Background: There is a growing demand of dialysis in Asia for end-stage renal failure patients. Diabetes mellitus is the leading cause of end-stage renal failure in many countries in Asia. Summary: The growth of peritoneal dialysis (PD) in Asia is significant and seeing a good trend. With the enhanced practices of PD, the quality of care in PD in Asia is also improved. Overall, PD and hemodialysis (HD) are comparable in clinical outcome. There is a global trend in the reduction of peritonitis rates and Asian countries also witness such improvement. The socio-economic benefits of PD for end-stage renal failure patients in both urban and rural areas in the developed and developing regions of Asia are an important consideration. This can help to reduce the financial burden of renal failure in addressing the growing demand of patients on dialysis. Initiatives should be considered to further drive down the cost of PD in Asia. Key Messages: Growing demand for dialysis by an increasing number of end-stage renal failure patients requires the use of a cost-effective quality dialysis modality. PD is found to be comparable to HD in outcome and quality. In most countries in Asia, PD should be more cost-effective than HD. A ‘PD-first' or a ‘PD as first considered therapy' policy can be an overall strategy in many countries in Asia in managing renal failure patients, taking the examples of Hong Kong and Thailand. Facts from East and West: (1) PD is cheaper than HD and provides a better quality of life worldwide, but its prevalence is significantly lower than that of HD in all countries, with the exception of Hong Kong. Allowing reimbursement of PD but not HD has permitted to increase the use of PD over HD in many Asian countries like Hong Kong, Vietnam, Taiwan, Thailand, as well as in New Zealand and Australia over the last years. In the Western world, however, HD is still promoted, and the proportion of patients treated with PD decreases. Japan remains an exception in Asia where PD penetration is very low. Lack of adequate education of practitioners and information of patients might as well be reasons for the low penetration of PD in both the East and West. (2) Patient survival of PD varies between and within countries but is globally similar to HD. (3) Peritonitis remains the main cause of morbidity in PD patients. South Asian countries face specific issues such as high tuberculosis and mycobacterial infections, which are rare in developed Asian and Western countries. The infection rate is affected by climatic and socio-economic factors and is higher in hot, humid and rural areas. (4) Nevertheless, the promotion of a PD-first policy might be beneficial particularly for remote populations in emerging countries where the end-stage renal disease rate is increasing dramatically.

1.
Liyanage T, Ninomiya T, Jha V, Neal B, Patrice HM, Okpechi I, Zhao MH, Lv J, Garg AX, Knight J, Rodgers A, Gallagher M, Kotwal S, Cass A, Perkovic V: Worldwide access to treatment for end-stage kidney disease: a systematic review. Lancet 2015;385:1975-1982.
2.
Saran R, Li Y, Robinson B, et al: US Renal Data System 2014 annual data report: epidemiology of kidney disease in the United States. Am J Kidney Dis 2015;65(6 suppl 1):A7.
3.
Abraham G: The challenges of renal replacement therapy in Asia. Nat Clin Pract Nephrol 2008;4:643.
4.
Fresenius Medical Care: Fresenius Medical Care Annual Report 2013: ESRD Patients in 2013: A Global Perspective. Bad Homburg, Fresenius Medical Care, 2013.
5.
Jain AK, Blake P, Cordy P, Garg AX: Global trends in rates of peritoneal dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2012;23:533-544.
6.
Li PK, Chow KM: How to have a successful peritoneal dialysis program. Perit Dial Int 2003;23(suppl 2):S183-S187.
7.
Li PK, Chow KM: Peritoneal dialysis-first policy made successful: perspectives and actions. Am J Kidney Dis 2013;62:993-1005.
8.
Lameire N, van Biesen W: Epidemiology of peritoneal dialysis: a story of believers and nonbelievers. Nat Rev Nephrol 2010;6:75-82.
9.
Kawaguchi Y: Various obstacles to peritoneal dialysis development in Japan: too much money? Too much fear? Perit Dial Int 2007;27(suppl 2):S56-S58.
10.
Vikrant S: Long-term clinical outcomes of peritoneal dialysis patients: 9-year experience of a single center from North India. Perit Dial Int 2014;34:426-433.
11.
Jha V: Peritoneal dialysis in India: current status and challenges. Perit Dial Int 2008;28 (suppl 3):S36-S41.
12.
Jha V: Current status of end-stage renal disease care in India and Pakistan. Kidney Int Suppl 2013;3:157-160.
13.
