Introduction: Biomarkers are urgently required to identify peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients at risk of cardiovascular (CV) events. This study aimed to investigate the predictive value of soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 (sST2) for CV events in patients undergoing incident PD. Methods: In this prospective cohort study, incident PD patients were enrolled. Blood samples to measure sST2 levels were obtained before PD catheter implantation. The patients underwent a standard peritoneal equilibration test (PET) after initiation of PD for 4–6 weeks. The sST2 levels in both serum and dialysate were determined using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. CV events were recorded during the follow-up period. Results: A total of 137 patients were enrolled. During the follow-up period of 17.3 months, 49 (35.76%) patients experienced CV events. When patients were dichotomized based on the median values and the calculated cutoff values of sST2, the higher sST2 group had 2.980- and 3.048-fold increased risks of CV events, respectively, when compared with the lower sST2 group. Moreover, the prognostic value of sST2 remained significant as a continuous variable (per 1 standard deviation increase, hazard ratio [HR] = 1.037, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.010–1.066, p = 0.008). N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels were found to indicate a higher risk only when dichotomized based on the calculated cutoff values. Furthermore, serum sST2 and NT-proBNP levels simultaneously above the calculated cutoff values were associated with a higher risk of CV events (HR = 3.398, 95% CI 1.813–6.367, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Baseline serum sST2 level is an independent predictor of the risk of CV events in patients receiving incident PD, and in combination with NT-proBNP level, it can provide a more accurate predictive value.

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a home-based renal replacement therapy for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) [1]. The major cause of death in patients undergoing PD is cardiovascular (CV) disease, which accounts for nearly half of all deaths of a known cause [2]. Therefore, the prediction of CV events is critical in these patients, as it may improve the overall management and prognosis.

Suppression of tumorigenicity-2 (ST2) is a member of the interleukin (IL)-1 receptor family [3]. The two essential forms are a transmembrane form (ST2 ligand, ST2L) and a soluble form (sST2). By binding to ST2L, IL-33 exerts its cellular functions, including several cardioprotective effects. sST2 acts as a decoy receptor to sequester free IL-33, preventing activation of the ST2/IL-33 signaling pathway and subsequently aggravating myocardial fibrosis and myocardial cell apoptosis [4, 5]. It is regarded as a marker of fibrosis, remodeling, and inflammation.

Previous studies have demonstrated that serum sST2 level is independent of renal function and age and is not influenced by hemodialysis (HD) [6‒8]. Therefore, it may be a stable biomarker, and its prognostic value in patients undergoing HD has attracted increasing interest. Studies in HD have found that elevated sST2 levels are independently predictive of all-cause and CV mortality [9, 10]. However, the role of sST2 in PD has not been adequately investigated. Only one study involving patients with prevalent PD has shown that higher serum sST2 levels are associated with increased mortality and CV event risk [11]. In this study, we explored the ability of sST2 to predict CV events in patients receiving incident PD.

Study Participants

In this longitudinal single-center cohort study, all adult patients (≥18 years of age) who initiated PD therapy from March 2020 to June 2021 in the PD center of West China Hospital of Sichuan University and regularly been followed up subsequently were included. Exclusion criteria included a history of kidney transplantation, prior HD, active infections before the first peritoneal equilibration test (PET), malignancy, chronic liver disease, or systemic rheumatic disease. Patients who could not tolerate a 2-L peritoneal fill volume during PET were also excluded.

This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of West China Hospital of Sichuan University [2019(1015)]. Written informed consent was obtained from all the participants. This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (https://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx, ChiCTR1900027473).

Data Collection and Laboratory Measurement

The patients’ medical histories, demographic characteristics, and dates of PD initiation were collected. Baseline CV disease, smoking history, and type of PD were also recorded. Blood samples to measure sST2 levels were obtained before PD catheter implantation. All patients underwent a standard PET 4–6 weeks after initiation of PD. Blood samples for laboratory parameters and dialysate samples were obtained during the first PET. Complete blood count, biochemical indexes, high-sensitive C-reactive protein, IL-6, β2-microglobulin, intact parathyroid hormone, and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) were measured in the central clinical laboratory of our hospital. The urea clearance index and weekly creatinine clearance (Ccr) were determined using standard methods and indexed by body surface area to assess dialysis adequacy. Residual renal function was calculated as the average of 24-h urinary urea and Ccr values [12].

