The basophilic propagating activity was determined in conditioned media obtained from cell cultures of mononuclear cells from atopic and healthy individuals. The activity was analyzed as the capacity to induce differentiation in the human basophilic cell line KU812. The KU812 cells responded primarily to cultured media with histamine production and secondarily with granulation. Eight atopic individuals, 3 of whom having mild symptoms, with known birch allergies were selected together with 3 control individuals. Total and specific IgE were analyzed in sera, and basophil and eosinophil counts were determined from blood smears after Wright’s staining. Significant differences between the symptomatic atopic individuals and the control group were obtained for eosinophil counts (p < 0.05) and in the KU812 basophilic differentiation activity assay (p < 0.01). No single test could significantly discriminate between symptomatic and nonsymptomatic individuals, but the KU812 cell assay in combination with the eosinophil count clearly distinguished the symptomatic individuals from the control group. Increased levels of IgE specific to birch allergen were only obtained in the atopic individuals (p < 0.001). No difference in basophilic propagating activity was observed with supernatants from cells incubated with birch pollen allergen. Serum tested for basophilic propagating activity showed no or decreased values of inducing histamine production in the KU812 cell line. In conclusion, the KU812 assay for basophilic propagating activity was the most useful discriminating test to select symptomatic atopic individuals from nonsymptomatic atopic and control individuals.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.