Introduction: Smoking cessation is influenced by genetic and environmental factors, particularly genetic polymorphisms influencing nicotine metabolism. This study investigated the association between specific nicotine metabolism-related genetic variants and smoking cessation among Korean men. Methods: A candidate gene association study was performed targeting single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within nicotine metabolism-related genes. Participants were categorized as never, former, or current smokers. A Genetic Risk Score (GRS) was computed using significant SNPs to evaluate cumulative genetic influence. Results: Six SNPs showed significant association with smoking cessation in a Korean cohort. A higher GRS was associated with increased odds of current smoking compared to former smoking (OR = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.12–1.25, p < 0.001). Conclusion: This study indicates a substantial genetic component in smoking cessation, highlighting the importance of population-specific approaches, and may aid personalized smoking cessation strategies based on genetic predisposition among Koreans.

Cigarette smoking is a major risk factor for several human diseases. Among men in Korea, smoking accounted for 19.5% of all causes of mortality from 2011 to 2015 [1], and smoking accounted for 41.1% of all cancers and 33.4% of all cardiovascular diseases in 2012 [2]. In Korea, the smoking rate among men was 34.0% in 2020, which is notably higher than that in other developed countries [3]. Therefore, smoking cessation is crucial for reducing smoking-related diseases, lowering healthcare costs, and improving population health. However, despite widespread efforts, the success rate of smoking cessation varies among individuals.

The rate of nicotine metabolism, which is mediated by several enzymes, plays a key role in successful smoking cessation (Fig. 1) [4, 5]. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in nicotine metabolism-related genes influence nicotine metabolism across different ethnic groups [6, 7]. For instance, CYP2A6 SNPs, such as rs56113850 and rs113288603, are associated with nicotine metabolism in Finnish cohorts [8]. In African American smokers, CYP2A6 SNP rs12459249 significantly affects nicotine metabolism rates, explaining the differences between African American and European American smokers [9]. The frequency of CYP2A6 variants varies by ethnicity; slow-metabolizing alleles are more prevalent in Asian populations than in European and African populations, influencing smoking behaviors and nicotine dependence [10]. However, few studies have explored the association between genetic variants involved in nicotine metabolism and smoking cessation in Koreans. We hypothesized that specific polymorphisms in nicotine metabolism-related genes are associated with smoking cessation. To test this hypothesis, we examined a set of candidate genes associated with nicotine metabolism to identify relevant genetic polymorphisms associated with smoking cessation in men from a large Korean population-based cohort.

Fig. 1.

Nicotine metabolism in stylized human liver cells showing candidate genes (adapted from Ring et al. [5]).

Fig. 1.

Nicotine metabolism in stylized human liver cells showing candidate genes (adapted from Ring et al. [5]).

Close modal

Study Design and Participants

Data from the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study (KoGES) Health Examination were used in this study. The cohort comprised community dwellers recruited from the National Health Examinee Registry (aged 40–79 years at baseline). Eligible participants were asked to volunteer, and data on their medical history and self-reported smoking status were collected. Participants were categorized as never smokers (individuals who had never smoked or smoked fewer than 100 cigarettes in their lifetime), former smokers (individuals who had smoked at least 100 cigarettes in their lifetime but had quit smoking at the time of the interview), and current smokers (individuals who had smoked at least 100 cigarettes in their lifetime and were actively smoking at the time of the interview), following a previous study [11].

The KoGES cohort comprised 58,701 individuals, all of Korean ethnicity, with available genome-wide SNP genotype data. Of these, female participants (n = 38,404) were excluded because of the relatively low smoking rate among women in Korea [3]. Participants with missing data (n = 59) and those with comorbidities (n = 15,874) were also excluded to minimize the confounding effect of diseases on smoking cessation. This approach enabled the selection of apparently healthy individuals, focusing the analysis on genetic rather than environmental factors.

