Background: Pediatric intracranial aneurysms tend to differ in etiology, size, and location from their adult counterparts, and they are often less amenable to microsurgical clip reconstruction techniques. Endovascular treatment with detachable coils is an accepted treatment technique for pediatric patients, though high recurrence rates have been reported with coil embolization of large and giant aneurysms in this population. While the Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) is FDA-approved for adult intracranial aneurysms, the use of PEDs in pediatric patients is considered off-label. Case Descriptions: We present 3 cases of pediatric intracranial aneurysms in a 5-year-old male, a 12-year-old male, and a 12-year-old female who presented with symptoms including seizure, headache, and blurred vision. The 2 male patients were found to have intradural vertebral artery saccular aneurysms, while the female patient had a paraophthalmic right internal carotid complex aneurysm. After endovascular reconstruction of the aneurysms with PEDs, follow-up angiography showed complete occlusion of the previous aneurysms with no residual aneurysm filling in all 3 cases. Conclusion: While further investigation is needed, the evidence presented here supports the conclusion that the PED can be an effective and viable treatment strategy in the pediatric population.

Intracranial aneurysms are uncommon in the pediatric population, occurring in only 0.5–4.6% of patients 18 years of age or younger [1, 2]. Most aneurysmal risk factors in adults do not exist in pediatric patients. Pediatric patients also show different pathogenesis, demographics, and anatomical features for aneurysms, including male predominance, higher incidence in the posterior circulation, and a greater incidence of large and giant aneurysms. The initial presentations of most unruptured aneurysms in the pediatric population include headache, seizure, and mass effect [3]. Aneurysms in this population are often not amenable to direct microsurgical clip reconstruction techniques due to the predominance of unfavorable locations for surgical access [4, 5]. High recurrence rates following endovascular coiling also make traditional endovascular therapies less favored in pediatric patients [6, 7].

The Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) was approved by the FDA in 2011 for adult patients and has since been shown to provide higher aneurysm occlusion rates compared with preexisting endovascular techniques such as coiling and parent vessel occlusion, with comparable associated morbidity [8-10]. To date, however, there has been only one clinical trial comparing the efficacy and safety of endovascular coiling and clipping in children [11]. There have also been relatively few case reports on pediatric patients treated with flow diversion [3, 5, 12-14]. To illustrate the safety and efficacy of this relatively new endovascular technique in treating intracranial aneurysms in pediatric patients, we present in this article our experience in treating 3 pediatric aneurysm cases using the PED.

The 3 cases that will be discussed in this article are summarized in Table 1. All patients were given aspirin (81 mg) and Plavix (0.2–1.0 mg/kg/day, maximum 75 mg/day) for 5 days prior to the procedure. Platelet inhibition was measured using the P2Y12 assay. On the day of the procedure, the goal of P2Y12 reactivity between 50 and 150 was achieved. All of the procedures were performed under general endotracheal anesthesia.

Case 1

A 12-year-old male presented to the emergency department with neck stiffness of several weeks’ duration. CT of the head showed a giant left vertebral artery aneurysm at the foramen magnum level. The patient was evaluated and scheduled for an elective cerebral angiogram and possible embolization and was discharged home. He later returned to the hospital with complaints of a headache and more severe neck pain than first reported. An MRI/MRA of the patient’s head confirmed an approximately 2-cm aneurysm arising from the left vertebral artery proximal to the vertebrobasilar junction, which had enlarged since the prior CT study.

The patient was admitted and underwent cerebral angiography, demonstrating a giant partially thrombosed aneurysm originating from a distal left vertebral artery, without incorporation of the vertebrobasilar junction (Fig. 1). The left posterior inferior cerebellar artery originated just proximal to the aneurysmal segment. A left lateral medullary perforator (bulbar artery) originated 7 mm proximal to the aneurysmal segment. Other than the symptoms of a severe headache and neck pain, the patient’s history and neurological examination were unremarkable.

Fig. 1.

Pipeline embolization of a left vertebral artery aneurysm. a Left vertebral injection, oblique view, showing a distal intracranial left vertebral artery aneurysm, 1.2 cm proximal to the vertebrobasilar junction, measuring 2.4 × 1.6 cm, with a neck size of 1.9 cm. b Native image, lateral view, af ter telescopic deployment of five overlapping PEDs, showing the proximal and distal ends of the PEDs (arrows). c Left vertebral angiogram, post PED reconstruction and coiling, showing complete occlusion of the aneurysm. d A 6-month follow-up diagnostic angiography demonstrated complete occlusion of the aneurysm with no residual aneurysm filling. PED, Pipeline Embolization Device.

