Background/Aims: The mechanism by which angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) attenuate renal fibrosis has not been fully uncovered. Methods: Renal fibrosis in rats was triggered by unilateral ureteral obstruction (UUO) and treated with Enalapril. Results: Enalapril attenuated renal fibrosis, as evidenced by the fibrosis scores (1.07±0.73 versus 2.18±0.75 for 200 mg/ml Enalapril versus control, p<0.01) of Enalapril-treated UUO rats compared to mock-treated UUO rats. The amelioration was mast cell dependent, as Enalapril exhibited no effects on mast cell-deficient Kitwsh/wsh mice developing renal fibrosis. We detected lower levels of transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) and alpha-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA, a fibroblast activation marker) in the kidney tissue of Enalapril-treated UUO rats relative to the control UUO rats. Enalapril-treated UUO rats exhibited far fewer mast cells infiltrating per area in the kidney tissue than the control UUO rats (8.00±0.65 versus 29.00±0.57, p<0.01). Electron microscopy images revealed that mast cell degranulation was inhibited by Enalapril treatment. Further, IgE-mediated passive cutaneous anaphylaxis demonstrated that Enalapril blocked mast cell degranulation in vivo. Conclusion: Enalapril attenuated renal fibrosis in UUO rats, possibly by a mechanism involving the suppression of mast cell degranulation.

Regardless of the initial causes, patients with chronic kidney diseases commonly undergo renal fibrosis prior to end-stage renal failure [1]. Renal fibrosis, including tubulointerstitial fibrosis and glomerulosclerosis, is characterized by the excessive accumulation and deposition of extracellular matrix components [2,3]. Most of our knowledge on renal fibrosis derives from studies in experimental animal models [4,5]. Rats subjected to unilateral ureteral obstruction (UUO), in which one of the ureters is ligated to obstruct urine evacuation from the kidney, are often used as a renal fibrosis model. Interstitial fibrosis has been observed in the operated kidney as early as 3 days after surgery [6,7,8]. Renal fibrosis involves a complex network of cellular interactions, cytokine/chemokine production, and signaling pathways [2] of which dysregulations may cause fibroblast activation [9,10], epithelia to mesenchymal transition (EMT) [11], monocyte/macrophage infiltration [12], and cellular apoptosis [13], eventually leading to histological alterations in the kidney tissue. In this process, transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) plays a significant role as an inflammatory mediator [14,15,16].

Mast cells are among the major components of infiltrating leukocytes in kidney tissue undergoing fibrosis [17]. A number of studies have reported the correlation between mast cells and renal fibrosis in both animal models and human diseases [17,18,19]. Nevertheless, the pathophysiological role of mast cells in renal fibrosis is not yet conclusive, as both aggravating and protective roles of mast cells in renal fibrosis have been reported even by studies using similar mast cell-deficient animal models [17,20,21]. Nonetheless, substantial evidence supports that mast cells promote fibrosis in renal diseases. First, mast cells have been reported to produce TGF-β and fibroblast growth factor (FGF), which trigger the activation and proliferation of fibroblasts [22,23]. Apart from secreting profibrotic cytokines, the mast cell-specific proteases tryptase and chymase may be involved in tissue remodeling and fibrosis [24,25]. Based on these findings, mast cells are suggested as a therapeutic target for renal fibrosis [26]. Reportedly, stabilizing mast cells with drugs in a rat UUO model attenuated the development of tubulointerstitial fibrosis [19].

Recently, studies have shown that mast cells can express and secrete active renin and that the ensuing angiotensin II in the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) may trigger excessive collagen deposition and changes in vascular resistance to accelerate renal fibrosis [19,27]. This finding provides a rationale for using angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) to block the conversion from angiotensin I to angiotensin II to attenuate renal fibrosis [28]. Accordingly, preliminary results from rat UUO models support the efficacy of ACEIs in ameliorating renal fibrosis [29].

Although ACEIs appear to be promising for the treatment of renal fibrosis, the mechanism by which ACEIs reduce renal fibrosis has not been fully revealed. In this study, we observed the effects of ACEI on TGF-β, fibroblast activation, and mast cells in a rat UUO model.

Animal models

This study was conducted in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All animal-related protocols in this study were conducted with approval from the Medical Ethics Committee of Tianjin Medical University. All surgery was performed under sodium pentobarbital anesthesia, and all efforts were made to minimize suffering.

Six- to 8-week-old male Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 180∼200 g were purchased from the Beijing Experimental Animal Center (Beijing, China). Kitwsh/wsh mice were kind gifts from Professor Zhi Yao at Tianjin Medical University. All animals were housed in the animal core facility of the institution under standard environmental conditions. Rats and mice had ad libitum access to standard chow and drinking water. Rats were randomly assigned to four groups (n=15 for each group, total N=60): the sham-operated group, UUO group, UUO group administered Enalapril at 100 mg/ml in drinking water, and UUO group administered Enalapril at 200 mg/ml in drinking water. UUO was performed as previously described [4] and maintained for two weeks. Enalapril and placebo were administered daily for the treatment group and control group, respectively, following UUO surgery. Two weeks after surgery, the rats were euthanized, and the operated kidneys were excised for analysis.

IgE-dependent passive cutaneous anaphylaxis (PCA) was induced in the ear pinna. Briefly, mice under anesthesia and analgesia were sensitized passively to IgE by the intradermal injection of 20 ng DNP-specific IgE antibody (clone SPE-7; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) in 20 µl phosphate buffer saline (PBS) and challenged 24 h later by intravenous injection with 200 µg DNP (Sigma-Aldrich) in 100 µl PBS. Ear swelling was measured immediately before antigen challenge and at 30-min intervals after antigen challenge for 6 h using a micrometer (Mitutoyo Digimatic Micrometer 0-25 mm).

Measure of UUN, UCR, BUN, and SCR and fibrosis scoring

Blood and urine samples were collected to measure urea urine nitrogen (UUN), urea creatine (UCR), blood urine nitrogen (BUN), and serum creatine (SCR), as previously described [30]. The extent of renal fibrosis was scored as defined elsewhere [19].

Immunohistochemistry

Kidney tissue was fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and then embedded in paraffin wax to make 4-micrometer thick sections. The kidney sections were deparaffinized with xylene and rehydrated using graded ethanol followed by distilled water. Endogenous peroxidase was blocked with 3% hydrogen peroxide, and sections were heated in 0.1% sodium citrate buffer (pH 6.0) for antigen retrieval. Anti-α-SMA antibody (ab5694, Abcam, MA, USA), anti-TGF-β antibody (ab66043), and anti-mast cell tryptase antibody (ab2378) were diluted at 1:100 for primary antibody incubation. Peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies were used for the color-producing reaction.

RNA extraction and quantitative real time PCR

Total RNA extraction from kidney tissue was conducted using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, USA) in compliance with the manufacturer's instructions. The total RNA was used for cDNA synthesis with the Super-Script II Kit (Qiagen, Germany). Real-time PCR was performed following a standard protocol on the ABI 7900HT System (Applied Biosystems, USA). The relative expression levels of TGF-β and α-SMA were normalized to the internal control (β-actin). The primers for TGF-β and α-SMA cDNA amplification are listed below:

The forward primer for TGF-β: 5'-AGCGCATCGAAGCCATCCGTG-3'

The reverse primer for TGF-β: 5'-CACTGCTTCCCGAATGTCTGACGT-3'

The forward primer for α-SMA: 5'-GCGGGCATCCACGAAACCAC-3'

The reverse primer for α-SMA: 5'-TGACAGGCCAGGGCTAGAAGGGTA-3'

Western blot analysis

Kidney tissue was extracted in RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS) supplemented with proteinase and phosphatase inhibitor cocktails (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Protein samples (15 µg per load) were resolved by 10% SDS-PAGE and then electro-transferred onto the nitrocellulose membrane (Millipore, USA). The blots were blocked in TBS buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl) with 5% milk and 0.02% Tween-20 at room temperature for one hour. Primary antibody incubation was performed overnight at 4 °C. HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (Jackson Immunoresearch laboratory, USA) incubation was conducted at room temperature for one hour. The blots were developed with Western Lightning-Enhanced Chemiluminescence Substrate (Perkin Elmer) and exposed to X-ray films. Specific antibodies against TGF-β, α-SMA, chymase (ab186417), and β-actin (ab8227) were obtained from Abcam (MA, USA).

Electron microscopy

Electron microscopic observation of mast cells followed previously established protocols [31]. Briefly, kidney tissues were fixed with 3% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). Ultrathin sections were placed onto a copper grid, stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, and observed under a transmission electron microscope (Hitachi H-600, Japan). Mast cell granules were discerned by the morphological features at a magnification of 10,000 ×.

Statistical analysis

Three repeats were performed for each experiment. ANOVA was performed to examine the differences among multiple (≥3) groups. The statistical significance level was set at p<0.05.

ACEI attenuated renal fibrosis in UUO rats

Fibrosis scoring showed that the UUO rats had obvious fibrosis in the operated kidneys compared with the sham-operated rats in which the kidneys showed almost no fibrosis (Figure 1, p<0.01 ANOVA). Fibrosis scores reflected that UUO rats receiving Enalapril in the drinking water exhibited significant amelioration in renal fibrosis relative to the mock-treated UUO rats. UUO rats administered 200 mg/ml Enalapril in drinking water exhibited considerably reduced renal fibrosis compared with both the mock-treated UUO rats (p<0.01, ANOVA) and the UUO rats treated with 100 mg/ml Enalapril (p<0.05, ANOVA).

Fig. 1

The mean fibrosis scores of rats under different treatments. The extent of fibrosis under the treatment of sham operation, UUO, UUO receiving a single dose of Enalapril (100 mg/ml), and UUO receiving a double dose of Enalapril (200 mg/ml) were scored. Each treatment started with 15 rats. “*” and “**” represent p<0.05 and 0.01 by ANOVA, respectively.

Fig. 1

The mean fibrosis scores of rats under different treatments. The extent of fibrosis under the treatment of sham operation, UUO, UUO receiving a single dose of Enalapril (100 mg/ml), and UUO receiving a double dose of Enalapril (200 mg/ml) were scored. Each treatment started with 15 rats. “*” and “**” represent p<0.05 and 0.01 by ANOVA, respectively.

Close modal

The blood and urea parameters of the different groups also indicated that Enalapril attenuated renal fibrosis in UUO rats (Table 1). The mock-treated UUO rats showed much higher levels of UUN, UCR, and BUN and a slightly higher level of SCR than the sham-operated rats (p<0.01, ANOVA). The levels of UUN, UCR, BUN, and SCR in the UUO rats under treatment with both 100 mg/ml and 200 mg/ml Enalapril decreased significantly compared with the mock-treated UUO rats, with a greater decline under the treatment of 200 mg/ml Enalapril (ANOVA, p<0.05).

Table 1

Comparison of UUN, UCR, BUN, and SCR of the different rat groups

Comparison of UUN, UCR, BUN, and SCR of the different rat groups
Comparison of UUN, UCR, BUN, and SCR of the different rat groups

TGF-β and α-SMA decreased in the operated kidney in UUO rats administered ACEI

It has demonstrated that the up-regulation of TGF-β and α-SMA is associated with renal fibrosis [32,33]. To explore the mechanism by which Enalapril attenuates renal fibrosis, kidney tissues from control UUO rats and Enalapril-treated UUO rats were incubated with specific antibodies recognizing TGF-β/α-SMA. The results showed that the staining of both TGF-β and α-SMA decreased appreciably in UUO rats under Enalapril treatment compared with the control UUO rats (Figure 2, A-B'). Statistic analysis further confirmed the significant difference in the index of density per area (IOD/area) of TGF-β /α-SMA between the UUO rats treated with Enalapril and the mock-treated UUO rats (Table 2, p<0.05). In accordance with the immunohistochemical results, semi-quantitative RT-PCR and Western blot results showed that both the mRNA and protein levels of TGF-β and α-SMA in the operated kidney of UUO rats under Enalapril treatment decreased significantly compared with the control UUO rats (Figure 2, C, D). Further, quantitative RT-PCR analysis indicated that the levels of TGF-β and α-SMA were significantly raised in the operated kidney in UUO rats compared with the sham-operated rats, whereas Enalapril treatment resulted in the down-regulation of TGF-β and α-SMA in an apparently dose-dependent way (Figure 3).

