Background/Aims: The metabolic syndrome (MetS), as assessed using dichotomous criteria, is associated with increased risk of future chronic kidney disease (CKD), though this relationship is unclear among African Americans, who have lower risk for MetS but higher risk for CKD. Methods: We performed logistic regression using a sex- and race-specific MetS-severity z-score to assess risk of incident CKD among 2,627 African-American participants of the Jackson Heart Study, assessed at baseline and 8 years later. Based on quartile of baseline MetS severity, we further assessed prevalence of being in the lowest quartile of baseline GFR, the lowest quartile of relative GFR at follow-up, microalbuminuria and incident CKD. Results: Higher MetS-severity was associated with higher prevalence of GFR in the lowest quartile at baseline among males and females. Among African-American females but not males, higher baseline MetS-severity was associated with a higher prevalence of baseline elevations in microabuminuria (p<0.01), steep decline in GFR (p<0.001) and a higher incidence of CKD (p<0.0001). Women in increasing quartiles of baseline MetS-severity exhibited a linear trend toward higher odds of future CKD (p<0.05), with those in the 4th quartile of MetS-severity (compared to the 1st) having an odds ratio of 2.47 (95% confidence interval 1.13, 5.37); no such relationship was seen among men (p value for trend 0.49). Conclusion: MetS-severity exhibited sex-based interactions regarding risk for future GFR deterioration and CKD, with increasing risk in women but not men. These data may have implications for triggering CKD screening among African-American women with higher degrees of MetS-severity.

Keywords:
Chronic kidney disease, Metabolic syndrome, Cardiovascular disease, Glomerular filtration rate, Microalbuminuria, Risk
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2018 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel
2018
Open Access License / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND). Usage and distribution for commercial purposes as well as any distribution of modified material requires written permission. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License .
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives