We examined Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) in saliva samples and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from 9 patients with acute infectious mononucleosis (IM) and 4 patients with chronic active EBV infection (CEBV). All saliva samples from patients with acute IM were positive for EBV by both Southern blot hybridization assay and the cord transformation assay. In contrast, EBV DNA could not be detected in saliva samples from patients with CEBV. Only one of the saliva samples from 4 patients with CEBV could transform cord blood lymphocytes with extreme difficulty. No saliva samples from patients with CEBV were capable of inducing early antigens in Raji cells. On the other hand, EBV DNA was detected in PBMC from 3 of the 4 patients with CEBV but not in those from patients with acute IM by Southern blot hybridization. Spontaneous lymphoblastoid cell lines could be easily established from PBMC of patients with acute IM but not from PBMC of patients with CEBV, despite several attempts. Viral capsid antigen and early antigens were not observed in cultured cells from patients with CEBV. These results suggest that the main site of EBV replication in CEBV might not be oropharyngeal epithelial cells.

Keywords:
Epstein-Barr virus, Infectious mononucleosis, Chronic active Epstein-Barr virus infection
© 1989 S. Karger AG, Basel
1989
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.