Assessment of sST2 Concentration

All samples (serum after centrifugation) were stored in a deep freezer at −80°C. sST2 levels in both the serum and dialysate were determined using specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits according to the manufacturer’s recommendations (R&D Systems, Inc. Minneapolis, MN, USA). The results are expressed as ng/mL. The lower limit of detection for sST2 was 31.3 pg/mL.

Study Outcomes and Follow-Up

The clinical outcome measure was the occurrence of CV events. According to the Framingham Heart Study, CV events are defined as those related to coronary heart disease (coronary death, myocardial infarction, coronary insufficiency, and angina) and peripheral artery disease (intermittent claudication), cerebrovascular events (ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, and transient ischemic attack), and heart failure [13]. All patients were followed until December 2023, censored at death or until the termination of PD treatment, whichever occurred first.

Statistical Analysis

Continuous variables are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation or median (interquartile range, IQR) and were compared using Student’s t test or the Mann-Whitney U test. Discrete variables are expressed as percentages and were compared using the χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test. Spearman’s rank correlation analysis was performed to analyze the associations between serum sST2 level and other variables. To determine variables independently associated with sST2, a stepwise multiple linear regression analysis was performed. Cox proportional regression analyses were performed to determine the independent prognostic values of sST2 and NT-proBNP for CV events. Cumulative survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and compared using log-rank tests. Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated to determine the prognostic abilities of sST2 and NT-proBNP and identify the optimal cutoff values. All data analyses were performed using SPSS version 26.0 (SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL, USA), and statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

Cohort Characteristics

Figure 1 shows the flowchart of the study. 164 patients underwent serum sST2 measurements and received PD catheter implantation. One patient withdrew from PD for catheter migration, and 26 patients were excluded for the following reasons: peritonitis (5), unqualified samples (8), lost to follow-up (9) and 4 patients could not tolerate 2 L peritoneal fill volume during the PET because of small abdominal cavity.

Fig. 1.

Study flowchart.

In total, the study enrolled 137 participants with a median age of 47 years (IQR 36–54); 59.82% of them were men. Primary glomerulonephritis was the most common cause of ESRD in the study population. About 10.22% of the patients had CV disease at baseline. All the participants were prescribed peritoneal dialysate containing 1.5% or 2.5% dextrose. Detailed information on the patients’ baseline characteristics is presented in Table 1.

