The dynamic mechanical characteristics of the arterial wall, especially its alinearity and viscoelastic behaviour, are revealed by pressure-distension loops, where the change in diameter (distension) of a lumen is plotted as a function of the change in transmural pressure. For linearity, the pressure-distension loop should be closed and straight, while viscous behavior results in an open loop. For a correct interpretation of the loops, it is essential that both distension and pressure are recorded simultaneously at the same location and processed by circuitries having the same frequency characteristics. The present paper aims at quantifying the effect of misalignment in recording position and of mismatch in frequency characteristics by analyzing the distension and pressure waveforms obtained at known locations in a phantom rig under pulsatile conditions with equipment with a validated frequency response. It is concluded that misalignment of only a few millimeters or mismatch in frequency response, even if the cutoff frequencies are far beyond the signal frequencies of interest, strongly affects the shape of the pressure-distension loop. If the forward and reflected pressure wave partially coincide, position misalignment cannot adquately be corrected for. The frequency mismatch, however, can be corrected for by crosswise preprocessing a waveform by a filter with the frequency response of the registration equipment used for the recording of the other waveform. It is important to consider these artifacts in interpreting pressure-distension loops in the clinical situation.

Keywords:
Arteries, Dynamics, Blood pressure, Elasticity, Hysteresis
1.
Kiechl S, Willeit J: The natural course of atherosclerosis. Part II: Vascular remodeling. Bruneck Study Group. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1999;19:1491–1498.
2.
Bauer RD, Busse R, Schabert A, Summa Y, Wetterer E: Separate determination of the pulsatile elastic and viscous forces developed in the arterial wall in vivo. Pflugers Arch 1979;380:221–226.
3.
Stefanadis C, Stratos C, Vlachopoulos C, Marakas S, Boudoulas H, Kallikazaros I, Tsiamis E, Toutouzas K, Sioros L, Toutouzas P: Pressure-diameter relation of the human aorta. A new method of determination by the application of a special ultrasonic dimension catheter. Circulation 1995;92:2210–2219.
4.
Busse R, Bauer RD, Schabert A, Summa Y, Bumm P, Wetterer E: The mechanical properties of exposed human common carotid arteries in vivo. Basic Res Cardiol 1979;74:545–554.
5.
Boutouyrie P, Bezie Y, Lacolley P, Challande P, Chamiot-Clerc P, Benetos A, de la Faverie JF, Safar M, Laurent S: In vivo/in vitro comparison of rat abdominal aorta wall viscosity. Influence of endothelial function. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1997;17:1346–1355.
6.
Langewouters GJ, Wesseling KH, Goedhard WJA: The static elastic properties of 45 human thoracic and 20 abdominal aortas in vitro and the parameters of a new model. J Biomech 1984;17:425–435.
7.
Reneman RS, Hoeks APG, Westerhof N: Non-invasive assessment of artery wall properties in humans – methods and interpretation. J Vasc Invest 1996;2:53–64.
8.
Kelly R, Hayward C, Avolio A, O’Rourke M: Noninvasive determination of age-related changes in the human arterial pulse. Circulation 1989;80:1652–1659.
9.
Armentano R, Megnien JL, Simon A, Bellenfant F, Barra J, Levenson J: Effects of hypertension on viscoelasticity of carotid and femoral arteries in humans. Hypertension 1995;26:48–54.
10.
Hoeks APG, Brands PJ, Smeets FAM, Reneman RS: Assessment of the distensibility of superficial arteries. Ultrasound Med Biol 1990;16:121–128.
11.
Hoeks APG, Reneman RS: Biophysical principles of vascular diagnosis. J Clin Ultrasound 1995;23:71–79.
12.
Powalowski T, Trawinski Z: Noninvasive evaluation of the elasticity of common carotid artery wall. Arch Acoustics 1994;19:451–465.
13.
Hayoz D, Bernardi L, Noll G, Weber R, Porret CA, Passino C, Wenzel R, Stergiopulos N: Flow-diameter phase shift. A potential indicator of conduit artery function. Hypertension 1995;26:20–25.
14.
Brands PJ, Hoeks APG, Willigers J, Wiilekes C, Reneman RS: An integrated system for the non-invasive assessment of vessel wall and hemodynamic properties of large arteries by means of ultrasound. Eur J Ultrasound 1999;9:257–266.
15.
Brands PJ, Hoeks APG, Ledoux LAF, Reneman RS: A radio frequency domain complex cross-correlation model to estimate blood flow velocity and tissue motion by means of ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 1997;23:911–920.
16.
Nichols WN, O’Rourke MF: McDonald’s Blood Flow in Arteries. London, Edward Arnold, 1990.
17.
Shau YW, Wang CL, Shieh JY, Hsu TC: Non-invasive assessment of the viscoelasticity of peripheral arteries. Ultrasound Med Biol 1999;25:1377–1388.
18.
Stefanadis C, Dernellis J, Vlachopoulos C, Tsioufis C, Tsiamis E, Toutouzas K, Pitsavos C, Toutouzas P: Aortic function in arterial hypertension determined by pressure-diameter relation: Effects of diltiazem. Circulation 1997;96:1853–1858.
19.
Stefanadis C, Dernellis J, Tsiamis E, Diamantopoulos L, Michaelides A, Toutouzas P: Assessment of aortic line of elasticity using polynomial regression analysis. Circulation 2000;101:1819–1825.
20.
Boutouyrie P, Boumaza S, Challande P, Lacolley P, Laurent P: Smooth muscle tone and arterial wall viscosity: An in vivo, in vitro study. Hypertension 1998;32:360–364.
© 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel
2001
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.