Objective: An important proportion of coding sequences in genomes, notably in viruses, do not match any sequences in databases and are assigned as ORFan sequences. Nucleocytoplasmic large DNA viruses (NCLDVs) harbor great numbers of ORFs with a high number consisting of ORFans. Thus, we decided to decipher the nature of ORFans in the NCLDVs. Methods: A genome-wide study was carried out to estimate the ORFan proportion in NCLDV genomes and to analyze their general features compared with non-ORFan. Results: The ORFan percentages comprised between 2.8 and 75.2% of the ORF content according to the virus lineage. We propose to classify ORFans in four categories according to their possible match with metagenomic sequences and their prevalence at different taxonomic ranks. Our results indicate that NCLDV ORFans have overall similar features with non-ORFans, except they are shorter. Conclusions: An ORFan classification scheme was proposed to decipher their origin and evolution. Most ORFans were likely labeled ORFan owing to the gap of knowledge of the sequence space. ORFans might be true functional genes with likely the same expression potential as non-ORFan genes. Part of them may also correspond to new genes formed de novo through the diverse mechanisms of gene evolution.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.