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of 137 incident PD patients

VariablesN = 137
Male, n (%) 82 (59.85) 
Age, years 47 (36,54) 
BSA, m2 1.6±0.2 
Systolic pressure, mm Hg 135.72±21.2 
Diastolic pressure, mm Hg 88.69±14.33 
Cause of ESRD, n (%) 
 Primary glomerulonephritis 95 (69.34) 
 Diabetic kidney disease 15 (10.95) 
 Hypertensive nephrosclerosis 10 (7.30) 
 Polycystic kidney disease 6 (4.38) 
 Others 11 (8.03) 
CV disease, n (%) 14 (10.22) 
 Coronary heart disease 1 (0.73) 
 Heart failure 1 (0.73) 
 Cerebrovascular events 11 (8.03) 
 Peripheral artery disease 1 (0.73) 
Smoking history 24 (17.25) 
CAPD, n (%) 112 (81.75) 
APD, n (%) 25 (18.25) 
24 h urine volume, L/24 h 1 (0.7, 1.3) 
Hemoglobin, g/L 103.68±15.93 
Albumin, g/L 37.04±4.54 
Glucose, mmol/L 4.9 (4.57, 5.48) 
Blood urea, mmol/L 20.4 (16.7, 25.05) 
eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m2 5.88 (4.55, 7.74) 
Serum creatine, μmol/L 744 (602, 987.5) 
Cystatin-C, mg/L 5.05 (4.45, 5.77) 
Uric acid, μmol/L 381.94±103.87 
Triglyceride, mmol/L 1.23 (0.84, 1.81) 
Total cholesterol, mmol/L 4.06±1.00 
Alkaline phosphatase, IU/L 69 (60, 88.75) 
Sodium, mmol/L 141.7 (139.9, 143.1) 
Potassium, mmol/L 4.14±0.58 
Calcium, mmol/L 2.24 (2.14, 2.32) 
Phosphate, mmol/L 1.5 (1.3, 1.9) 
IL-6, pg/mL 4.13 (2.99, 6.65) 
β2-MG, mg/L 22.6 (18.8, 30.3) 
hs-CRP, mg/L 1.39 (0.48, 3.73) 
iPTH, pmol/L 22.64 (13, 34.61) 
Peritoneal Kt/V 0.99 (0.75, 1.46) 
Renal Kt/V 0.85 (0.49, 1.39) 
Total Kt/V 2.02 (1.4, 2.67) 
Peritoneal Ccr, L/1.73 m2 28.53 (22.1, 35.12) 
Renal Ccr, L/1.73 m2 50.15 (28.48, 74.74) 
Total Ccr, L/1.73 m2 77.76 (58.96, 102.84) 
RRF, mL/min/1.73 m2 4.56 (2.79, 6.76) 
D/P Cr 0.62±0.12 
NT-ProBNP, pg/mL 1685 (753, 4,560.50) 
Serum sST2, ng/mL 11.9 (7.3, 18.53) 
Dialysate sST2, ng/mL 0.27 (0.14, 0.52) 
VariablesN = 137
Male, n (%) 82 (59.85) 
Age, years 47 (36,54) 
BSA, m2 1.6±0.2 
Systolic pressure, mm Hg 135.72±21.2 
Diastolic pressure, mm Hg 88.69±14.33 
Cause of ESRD, n (%) 
 Primary glomerulonephritis 95 (69.34) 
 Diabetic kidney disease 15 (10.95) 
 Hypertensive nephrosclerosis 10 (7.30) 
 Polycystic kidney disease 6 (4.38) 
 Others 11 (8.03) 
CV disease, n (%) 14 (10.22) 
 Coronary heart disease 1 (0.73) 
 Heart failure 1 (0.73) 
 Cerebrovascular events 11 (8.03) 
 Peripheral artery disease 1 (0.73) 
Smoking history 24 (17.25) 
CAPD, n (%) 112 (81.75) 
APD, n (%) 25 (18.25) 
24 h urine volume, L/24 h 1 (0.7, 1.3) 
Hemoglobin, g/L 103.68±15.93 
Albumin, g/L 37.04±4.54 
Glucose, mmol/L 4.9 (4.57, 5.48) 
Blood urea, mmol/L 20.4 (16.7, 25.05) 
eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m2 5.88 (4.55, 7.74) 
Serum creatine, μmol/L 744 (602, 987.5) 
Cystatin-C, mg/L 5.05 (4.45, 5.77) 
Uric acid, μmol/L 381.94±103.87 
Triglyceride, mmol/L 1.23 (0.84, 1.81) 
Total cholesterol, mmol/L 4.06±1.00 
Alkaline phosphatase, IU/L 69 (60, 88.75) 
Sodium, mmol/L 141.7 (139.9, 143.1) 
Potassium, mmol/L 4.14±0.58 
Calcium, mmol/L 2.24 (2.14, 2.32) 
Phosphate, mmol/L 1.5 (1.3, 1.9) 
IL-6, pg/mL 4.13 (2.99, 6.65) 
β2-MG, mg/L 22.6 (18.8, 30.3) 
hs-CRP, mg/L 1.39 (0.48, 3.73) 
iPTH, pmol/L 22.64 (13, 34.61) 
Peritoneal Kt/V 0.99 (0.75, 1.46) 
Renal Kt/V 0.85 (0.49, 1.39) 
Total Kt/V 2.02 (1.4, 2.67) 
Peritoneal Ccr, L/1.73 m2 28.53 (22.1, 35.12) 
Renal Ccr, L/1.73 m2 50.15 (28.48, 74.74) 
Total Ccr, L/1.73 m2 77.76 (58.96, 102.84) 
RRF, mL/min/1.73 m2 4.56 (2.79, 6.76) 
D/P Cr 0.62±0.12 
NT-ProBNP, pg/mL 1685 (753, 4,560.50) 
Serum sST2, ng/mL 11.9 (7.3, 18.53) 
Dialysate sST2, ng/mL 0.27 (0.14, 0.52) 

ESRD, end-stage renal stage; CAPD, continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis; APD, automated peritoneal dialysis; BSA, body surface area; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; IL-6, interleukin-6; β2-MG, β2-microglobulin; hs-CRP, high-sensitive C-reactive protein; iPTH, intact parathyroid hormone; Kt/V, urea clearance index; Ccr, creatinine clearance; RRF, residual renal function; D/P Cr, dialysate/plasma ratio of creatinine at 4 h; NT-ProBNP, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide; sST2, soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2.

