Passive mechanical and morphometric properties of porcine cerebral bridging veins were studied. Fifteen cerebral bridging veins were obtained from 7 pigs. The superior sagittal sinus, bridging veins and the meninges were excised and placed in aerated calcium-free Krebs solution. The outflow cuff segment is a narrow region at the junction of the cerebral bridging veins and superior sagittal sinus. The principal direction of collagen fibres was longitudinal in the bridging vein and circumferential in the cuff region. The diameter was smaller in the outflow cuff segment than in the cerebral bridging veins in the pressure range studied (0–23 mm Hg) whereas the thickness was highest in the outflow cuff segment (p < 0.01). The circumferential stress-strain analysis showed that the outflow cuff segment was extensible up to a strain of 0.25. At higher strains the outflow cuff segment was progressively stiffer than the cerebral bridging vein (p < 0.05). The longitudinal stress-strain relation for the cerebral bridging vein was shifted to the left compared to the outflow cuff segment (p < 0.05). When compared to the stress-strain properties in the circumferential direction, the outflow cuff segment was more extensible and the cerebral bridging vein stiffer in longitudinal direction (p < 0.05). The opening angle of the outflow cuff segment and the cerebral bridging vein was 115 ± 4 and 120 ± 4 (means ± SE) without statistical difference between the two regions. In conclusion the difference in biomechanical properties between the outflow cuff segment and the cerebral bridging vein was associated to their difference in histology and fibre arrangement. This indicates that the function of the outflow cuff segment is to act as a flow-limiting resistance to the outflow from the cerebral circulation.

Keywords:
Cerebral vessels, Opening angle, Strain, Stress, Zero-stress state
1.
Williams PL, Warwick R, Dyson M, et al: Gray’s Anatomy, ed. 38. New York, Churchill Livingstone, 1995, pp 1580–1589.
2.
Edvinsson L, Hogestatt ED, Uddman R, Auer LM: Cerebral veins: Fluorescence histochemistry, electron microscopy, and in vitro reactivity. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1983;3:226–230.
3.
Lange W, Halata Z: Comparative study on the pre- and postterminal blood vessels in the cerebellar cortex of Rhesus monkey, cat and rat. Anat Embryol 1979;158:51–62.
4.
Roggendorf W, Cervos-Navarro J: Characterization of venules in the brain; in Cervos-Navarro, J, et al (eds): Advances in Neurology. New York, Raven, 1978, vol. 20, pp 39–46.
5.
Roggendorf W, Cervos-Navarro J, Lazaro-Lacalle MD: Ultrastructure of venules in the cat brain. Cell Tissue Res 1978;192:461–474.
6.
Fung YC: Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissue. New York, Springer, 1993.
7.
Glagov S: Intimal hyperplasia, vascular modeling, and the restenosis problem. Circulation 1994;89:2888–2891.
8.
Fung YC, Liu SQ: Strain distribution in small blood vessels with zero-stress state taken into consideration. Am J Physiol 1992;262:H544–H552.
9.
Fung YC: Biomechanics: Motion, Flow, Stress and Growth. New York, Springer, 1990.
10.
Gregersen H, Kassab GS: Biomechanics of the gastrointestinal tract. Neurogastroenterol Motil 1996;8:277–297.
11.
Chuong CJ, Fung YC: On residual stresses in arteries. ASME. J Biomech Eng 1986;108:189–192.
12.
Han HC, Fung YC: Special dependence of the zero-stress state of aorta: Pig versus rat. J Biomech Eng 1991;113:446–451.
13.
Han HC, Fung YC: Residual strain in porcine and canine trachea. J Biomech 1991;24:307–315.
14.
Omens, JH, Fung YC: Residual strain in the rat left ventricle. Circ Res 1990;66:37–45.
15.
Vaishnav RN, Vossoughi J: Estimation of residual strains in aortic segments; in Hall CW (ed): Biomechanical Engineering. Recent Developments. New York, Pergamon, 1983, pp 330–333.
16.
Xie JP, Liu SQ, Yang RF, Fung YC: The zero-stress state of rat veins and vena cava. J Biomech Eng 1991;113:36–41.
17.
Auer LM, Ishiyama N, Hodde KC, Kleinert R, Pucher R: Effect of intracranial pressure on bridging veins in rats. J Neurosurg 1987;67:263–268.
18.
Roggendorf W, Cervos-Navarro J: Ultrastructure of venules in human and cat brain; in Auer LM, Loew F (eds): The Cerebral Veins: An Experimental and Clinical Update. New York, Springer, 1983, pp 39–46.
19.
Takahashi M: On the fine structure of the rat intracranial veins. Acta Anat Nippon 1968;43:238–254.
20.
Walter GF, Auer LM, Sayama I: Morphological analysis of contractile elements in pial and intraparenchymal veins after in vivo perfusion fixation; in Auer LM, Loew F (eds): The Cerebral Veins: An Experimental and Clinical Update. New York, Springer, 1983, pp 57–63.
21.
Katz AI, Chan Y, Moreno AH: Flow through a collapsible tube. Experimental analysis and mathematical model. Biophys J 1969;9:1261–1279.
22.
Moreno AH, Katz AI, Gold LD, Reddy RV: Mechanics of distension of dog veins and other very thin-walled tubular structures. Circ Res 1970;27:1069–1080.
23.
Kresch E, Noordergraaf A: Cross-sectional shape of collapsible tube. Biophys J 1972;12:274–294.
24.
Johnston IH, Rowan JO: Raised intracranial pressure and cerebral blood flow. 3. Venous outflow tract pressures and vascular resistances in experimental intracranial hypertension. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1974;37:392–402.
25.
Yada K, Nagakawa Y, Tsuru M: Circulatory disturbance of the venous system during experimental intracranial hypertension. J Neurosurg 1973;39:723–729.
26.
Auer LM, Sayama I, Johansson BB, et al: Pial venous reaction to sympathetic stimulation during elevated intracranial pressure; in Auer LM, Loew F (eds): The Cerebral Veins: An Experimental and Clinical Update. New York, Springer, 1983, pp 143–153.
27.
Sano H, Kawase T, Toya S: The changes in the cerebral microcirculation during increased intracranial pressure ; in Auer LM, Loew F (eds): The Cerebral Veins: An Experimental and Clinical Update. New York, Springer, 1983, pp 231–238.
28.
Pang Q, Rasmussen M, von Oettingen G, Astrup J: The vasomotor response of the cerebral bridging veins to changes in ICP and PaCO2, unpublished.
© 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel
2001
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.