Unilateral diaphragmatic paralysis is often suspected when a hemidiaphragm is found abnormally elevated on chest radiography. Chest radiography has a high sensitivity for diaphragmatic palsy. A 67-year-old male presented to the hospital with a history of 4 months of exertional breathlessness that improved after taking a rest. The patient had normal cardiac and respiratory physical function. He also had a normal electrocardiogram and good systolic function on echocardiography. A treadmill test revealed ST-segment changes during peak exercise and recovery phases. On chest X-ray, his right hemidiaphragm was shown to be significantly elevated. Further investigation was conducted to rule out diaphragmatic paralysis, and the findings took a surprising turn to an entirely different diagnosis.

A 67-year-old male presented to our outpatient department complaining of shortness of breath while walking upstairs that improved after taking a rest. He had noticed this for the last 4 months. He had been found to have hypertension for 4 years and had a transurethral resection of his prostate for lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia. He had also been operated in the past for a left and right inguinal hernia surgery and had undergone a tonsillectomy at the age of 12 years. He has never smoked in his life. On examination, he had a normal first and second heart sound and normal breath sounds. His jugular venous pressure was normal. He had truncal obesity and gynecomastia.

This patient presented to us after some examinations by the previous facility, such as urinary routine microscopic examination to screen for any urinary tract infection in the background of his benign prostatic hyperplasia. The results were within the normal range, except for mild microalbuminuria, which reflected an early renal injury due to his hypertension. An electrocardiogram showed a sinus rhythm and echocardiography showed normal left ventricular systolic function with an ejection fraction of 62%.

Further investigation by treadmill test showed ST-segment changes in the aVL lead during peak exercise (Fig. 1) and the recovery phase (Fig. 2). On a chest radiogram (posteroanterior view), we noticed a significant elevation in the right dome of his diaphragm (Fig. 3). Unilateral diaphragmatic palsy is often associated with the finding of an elevated hemidiaphragm on chest radiography, which is defined as the right dome of the diaphragm sitting > 2 cm higher than its left counterpart or the left hemidiaphragm sitting equally high or higher than its right counterpart. Chest radiography has a high sensitivity for diaphragmatic palsy but has a low positive predictive value. Diaphragmatic elevation has some common alternative causes such as Morgagni hernia, hiatal hernia, and a pulmonary or mediastinal mass and subphrenic abscess [1].

Fig. 1.

ST-segment changes seen in the aVL lead during peak exercise in the treadmill test.

Fig. 1.

ST-segment changes seen in the aVL lead during peak exercise in the treadmill test.

Close modal
Fig. 2.

ST-segment changes seen in the aVL lead during the recovery phase during the treadmill test.

Fig. 2.

ST-segment changes seen in the aVL lead during the recovery phase during the treadmill test.

Close modal
Fig. 3.

Elevation of both the right and the left dome of the diaphragm seen on posteroanterior view of the chest X-ray.

Fig. 3.

Elevation of both the right and the left dome of the diaphragm seen on posteroanterior view of the chest X-ray.

Close modal

At this juncture, we wanted to rule these alternatives out, also to see if there was some association between his symptoms and possible diaphragmatic palsy. We evaluated the patient first by ultrasonography (USG) of the abdomen, which showed no paradoxical movement in the diaphragm but was unable to show any clear structures under the right dome of the diaphragm due to it being full of gas.

This was a point where we needed another imaging modality to resolve our diagnostic uncertainty, and a computed tomography (CT) scan was done. The CT scan of the abdomen revealed gas-filled colonic loops between the right hemidiaphragm and the liver (Fig. 4, 5).

Fig. 4.

Gas-filled colonic loops between the liver and the right dome of the diaphragm as seen on the computed tomography scan of the abdomen.

Fig. 4.

Gas-filled colonic loops between the liver and the right dome of the diaphragm as seen on the computed tomography scan of the abdomen.

Close modal
Fig. 5.

Gas-filled colonic loops behind and above the liver and below the right dome of the diaphragm as seen on the computed tomography scan of the abdomen.

Fig. 5.

Gas-filled colonic loops behind and above the liver and below the right dome of the diaphragm as seen on the computed tomography scan of the abdomen.

Close modal

The first apparent diaphragmatic palsy with shortness of breath took a surprising turn to an entirely different diagnosis. The colonic loops behind and above the liver and below the right dome of the diaphragm were interpreted as Chilaiditi’s sign, which, needless to say, was incidental, but the actual cause of the patient’s shortness of breath on unaccustomed exercise was defined by the treadmill test that showed significant changes at peak exercise and recovery.

In this patient, the elevation of his right hemidiaphragm would have remained unnoticed if he had not visited our internist team, who had initially suspected it as diaphragmatic palsy on chest X-ray. The patient was evaluated by CT scan of the abdomen for free after the USG had revealed a gas-filled abdomen. V.P., one of the authors of this case report, had the privilege of making home visits to the patient to understand more about his life in order to find out possible reasons for his current problems. V.P. learned about his past work as a chemical engineer, past medical and surgical history, life story, daily activities, dietary patterns, familial relationships, and future expectations. The visits also offered the opportunity to address his concerns about the current diagnosis, as well as to explain the prognosis of the patient’s medical problems and the importance of regular medication and exercising. Although this was an incidental finding of the investigations, it served to rule out other concerns and to reassure the patient and the attending team. The patient shared his relief as he was concerned that it could be a source of the current problem.