Factors Associated with Serum sST2 Level

The median sST2 levels in serum and dialysate were 11.90 ng/mL (IQR 7.29–18.53) and 0.27 ng/mL (IQR 0.14–0.52), respectively. Univariate analysis showed a significant correlation between the sST2 level in serum and that in dialysate (r = 0.338, p = 0.000), but the correlation did not remain after multivariate adjustment. Male sex (r = 0.269, p = 0.001), age (r = 0.180, p = 0.024), IL-6 (r = 0.228, p = 0.006), and β2-microglobulin (r = 0.227, p = 0.006) were found to be significantly correlated with serum sST2 level (Table 2).

Table 2.

Influencing factors of baseline serum sST2 level

ParametersUnivariate analysisMultivariate analysis
rp valuerp value
Age (years) 0.144 0.094 0.180 0.024 
BSA (m20.170 0.047   
Male 0.216 0.011 0.269 0.001 
Peritoneal Kt/V −0.165 0.054   
Renal Kt/V −0.255 0.003   
Total Kt/V −0.282 0.001   
Renal Ccr (L/1.73 m2−0.207 0.016   
Total Ccr (L/1.73 m2−0.212 0.013   
RRF 0.228 0.007   
Serum creatine (μmol/L) 0.198 0.021   
eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2−0.161 0.061   
Cystatin-C (mg/L) 0.228 0.007   
Alkaline phosphatase (IU/L) 0.156 0.070   
Phosphate (mmol/L) 0.151 0.079   
IL-6 (pg/mL) 0.307 0.000 0.228 0.006 
β2-MG (mg/L) 0.302 0.000 0.227 0.006 
hs-CRP (mg/L) 0.252 0.003   
Dialysate sST2 (ng/mL) 0.338 0.000   
ParametersUnivariate analysisMultivariate analysis
rp valuerp value
Age (years) 0.144 0.094 0.180 0.024 
BSA (m20.170 0.047   
Male 0.216 0.011 0.269 0.001 
Peritoneal Kt/V −0.165 0.054   
Renal Kt/V −0.255 0.003   
Total Kt/V −0.282 0.001   
Renal Ccr (L/1.73 m2−0.207 0.016   
Total Ccr (L/1.73 m2−0.212 0.013   
RRF 0.228 0.007   
Serum creatine (μmol/L) 0.198 0.021   
eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2−0.161 0.061   
Cystatin-C (mg/L) 0.228 0.007   
Alkaline phosphatase (IU/L) 0.156 0.070   
Phosphate (mmol/L) 0.151 0.079   
IL-6 (pg/mL) 0.307 0.000 0.228 0.006 
β2-MG (mg/L) 0.302 0.000 0.227 0.006 
hs-CRP (mg/L) 0.252 0.003   
Dialysate sST2 (ng/mL) 0.338 0.000   

BSA, body surface area; IL-6, interleukin-6; β2-MG, β2-microglobulin; hs-CRP, high-sensitive C-reactive protein; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; Kt/V, urea clearance index; Ccr, creatinine clearance; RRF, residual renal function; sST2, soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2.

Predictive Value of sST2 and NT-proBNP for CV Events in Incident PD Patients

During a median follow-up of 17.28 months (IQR 9.25–21.43), 49 (35.76%) patients experienced CV events, which consisted of coronary heart disease (4 patients, 2.92%), heart failure (37 patients, 27.00%), cerebrovascular events (4 patients, 2.92%), and peripheral artery disease (4 patients, 2.92%).

Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that both sST2 and serum phosphate levels were significantly associated with the risk of CV events when using continuous approach (Table 3). When using a dichotomized approach (both median and calculated cutoff values), the higher sST2 group had 2.980- and 3.048-fold increased risks of CV events when compared to the lower sST2 group (Table 4). However, only when patients were dichotomized based on the calculated cutoff values, the higher NT-proBNP group had a 2.530-fold increased risk for CV events compared to the lower NT-proBNP group (Table 4). The Kaplan-Meier survival curves revealed that patients with higher sST2 levels showed significantly worse outcomes than those with lower sST2 levels (log-rank test; p < 0.001). Similarly, patients with elevated NT-proBNP levels had a notably higher risk of CV events (log-rank test; p < 0.001) (Fig. 2a, b).

Table 3.

