To evaluate the diagnostic value of nucleic-acid-sequence-based amplification (NASBA) for the detection of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in transplant recipients, we compared immediate early 1 (IE1) and late pp67 mRNA detection by NASBA with the antigenemia assay, PCR and viral culture in 72 renal transplant (RTx) recipients and with antigenemia and serology in 25 liver transplant (LTx) recipients. Antigenemia, viral culture and pp67 NASBA were almost equivalent for the detection of CMV in RTx recipients. In LTx recipients, antigenemia detected more positive samples and more positive recipients compared to pp67 NASBA. In RTx recipients, PCR detected more positive samples and positive recipients compared to pp67 NASBA, antigenemia and viral culture. Also the first day of detection was slightly earlier for PCR. However, IE1 NASBA was the most sensitive test and detected 96% of all positive samples and positive transplant recipients. In addition, IE1 NASBA preceded PCR and all other positive results. This makes IE1 NASBA a very attractive screening test for the early detection of CMV infection.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.