Table 2

Comparison of IOD/area of TGF-β, α-SMA, and tryptase of the different rat groups

Comparison of IOD/area of TGF-β, α-SMA, and tryptase of the different rat groups
Comparison of IOD/area of TGF-β, α-SMA, and tryptase of the different rat groups
Fig. 2

The levels of TGF-β and α-SMA were reduced in response to Enalapril treatment. TGF-β (A-A') and α-SMA (B-B') in kidney tissue were immunostained. Arrowheads indicate the high levels of TGF-β and α-SMA in the kidney tissue of UUO rats (A and B) compared with Enalapril-treated UUO rats (A' and B'). Panels C and D show RT-PCR (C) and Western blot (D) results, respectively. “1”, “2”, and “3” indicate the samples from control UUO rats, UUO rats receiving Enalapril 200 mg/ml, and sham-operated rats, respectively.

Fig. 2

The levels of TGF-β and α-SMA were reduced in response to Enalapril treatment. TGF-β (A-A') and α-SMA (B-B') in kidney tissue were immunostained. Arrowheads indicate the high levels of TGF-β and α-SMA in the kidney tissue of UUO rats (A and B) compared with Enalapril-treated UUO rats (A' and B'). Panels C and D show RT-PCR (C) and Western blot (D) results, respectively. “1”, “2”, and “3” indicate the samples from control UUO rats, UUO rats receiving Enalapril 200 mg/ml, and sham-operated rats, respectively.

Close modal
Fig. 3

The relative levels of TGF-β and α-SMA in the kidney tissue of different rat groups, determined by qRT-PCR. Rats were randomly divided into four groups, namely sham-operated, UUO, UUO treated with 100 mg/ml Enalapril, and UUO treated with 200 mg/ml Enalapril.

Fig. 3

The relative levels of TGF-β and α-SMA in the kidney tissue of different rat groups, determined by qRT-PCR. Rats were randomly divided into four groups, namely sham-operated, UUO, UUO treated with 100 mg/ml Enalapril, and UUO treated with 200 mg/ml Enalapril.

Close modal

ACEI attenuated renal fibrosis via mast cell modulation

To demonstrate that Enalapril exerts its effects through specifically modulating mast cells, we treated Kitwsh/wsh mice (mast cell-deficient phenotype) developing UUO with Enalapril. We observed that the Kitwsh/wsh mice developed renal fibrosis upon UUO operation. However, Enalapril failed to attenuate the process as it did in wild-type UUO rats (Figure 4). Strikingly, Enalapril showed efficacy on Kitwsh/wsh mice undergoing renal fibrosis with the reconstitution of mast cells from wild-type mice (Figure 4), strongly implying the direct modulation of mast cells by the drug.

Fig. 4

Evaluation of renal fibrosis in Kitwsh/wsh mice under different treatments. Rats were randomly assigned to each group (n=15), and the treatment for each column in the graph was as indicated. Enalapril was given to mice in drinking water at 100 mg/ml and 200 mg/ml for single and double dose treatment, respectively. “*” and “**” represent p<0.05 and 0.01 by ANOVA, respectively.

Fig. 4

Evaluation of renal fibrosis in Kitwsh/wsh mice under different treatments. Rats were randomly assigned to each group (n=15), and the treatment for each column in the graph was as indicated. Enalapril was given to mice in drinking water at 100 mg/ml and 200 mg/ml for single and double dose treatment, respectively. “*” and “**” represent p<0.05 and 0.01 by ANOVA, respectively.

Close modal

Mast cell infiltration and degranulation were suppressed in UUO rats treated with ACEI

It has been shown that infiltrating mast cells are inflammation mediators during renal fibrosis and are associated with the progression of fibrosis in human diseases [27]. In this study, toluidine blue staining showed that the kidney tissue of UUO rats had more infiltrating mast cells than in the sham-operated rats, and Enalapril treatment reduced mast cell infiltration in the kidney tissue of UUO rats (Figure 5, B-B''' and Figure 6). Moreover, the number of mast cells per area in UUO rats was inversely correlated with the dosage of Enalapril (Figure 6). Previous studies suggested the profibrotic role of mast cell-specific proteases in renal fibrosis [25,34,35]. In this study, we found that tryptase-positive mast cells were significantly reduced in the kidney tissue of UUO rats treated with Enalapril compared with the control UUO rats (Figure 5, C-C'''). Chymase is another major component of mast cell-specific proteases; however, the expression of chymase seemingly did not change in response to Enalapril treatment (Figure 7). By electron microscopy, we clearly saw the differences in granule morphology between the mast cells in mock-treated UUO rats and in Enalapril-treated UUO rats. The images showed that the granules of mast cells in UUO rats receiving Enalapril were much larger and less dense than in mock-treated UUO rats (Figure 5, A-A'''). We observed the breakdown of the mast cell membrane and release of granules in mock-treated UUO rats (Figure 5, A and A'', black arrows). Under Enalapril treatment, the cell membrane integrity seemed well preserved, and very few granules were released (Figure 5, A' and A''', red arrows).