Covariates

Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight (kg) divided by height squared (m2). Regular exercisers were identified using the question, “do you engage in regular exercise to the extent of sweating?” with responses recorded as “yes” or “no.” Marital status was categorized based on the participants’ current marital status.

Genotyping and Quality Control

Genotype data, generated using the Korea Biobank Array (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA), were provided by the Center for Genome Science, Korea National Institute of Health. The obtained data were filtered using the following criteria: call rate >97%, minor allele frequency >1%, and Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium p < 1 × 10−5. The genotypes were phased using ShapeIT v2 and IMPUTE v2 was used for imputation analyses of the genotype data, with 1,000 Genomes Phase 3 data as the reference panel. A total of 7,975,321 SNPs on chromosomes 1–22 were identified. From these SNPs, 12 gene regions associated with the nicotine metabolism pathway were selected (Fig. 1; online suppl. Table 1; for all online suppl. material, see https://doi.org/10.1159/000543543), encompassing 1,644 SNPs, with 57–395 SNPs per region.

Statistical Analysis

The characteristics of the study population are presented as mean ± standard deviation or percentage. Continuous variables were evaluated using analysis of variance test to compare never, former, and current smokers, while categorical variables were assessed using chi-squared tests. To test the association between nicotine metabolism-related genetic polymorphisms and smoking cessation, SNPs in 12 gene regions (online suppl. Table 1) were analyzed. Genotype effects were determined by analyzing 1,644 SNPs in nicotine metabolism-related genes. Logistic regression analysis was conducted using PLINK v1.9 software by dividing the participants into three comparison groups: former compared to current smokers, never compared to current smokers, and never compared to former smokers. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated, adjusting for three sets of covariates across three models: model 1, adjusted for age; model 2, adjusted for age, drinking status, and exercise status; and model 3, adjusted for age, drinking status, exercise status, BMI, marital status, and monthly income. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

Six SNPs with significant associations (online suppl. Table 2) were used to calculate the Genetic Risk Score (GRS) employing an additive genetic model based on the effect alleles (those associated with increased difficulty in smoking cessation) of each SNP. The GRS for each sample was calculated using the following formula:
where k is the number of significant SNPs, βi is the OR for the effect allele, and Ni denotes the number of effect alleles [12, 13].

A comprehensive list of SNPs analyzed in this study, along with their corresponding results, is provided in the online supplementary material. To calculate MAF and R2, PLINK v1.9 software (https://www.cog-genomics.org/plink/1.9/) was used. SNPs with an MAF >1% were included to ensure robust statistical power and avoid rare variant bias. Independent SNPs were selected using a linkage disequilibrium threshold of R2 <0.2 based on allele frequencies derived from the 1,000 Genomes East Asian reference panel.

For haplotype-based regression analysis, weighted linear regression was performed with smoking status as the dependent variable and the number of effect alleles as the independent variable. The analysis was performed in Python (version 3.12.4) using the generalized linear models from the statsmodels.api package (version 0.14.2, https://www.statsmodels.org/stable/glm.html). Covariates were included to adjust the models.

The demographic and lifestyle characteristics of the participants are shown in Table 1. The final analysis included 4,364 men (1,326 never; 1,684 former; and 1,354 current smokers). The average age of participants in different groups differed significantly, with current smokers being younger (49.6 ± 7.9 years) than former (53.1 ± 8.1 years) and never smokers (52.7 ± 8.5 years). Alcohol intake was significantly higher in current smokers than that in former and never smokers. In addition, a lower percentage of current smokers engaged in regular exercise than former and never smokers. Marital status and BMI also differed across the groups, whereas monthly income showed no significant variation.

Table 1.

