Background/Aims: To identify the relationship between systemic and local hemodynamics, as well as segmental biomechanical properties in a musculocutaneous resistance artery during angiotensin-II hypertension and its recovery. Methods: Rats were infused with angiotensin-II using implanted osmotic minipumps (ALZET 2ML4, 150 ng/kg/min) for 4 weeks. Measurements were made either immediately following infusion or after an additional 4-week recovery period. Parallel controls were created. Segmental geometry and blood flow were determined in vivo on microsurgically exposed segments of the saphenous arterial branch (350 µm). Pressure-radius plots of excised cylindrical segments were recorded by pressure arteriography. Results: Eutrophic hypertensive wall remodeling developed, with reduced passive radius, increased wall thickness, elevated low-stress elastic modulus, reduced norepinephrine contraction, and reduced endothelium-mediated dilation. Relaxed wall geometry fully healed in 4 weeks of recovery, but an increased contractility and a reduced in vivo lumen persisted. Regional hemodynamic resistance correlated positively with systemic arterial pressure and wall thickness in vivo, and negatively with in vivo lumen size throughout these studies. Conclusion: A partial recovery of the biomechanical parameters was found. Healing of eutrophic hypertensive remodeling of the resistance artery wall is a complex biomechanical process, not a simple reversal of the original pathological sequel.

Keywords:
Hypertension, Vascular biomechanics, Angiogenesis, Resistance artery, Angiotensin-II, Arterial remodeling, Aging, Vascular recovery
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel
2010
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.