Fig. 1.

Pipeline embolization of a left vertebral artery aneurysm. a Left vertebral injection, oblique view, showing a distal intracranial left vertebral artery aneurysm, 1.2 cm proximal to the vertebrobasilar junction, measuring 2.4 × 1.6 cm, with a neck size of 1.9 cm. b Native image, lateral view, af ter telescopic deployment of five overlapping PEDs, showing the proximal and distal ends of the PEDs (arrows). c Left vertebral angiogram, post PED reconstruction and coiling, showing complete occlusion of the aneurysm. d A 6-month follow-up diagnostic angiography demonstrated complete occlusion of the aneurysm with no residual aneurysm filling. PED, Pipeline Embolization Device.

Close modal

To treat this patient, a 4-gauge French sheath was placed in the right femoral artery, and diagnostic angiography was performed using 4-gauge French diagnostic catheters. The diagnostic catheter and sheath were then exchanged for a 088 Neuron Max guide catheter. The aneurysm was selectively catheterized using an Echelon-10 microcatheter. The aneurysm neck was then crossed with a Marksman microcatheter, which was advanced into the distal basilar artery. The aneurysmal segment of the left vertebral artery was reconstructed with five overlapping PEDs, telescopically deployed from proximal to distal across the aneurysm neck, in such a way that the proximal perforator and the vertebrobasilar junction were preserved. Once the pipeline reconstruction was completed, the aneurysm fundus was coiled with multiple detachable platinum coils. This final step was based on growing evidence in the IntrePED database supporting the addition of coils for large and giant aneurysms [15]. Since treatment with the PED takes a few months to fully secure the aneurysm, coiling on top of the PED is done in order to secure the aneurysm faster, especially with warning signs such as growth of the aneurysm.

At the 6-month follow-up, the patient was neurologically intact and was taking aspirin (81 mg) and Plavix (50 mg) daily. His 6-month follow-up angiography demonstrated complete occlusion of the previously known left vertebral artery aneurysm, without residual aneurysmal dome filling.

Case 2

A 12-year-old female presented to the emergency department complaining of frontal and left occipital headache lasting 1 week and a 1-h episode of blurred vision. The initial head MRI/MRA showed a complex aneurysm arising from the terminus segment of the right internal carotid artery (ICA). The patient underwent elective cerebral angiography that demonstrated a complex dysplastic segment of the distal ICA associated with a fusiform aneurysm of the supraclinoid segment of the right ICA. The patient’s past medical history and physical examination were otherwise unremarkable.

Diagnostic angiography was performed using a 5-gauge French diagnostic catheter that was then exchanged for a 6-gauge French Neuron Max guiding catheter over an exchange-length wire. The tip of the guiding catheter was positioned within the bulb of the ICA. A 5-gauge French Navien catheter was placed in the horizontal petrosal segment of the ICA. Subsequently, using roadmap guidance, a Marksman catheter was positioned using a 0.014 Transend wire into the A1 segment of the right anterior cerebral artery. The aneurysms and dysplastic segment were treated using a partially overlapping construct of four PEDs, spanning the A1 to cavernous segments, in the setting of an accessory middle cerebral artery variant (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Pipeline embolization of a right ICA aneurysm. a Right ICA angiogram, anteroposterior view, demonstrating a complex dysplasia of the supraclinoid segment of the right ICA associated with a fusiform aneurysm. b Native image, oblique view, after telescopic deployment of four overlapping PEDs, shows the proximal ends (thin arrow) and distal ends (thick arrow) of the PEDs. c Anteroposterior view angiogram of right ICA post PED deployment showing the proximal ends (arrowhead) and distal ends (thin arrows) of the PEDs. d An 8-month follow-up diagnostic angiography demonstrated complete occlusion of the aneurysm with no residual aneurysm filling. ICA, internal carotid artery; PED, Pipeline Embolization Device.

Fig. 2.