Characteristics of study population

TotalNever smokerFormer smokerCurrent smokerp value
N 4,364 1,326 1,684 1,354  
Age, years 51.9±8.3 52.7±8.5 53.1±8.1 49.6±7.9 <0.001 
Alcohol intake, g/week 173.3±357.8 116.9±184.9 167.6±193.6 219.8±540.0 <0.001 
Regular exercise, %     <0.001 
 Yes 57.1 61.7 62.2 46.2  
 No 42.9 38.3 37.8 53.8  
BMI, kg/m2 23.7±2.5 23.6±2.5 23.9±2.5 23.4±2.6 <0.001 
Married, %     <0.001 
 Yes 93.7 95.3 94.6 91.0  
 No 6.3 4.7 5.4 9.00  
Monthly income, %     0.763 
 KRW <2,000,000 23.5 23.5 23.2 23.7  
 KRW 2,000,000–4,000,000 46.8 45.2 47.0 48.3  
 KRW 4,000,000–6,000,000 19.9 20.6 19.7 19.5  
 KRW >6,000,000 9.8 10.7 10.1 8.5  
TotalNever smokerFormer smokerCurrent smokerp value
N 4,364 1,326 1,684 1,354  
Age, years 51.9±8.3 52.7±8.5 53.1±8.1 49.6±7.9 <0.001 
Alcohol intake, g/week 173.3±357.8 116.9±184.9 167.6±193.6 219.8±540.0 <0.001 
Regular exercise, %     <0.001 
 Yes 57.1 61.7 62.2 46.2  
 No 42.9 38.3 37.8 53.8  
BMI, kg/m2 23.7±2.5 23.6±2.5 23.9±2.5 23.4±2.6 <0.001 
Married, %     <0.001 
 Yes 93.7 95.3 94.6 91.0  
 No 6.3 4.7 5.4 9.00  
Monthly income, %     0.763 
 KRW <2,000,000 23.5 23.5 23.2 23.7  
 KRW 2,000,000–4,000,000 46.8 45.2 47.0 48.3  
 KRW 4,000,000–6,000,000 19.9 20.6 19.7 19.5  
 KRW >6,000,000 9.8 10.7 10.1 8.5  

The SNPs associated with smoking cessation in Korean men are presented in online supplementary Table 2, among which six SNPs (rs2431412, rs45625338, rs41297431, rs118063322, rs144769946, and rs2715904) showed significant associations after adjusting for age. Details of the associations of these SNPs across the three smoking status comparisons are shown in Table 2. The OR and p values for each SNP in the three models are shown in Table 2. In model 3, after adjusting for all covariates, four SNPs in the former compared to current smoker comparison and two SNPs in the never compared to current smoker comparison showed significant associations, whereas no significant SNP was identified in the never compared to former smoker comparison.

Table 2.

Associations of six nicotine metabolism-related SNPs with smoking status in Korean men