Fig. 5

Enalapril attenuated renal fibrosis via regulating mast cell degranulation. (A-A''′) The kidney tissues of control UUO rats and UUO rats receiving Enalapril were analyzed by transmission electron microscopy. Mast cells in the presence of Enalapril showed granules with larger volume and lower density than the control. The degranulation of mast cells in UUO rats is indicated by black arrowheads in A and A''. The cell membrane of mast cells was intact under the Enalapril treatment (A'and A'''), and degranulation was hardly seen. Images in the middle panel (B-B''') show the representative results of toluidine blue staining. In control UUO rats, mast cells accumulated around the renal glomerulus, as well as in fibrosis areas (indicated by arrowheads in B). A single glomerulus is shown in B'' and B''' with mast cells indicated by red arrowheads. The bottom panel images (C-C''') show immunostaining of mast cell tryptase. A single glomerulus is shown in C'' and C'''. Red arrowheads point to the tryptase staining.

Fig. 5

Enalapril attenuated renal fibrosis via regulating mast cell degranulation. (A-A''′) The kidney tissues of control UUO rats and UUO rats receiving Enalapril were analyzed by transmission electron microscopy. Mast cells in the presence of Enalapril showed granules with larger volume and lower density than the control. The degranulation of mast cells in UUO rats is indicated by black arrowheads in A and A''. The cell membrane of mast cells was intact under the Enalapril treatment (A'and A'''), and degranulation was hardly seen. Images in the middle panel (B-B''') show the representative results of toluidine blue staining. In control UUO rats, mast cells accumulated around the renal glomerulus, as well as in fibrosis areas (indicated by arrowheads in B). A single glomerulus is shown in B'' and B''' with mast cells indicated by red arrowheads. The bottom panel images (C-C''') show immunostaining of mast cell tryptase. A single glomerulus is shown in C'' and C'''. Red arrowheads point to the tryptase staining.

Close modal
Fig. 6

The number of mast cells per area in UUO rats receiving Enalapril decreased compared with control UUO rats. The number of infiltrating mast cells per area in kidney tissue of rats subjected to sham operation, UUO, UUO plus 100 mg/ml Enalapril, and UUO plus 200 mg/ml Enalapril were statistically analyzed. “*” and “**” represent p<0.05 and 0.01 by ANOVA, respectively.

Fig. 6

The number of mast cells per area in UUO rats receiving Enalapril decreased compared with control UUO rats. The number of infiltrating mast cells per area in kidney tissue of rats subjected to sham operation, UUO, UUO plus 100 mg/ml Enalapril, and UUO plus 200 mg/ml Enalapril were statistically analyzed. “*” and “**” represent p<0.05 and 0.01 by ANOVA, respectively.

Close modal
Fig. 7

Chymase expression was not altered in the presence of Enalapril. The lane 1, 2, and 3 represent samples from UUO rats, UUO rats receiving 200 mg/ ml Enalapril, and UUO rats with 100 mg/ml Enalapril, respectively.

Fig. 7

Chymase expression was not altered in the presence of Enalapril. The lane 1, 2, and 3 represent samples from UUO rats, UUO rats receiving 200 mg/ ml Enalapril, and UUO rats with 100 mg/ml Enalapril, respectively.

Close modal

To further prove that Enalapril blocked mast cell degranulation in vivo, IgE-dependent passive cutaneous anaphylaxis (PCA) was performed. Mice were sensitized by IgE antibody, followed by antigen challenge. We measured the ear thickness of mice subjected to PCA. The results showed that Enalapril significantly suppressed the ear swelling in mice (Figure 8), suggesting that the drug directly affected mast cell degranulation.

Fig. 8

Enalapril suppressed IgE-dependent passive cutaneous anaphylaxis. Ear thickness was measured immediately before antigen challenge and at 30 min intervals after antigen challenge for 6 hours.