Univariate Cox models for risk of cardiovascular events

VariablesUnivariate analysisMultivariate analysis
HR (95% CI)p valueHR (95% CI)p value
β2-MG 1.059 (1.025, 1.095) 0.001   
Phosphate 3.966 (2.248, 6.995) <0.001 3.194 (1.769, 5.765) <0.001 
Serum sST2 1.052 (1.027, 1.079) <0.001 1.037 (1.010, 1.066) 0.008 
Serum creatine 1.002 (1.001, 1.002) 0.002   
Weekly renal Kt/V 0.403 (0.228, 0.711) 0.002   
Leukocyte count 1.233 (1.071, 1.420) 0.004   
Weekly total Kt/V 0.580 (0.394, 0.854) 0.006   
Systolic blood pressure 1.017 (1.004, 1.030) 0.009   
NT-proBNP 1.000 (1.000, 1.000) 0.010   
24 h urine volume 0.473 (0.256, 0.874) 0.017   
Weekly renal Ccr 0.988 (0.978, 0.998) 0.022   
Weekly total Ccr 0.988 (0.978, 0.998) 0.025   
Glucose 1.218 (1.005, 1.476) 0.044   
Ferritin 1.001 (1.000, 1.002) 0.049   
VariablesUnivariate analysisMultivariate analysis
HR (95% CI)p valueHR (95% CI)p value
β2-MG 1.059 (1.025, 1.095) 0.001   
Phosphate 3.966 (2.248, 6.995) <0.001 3.194 (1.769, 5.765) <0.001 
Serum sST2 1.052 (1.027, 1.079) <0.001 1.037 (1.010, 1.066) 0.008 
Serum creatine 1.002 (1.001, 1.002) 0.002   
Weekly renal Kt/V 0.403 (0.228, 0.711) 0.002   
Leukocyte count 1.233 (1.071, 1.420) 0.004   
Weekly total Kt/V 0.580 (0.394, 0.854) 0.006   
Systolic blood pressure 1.017 (1.004, 1.030) 0.009   
NT-proBNP 1.000 (1.000, 1.000) 0.010   
24 h urine volume 0.473 (0.256, 0.874) 0.017   
Weekly renal Ccr 0.988 (0.978, 0.998) 0.022   
Weekly total Ccr 0.988 (0.978, 0.998) 0.025   
Glucose 1.218 (1.005, 1.476) 0.044   
Ferritin 1.001 (1.000, 1.002) 0.049   

β2-MG, β2-microglobulin; sST2, soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2; Kt/V, urea clearance index; Ccr, creatinine clearance.

Table 4.

Prognostic value of sST2 and NT-proBNP for cardiovascular events

Crude HR (95% CI)p valueAdjusted HR 1 (95% CI)ap value
sST2 (per 1 SD) 1.052 (1.027–1.079) <0.001 1.037 (1.010–1.066) 0.008 
sST2 ≥11.90 ng/mL (vs. <11.90) 3.079 (1.654–5.735) <0.001 2.980 (1.541–5.763) 0.001 
sST2 ≥ cutoff (vs. < cutoff) 3.259 (1.770–6.000) <0.001 3.048 (1.595–5.824) 0.001 
NT-proBNP (per 1SD) 1.000 (1.000–1.000) 0.01 
NT-proBNP ≥1,685 pg/mL (vs. <1,685) 2.784 (2.514–5.123) 0.001   
NT-proBNP ≥ cutoff (vs. < cutoff) 3.529 (1.836–6.783) <0.001 2.530 (1.237–5.176) 0.011 
sST2 and NT-proBNP* 4.090 (2.318–7.217) <0.001 3.398 (1.813–6.367) <0.001 
Crude HR (95% CI)p valueAdjusted HR 1 (95% CI)ap value
sST2 (per 1 SD) 1.052 (1.027–1.079) <0.001 1.037 (1.010–1.066) 0.008 
sST2 ≥11.90 ng/mL (vs. <11.90) 3.079 (1.654–5.735) <0.001 2.980 (1.541–5.763) 0.001 
sST2 ≥ cutoff (vs. < cutoff) 3.259 (1.770–6.000) <0.001 3.048 (1.595–5.824) 0.001 
NT-proBNP (per 1SD) 1.000 (1.000–1.000) 0.01 
NT-proBNP ≥1,685 pg/mL (vs. <1,685) 2.784 (2.514–5.123) 0.001   
NT-proBNP ≥ cutoff (vs. < cutoff) 3.529 (1.836–6.783) <0.001 2.530 (1.237–5.176) 0.011 
sST2 and NT-proBNP* 4.090 (2.318–7.217) <0.001 3.398 (1.813–6.367) <0.001 

aAdjusted HR was calculated after adjustment of variables with p < 0.05 from univariate Cox analysis.