Pipeline embolization of a right ICA aneurysm. a Right ICA angiogram, anteroposterior view, demonstrating a complex dysplasia of the supraclinoid segment of the right ICA associated with a fusiform aneurysm. b Native image, oblique view, after telescopic deployment of four overlapping PEDs, shows the proximal ends (thin arrow) and distal ends (thick arrow) of the PEDs. c Anteroposterior view angiogram of right ICA post PED deployment showing the proximal ends (arrowhead) and distal ends (thin arrows) of the PEDs. d An 8-month follow-up diagnostic angiography demonstrated complete occlusion of the aneurysm with no residual aneurysm filling. ICA, internal carotid artery; PED, Pipeline Embolization Device.

Close modal

At the 8-month follow-up, the patient was neurologically intact and was taking aspirin (81 mg) and Plavix (50 mg) daily. Her 8-month follow-up angiography demonstrated complete occlusion of the previous complex aneurysm of the distal right ICA, without residual aneurysm filling. There was also reconstruction of the dysplastic segment.

Case 3

A 5-year-old male with a history of tuberous sclerosis, seizures, and cardiac rhabdomyoma was found to have a left-sided vertebral artery aneurysm during a tuberous sclerosis workup. He was electively admitted for a diagnostic cerebral angiogram. After discussion with the referring physician, the decision was made to perform pipeline embolization of the left vertebral aneurysm.

A diagnostic angiogram was performed using a 5-gauge French Envoy catheter. Following angiographic evaluation, the aneurysm was crossed with a 0.014 Transend guidewire over which a 2.8-French Marksman microcatheter was advanced past the aneurysm and into the basilar artery. The catheter was positioned with its distal tip just proximal to the basilar artery. The aneurysm was subsequently treated by placing two overlapping PEDs (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3.

Pipeline embolization of a left vertebral artery aneurysm. a Left vertebral angiogram, anteroposterior view, demonstrating a wide neck distal intracranial left vertebral artery aneurysm. b Anteroposterior view angiogram of the left vertebral artery after the deployment of two PEDs, with arrows showing the proximal and distal ends of the PEDs. c A 1-year follow-up diagnostic angiography examination shows complete elimination of a previous aneurysm and no residual aneurysm filling. PED, Pipeline Embolization Device.

Fig. 3.

Pipeline embolization of a left vertebral artery aneurysm. a Left vertebral angiogram, anteroposterior view, demonstrating a wide neck distal intracranial left vertebral artery aneurysm. b Anteroposterior view angiogram of the left vertebral artery after the deployment of two PEDs, with arrows showing the proximal and distal ends of the PEDs. c A 1-year follow-up diagnostic angiography examination shows complete elimination of a previous aneurysm and no residual aneurysm filling. PED, Pipeline Embolization Device.

Close modal

At the 1-year follow-up, the patient was neurologically intact and was taking aspirin (81 mg) and Plavix (25 mg) daily. The 1-year follow-up angiogram did not demonstrate any residual aneurysm filling.

Pediatric intracranial aneurysms are rare lesions, representing only about 1.0–4.6% of all reported intracranial aneurysms [12, 16]. The long life expectancy of most children and the associated disability-adjusted life years among this population necessitate a form of treatment that demonstrates both high obliteration and low recurrence rates. Up to 40% of all pediatric intracranial aneurysms are giant (> 25 mm in diameter), and up to 51% exhibit fusiform/dolichoectatic morphologic features [17, 18]. Researchers have reported that among the 42% of pediatric aneurysms involving the posterior circulation, 32% were in the posterior cerebral artery, and that among the 58% of pediatric aneurysms involving the anterior circulation, 26% were at the terminal and cavernous portion of the ICA [18]. Thus, the frequency of intracranial aneurysms not amenable to open surgery or coil occlusion is quite high in pediatric patients.

Studies have shown more favorable outcomes after coil embolization, compared with open surgery, for aneurysms involving the posterior circulation [19]. Furthermore, aneurysms in the cavernous segment of the ICA, which are often difficult to treat with microsurgery, can readily be approached by endovascular methods [19]. Endovascular treatment of aneurysms is associated with lower mortality compared to microsurgical clipping in the pediatric population [20].

