Cellular immune defences in sea urchins are shared amongst the coelomocytes - a heterogeneous population of cells residing in the coelomic fluid (blood equivalent) and tissues. The most iconic coelomocyte morphotype is the red spherule cell (or amebocyte), so named due to the abundance of cytoplasmic vesicles containing the naphthoquinone pigment echinochrome A. Despite their identification over a century ago, and evidence of antiseptic properties, little progress has been made in characterising the immunocompetence of these cells. Upon exposure of red spherule cells from sea urchins, i.e., Paracentrotus lividus and Psammechinus miliaris, to microbial ligands, intact microbes, and damage signals, we observed cellular degranulation and increased detection of cell-free echinochrome in the coelomic fluid ex vivo. Treatment of the cells with ionomycin, a calcium-specific ionophore, confirmed that an increase in intracellular levels of Ca2+ is a trigger of echinochrome release. Incubating Gram-positive/negative bacteria as well as yeast with lysates of red spherule cells led to significant reductions in colony-forming units. Such antimicrobial properties were counteracted by the addition of ferric iron (Fe3+), suggesting that echinochrome acts as a primitive iron chelator in echinoid biological defences.

1.
Sodergren E, Weinstock GM, Davidson EH, Cameron RA, Gibbs RA, Angerer RC, et al: The genome of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus. Science 2006;314:941-952.
2.
Hibino T, Loza-Coll M, Messier C, Majeske AJ, Cohen AH, Terwilliger DP, et al: The immune gene repertoire encoded in the purple sea urchin genome. Dev Biol 2006;300:349-365.
3.
Smith LC, Ghosh J, Buckley KM, Clow LA, Dheilly NM, Haug T, et al: Echinoderm immunity; in Söderhäll K (ed): Invertebrate Immunity. New York, Springer US, 2010, pp 260-301.
4.
Stokes BA, Yadav S, Shokal U, Smith LC, Eleftherianos I: Bacterial and fungal pattern recognition receptors in homologous innate signalling pathways of insects and mammals. Front Microbiol 2015;6:19.
5.
Butt TM, Coates CJ, Dubovskiy IM, Ratcliffe NA: Entomopathogenic fungi: new insights into host-pathogen interactions. Adv Genet 2016;94:307-364.
6.
Lun CM, Samuel RL, Gillmor SD, Boyd A, Smith LC: The recombinant sea urchin immune effector protein, rSpTransformer-E1, binds to phosphatidic acid and deforms membranes. Front Immunol 2017;8:481.
7.
Smith LC, Lun CM: The SpTransformer gene family (formerly Sp185/333) in the purple sea urchin and the functional diversity of the anti-pathogen rSpTransformer-E1 protein. Front Immunol 2017;8:725.
8.
Gross PS, Clow LA, Smith LC: SpC3, the complement homologue from the purple sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus purpuratus, is expressed in two subpopulations of the phagocytic coelomocytes. Immunogenetics 2000;51:1034-1044.
9.
Majeske AJ, Bayne CJ, Smith LC: Aggregation of sea urchin phagocytes is augmented in vitro by lipopolysaccharide. PLoS One 2013;8:e61419.
10.
Romero A, Novoa B, Figueras A: Cell mediated immune response of the Mediterranean sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus after PAMPs stimulation. Dev Comp Immunol 2016;62:29-38.
11.
Arizza V, Giaramita FT, Parrinello D, Cammarata M, Parrinello N: Cell cooperation in coelomocyte cytotoxic activity of Paracentrotus lividus coelomocytes. Comp Biochem Physiol A: Mol Integr Physiol 2007;147:389-394.
12.
Heatfield BM, Travis DF: Ultrastructural studies of regenerating spines of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus. 2. Cell types with spherules. J Morphol 1975;145:51-71.
13.
Johnson PT: The coelomic elements of sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus). 3. In vitro reaction to bacteria. J Invertebr Pathol 1969;13:42-62.
14.
Johnson PT, Chapman FA: Infection with diatoms and other microorganisms in sea urchin spines (Strongylocentrotus franciscanus). J Invertebr Pathol 1970;16:268-276.
15.
Coffaro KA, Hinegardner RT: Immune response in the sea urchin Lytechinus pictus. Science 1977;197:1389-1390.
16.
Service M, Wardlaw AC: Echinochrome-A as a bactericidal substance in the coelomic fluid of Echinus esculentus (L.). Comp Biochem Physiol B Comp Biochem 1984;79:161-165.
17.