Rajapurkar MM, John GT, Kirpalani AL, Abraham G, Agarwal SK, Almeida AF, Gang S, Gupta A, Modi G, Pahari D, Pisharody R, Prakash J, Raman A, Rana DS, Sharma RK, Sahoo RN, Sakhuja V, Tatapudi RR, Jha V: What do we know about chronic kidney disease in India: first report of the Indian CKD registry. BMC Nephrol 2012;13:10.
14.
Xie Y, Chen X: Epidemiology, major outcomes, risk factors, prevention and management of chronic kidney disease in China. Am J Nephrol 2008;28:1-7.
15.
Zuo L, Wang M: Current burden and probable increasing incidence of ESRD in China. Clin Nephrol 2010;74(suppl 1):S20-S22.
16.
Liu ZH: Nephrology in China. Nat Rev Nephrol 2013;9:523-528.
17.
Karopadi AN, Mason G, Rettore E, Ronco C: Cost of peritoneal dialysis and haemodialysis across the world. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2013;28:2553-2569.
18.
Lo WK: Peritoneal dialysis in the Far East - an astonishing situation in 2008. Perit Dial Int 2009;29(suppl 2):S227-S229.
19.
Tungsanga K, Kanjanabuch T, Mahatanan N, Praditpornsilp K, Avihingsanon Y, Eiam-Ong S: The status of, and obstacles to, continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in Thailand. Perit Dial Int 2008;28(suppl 3):S53-S58.
20.
Dhanakijcharoen P, Sirivongs D, Aruyapitipan S, Chuengsaman P, Lumpaopong A: The ‘PD First' policy in Thailand: three-years experiences (2008-2011). J Med Assoc Thai 2011;94(suppl 4):S153-S161.
21.
Davies SJ: Peritoneal dialysis - current status and future challenges. Nat Rev Nephrol 2013;9:399-408.
22.
Ho YW, Chau KF, Choy BY, Fung KS, Cheng YL, et al: Hong Kong renal registry report 2012. Hong Kong J Nephrol 2013;15:28-43.
23.
McDonald S, Hurst K: ANZDATA registry report 2012. Adelaide, South Australia. Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry 2012.
24.
Choo JCJ, Ong SY, Krishnasamy T, Foo MWY: The Singapore General Hospital Peritoneal Dialysis Programme from 2000-2008. Proc Singapore Healthc 2012;21:132-139.
25.
Wu MS, Wu IW, Hsu KH: Survival analysis of Taiwan Renal Registry Data System (TWRDS) 2000-2009. Acta Nephrol 2012;26:104-108.
26.
Yao Q, Zhang W, Qian J: Dialysis status in China: a report from the Shanghai Dialysis Registry (2000-2005). Ethn Dis 2009;19:23-26 .
27.
Zhang F, Liu H, Gong X, Liu F, Peng Y, Cheng M, Guo C: Risk factors for mortality in Chinese patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int 2015;35:199-205.
28.
Abraham G, Kumar V, Nayak KS, Ravichandran R, Srinivasan G, Krishnamurthy M, Prasath AK, Kumar S, Thiagarajan T, Mathew M, Lesley N: Predictors of long-term survival on peritoneal dialysis in South India: a multicenter study. Perit Dial Int 2010;30:29-34.
29.
Prasad N, Gupta A, Sinha A, Singh A, Sharma RK, Kumar A, Kaul A: A comparison of outcomes between diabetic and nondiabetic CAPD patients in India. Perit Dial Int 2008;28:468-476.
30.
Weiner DE, Tighiouart H, Stark PC, Amin MG, MacLeod B, Griffith JL, et al: Kidney disease as a risk factor for recurrent cardiovascular disease and mortality. Am J Kidney Dis 2004;44:198-206.
31.
Szeto CC, Wong TY, Chow KM, Leung CB, Li PK: Are peritoneal dialysis patients with and without residual renal function equivalent for survival study? Insight from a retrospective review of the cause of death. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2003;18:977-982.
32.
Foley RN, Parfrey PS, Sarnak MJ: Clinical epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in chronic renal disease. Am J Kidney Dis 1998;32(suppl 3):S112-S119.
33.
Li PK, Chow KM: The clinical and epidemiological aspects of vascular mortality in chronic peritoneal dialysis patients. Perit Dial Int 2005;25(suppl 3):S80-S83.
34.
Szeto CC, Chow KM, Kwan BC, et al: New-onset hyperglycemia in nondiabetic Chinese patients started on peritoneal dialysis. Am J Kidney Dis 2007;49:524-532.