Back in 2003, after conducting an 11-year follow-up study of 916 coiled aneurysms, Murayama et al. [21] found that aneurysm size and morphology were the critical variables leading to incomplete initial occlusion and later recurrence in endovascularly treated aneurysms. This study also found that in giant aneurysms, incomplete coiling occurred in 63% of cases, with a recurrence rate of 60% of incompletely coiled and 42% of completely coiled aneurysms. Other researchers found that endovascularly treated pediatric aneurysms with coiling had significantly higher rates of recurrence and formation of de novo aneurysms compared to a surgical cohort that underwent microsurgical treatment [22]. In addition, a large coil mass was associated with continued mass effect in large and giant intracranial aneurysms, leading to devastating neurological deficits [4]. The PED was developed to help with these problems and to improve the effectiveness of endovascular treatment. The Pipeline for Uncoilable or Failed Aneurysms (PUFS) trial demonstrated the safe and effective use of the PED in the treatment of large and giant anterior circulation intracranial ICA aneurysms, evidenced by low permanent morbidity or mortality (5.6%) and high rates of complete aneurysm occlusion, with durable results now demonstrated up to 5 years post treatment [16, 23].

The use of PEDs to treat intracranial aneurysms was approved by the FDA for adults in 2011. However, there is not as much accumulated evidence for the use of this approach in pediatric patients, where it is still considered an off-label treatment. The cases presented here make an important contribution to this needed evidence. All of the cases involved complex lesions located in the distal vertebral artery and the supraclinoid segment of the ICA. All were felt to be difficult surgical cases and either not amenable to coil occlusion or at high risk for recurrence with existing coil or stent-coil methods [24]. Thus, a PED approach was selected based on the apparent durability of pipeline-based vessel reconstruction, resulting in endothelialization of the neolumen and long-term aneurysm exclusion from parent circulation [25, 26].

Pipeline embolization has several potential advantages, especially in the pediatric population. The risk of intraoperative blood loss is considerably less when using endovascular methods for small children. Other advantages include relatively straightforward access to all vascular locations, less dependency on a large coil volume, and the ability to reconstruct whole vascular segments without the need for parent vessel occlusion. However, there are also some limitations. Pipeline embolization requires a largely empiric dual antiplatelet regimen, which in young, active children might be problematic. Moreover, if PED treatment fails, the low porosity of the device construct may preclude access to an aneurysm for further coiling. This can limit downstream options to vessel sacrifice, with or without bypass. It is also still unclear how exactly PED treatments will adjust to vessel growth in children.

While the findings of the current study are extremely promising, additional research needs to be carried out beyond these 3 cases. More long-term studies are also needed. Our patients’ aneurysms were reconstructed using two to five overlapping PEDs per aneurysm, and follow-up diagnostic angiographies up to 1 year following the procedures demonstrated complete occlusion of the aneurysms and no residual filling defects. Future studies will need to investigate additional PED procedures in pediatric patients and to examine long-term complication and regrowth rates beyond 1 year. At the current time we can say that surgical management and endovascular coiling are likely to remain the major treatment strategies in the armamentarium of pediatric neurosurgeons and neurointerventionists, but PED treatment should be considered as a robust alternative for the occlusion of large to giant pediatric aneurysms.

Pediatric intracranial aneurysms are more amenable to endovascular therapies compared to microsurgical constructive and deconstructive techniques. Endovascular coiling treatments lead to a high recurrence rate in pediatric aneurysms. Moreover, the mass effect exerted on adjacent vital structures from a giant coiled aneurysm can lead to continued or worsening neurological deficits. Pipeline embolization may be a more effective treatment for completely eliminating aneurysms and reconstructing dysplastic vascular segments in the pediatric population. This article presented 3 cases of pediatric patients who were successfully treated using PEDs, thus demonstrating the potential value of the PED approach. The evidence for the success of PED treatment as an alternative to currently available therapeutic strategies for appropriately selected pediatric cerebral aneurysms warrants further investigation with long-term follow-up.

The authors would like to state that subjects or their legal parents have given their informed consent and that the study protocol was approved by the institute’s committee on human research. No animals were involved.