SNPCHRBPGeneA1Former smoker compared to current smoker
model 1model 2model 3
OR (95% CI)p valueOR (95% CI)p valueOR (95% CI)p value
rs2431412 19 41349259 CYP2A6 0.54 (0.36–0.83) 0.005 0.51 (0.33–0.78) 0.002 0.49 (0.31–0.75) 0.001 
rs45625338 234637905 UGT1A9 0.67 (0.53–0.85) 0.001 0.65 (0.52–0.83) 0.000 0.65 (0.50–0.82) <0.001 
rs41297431 70351024 UGT2B4 1.46 (1.14–1.88) 0.003 1.45 (1.12–1.87) 0.004 1.45 (1.12–1.90) 0.006 
rs118063322 69884990 UGT2B10 0.85 (0.74–0.98) 0.023 0.85 (0.74–0.99) 0.032 0.86 (0.74–0.99) 0.039 
rs144769946 69509560 UGT2B15 1.16 (1.03–1.30) 0.018 1.14 (1.01–1.28) 0.038 1.12 (0.99–1.27) 0.069 
rs2715904 201532203 AOX1 0.86 (0.74–0.99) 0.036 0.85 (0.73–0.98) 0.026 0.87 (0.75–1.01) 0.076 
SNPCHRBPGeneA1Former smoker compared to current smoker
model 1model 2model 3
OR (95% CI)p valueOR (95% CI)p valueOR (95% CI)p value
rs2431412 19 41349259 CYP2A6 0.54 (0.36–0.83) 0.005 0.51 (0.33–0.78) 0.002 0.49 (0.31–0.75) 0.001 
rs45625338 234637905 UGT1A9 0.67 (0.53–0.85) 0.001 0.65 (0.52–0.83) 0.000 0.65 (0.50–0.82) <0.001 
rs41297431 70351024 UGT2B4 1.46 (1.14–1.88) 0.003 1.45 (1.12–1.87) 0.004 1.45 (1.12–1.90) 0.006 
rs118063322 69884990 UGT2B10 0.85 (0.74–0.98) 0.023 0.85 (0.74–0.99) 0.032 0.86 (0.74–0.99) 0.039 
rs144769946 69509560 UGT2B15 1.16 (1.03–1.30) 0.018 1.14 (1.01–1.28) 0.038 1.12 (0.99–1.27) 0.069 
rs2715904 201532203 AOX1 0.86 (0.74–0.99) 0.036 0.85 (0.73–0.98) 0.026 0.87 (0.75–1.01) 0.076 
SNPCHRBPGeneA1Never smoker compared to current smoker
model 1model 2model 3
OR (95% CI)p valueOR (95% CI)p valueOR (95% CI)p value
rs2431412 19 41349259 CYP2A6 0.58 (0.37–0.9) 0.015 0.52 (0.33–0.81) 0.005 0.52 (0.33–0.83) 0.006 
rs45625338 234637905 UGT1A9 0.71 (0.56–0.91) 0.008 0.67 (0.51–0.87) 0.003 0.67 (0.51–0.88) 0.004 
rs41297431 70351024 UGT2B4 1.21 (0.94–1.55) 0.146 1.18 (0.91–1.54) 0.215 1.16 (0.88–1.52) 0.283 
rs118063322 69884990 UGT2B10 0.85 (0.73–0.98) 0.026 0.85 (0.73–1.00) 0.044 0.86 (0.73–1.01) 0.061 
rs144769946 69509560 UGT2B15 1.11 (0.98–1.26) 0.109 1.07 (0.94–1.22) 0.321 1.08 (0.94–1.24) 0.260 
rs2715904 201532203 AOX1 0.92 (0.79–1.07) 0.265 0.90 (0.77–1.06) 0.216 0.94 (0.8–1.11) 0.457 
SNPCHRBPGeneA1Never smoker compared to current smoker
model 1model 2model 3
OR (95% CI)p valueOR (95% CI)p valueOR (95% CI)p value
rs2431412 19 41349259 CYP2A6 0.58 (0.37–0.9) 0.015 0.52 (0.33–0.81) 0.005 0.52 (0.33–0.83) 0.006 
rs45625338 234637905 UGT1A9 0.71 (0.56–0.91) 0.008 0.67 (0.51–0.87) 0.003 0.67 (0.51–0.88) 0.004 
rs41297431 70351024 UGT2B4 1.21 (0.94–1.55) 0.146 1.18 (0.91–1.54) 0.215 1.16 (0.88–1.52) 0.283 
rs118063322 69884990 UGT2B10 0.85 (0.73–0.98) 0.026 0.85 (0.73–1.00) 0.044 0.86 (0.73–1.01) 0.061 
rs144769946 69509560 UGT2B15 1.11 (0.98–1.26) 0.109 1.07 (0.94–1.22) 0.321 1.08 (0.94–1.24) 0.260 
rs2715904 201532203 AOX1 0.92 (0.79–1.07) 0.265 0.90 (0.77–1.06) 0.216 0.94 (0.8–1.11) 0.457 
SNPCHRBPGeneA1Never smoker compared to former smoker
model 1model 2model 3
OR (95% CI)p valueOR (95% CI)p valueOR (95% CI)p value
rs2431412 19 41349259 CYP2A6 0.84 (0.65–1.09) 0.856 1.00 (0.70–1.45) 0.983 1.01 (0.70–1.47) 0.946 
rs45625338 234637905 UGT1A9 1.10 (0.89–1.35) 0.399 1.09 (0.87–1.35) 0.457 1.12 (0.90–1.40) 0.321 
rs41297431 70351024 UGT2B4 0.84 (0.65–1.09) 0.187 0.86 (0.66–1.11) 0.251 0.82 (0.63–1.08) 0.163 
rs118063322 69884990 UGT2B10 1.00 (0.88–1.14) 0.987 1.01 (0.88–1.15) 0.914 1.01 (0.88–1.16) 0.908 
rs144769946 69509560 UGT2B15 0.96 (0.85–1.08) 0.498 0.95 (0.84–1.07) 0.408 0.96 (0.85–1.09) 0.569 
rs2715904 201532203 AOX1 1.06 (0.92–1.21) 0.426 1.05 (0.91–1.21) 0.476 1.08 (0.93–1.25) 0.315 
SNPCHRBPGeneA1Never smoker compared to former smoker
model 1model 2model 3
OR (95% CI)p valueOR (95% CI)p valueOR (95% CI)p value
rs2431412 19 41349259 CYP2A6 0.84 (0.65–1.09) 0.856 1.00 (0.70–1.45) 0.983 1.01 (0.70–1.47) 0.946 
rs45625338 234637905 UGT1A9 1.10 (0.89–1.35) 0.399 1.09 (0.87–1.35) 0.457 1.12 (0.90–1.40) 0.321 
rs41297431 70351024 UGT2B4 0.84 (0.65–1.09) 0.187 0.86 (0.66–1.11) 0.251 0.82 (0.63–1.08) 0.163 
rs118063322 69884990 UGT2B10 1.00 (0.88–1.14) 0.987 1.01 (0.88–1.15) 0.914 1.01 (0.88–1.16) 0.908 
rs144769946 69509560 UGT2B15 0.96 (0.85–1.08) 0.498 0.95 (0.84–1.07) 0.408 0.96 (0.85–1.09) 0.569 
rs2715904 201532203 AOX1 1.06 (0.92–1.21) 0.426 1.05 (0.91–1.21) 0.476 1.08 (0.93–1.25) 0.315 

