Aim: To assess the relation between intima-media thickness (IMT) of the common carotid artery and atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (ARAS) ≧50% (one or both renal arteries) in type 2 diabetic patients with hypertension. Methods: We performed a retrospective study of type 2 diabetic patients with hypertension who underwent magnetic resonance angiography or digital subtraction angiography for renal artery stenosis at the National Cardiovascular Center or at the Nagasaki Municipal Medical Center between May 1999 and May 2001. Renal artery stenosis was defined as a narrowing of the artery to at least 50% of normal. Thirty type 2 diabetic patients with hypertension (17 men and 13 women, mean age 65.4 ± 7.6 years) were identified and divided into two groups: those with ARAS in one or both renal arteries (n = 15) and those without ARAS (n = 15). We used high-resolution B-mode ultrasonography to measure the IMT of the common carotid artery. Results: With and without ARAS were 9 men and 6 women (mean age 65.0 ± 7.6 years) and 8 men and 7 women (mean age 65.7 ± 6.8 years), respectively. The IMT of the carotid artery was significantly greater in patients with ARAS than in patients without ARAS (1.07 ± 0.10 vs. 0.84 ± 0.12 mm, p < 0.01). However, the only clinical findings that statistically significantly differed were systolic blood pressure and plasma renin activity. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that the measurement of the IMT of the carotid artery may be useful as a noninvasive screening method for the defection of ARAS even in asymptomatic type 2 diabetic patients.

Keywords:
Renovascular disease, Diabetes mellitus, Atherosclerosis, Common carotid artery
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel
2002
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.