The authors declare that they have no competing interests. This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

1.
Jian
BJ
,
Hetts
SW
,
Lawton
MT
,
Gupta
N
.
Pediatric intracranial aneurysms
.
Neurosurg Clin N Am
.
2010
Jul
;
21
(
3
):
491
501
.
[PubMed]
1042-3680
2.
Kakarla
UK
,
Beres
EJ
,
Ponce
FA
,
Chang
SW
,
Deshmukh
VR
,
Bambakidis
NC
, et al.
Microsurgical treatment of pediatric intracranial aneurysms: long-term angiographic and clinical outcomes
.
Neurosurgery
.
2010
Aug
;
67
(
2
):
237
49
.
[PubMed]
0148-396X
3.
Ikeda
DS
,
Marlin
ES
,
Shaw
A
,
Powers
CJ
.
Successful endovascular reconstruction of a recurrent giant middle cerebral artery aneurysm with multiple telescoping flow diverters in a pediatric patient
.
Pediatr Neurosurg
.
2015
;
50
(
2
):
88
93
.
[PubMed]
1016-2291
4.
Halbach
VV
,
Higashida
RT
,
Dowd
CF
,
Barnwell
SL
,
Fraser
KW
,
Smith
TP
, et al.
The efficacy of endosaccular aneurysm occlusion in alleviating neurological deficits produced by mass effect
.
J Neurosurg
.
1994
Apr
;
80
(
4
):
659
66
.
[PubMed]
0022-3085
5.
Navarro
R
,
Brown
BL
,
Beier
A
,
Ranalli
N
,
Aldana
P
,
Hanel
RA
.
Flow diversion for complex intracranial aneurysms in young children
.
J Neurosurg Pediatr
.
2015
Mar
;
15
(
3
):
276
81
.
[PubMed]
1933-0707
6.
Krishna
H
,
Wani
AA
,
Behari
S
,
Banerji
D
,
Chhabra
DK
,
Jain
VK
.
Intracranial aneurysms in patients 18 years of age or under, are they different from aneurysms in adult population?
Acta Neurochir (Wien)
.
2005
May
;
147
(
5
):
469
76
.
[PubMed]
0001-6268
7.
Sanai
N
,
Quinones-Hinojosa
A
,
Gupta
NM
,
Perry
V
,
Sun
PP
,
Wilson
CB
, et al.
Pediatric intracranial aneurysms: durability of treatment following microsurgical and endovascular management
.
J Neurosurg
.
2006
Feb
;
104
(
2
Suppl
):
82
9
.
[PubMed]
0022-3085
8.
Chalouhi
N
,
Tjoumakaris
S
,
Starke
RM
,
Gonzalez
LF
,
Randazzo
C
,
Hasan
D
, et al.
Comparison of flow diversion and coiling in large unruptured intracranial saccular aneurysms
.
Stroke
.
2013
Aug
;
44
(
8
):
2150
4
.
[PubMed]
0039-2499
9.
Kallmes
DF
,
Brinjikji
W
,
Boccardi
E
,
Ciceri
E
,
Diaz
O
,
Tawk
R
, et al.
Aneurysm Study of Pipeline in an Observational Registry (ASPIRe)
.
Intervent Neurol
.
2016
Jun
;
5
(
1-2
):
89
99
.
[PubMed]
1664-9737
10.
Kallmes
DF
,
Brinjikji
W
,
Cekirge
S
,
Fiorella
D
,
Hanel
RA
,
Jabbour
P
, et al.
Safety and efficacy of the Pipeline embolization device for treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a pooled analysis of 3 large studies
.
J Neurosurg
.
2016
;
•••
:
1
6
.
[PubMed]
0022-3085
11.
Agid
R
,
Souza
MP
,
Reintamm
G
,
Armstrong
D
,
Dirks
P
,
TerBrugge
KG
.
The role of endovascular treatment for pediatric aneurysms
.
Childs Nerv Syst
.
2005
Dec
;
21
(
12
):
1030
6
.
[PubMed]
0256-7040
12.
Burrows
AM
,
Zipfel
G
,
Lanzino
G
.
Treatment of a pediatric recurrent fusiform middle cerebral artery (MCA) aneurysm with a flow diverter
.
J Neurointerv Surg
.
2013
Nov
;
5
(
6
):
e47
.
[PubMed]
1759-8478
13.
Vachhani
JA
,
Nickele
CM
,
Elijovich
L
,
Klimo
P
,
Arthur
AS
.
Flow Diversion for Treatment of Growing A2 Aneurysm in a Child: Case Report and Review of Flow Diversion for Intracranial Aneurysms in Pediatric Patients
.
World Neurosurg
.
2016
Dec
;
96
:
607.e13
7
.
[PubMed]
1878-8750
14.