Fig. 8

Enalapril suppressed IgE-dependent passive cutaneous anaphylaxis. Ear thickness was measured immediately before antigen challenge and at 30 min intervals after antigen challenge for 6 hours.

Close modal

Renal fibrosis is commonly seen in chronic kidney diseases [2]. Over-production of TGF-β, fibroblast activation (α-SMA), and infiltrating mast cells are hallmarks of this process and are proposed as targets for interfering with the progression of renal fibrosis in patients [36]. A number of studies have investigated the efficacy of ACEIs in preventing fibrosis in various injury and diseases models [28]. Among these studies, some have demonstrated that ACEIs ameliorated renal fibrosis in animal models, although they were not completely effective [29,30]. To further explore the potential of ACEIs in treating renal fibrosis, first, we must fully understand the mechanism by which ACEI attenuates renal fibrosis. Here, we took advantage of the widely used renal fibrosis model in rats (UUO) to study how key profibrotic factors including TGF-β, fibroblast activation (α-SMA), and mast cells would be impacted by ACEIs.

Our results showed that levels of TGF-β and α-SMA were significantly decreased at both the protein and mRNA levels in the kidney tissue of UUO rats treated with Enalapril compared with the control UUO rats (Figure 2), which was consistent with the observations in previous studies [36,37].

By using Kitwsh/wsh mice developing UUO, we demonstrated that the efficacy of Enalapril on renal fibrosis was mast cell dependent. This finding highlights a direct modulation of mast cells by Enalapril in the UUO model. Thus, we focused on a mechanistic study of mast cells in the subsequent experiments. We observed fewer infiltrating mast cells and tryptase-positive mast cells in the kidney of UUO rats treated with Enalapril compared with the control UUO rats (Figure 5 and 6). Mast cell-specific proteases play a role in tissue remodeling during renal fibrosis [25]. Accordingly, the decrease in tryptase-positive mast cells under Enalapril treatment suggested less severe renal fibrosis in UUO rats. However, we did not see a decrease in chymase expression in the presence of Enalapril (Figure 7). The different impact on tryptase and chymase by Enalapril will be an interesting question for future studies.

Moreover, we found that Enalapril inhibited the degranulation of mast cells that infiltrated into the kidney tissue, as evidenced by the electron microscopy images showing seemingly intact cell membrane and granules within mast cells in the kidney tissue of UUO rats under Enalapril treatment (Figure 5). Further, IgE-dependent passive cutaneous anaphylaxis was shown to be attenuated by Enalapril. As ear swelling was dependent on mast cell degranulation in the experimental model, this result confirmed that Enalapril blocked mast cell degranulation in vivo.

In a proposed model, renin released from mast cell granules activates the renin-angiotensin system (RAS), resulting in fibroblast activation. The activated fibroblasts may increase the production of inflammatory mediator TGF-β, which aggravates the renal fibrosis [19]. Within the framework of this model, Enalapril blocks the conversion from angiotensin I to angiotensin II, which consequently inhibits the activation of RAS and reduces TGF-β production. Here, our data suggest that the suppression of mast cell degranulation might reflect a negative feedback regulation of the mast cell-RAS axis in the presence of Enalapril. We infer that as Enalapril blocks the conversion of angiotensin, a feedback signal may modulate mast cells to undergo less degranulation and renin release to further the deactivate mast cell-RAS axis at the very beginning.

The results in this study demonstrate that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors can attenuate renal fibrosis in a rat UUO model by regulating the pro-inflammatory cytokine TGF-β, fibroblast activation (α-SMA), mast cell infiltration, and possibly, mast cell degranulation. Our findings give new insights into the mechanism by which ACEIs reduce renal fibrosis in chronic kidney diseases.

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

This work was supported by a grant from Tianjin Medical University (2014KYM12) and a grant from The Affiliated Hospital of Logistics College of the Chinese People's Armed Police Force (FYQ201564).