Chilaiditi’s sign, a rare radiographic finding, occurs due to colonic interposition between the diaphragm and the liver. Radiographically, colonic interposition is characterized by gas under the right hemidiaphragm. In 1910, the Greek radiologist Demetrius Chilaiditi first reported in a small case series on 3 patients who had the colon interposed between the liver and the right hemidiaphragm. Most patients with this condition remain asymptomatic throughout their life, and the condition is often incidentally detected on chest radiography or CT scans of the abdomen. This radiographic finding must be distinguished from Chilaiditi’s syndrome, which is defined by the presence of clinical symptoms associated with the hepatodiaphragmatic interposition of the colon [2, 3]. The symptoms most commonly manifest in patients with Chilaiditi’s syndrome are gastrointestinal (e.g., nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, distension, and constipation), respiratory (e.g., dyspnea and distress), and occasionally angina-like chest pain. Chilaiditi’s syndrome is more often observed among older people, and males are 4 times more frequently affected than females. Conditions that increase the right subdiaphragmatic space and intestinal hypermobility predispose patients to develop this colonic interposition. Several predisposing factors have been implicated in the development of Chilaiditi’s sign, broadly categorized into diaphragmatic, intestinal, hepatic, and other causes including abdominal obesity. Patients with liver cirrhosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or mental retardation have an increased prevalence of this condition. In the current patient, central obesity may have predisposed him to develop this interposition [4].

Pneumoperitoneum and subphrenic abscess are two important differential diagnoses of this radiographic sign. Other differential diagnoses include bowel obstruction, volvulus, and diaphragmatic hernia [3]. Historically, Chilaiditi’s sign, also known as pseudopneumoperitonium, had been misinterpreted on chest X-ray as true pneumoperitoneum (free air in the peritoneal cavity). Physicians should carefully investigate to rule out this serious condition, as this may lead to unnecessary surgeries. Gas-filled colonic haustrations or normal plicae circulares under the right diaphragm can help distinguish Chilaiditi’s sign from true pneumoperitoneum [4]. Chilaiditi’s sign is diagnosed based upon findings observed on plain radiograms and CT scans. The associated radiography findings are characterized by elevation of the right dome of the diaphragm above the liver by the intestine, distension of the bowel by air, and depression of the superior margin of the liver below the level of the left dome of the diaphragm. For patients with liver cirrhosis, recognition of this sign is mandatory before any percutaneous transhepatic procedure such as liver biopsy is undertaken, to prevent intestinal injury. CT scanning is recommended to establish an accurate diagnosis if it cannot be achieved by radiography or ultrasound [3]. In this case, the right diaphragmatic elevation was incidentally detected on chest X-ray without any evidence of colonic gas shadows under it. The initial suspicion of diaphragmatic palsy turned into a different diagnosis on abdominal CT. This finding makes an important point, namely, that Chilaiditi’s sign need not always have a visible colonic gas shadow on chest X-ray, as that may be detected on abdominal CT.

Diaphragmatic palsy can be a differential diagnosis for an elevated right dome of the diaphragm, but Chilaiditi’s sign should also be considered if USG shows no findings positive for diaphragmatic palsy. Chilaiditi’s sign need not always have visible gas shadows on chest X-ray, as that may be detected on abdominal CT. Shortness of breath can be due to stable angina, which may not be attributed to the presence of Chilaiditi’s sign.

We acknowledge Dr. Bhavik Shah for his initial review and editing of our manuscript.

The study subject has given written informed consent to publish the details and photographs of the case.

The authors have read and understood the Integrative Medicine International policy on declarations of interest, and the authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Any further requests for information can be made by contacting R.B., the corresponding author.

1.
Dubé
BP
,
Dres
M
;
Bruno-Pierre Dubé
.
Martin Dres. Diaphragm Dysfunction: Diagnostic Approaches and Management Strategies
.
J Clin Med
.
2016
;
5
(
12
):
113
. 2077-0383
2.
Saber
AA
,
Boros
MJ
.
Chilaiditi’s syndrome: what should every surgeon know?
Am Surg
.
2005
Mar
;
71
(
3
):
261
3
.
[PubMed]
0003-1348
3.
Moaven
O
,
Hodin
RA
.
Chilaiditi syndrome: a rare entity with important differential diagnoses
.
Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)
.
2012
Apr
;
8
(
4
):
276
8
.
[PubMed]
1554-7914
4.
Yin
AX
,
Park
GH
,
Garnett
GM
,
Balfour
JF
.
Chilaiditi syndrome precipitated by colonoscopy: a case report and review of the literature
.
Hawaii J Med Public Health
.
2012
Jun
;
71
(
6
):
158
62
.
[PubMed]
2165-8242

Vivek Podder is a BMJ Case Reports Elective (https://promotions.bmj.com/jnl/bmj-case-reports-student-electives-2/).

Open Access License / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND). Usage and distribution for commercial purposes as well as any distribution of modified material requires written permission. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.