Model 1, adjusted by age; model 2, adjusted by age, drinking status, and exercise status; model 3, adjusted by age, drinking status, exercise status, BMI, current marriage status, and monthly income.

SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; CHR, chromosome; BP, base pair; A1, minor allele; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

As shown in Table 3, a higher GRS in the former compared to current smokers and never compared to current smokers comparisons was associated with an increased likelihood of being a current smoker (OR = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.12–1.25, p = 4.53E−09 and OR = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.07–1.2, p = 3.33E−05, respectively). In contrast, no significant association was observed in the never compared to former smokers comparison (OR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.92–1.02, p = 1.79E−01). These associations remained consistent across all three models.

Table 3.

Association between GRS and smoking status

Smoking groupModel 1Model 2Model 3
OR (95% CI)p valueOR (95% CI)p valueOR (95% CI)p value
Former smoker compared to current smoker 1.18 (1.12–1.25) 2.18E−09 1.18 (1.12–1.25) 2.48E−09 1.18 (1.12–1.25) 4.53E−09 
Never smoker compared to current smoker 1.14 (1.07–1.2) 1.42E−05 1.14 (1.07–1.21) 2.50E−05 1.13 (1.07–1.2) 3.33E−05 
Never smoker compared to former smoker 0.96 (0.92–1.01) 1.57E−01 0.97 (0.92–1.02) 1.92E−01 0.96 (0.92–1.02) 1.79E−01 
Smoking groupModel 1Model 2Model 3
OR (95% CI)p valueOR (95% CI)p valueOR (95% CI)p value
Former smoker compared to current smoker 1.18 (1.12–1.25) 2.18E−09 1.18 (1.12–1.25) 2.48E−09 1.18 (1.12–1.25) 4.53E−09 
Never smoker compared to current smoker 1.14 (1.07–1.2) 1.42E−05 1.14 (1.07–1.21) 2.50E−05 1.13 (1.07–1.2) 3.33E−05 
Never smoker compared to former smoker 0.96 (0.92–1.01) 1.57E−01 0.97 (0.92–1.02) 1.92E−01 0.96 (0.92–1.02) 1.79E−01 