35.
Szeto CC, Kwan BC, Chow KM, Leung CB, Cheng PM, Law MC, Li PKT: Metabolic syndrome in peritoneal dialysis patients: choice of diagnostic criteria and prognostic implications. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2014;9:779-787.
36.
Kiran VR, Zhu TY, Yip T, Lui SL, Lo WK: Body mass index and mortality risk in Asian peritoneal dialysis patients in Hong Kong - impact of diabetes and cardiovascular disease status. Perit Dial Int 2014;34:390-398.
37.
Kim YK, Kim SH, Kim HW, Kim YO, Jin DC, et al: The association between body mass index and mortality on peritoneal dialysis: a prospective cohort study. Perit Dial Int 2014;34:383-389.
38.
Prasad N, Sinha A, Gupta A, Sharma RK, Bhadauria D, et al: Effect of body mass index on outcomes of peritoneal dialysis patients in India. Perit Dial Int 2014;34:399-408.
39.
Li PK, Szeto CC, Piraino B, Bernardini J, Figueiredo AE, et al: Peritoneal dialysis-related infections recommendations: 2010 update. Perit Dial Int 2010;30:393-423.
40.
Han SH, Lee SC, Ahn SV, Lee JE, Choi HY, Kim BS, et al: Improving outcome of CAPD: twenty-five years' experience in a single Korean center. Perit Dial Int 2007;27:432-440.
41.
Mizuno M, Ito Y, Tanaka A, Suzuki Y, Hiramatsu H, Watanabe M, et al: Peritonitis is still an important factor for withdrawal from peritoneal dialysis therapy in the Tokai area of Japan. Clin Exp Nephrol 2011;15:727-737.
42.
Abraham G, Pratap B, Sankarasubbaiyan S, Govindan P, Nayak KS, et al: Chronic peritoneal dialysis in South Asia - challenges and future. Perit Dial Int 2008;28:13-19.
43.
Jha V, Chugh KS: The practice of dialysis in the developing countries. Hemodial Int 2003;7:239-249.
44.
Matuszkiewicz-Rowinska J: Update on fungal peritonitis and its treatment. Perit Dial Int 2009;29(suppl 2):S161-S165.
45.
Lui SL, Chan TM, Lai KN, Lo WK: Tuberculous and fungal peritonitis in patients undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int 2007;27(suppl 2):S263-S266.
46.
Mujais S: Microbiology and outcomes of peritonitis in North America. Kidney Int Suppl 2006;103:S55-S62.
47.
Li PK, Chow KM: Infectious complications in dialysis - epidemiology and outcomes. Nat Rev Nephrol 2012;8:77-88.
48.
Prasad KN, Prasad N, Gupta A, Sharma RK, Verma AK, Ayyagari A: Fungal peritonitis in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis: a single centre Indian experience. J Infect 2004;48:96-101.
49.
Ram R, Swarnalatha G, Neela P, Murty KV: Fungal peritonitis in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis: a single-centre experience in India. Nephron Clin Pract 2008;110:c207-c212.
50.
Chow KM, Li PK: Choice of dialysis - what to do with economic incentives. Nat Rev Nephrol 2012;8:495-496.
51.
Zhou JH, Ni ZH, Mei CL, Yu XQ, Liu FY, Miao LN, et al: Efficacy and safety of Changfu peritoneal dialysis solution: a multi-center prospective randomized controlled trial. Chin Med J (Engl) 2013;126:4204-4209.
52.
Leung CB, Cheung WL, Li PK: Renal registry in Hong Kong - the first 20 years. Kidney Int Suppl 2015;5:33-38.
53.
Liu FX, Rutherford P, Smoyer-Tomic K, et al: A global overview of renal registries: a systematic review. BMC Nephrol 2015;16:31.
54.
Jin DC, Ha IS, Kim NH, Lee SW, Lee JS, Yoon SR, Kim BS: Brief report: renal replacement therapy in Korea, 2010. Kidney Res Clin Pract 2012;31:62-71.
55.
Nakamoto H, Kawaguchi Y, Suzuki H: Is technique survival on peritoneal dialysis better in Japan? Perit Dial Int 2006;26:136-143.
56.
Hsieh YP, Chang CC, Wang SC, Wen YK, Chiu PF, Yang Y: Predictors for and impact of high peritonitis rate in Taiwanese continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients. Int Urol Nephrol 2015;47:183-189.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.