Gerardi P, Lassegues M, Canicatti C: Cellular distribution of sea urchin antibacterial activity. Biol Cell 1990;70:153-157.
18.
Matranga V, Pinsino A, Celi M, Bella GD, Natoli A: Impacts of UV-B radiation on short-term cultures of sea urchin coelomocytes. Mar Biol 2006;149:25-34.
19.
Pinsino A, Della Torre C, Sammarini V, Bonaventura R, Amato E, Matranga V: Sea urchin coelomocytes as a novel cellular biosensor of environmental stress: a field study in the Tremiti Island Marine Protected Area, Southern Adriatic Sea, Italy. Cell Biol Toxicol 2008;24:541-552.
20.
Pinsino A, Matranga V: Sea urchin immune cells as sentinels of environmental stress. Dev Comp Immunol 2015;49:198-205.
21.
Brockton V, Henson JH, Raftos DA, Majeske AJ, Kim YO, Smith LC: Localization and diversity of 185/333 proteins from the purple sea urchin - unexpected protein-size range and protein expression in a new coelomocyte type. J Cell Sci 2008;121:339-348.
22.
Coates CJ, Whalley T, Nairn J: Phagocytic activity of Limulus polyphemus amebocytes in vitro. J Invertebr Pathol 2012;111:205-210.
23.
Smith LC, Britten RJ, Davidson EH: Lipopolysaccharide activates the sea urchin immune system. Dev Comp Immunol 1995;19:217-224.
24.
Pozharitskaya ON, Ivanova SA, Shikov AN, Makarov VG: Evaluation of free radical-scavenging activity of sea urchin pigments using HPTLC with post-chromatographic derivatization. Chromatographia 2013;76:1353-1358.
25.
Pearse JS, Costa DP, Yellin MB, Agegian CR: Localized mass mortality of red sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus franciscanus near Santa Cruz, California. Fish Bull 1977;75:645-648.
26.
Höbaus E: Coelomocytes in normal and pathologically altered body walls of sea urchins. Echinoderms Present Past 1980;3:247.
27.
Nair SV, Del Valle H, Gross PS, Terwilliger DP, Smith LC: Macroarray analysis of coelomocyte gene expression in response to LPS in the sea urchin: identification of unexpected immune diversity in an invertebrate. Physiol Genomics 2005;22:33-47.
28.
Krautz R, Arefin B, Theopold U: Damage signals in the insect immune response. Frontiers in plant science 2014;5:342.
29.
Segawa K, Nagata S: An apoptotic “eat me” signal: phosphatidylserine exposure. Trends Cell Biol 2015;25:639-650.
30.
Vevers HG: Pigmentation of the echinoderms. Proceedings 14th Int Congr Zool, Washington 1963, p 120.
31.
Evans IR, Wood W: Drosophila blood cell chemotaxis. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2014;30:1-8.
32.
Morgan AJ, Davis LC, Galione A: Imaging approaches to measuring lysosomal calcium. Methods Cell Biol 2015;126:159-195.
33.
Smith VJ: Immunology of invertebrates: cellular. eLS 2010, DOI: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0002344.pub2.
34.
Li C, Blencke HM, Haug T, Jørgensen Ø, Stensvåg K: Expression of antimicrobial peptides in coelomocytes and embryos of the green sea urchin (Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis). Dev Comp Immunol 2014;43:106-113.
35.
Brasseur L, Hennebert E, Fievez L, Caulier G, Bureau F, Tafforeau L, et al: The roles of spinochromes in four shallow water tropical sea urchins and their potential as bioactive pharmacological agents. Mar Drugs 2017;15:179.
36.
Lebedev AV, Ivanova MV, Levitsky DO: Echinochrome, a naturally occurring iron chelator and free radical scavenger in artificial and natural membrane systems. Life Sci 2005;76:863-875.
37.
Kubo I, Lee SH, Ha TJ: Effect of EDTA alone and in combination with polygodial on the growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Agric Food Chem 2005;53:1818-1822.
38.
Ito T, Matsutani T, Mori K, Nomura T: Phagocytosis and hydrogen peroxide production by phagocytes of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus nudus. Dev Comp Immunol 1992;16:287-294.
39.
Ong ST, Ho JZS, Ho B, Ding JL: Iron-withholding strategy in innate immunity. Immunobiology 2006;211:295-314.
40.
Dheilly NM, Raftos DA, Haynes PA, Smith LC, Nair SV: Shotgun proteomics of coelomic fluid from the purple sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus purpuratus. Dev Comp Immunol 2013;40:35-50.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.