Model 1, adjusted by age; model 2, adjusted by age, drinking status, and exercise status; model 3, adjusted by age, drinking status, exercise status, BMI, current marriage status, and monthly income.

Online supplementary Table 3 presents the distribution of effect allele numbers across the three smoking groups. Individuals with more effect alleles, linked to greater difficulty in smoking cessation, were more prevalent among the current smokers. An increase in effect allele numbers was associated with a higher proportion of current smokers, particularly in the higher effect allele category.

Online supplementary Table 4 presents the linear regression analysis linking the number of effect alleles with smoking status. An increased number of effect alleles was consistently associated with a higher likelihood of smoking in all models (OR = 1.04, 95% CI: 1.02–1.06, p < 0.0001 for each model).

Uhl et al. [14] demonstrated that successful smoking cessation is influenced by polygenic factors. Nicotine is primarily metabolized into cotinine [15], and the nicotine metabolic rate can help predict the success of transdermal nicotine therapy [4]. Kaufmann et al. [4] also showed that faster nicotine metabolism significantly reduces the likelihood of quitting smoking. To our knowledge, this is the first large population-based study to examine the genetic polymorphisms associated with smoking cessation in men, focusing on nicotine metabolism-related genes in Korea.

Our findings offer new insights into the association between genetic polymorphisms involved in nicotine metabolism and smoking cessation among Koreans, adding to research on ethnic variability. The significant correlation between a higher GRS and current smoking status aligns with studies showing genetic predisposition to nicotine dependence in other populations, such as African Americans and Europeans. For instance, the CYP2A6 SNP rs12459249 has been identified as a significant variant affecting nicotine metabolism rates in African American smokers, contributing to the observed ethnic differences in nicotine metabolism between African American and European American populations [9]. In our study, we identified several SNPs in nicotine metabolism-related genes associated with smoking cessation in Koreans, indicating that genetic variants influencing nicotine dependence may vary across populations. While SNPs like rs56113850 and rs113288603, which are linked to nicotine metabolic ratios in Finnish cohorts [8], were not prominent in our Korean population, this highlights population-specific genetic influences on smoking behavior.

This study identifies novel SNPs associated with smoking cessation, emphasizing the need for population-specific genetic research. These SNPs, selected based on their functional significance within nicotine metabolism pathways, have not been previously investigated in smoking cessation contexts. Although not previously linked to smoking cessation, their presence in key nicotine-metabolizing genes suggests that genetic variants within the same pathway may influence smoking behavior differently across populations. This study provides initial insights into the associations of these SNPs with smoking behaviors in a Korean cohort, expanding the understanding of genetic factors in nicotine dependence.

The GRS analysis revealed significant correlations between cumulative genetic risk and smoking behavior. A higher GRS was significantly associated with an increased likelihood of being a current smoker, across all adjusted models accounting for confounders such as age, drinking status, exercise, BMI, marital status, and income, underscoring the robustness of this relationship. The absence of a significant association between never and former smokers indicates that the GRS specifically distinguishes current smokers, making it a potential predictor of ongoing nicotine dependence. This finding aligns with those of previous studies showing that genetic predispositions play a crucial role in sustaining nicotine dependence, thereby affecting smoking cessation outcomes [16]. By aggregating the effects of multiple SNPs involved in nicotine metabolism, our GRS analysis provides a more comprehensive understanding of the genetic influences on smoking behavior than single SNP analyses. These findings highlight the importance of genetic studies across diverse populations to identify unique genetic factors in smoking behavior and cessation and to guide personalized interventions. In the Korean population, the association between higher GRS and current smoking status suggests that this model could identify individuals at higher risk of persistent smoking, informing more targeted and effective cessation strategies.