Vargas
SA
,
Diaz
C
,
Herrera
DA
,
Dublin
AB
.
Intracranial Aneurysms in Children: The Role of Stenting and Flow-Diversion
.
J Neuroimaging
.
2016
Jan-Feb
;
26
(
1
):
41
5
.
[PubMed]
1051-2284
15.
Park
MS
,
Kilburg
C
,
Taussky
P
,
Albuquerque
FC
,
Kallmes
DF
,
Levy
EI
, et al.
Pipeline Embolization Device with or without Adjunctive Coil Embolization: Analysis of Complications from the IntrePED Registry
.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol
.
2016
Jun
;
37
(
6
):
1127
31
.
[PubMed]
0195-6108
16.
Becske
T
,
Brinjikji
W
,
Potts
MB
,
Kallmes
DF
,
Shapiro
M
,
Moran
CJ
, et al.
Long-Term Clinical and Angiographic Outcomes Following Pipeline Embolization Device Treatment of Complex Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysms: Five-Year Results of the Pipeline for Uncoilable or Failed Aneurysms Trial
.
Neurosurgery
.
2017
Jan
;
80
(
1
):
40
8
.
[PubMed]
1524-4040
17.
Fulkerson
DH
,
Voorhies
JM
,
Payner
TD
,
Leipzig
TJ
,
Horner
TG
,
Redelman
K
, et al.
Middle cerebral artery aneurysms in children: case series and review
.
J Neurosurg Pediatr
.
2011
Jul
;
8
(
1
):
79
89
.
[PubMed]
1933-0707
18.
Huang
J
,
McGirt
MJ
,
Gailloud
P
,
Tamargo
RJ
:
Intracranial aneurysms in the pediatric population: case series and literature review.
Surg Neurol 63:424-432; discussion
2005
; 432-423.
19.
Gruber
DP
,
Zimmerman
GA
,
Tomsick
TA
,
van Loveren
HR
,
Link
MJ
,
Tew
JM
 Jr
.
A comparison between endovascular and surgical management of basilar artery apex aneurysms
.
J Neurosurg
.
1999
May
;
90
(
5
):
868
74
.
[PubMed]
0022-3085
20.
Alawi
A
,
Edgell
RC
,
Elbabaa
SK
,
Callison
RC
,
Khalili
YA
,
Allam
H
, et al.
Treatment of cerebral aneurysms in children: analysis of the Kids’ Inpatient Database
.
J Neurosurg Pediatr
.
2014
Jul
;
14
(
1
):
23
30
.
[PubMed]
1933-0707
21.
Murayama
Y
,
Nien
YL
,
Duckwiler
G
,
Gobin
YP
,
Jahan
R
,
Frazee
J
, et al.
Guglielmi detachable coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms: 11 years’ experience
.
J Neurosurg
.
2003
May
;
98
(
5
):
959
66
.
[PubMed]
0022-3085
22.
Saraf
R
,
Shrivastava
M
,
Siddhartha
W
,
Limaye
U
.
Intracranial pediatric aneurysms: endovascular treatment and its outcome
.
J Neurosurg Pediatr
.
2012
Sep
;
10
(
3
):
230
40
.
[PubMed]
1933-0707
23.
Becske
T
,
Kallmes
DF
,
Saatci
I
,
McDougall
CG
,
Szikora
I
,
Lanzino
G
, et al.
Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial
.
Radiology
.
2013
Jun
;
267
(
3
):
858
68
.
[PubMed]
0033-8419
24.
Shapiro
M
,
Becske
T
,
Sahlein
D
,
Babb
J
,
Nelson
PK
.
Stent-supported aneurysm coiling: a literature survey of treatment and follow-up
.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol
.
2012
Jan
;
33
(
1
):
159
63
.
[PubMed]
0195-6108
25.
Alderazi
YJ
,
Shastri
D
,
Kass-Hout
T
,
Prestigiacomo
CJ
,
Gandhi
CD
.
Flow diverters for intracranial aneurysms
.
Stroke Res Treat
.
2014
;
2014
:
415653
.
[PubMed]
2042-0056
26.
Fiorella
D
,
Lylyk
P
,
Szikora
I
,
Kelly
ME
,
Albuquerque
FC
,
McDougall
CG
, et al.
Curative cerebrovascular reconstruction with the Pipeline embolization device: the emergence of definitive endovascular therapy for intracranial aneurysms
.
J Neurointerv Surg
.
2009
Jul
;
1
(
1
):
56
65
.
[PubMed]
1759-8478
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.