To investigate the role of sympathetic neurovascular reactivity in the gender differences of cutaneous, cold-induced vasomotor response, we compared direct (at the site of cooling) and indirect (at a site remote from the cooling site) response measured by laser Doppler (LD) flowmetry in 12 healthy males and 12 healthy females. The females underwent testing twice, once in the follicular and once in the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle. We measured LD flow before and during local cooling of one hand at 15°C. We found that local cooling evokes a significantly greater decrease in cutaneous LD flow in females than in males in direct as well as in indirect response conditions (p < 0.05). Comparing the response in females in the different phases of menstrual cycle, we obtained a significantly greater direct response to local cooling in the luteal phase than in the follicular phase (p < 0.05). In contrast, there was no menstrual-cycle-dependent difference in the indirect response to cold. The results of our study strongly indicate that sympathetic neural reactivity, as assessed by way of an indirect response to a cold stimulus, significantly contributes to gender differences in the response to local cooling. In contrast, the variation in microvascular responsiveness to cold exposure due to the menstrual cycle is most probably caused by local vascular mechanisms rather than by variation in sympathetic neural reactivity to local cooling.

Keywords:
Microcirculation, Microcirculation, sex factors, Microcirculation, cold response, Fingers, Skin, Laser Doppler flowmetry, Menstrual cycle, Neural reactivity, sympathetic
1.
Bungum L, Kvernebo K, Oian P, Maltau JM: Laser Doppler-recorded reactive hyperaemia in the forearm skin during the menstrual cycle. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996;103(1):70–75.
2.
Bartelink ML, DeWit A, Wollersheim H, Theeuwes A, Thien T: Skin vascular reactivity in healthy subjects: Influence of hormonal status. J Appl Physiol 1993;74(2):727–732.
3.
Bartelink ML, Wollersheim H, Leesmans E, De Boo TH, Thien TH: A standardised finger cooling test for Raynaud’s phenomenon: Diagnostic value and sex differences. Eur Heart J 1993;14:614–622.
4.
Garcia-Villalon AL, Buchholz JN, Krause DN, Duckles SP: Sex differences in effects of 17β-estradiol on vascular adrenergic responses. Eur J Pharmacol 1996;314:339–345.
5.
McCredie RJ, McCrohon JA, Turner L, Griffiths KA, Handelsman DJ, Celermajer DS: Vascular reactivity is impaired in genetic females taking high-dose androgens. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;32:1331–1335.
6.
Jones PP, Snitker S, Skinner JS, Ravussin E: Gender differences in muscle sympathetic nerve activity: Effect of body fat distribution. Am J Physiol 1996;270:E363–E366.
7.
Weinstock M, Razin M, Schorer-Apelbaum D, Men D, McCarty R: Gender differences in sympathoadrenal activity in rats at rest and in response to footshock stress. Int J Dev Neurosci 1998;16(3/4):289–295.
8.
Ettinger SM, Silber DH, Collins BG, Gray KS, Sutliff G, Whisler SK, McClain JM, Smith MB, Yang QX, Sinoway LI: Influences of gender on sympathetic nerve responses to static exercise. J Appl Physiol 1996;80(1):245–251.
9.
Abdel-Rahman ARA, Merrill RH, Wooles WR: Gender-related differences in the baroreceptor reflex control of heart rate in normotensive humans. J Appl Physiol 1994;77(2):606–613.
10.
Flavahan NA, Lindblad LE, Verbeuren TJ, Shepherd JT, Vanhoutte PM: Cooling and α1-and α2-adrenergic responses in cutaneous veins: Role of receptor reserve. Am J Physiol 1985;249:H950–H955.
11.
Arora S, Veves A, Caballaro AE, Smakowski P, Lo Gerfo FW: Estrogen improves endothelial function. J Vasc Surg 1998;27:1141–1147.
12.
Marshall JM, Stone A, Johns EJ: Analysis of vascular responses evoked in the cutaneous circulation of one hand by cooling the contralateral hand. J Auton Nerv Syst 1990;31:57–66.
13.
Cooke JP, Creager MA, Osmundson PJ, Shepherd JT: Sex differences in control of cutaneous blood flow. Circulation 1990;82:1607–1615.
14.
Nilsson GE: Perimeds LDV flowmeter; in Sheperd AP, Öberg PA (eds): Laser-Doppler Flowmetry. Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1990, pp 57–72.
15.
Bartelink ML, Wollersheim H, Theeuwes A, Thien TH: Changes in skin blood flow during the menstrual cycle: The influence of the menstrual cycle on the peripheral circulation in healthy female volunteers. Clin Sci 1990;78:527–532.
16.
Mayrovitz HN, Regan MB: Gender differences in facial skin blood perfusion during basal and heated conditions determined by laser-Doppler flowmetry. Microvasc Res 1993;45:211–218.
17.
Cankar K, Finderle Ž, Štrucl M: The effect of local cooling of laser-Doppler flow on replanted fingers in the early period after replantation; in Messmer K, Kübler WM (eds): 6th World Congress for Microcirculation. Bologna, Monduzzi, 1996, pp 99–101.
18.
Nyström A, Backman C, Backman C: Effects of cold exposure on the circulation of replanted finger during the early postoperative period. J Hand Surg 1991;16A:1041–1045.
19.
Colucci WS, Gimbrone MA, McLaughlin MK, Halpern W, Alexander RW: Increased vascular catecholamine sensitivity and α-adrenergic receptor affinity in female and estrogen-treated male rats. Circ Res 1982;50:805–811.
20.
Mercuro G, Pitzalis L, Podda A, Zoncu S, Pilia I, Melis GB, Cherchi A: Effects of acute administration of natural progesterone on peripheral vascular responsiveness in healthy postmenopausal women. Am J Cardiol 1999;84:214–218.
21.
Del Rio G, Velardo A, Menozzi R, Zizzo G, Tavernari V, Venneri MG, Marrama P, Petraglia F: Acute estradiol and progesterone administration reduced cardiovascular and catecholamine responses to mental stress in menopausal women. Neuroendocrinology 1998;67:269–274.
22.
Meh D, Denišlič M: Quantitative assessment of thermal and pain sensitivity. J Neurol Sci 1994;127:164–169.
23.
Goldstein DS, Levinson P, Keiser HR: Plasma and urinary catecholamines during the human ovulatory cycle. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983;146:824–829.
24.
Vargas R, Delaney M, Farhat MY, Wolfe R, Rego A, Ramwell PW: Effect of estradiol 17β on pressor responses of rat mesenteric bed to norepinephrine, K+, and U-46619. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1995;25(2):200–206.
© 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel
2000
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.