This study has some limitations. It is a candidate gene association study, not a genome-wide association study; therefore, we did not use a genome-wide association study p value significance threshold of 5 × 10−8. Our selection of specific genes was guided by prior knowledge of nicotine metabolic processes. The candidate gene approach allowed us to concentrate on known genetic factors in metabolic pathways, thus facilitating a more focused investigation. A genome-wide approach may not adequately explain these underlying mechanisms. We chose the candidate gene method to explore the specific functional roles of genes in nicotine metabolism. Furthermore, we did not apply a Bonferroni correction to the 1,644 individual SNP tests due to its highly stringent threshold. Instead, we conducted a GRS analysis to address multiple comparisons and SNP correlations. This method, which assesses the cumulative impact of multiple SNPs, achieved statistical significance even with stringent correction. The significant association in the GRS analysis underscores the collective influence of genetic variants on smoking cessation, offering insights into the complex genetic predisposition to smoking behavior and cessation challenges.

This study provides new insights into the link between genetic polymorphisms related to nicotine metabolism and smoking cessation in Korean men. Using a targeted candidate gene approach, specific SNPs within genes involved in nicotine metabolism were identified as influencing smoking status. Our findings highlight the potential of the GRS to predict smoking behaviors and emphasize the importance of population-specific genetic studies for customized smoking cessation interventions. These findings add to the growing understanding of genetic factors in nicotine dependence and support future research on personalized smoking cessation.

This study was conducted using bioresources provided by the National Biobank of Korea, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, Republic of Korea (2019-059). We thank the participants and survey staff of the KoGES for their contribution to this study.

The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Theragen Bio (Approval No. 700062-20190819-GP-006-02). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

This study was not supported by any sponsor or funding.

J.-M.P.: conceptualization, data curation, investigation, methodology, validation, visualization, and writing – original draft; J.-E.C.: data curation, formal analysis, resources, software, visualization, and writing – original draft; J.-W.L.: conceptualization, investigation, methodology, project administration, supervision, validation, and writing – review and editing; and K.-W.H.: formal analysis, project administration, resources, software, supervision, and writing – review and editing.

Additional Information

Jae-Min Park and Ja-Eun Choi contributed equally to this work and shared first authorship.

The data (KoGES Data) are publicly available at the following site: https://biobank.nih.go.kr/cmm/main/mainPage.do and can be obtained from the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency. Please contact the corresponding authors if you have any questions regarding the data. We will review your requests and assist you in accessing the data. To ensure transparency and provide full access to the data supporting our findings, a comprehensive list of all the SNPs analyzed in this study, along with their results, is available in the online supplementary material. This supplementary table includes detailed information on each SNP, allowing for a thorough examination of the genetic associations explored in our analysis.