Combination (sST2 and NT-proBNP) as biomarker was considered positive when both biomarkers were higher than their optimal cutoff values.

Fig. 2.

Kaplan-Meier survival curves for cardiovascular events. Patients stratified by elevations over established cutoff values of sST2 (a), NT-proBNP (b); sST2, and NT-proBNP (c).

Fig. 2.

Kaplan-Meier survival curves for cardiovascular events. Patients stratified by elevations over established cutoff values of sST2 (a), NT-proBNP (b); sST2, and NT-proBNP (c).

Close modal

Furthermore, serum sST2 and NT-proBNP levels simultaneously above the calculated cutoff values were associated with a higher risk (hazard ratio = 3.398, 95% CI 1.813–6.367, p < 0.001) of CV events than higher sST2 or NT-proBNP levels alone (Table 4). Kaplan-Meier survival curves revealed that patients with two markers elevated had a markedly higher risk of CV events (log-rank test; p < 0.001) (Fig. 2c).

Receiver operating characteristic curves showed that serum sST2 and NT-proBNP levels could predict CV events; the area under the curve (AUC) values were 0.680 (95% CI 0.590–0.769, p = 0.001) and 0.681 (95% CI 0.590–0.773, p < 0.001), respectively. The calculated optimal cutoff values were identified: 13.17 ng/mL for sST2 and 1,580.50 pg/mL for NT-proBNP. The difference between the AUCs was not statistically significant (p > 0.05) (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3.

Receiver operating characteristic curve of serum sST2 and NT-proBNP to predict cardiovascular events.

Fig. 3.

Receiver operating characteristic curve of serum sST2 and NT-proBNP to predict cardiovascular events.

Close modal

The major finding of this study was that baseline serum sST2 level was an independent predictor of the risk of CV events in patients receiving incident PD. To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the role of sST2 on CV outcomes in an incident PD population. Furthermore, we found that the combination of sST2 and NT-proBNP improved the prediction accuracy for these patients.

sST2 has been confirmed as a potential marker for monitoring cardiac fibrosis and remodeling in patients with chronic kidney disease [5, 14]. sST2 has been studied mainly in patients undergoing HD, where it has shown a significant predictive value for all-cause and CV mortality [9, 10, 15, 16]. However, relatively few clinical studies have reported the predictive value of sST2 in ESRD patients undergoing PD. Only one study by Choi et al. [11] prospectively investigated the predictive ability of sST2 to clinical outcomes in patients undergoing prevalent PD with a median dialysis vintage of 30 months. The median sST2 level was 70.9 ng/mL, which was higher than that of our study. As dialysis vintage increases, volume management may become more difficult, and PD patients may be chronically in a hypervolemia status. Meanwhile, other CV disease risk factors are also increasing. Thus, sST2 levels might increase with prolonged dialysis vintage. Choi et al. [11] compared the predictive value of sST2 and sLR11 for all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events. However, we evaluated the predictive value of baseline sST2 for CV events in incident PD patients and compared it with NT-proBNP, a more widely used biomarker in clinical practice. Measuring baseline sST2 levels may help identify individuals at high risk of CV events earlier and initiate prompt management, which may improve their clinical outcomes.

NT-proBNP is widely used for diagnosing heart failure and predicting CV events [17], and its application in patients with renal impairment has been reported [15]. However, it is partially cleared by the kidneys or dialysis [18]. In clinical settings, the interpretation of serum biomarker concentrations affected by kidney function or dialysis is complex and thus not easily applicable. In this study, we found that serum sST2 levels were independent of renal function, urea clearance index, and Ccr in the studied population, which is consistent with previous reports in clinical settings [5, 6, 19, 20]. We also confirmed that, only when using calculated cutoff values, NT-proBNP showed predictive power for predicting CV events. Meanwhile, regardless of using the continuous or dichotomized (both median and calculated cutoff values) approach, sST2 showed better predictive power than NT-proBNP. We speculate that sST2 might be a more stable marker for the early risk stratification of potential CV events in patients receiving incident PD.

