We have recalculated the summarised odds ratios, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), for the relationship between exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) and lung cancer based on the odds ratios for the individual epidemiological studies given in the Environmental Protection Agency Report in 1992. Using DerSimonian’s method, the summarised odds ratio, with 95% Cl, for all the studies combined was estimated as 1.28 (1.13, 1.46). This method was used as the odds ratios for the individual studies indicated heterogeneity. This heterogeneity may arise because of differences in factors such as socio-economic status, housing or occupational environment among the countries where the epidemiological studies were carried out. If so, the summarised odds ratio for all the studies combined may not be an important parameter. Using Sugita’s method, which enables us to eliminate publication bias indirectly, the summarised odds ratio, with 95% Cl, for the 11 studies in the USA was estimated as 1.11 (0.97,1.28). Without eliminating publication bias, the value was 1.19(1.01,1.38). Including odds ratios from two new studies, the summarised odds ratio for the USA was found to be nearly equal to the value with publication bias eliminated. The odds ratios,with 95 % CIs, summarised above do not demonstrate whether or not ETS is a significant risk factor for lung cancer. The association between ETS and lung cancer is certainly weak.

Keywords:
Environmental tobacco smoke, Lung cancer, Epidemiological study, Summarised odds ratio, Meta-analysis
This content is only available via PDF.
1995
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.