1.
Park
YS
,
Park
S
,
Lee
CH
.
The attributable risk of smoking on all-cause mortality in Korean: a study using KNHANES IV–VI (2007–2015) with mortality data
.
Tuberc Respir Dis
.
2020
;
83
(
4
):
268
75
.
2.
Jung
KJ
,
Yun
YD
,
Baek
SJ
,
Jee
SH
,
Kim
IS
.
Smoking-attributable mortality among Korean adults, 2012
.
J Korea Soc Health Inform Stat
.
2013
;
38
(
2
):
36
48
.
3.
Statistics Korea [Internet]. Korean Statistical Information Service
.
Smoking rate (OECE)
.
2022
. [cited 2023 Oct 3]. Available from: https://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=101&tblId=DT_2KAAC04_OECD
4.
Kaufmann
A
,
Hitsman
B
,
Goelz
PM
,
Veluz-Wilkins
A
,
Blazekovic
S
,
Powers
L
, et al
.
Rate of nicotine metabolism and smoking cessation outcomes in a community-based sample of treatment-seeking smokers
.
Addict Behav
.
2015
;
51
:
93
9
.
5.
Ring
HZ
,
Lou
XJ
,
Thorn
CF
,
Benowitz
NL
.
Nicotine pathway
.
Pharmacokinetics
.
2019
[Internet] [cited 2023 Mar 15]. Available from: https://www.pharmgkb.org/pathway/PA2011
6.
Liu
M
,
Wang
H
,
Fu
Y
,
Li
X
,
Wu
P
,
Liu
G
, et al
.
The role of nicotine metabolic rate on nicotine dependence and rewarding: nicotine metabolism in Chinese male smokers and male mice
.
Mol Neurobiol
.
2024
;
61
(
10
):
7692
706
.
7.
Perez-Paramo
YX
,
Watson
CJW
,
Chen
G
,
Thomas
CE
,
Adams-Haduch
J
,
Wang
R
, et al
.
Impact of genetic variants in the nicotine metabolism pathway on nicotine metabolite levels in smokers
.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
.
2023
;
32
(
1
):
54
65
.
8.
Loukola
A
,
Buchwald
J
,
Gupta
R
,
Palviainen
T
,
Hallfors
J
,
Tikkanen
E
, et al
.
A genome-wide association study of a biomarker of nicotine metabolism
.
Plos Genet
.
2015
;
11
(
9
):
e1005498
.
9.
Chenoweth
MJ
,
Ware
JJ
,
Zhu
AZX
,
Cole
CB
,
Cox
LS
,
Nollen
N
, et al
.
Genome-wide association study of a nicotine metabolism biomarker in African American smokers: impact of chromosome 19 genetic influences
.
Addiction
.
2018
;
113
(
3
):
509
23
.
10.
Jones
SK
,
Wolf
BJ
,
Froeliger
B
,
Wallace
K
,
Carpenter
MJ
,
Alberg
AJ
.
Nicotine metabolism predicted by CYP2A6 genotypes in relation to smoking cessation: a systematic review
.
Nicotine Tob Res
.
2022
;
24
(
5
):
633
42
.
11.
Klemperer
EM
,
Hughes
JR
,
Callas
PW
,
West
JC
,
Villanti
AC
.
Tobacco and nicotine use among US adult “never smokers” in wave 4 (2016–2018) of the population assessment of tobacco and health study
.
Nicotine Tob Res
.
2021
;
23
(
7
):
1199
207
.
12.
Choi
SW
,
Mak
TS
,
O’Reilly
PF
.
Tutorial: a guide to performing polygenic risk score analyses
.
Nat Protoc
.
2020
;
15
(
9
):
2759
72
.
13.
Collister
JA
,
Liu
X
,
Clifton
L
.
Calculating polygenic risk scores (PRS) in UK Biobank: a practical guide for epidemiologists
.
Front Genet
.
2022
;
13
:
818574
.
14.
Uhl
GR
,
Liu
QR
,
Drgon
T
,
Johnson
C
,
Walther
D
,
Rose
JE
, et al
.
Molecular genetics of successful smoking cessation: convergent genome-wide association study results
.
Arch Gen Psychiatry
.
2008
;
65
(
6
):
683
93
.
15.
Patel
YM
,
Stram
DO
,
Wilkens
LR
,
Park
SS
,
Henderson
BE
,
Le Marchand
L
, et al
.
The contribution of common genetic variation to nicotine and cotinine glucuronidation in multiple ethnic/racial populations
.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
.
2015
;
24
(
1
):
119
27
.
16.
Belsky
DW
,
Moffitt
TE
,
Baker
TB
,
Biddle
AK
,
Evans
JP
,
Harrington
H
, et al
.
Polygenic risk and the developmental progression to heavy, persistent smoking and nicotine dependence: evidence from a 4-decade longitudinal study
.
JAMA Psychiatry
.
2013
;
70
(
5
):
534
42
.