1.
Liu Y: Renal fibrosis: new insights into the pathogenesis and therapeutics. Kidney Int 2006;69:213-217.
2.
Duffield JS: Cellular and molecular mechanisms in kidney fibrosis. J Clin Invest 2014;124:2299-2306.
3.
Liu Y: Cellular and molecular mechanisms of renal fibrosis. Nat Rev Nephrol 2011;7:684-696.
4.
Zeisberg M, Soubasakos MA, Kalluri R: Animal models of renal fibrosis. Methods Mol Med 2005;117:261-272.
5.
Chen H, Sun F, Zhong X, Shao Y, Yoshimura A, Liu Y: Eplerenone-mediated aldosterone blockade prevents renal fibrosis by reducing renal inflammation, interstitial cell proliferation and oxidative stress. Kidney Blood Press Res 2013;37:557-566.
6.
Iwano M, Plieth D, Danoff TM, Xue C, Okada H, Neilson EG: Evidence that fibroblasts derive from epithelium during tissue fibrosis. J Clin Invest 2002;110:341-350.
7.
Voelkl J, Mia S, Meissner A, Ahmed MS, Feger M, Elvira B, Walker B, Alessi DR, Alesutan I, Lang F: PKB/SGK-resistant GSK-3 signaling following unilateral ureteral obstruction. Kidney Blood Press Res 2013;38:156-164.
8.
Jiang MQ, Wang L, Cao AL, Zhao J, Chen X, Wang YM, Wang H, Peng W: HuangQi Decoction Improves Renal Tubulointerstitial Fibrosis in Mice by Inhibiting the Up-Regulation of Wnt/beta-Catenin Signaling Pathway. Cell Physiol Biochem 2015;36:655-669.
9.
Mack M, Yanagita M: Origin of myofibroblasts and cellular events triggering fibrosis. Kidney Int 2015;87:297-307.
10.
Pan B, Liu G, Jiang Z, Zheng D: Regulation of renal fibrosis by macrophage polarization. Cell Physiol Biochem 2015;35:1062-1069.
11.
Inoue T, Umezawa A, Takenaka T, Suzuki H, Okada H: The contribution of epithelial-mesenchymal transition to renal fibrosis differs among kidney disease models. Kidney Int 2015;87:233-238.
12.
Meng XM, Nikolic-Paterson DJ, Lan HY: Inflammatory processes in renal fibrosis. Nat Rev Nephrol 2014;10:493-503.
13.
Zhou Y, Xiong M, Niu J, Sun Q, Su W, Zen K, Dai C, Yang J: Secreted fibroblast-derived miR-34a induces tubular cell apoptosis in fibrotic kidney. J Cell Sci 2014;127:4494-4506.
14.
Hosper NA, van den Berg PP, de Rond S, Popa ER, Wilmer MJ, Masereeuw R, Bank RA: Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in fibrosis: collagen type I expression is highly upregulated after EMT, but does not contribute to collagen deposition. Exp Cell Res 2013;319:3000-3009.
15.
Manickam N, Patel M, Griendling KK, Gorin Y, Barnes JL: RhoA/Rho kinase mediates TGF-beta1-induced kidney myofibroblast activation through Poldip2/Nox4-derived reactive oxygen species. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2014;307:F159-171.
16.
Xu Y, Yang S, Huang J, Ruan S, Zheng Z, Lin J: TGF-beta1 induces autophagy and promotes apoptosis in renal tubular epithelial cells. Int J Mol Med 2012;29:781-790.
17.
Miyazawa S, Hotta O, Doi N, Natori Y, Nishikawa K, Natori Y: Role of mast cells in the development of renal fibrosis: use of mast cell-deficient rats. Kidney Int 2004;65:2228-2237.
18.
Summers SA, Gan PY, Dewage L, Ma FT, Ooi JD, O'Sullivan KM, Nikolic-Paterson DJ, Kitching AR, Holdsworth SR: Mast cell activation and degranulation promotes renal fibrosis in experimental unilateral ureteric obstruction. Kidney Int 2012;82:676-685.
19.
Veerappan A, Reid AC, O'Connor N, Mora R, Brazin JA, Estephan R, Kameue T, Chen J, Felsen D, Seshan SV, Poppas DP, Maack T, Silver RB: Mast cells are required for the development of renal fibrosis in the rodent unilateral ureteral obstruction model. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2012;302:F192-204.
20.
Kim DH, Moon SO, Jung YJ, Lee AS, Kang KP, Lee TH, Lee S, Chai OH, Song CH, Jang KY, Sung MJ, Zhang X, Park SK, Kim W: Mast cells decrease renal fibrosis in unilateral ureteral obstruction. Kidney Int 2009;75:1031-1038.
21.
