GB, Mande SS: Metagenome of the gut of a malnourished child. Gut Pathog 2011;3:7.
Huber T, Faulkner G, Hugenholtz P: Bellerophon: a program to detect chimeric sequences in multiple sequence alignments. Bioinformatics 2004;20:2317-2319.
Hur M, Kim Y, Song HR, Kim JM, Choi YI, Yi H: Effect of genetically modified poplars on soil microbial communities during the phytoremediation of waste mine tailings. Appl Environ Microbiol 2011;77:7611-7619.
Kim BS, Kim JN, Yoon SH, Chun J, Cerniglia CE: Impact of enrofloxacin on the human intestinal microbiota revealed by comparative molecular analysis. Anaerobe 2012a;18:310-320.
Kim OS, Cho YJ, Lee K, Yoon SH, Kim M, Na H, Park SC, Jeon YS, Lee JH, Yi H, Won S, Chun J: Introducing EzTaxon-e: A prokaryotic 16s rRNA gene sequence database with phylotypes that represent uncultured species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012b;62:716-721.
Lu J, Santo Domingo J, Shanks OC: Identification of chicken-specific fecal microbial sequences using a metagenomic approach. Water Res 2007;41:3561-3574.
Lutful Kabir SM: The role of probiotics in the poultry industry. Int J Mol Sci 2009;10:3531-3546.
Murry A Jr, Hinton A Jr, Morrison H: Inhibition of growth of Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium, and Clostridia perfringens on chicken feed media by Lactobacillus salivarius and Lactobacillus plantarum. Int J Poult Sci 2004;3:603-607.
Nava G, Bielke L, Callaway T, Castaneda M: Probiotic alternatives to reduce gastrointestinal infections: the poultry experience. Anim Health Res Rev 2005;6:105-118.
Nordentoft S, Mølbak L, Bjerrum L, De Vylder J, Van Immerseel F, Pedersen K: The influence of the cage system and colonisation of Salmonella Enteritidis on the microbial gut flora of laying hens studied by T-RFLP and 454 pyrosequencing. BMC Microbiol 2011;11:187.
Oakley BB, Buhr RJ, Ritz CW, Kiepper BH, Berrang ME, Seal BS, Cox NA: Successional changes in the chicken cecal microbiome during 42 days of growth are independent of organic acid feed additives. BMC Vet Res 2014;10:282.
Orcutt B, Bailey B, Staudigel H, Tebo BM, Edwards KJ: An interlaboratory comparison of 16s rRNA gene-based terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism and sequencing methods for assessing microbial diversity of seafloor basalts. Environ Microbiol 2009;11:1728-1735.
Sekelja M, Rud I, Knutsen S, Denstadli V, Westereng B, Næs T, Rudi K: Abrupt temporal fluctuations in the chicken fecal microbiota are explained by its gastrointestinal origin. Appl Environ Microbiol 2012;78:2941-2948.
Trafalska E, Grzybowska K: Probiotics - an alternative for antibiotics (in Polish)? Wiad Lek 2004;57:491-498.
Vandeplas S, Dubois Dauphin R, Beckers Y, Thonart P, Théwis A: Salmonella in chicken: current and developing strategies to reduce contamination at farm level. J Food Prot 2010;73:774-785.
Videnska P, Faldynova M, Juricova H, Babak V, Sisak F, Havlickova H, Rychlik I: Chicken faecal microbiota and disturbances induced by single or repeated therapy with tetracycline and streptomycin. BMC Vet Res 2013;9:30.
Waldroup AL: Contamination of raw poultry with pathogens. Worlds Poult Sci J 1996;52:7-25.
Yang Q, Ren S, Niu T, Guo Y, Qi S, Han X, Liu D, Pan F: Distribution of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in chicken manure and manure-fertilized vegetables. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2014;​21:1231-1241.
Zhu XY, Zhong T, Pandya Y, Joerger RD: 16s rRNA-based analysis of microbiota from the cecum of broiler chickens. Appl Environ Microbiol 2002;68:124-137.
You do not currently have access to this content.