Furthermore, we found that the predictive value of the combination of serum sST2 and NT-proBNP for CV events in incident PD patients was higher than that of sST2 or NT-proBNP alone, which is consistent with the findings of studies on maintenance HD [10]. During a median follow-up of 17.28 months, the incidence of CV events in our study reached 35.76%, reaffirming the high incidence of CV events in patients on dialysis. Cardiac disease-related mortality remains high [18], responsible for 36% of all-cause mortality in patients receiving PD, and CV events are common among this population (25–51% by county) [21, 22]. Therefore, it is essential to identify high-risk individuals among these patients and initiate appropriate intervention strategies to improve their survival. The combined use of sST2 and NT-proBNP may improve the predictive value of CV events in this population.

This study had some limitations. First, it was limited to a single center, we studied a relatively small cohort, and our findings may not be generalizable to other ethnicities. Second, echocardiography, which assesses cardiac structure and function, was not routinely performed. Third, medications that affect the CV risk were not documented and may have influenced clinical outcomes. Further research in a larger population is needed to elucidate the predictive value of sST2 for adverse CV events in patients receiving incident PD.

Baseline serum sST2 level is an independent predictor of the risk of CV events in patients undergoing incident PD, and its combination with NT-proBNP can provide a more accurate predictive value for these patients. These findings may contribute to the early identification of individuals at high risk of CV events and early intervention, which may improve the clinical outcomes of patients receiving PD.

The authors thank all the participating patients and staff of the PD Center, Department of Nephrology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University.

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the West China Hospital of Sichuan University, approval No. 2019(1015). It was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards set forth in the Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

This research was supported by Sichuan Science and Technology Program (No. 2022YFS0148).

Research idea and study design: Zi Li; sample collection and data acquisition: Xiaofang Wu, Zhiyun Zang, Yunyun Zhang, Qijiang Xu, Li Pu, Xiaoxiao Xia, and Niya Ma; statistical analysis and interpretation: Yunyun Zhang, Xiaofang Wu, and Li Pu; data supplementation and revision of the manuscript: Qijiang Xu; supervision or mentorship: Zi Li. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Additional Information

Yunyun Zhang, Qijiang Xu and Xiaofang Wu contributed equally to this work.

The datasets generated or analyzed during this study cannot be publicly shared due to ethical considerations. Access to the data can be requested from Zi Li upon reasonable request.