Madjene LC, Pons M, Danelli L, Claver J, Ali L, Madera-Salcedo IK, Kassas A, Pellefigues C, Marquet F, Dadah A, Attout T, El-Ghoneimi A, Gautier G, Benhamou M, Charles N, Daugas E, Launay P, Blank U: Mast cells in renal inflammation and fibrosis: lessons learnt from animal studies. Mol Immunol 2015;63:86-93.
22.
Ehara T, Shigematsu H: Contribution of mast cells to the tubulointerstitial lesions in IgA nephritis. Kidney Int 1998;54:1675-1683.
23.
Jones SE, Kelly DJ, Cox AJ, Zhang Y, Gow RM, Gilbert RE: Mast cell infiltration and chemokine expression in progressive renal disease. Kidney Int 2003;64:906-913.
24.
Fan YY, Nishiyama A, Fujisawa Y, Kobori H, Nakano D, Matsuura J, Hase N, Hitomi H, Kiyomoto H, Urata H, Kohno M: Contribution of chymase-dependent angiotensin II formation to the progression of tubulointerstitial fibrosis in obstructed kidneys in hamsters. J Pharmacol Sci 2009;111:82-90.
25.
Kondo S, Kagami S, Kido H, Strutz F, Muller GA, Kuroda Y: Role of mast cell tryptase in renal interstitial fibrosis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2001;12:1668-1676.
26.
Li Y, Liu FY, Peng YM, Li J, Chen J: Mast cell, a promising therapeutic target in tubulointerstitial fibrosis. Med Hypotheses 2007;69:99-103.
27.
Holdsworth SR, Summers SA: Role of mast cells in progressive renal diseases. J Am Soc Nephrol 2008;19:2254-2261.
28.
Kolesnyk I, Struijk DG, Dekker FW, Krediet RT: Effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers in patients with chronic kidney disease. Neth J Med 2010;68:15-23.
29.
Koo JW, Kim Y, Rozen S, Mauer M: Enalapril accelerates remodeling of the renal interstitium after release of unilateral ureteral obstruction in rats. J Nephrol 2003;16:203-209.
30.
Wojcikowski K, Wohlmuth H, Johnson DW, Gobe G: Effect of Astragalus membranaceus and Angelica sinensis combined with Enalapril in rats with obstructive uropathy. Phytother Res 2010;24:875-884.
31.
Chen ZH, Xiao L, Chen JH, Luo HS, Wang GH, Huang YL, Wang XP: Effects of fluoxetine on mast cell morphology and protease-1 expression in gastric antrum in a rat model of depression. World J Gastroenterol 2008;14:6993-6998.
32.
Loeffler I, Wolf G: Transforming growth factor-beta and the progression of renal disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2014;29:i37-i45.
33.
Meran S, Steadman R: Fibroblasts and myofibroblasts in renal fibrosis. Int J Exp Pathol 2011;92:158-167.
34.
Scandiuzzi L, Beghdadi W, Daugas E, Abrink M, Tiwari N, Brochetta C, Claver J, Arouche N, Zang X, Pretolani M, Monteiro RC, Pejler G, Blank U: Mouse mast cell protease-4 deteriorates renal function by contributing to inflammation and fibrosis in immune complex-mediated glomerulonephritis. J Immunol 2010;185:624-633.
35.
Beghdadi W, Madjene LC, Claver J, Pejler G, Beaudoin L, Lehuen A, Daugas E, Blank U: Mast cell chymase protects against renal fibrosis in murine unilateral ureteral obstruction. Kidney Int 2013;84:317-326.
36.
Moll S, Meier M, Formentini I, Pomposiello S, Prunotto M: New renal drug development to face chronic renal disease. Expert Opin Drug Discov 2014;9:1471-1485.
37.
Li X, Meng Y, Yang XS, Mi LF, Cai SX: ACEI attenuates the progression of CCl4-induced rat hepatic fibrogenesis by inhibiting TGF-beta1, PDGF-BB, NF-kappaB and MMP-2,9. World J Gastroenterol 2005;11:4807-4811.

Nan Sun and Lei Zhai contributed equally and therefore share first authorship.

Open Access License / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Open Access License: This is an Open Access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported license (CC BY-NC) (www.karger.com/OA-license), applicable to the online version of the article only. Distribution permitted for non-commercial purposes only.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.