In order to investigate the relationship between airway inflammation and the development of naturally occurring allergic airway hypersensitivity, the lower respiratory tract was studied in eighteen sheep 14 days after challenge with inhaled Ascaris suum antigen. Sheep could be classed into three groups on the basis of their response: group A (n = 6) had significant changes in both airway resistance and dynamic lung compliance; group B (n = 6) had changes in only dynamic lung compliance, and group C (n = 6) were nonresponders. The results showed that the volume density of secretory granules in lung mast cells was greater in hypersensitive sheep than in nonreacting sheep (p < 0.01). This high volume density was due to a high numerical density of granules in the mast cells. There was, however, no significant difference between groups in the numerical density of mast cells and eosinophils, or the observed degree of degranulation of mast cells. Although lymphocytes were commonly seen within the airway epithelium and subepithelial regions, infiltration of neutrophils or aggregation of dense and nodular lymphoid tissues were not common in the airways of any sheep. There was no significant difference in the infiltration of neutrophils or the aggregation of lymphocytes and lymphoid tissue in airways between the three groups. These findings indicate that there is an inherent difference in the volume density of lung mast cell granules between hypersensitive and nonreacting sheep but that other inflammatory cells are probably not directly involved in the initial development of allergic airway hypersensitivity in this species.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.