1.
Morelle
J
,
Marechal
C
,
Yu
Z
,
Debaix
H
,
Corre
T
,
Lambie
M
, et al
.
AQP1 promoter variant, water transport, and outcomes in peritoneal dialysis
.
N Engl J Med
.
2021
;
385
(
17
):
1570
80
.
2.
Johansen
KL
,
Chertow
GM
,
Foley
RN
,
Gilbertson
DT
,
Herzog
CA
,
Ishani
A
, et al
.
US renal data system 2020 annual data report: epidemiology of kidney disease in the United States
.
Am J Kidney Dis
.
2021
;
77
(
4 Suppl 1
):
A7
8
.
3.
Homsak
E
,
Gruson
D
.
Soluble ST2: a complex and diverse role in several diseases
.
Clin Chim Acta
.
2020
;
507
:
75
87
.
4.
Sanada
S
,
Hakuno
D
,
Higgins
LJ
,
Schreiter
ER
,
McKenzie
ANJ
,
Lee
RT
.
IL-33 and ST2 comprise a critical biomechanically induced and cardioprotective signaling system
.
J Clin Invest
.
2007
;
117
(
6
):
1538
49
.
5.
Plawecki
M
,
Morena
M
,
Kuster
N
,
Chenine
L
,
Leray-Moragues
H
,
Jover
B
, et al
.
sST2 as a new biomarker of chronic kidney disease-induced cardiac remodeling: impact on risk prediction
.
Mediators Inflamm
.
2018
;
2018
:
3952526
.
6.
Homsak
E
,
Ekart
R
.
Hemodiafiltration affects NT-proBNP but not ST2 serum concentration in end-stage renal disease patients
.
Clin Biochem
.
2016
;
49
(
15
):
1159
63
.
7.
Mueller
T
,
Gegenhuber
A
,
Kronabethleitner
G
,
Leitner
I
,
Haltmayer
M
,
Dieplinger
B
.
Plasma concentrations of novel cardiac biomarkers before and after hemodialysis session
.
Clin Biochem
.
2015
;
48
(
16–17
):
1163
6
.
8.
Homsak
E
,
Gruson
D
.
Soluble ST2: a complex and diverse role in several diseases
.
Clin Chim Acta
.
2020
;
507
:
75
87
.
9.
Seo
SM
,
Kim
SH
,
Kim
Y
,
Yoon
HE
,
Shin
SJ
.
Prognostic utility of soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 level as a predictor of clinical outcomes in incident hemodialysis patients
.
Int J Med Sci
.
2018
;
15
:
730
7
.
10.
Zhang
Z
,
Shen
B
,
Cao
X
,
Liu
Z
,
Chen
X
,
Nie
Y
, et al
.
Increased soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 level predicts all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in maintenance hemodialysis patients: a prospective cohort study
.
Blood Purif
.
2017
;
43
(
1–3
):
37
45
.
11.
Choi
YB
,
Lee
MJ
,
Park
JT
,
Han
SH
,
Kang
S-W
,
Yoo
T-H
, et al
.
Prognostic value of soluble ST2 and soluble LR11 on mortality and cardiovascular events in peritoneal dialysis patients
.
BMC Nephrol
.
2020
;
21
(
1
):
228
.
12.
van Olden
RW
,
Krediet
RT
,
Struijk
DG
,
Arisz
L
.
Measurement of residual renal function in patients treated with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis
.
J Am Soc Nephrol
.
1996
;
7
(
5
):
745
50
.
13.
D’Agostino
RB
,
Vasan
RS
,
Pencina
MJ
,
Wolf
PA
,
Cobain
M
,
Massaro
JM
, et al
.
General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care: the Framingham Heart Study
.
Circulation
.
2008
;
117
(
6
):
743
53
.
14.
Alam
ML
,
Katz
R
,
Bellovich
KA
,
Bhat
ZY
,
Brosius
FC
,
de Boer
IH
, et al
.
Soluble ST2 and galectin-3 and progression of CKD
.
Kidney Int Rep
.
2019
;
4
(
1
):
103
11
.
15.
Homsak
E
,
Ekart
R
.
ST2 as a novel prognostic marker in end-stage renal disease patients on hemodiafiltration
.
Clin Chim Acta
.
2018
;
477
:
105
12
.
16.
Wang
Z
,
Chen
Z
,
Yu
H
,
Ma
X
,
Zhang
C
,
Qu
B
, et al
.
Superior prognostic value of soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 for the short-term mortality of maintenance hemodialysis patients compared with NT-proBNP: a prospective cohort study
.
Ren Fail
.
2020
;
42
(
1
):
523
30
.
17.
Wang
AY-M
,
Lai
K-N
.
Use of cardiac biomarkers in end-stage renal disease
.
J Am Soc Nephrol
.
2008
;
19
(
9
):
1643
52
.
18.
Harrison
TG
,
Shukalek
CB
,
Hemmelgarn
BR
,
Zarnke
KB
,
Ronksley
PE
,
Iragorri
N
, et al
.
Association of NT-proBNP and BNP with future clinical outcomes in patients with ESKD: a systematic review and meta-analysis
.
Am J Kidney Dis
.
2020
;
76
(
2
):
233
47
.
19.
Bayes-Genis
A
,
Zamora
E
,
de Antonio
M
,
Galán
A
,
Vila
J
,
Urrutia
A
, et al
.
Soluble ST2 serum concentration and renal function in heart failure
.
J Card Fail
.
2013
;
19
(
11
):
768
75
.
20.
De Berardinis
B
,
Gaggin
HK
,
Magrini
L
,
Belcher
A
,
Zancla
B
,
Femia
A
, et al
.
Comparison between admission natriuretic peptides, NGAL and sST2 testing for the prediction of worsening renal function in patients with acutely decompensated heart failure
.
Clin Chem Lab Med
.
2015
;
53
(
4
):
613
21
.
21.
Cheikh Hassan
HI
,
Murali
K
,
Lonergan
M
,
Boudville
N
,
Johnson
D
,
Borlace
M
, et al
.
Association of peritonitis with cardiovascular mortality over time in the peritoneal dialysis population: an Australia and New Zealand dialysis and transplant Registry study
.
Kidney Int Rep
.
2022
;
7
(
11
):
2388
96
.
22.
Perl
J
,
Fuller
DS
,
Bieber
BA
,
Boudville
N
,
Kanjanabuch
T
,
Ito
Y
, et al
.
Peritoneal dialysis-related infection rates and outcomes: results from the peritoneal dialysis outcomes and practice patterns study (PDOPPS)
.
Am J Kidney Dis
.
2020
;
76
(
1
):
42
53
.