Human bronchial smooth muscle preparations from 10 freshly dissected pneumonectomy samples were evaluated for their mechanical characteristics and compared with results obtained for similar samples obtained from porcine tracheae. Length-tension relationships of in vitro smooth muscle were evaluated for passive stretching as well as active isometric force generation and isotonic shortening using electrical field stimulation. At the length (Lmax) producing maximal force (Pmax) resting tension was very high (60.0 ± 8.8% Pmax) compared with porcine trachealis (5.2 ± 2.3% Pmax). Maximum shortening was 25.0 ± 9.0% at a length of 75% Lmax with suboptimal shortening occurring at Lmax (12.0 ± 3.4%) for the human bronchus, whereas optimal shortening of porcine trachealis (71.4 ± 3.6%) occurred at Lmax. Morphometric evaluation revealed threefold less muscle per cross-sectional area of tissue for human (8.7 ± 1.5%) versus porcine (24.8 ± 1.9%) preparations. We conclude that the high passive tension and the decreased maximum shortening are produced by a relatively large load which must be overcome for the muscle to shorten, presumably provided by the greater connective tissue elastic component present in the airway. We suggest that a decrease in airway wall elastance would increase smooth muscle shortening, thereby leading to excessive responses to contractile agonists as seen in vivo in asthma.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.