We have measured markers of human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV 16) infection in children (1–10 years of age) who were hospitalized for reasons unrelated to papillomavirus infection. Genital and buccal swabs obtained from 79 children were tested for the presence of HPV 16 DNA by PCR. Low-level positivity was found in 34 donors, twice as often in oral than in genital swabs. There was no sex-specific difference, but there was a trend towards a higher positivity rate with young age. Serum antibodies (IgG) were measured by ELISA based on peptides derived from the HPV 16 early proteins E4 (one peptide), E6 (two peptides) or E7 (two peptides) in 75 children and by ELISA based on virus-like particles in 66 children. Low-positivity rates were found for E6 (5.1%), E7 (2.5%) or capsid proteins (1.5%), but 20.3% of the sera reacted with the E4-specific peptide. There was no correlation between sero-positivity and the detection of HPV 16 DNA. In those instances where HPV DNA positivity in young children represents true infection and not environmental contamination, we speculate that this infection is accompanied by low-level virus replication that does not induce a measurable antibody response. Reactivity to the E4 protein is likely due to cross-reacting antibodies directed either against E4 proteins of other HPV types or against unrelated antigens.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.