Fourteen Brown-Norway rats were pretreated with physiological saline (n = 7) or 500 μg Sephadex (n = 7) intratracheally. 24 h later, a bronchial provocation test was performed under pentobarbital anaesthesia using increasing doses of acetylcholine aerosol and the degree of bronchospasm was measured using a modified Konzett-Rössler method. Subsequently, leucocyte counts were determined in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), BALF cells were differentiated, and the chemiluminescence of the BALF leucocytes were measured. Finally, the lungs were removed and histologically examined. The cell count in the BALF was significantly (p < 0.05) increased in the animals pretreated with Sephadex compared to those in the saline group (mean value ± SEM: 0.38 ± 0.07 vs. 0.15 ± 0.02 × 106/ml). This difference was also reflected in the chemiluminescence measurements (2.51 ± 0.53 vs. 0.20 ± 0.03 × 106 counts/0.5 ml). In the Sephadex-treated animals there was also a significant increase in the absolute number of neutrophil (0.040 ± 0.010 vs. 0.011 ± 0.002 × 106/ml) and, in particular, eosinophil granulocytes (0.188 ± 0.055 vs. 0.003 ± 0.001 × 106/ml) in the total leucocytes of the BALF. Lung histology showed massive perialveolar and peribronchial oedema and granulomatous infiltrates, primarily with eosinophils, after intratracheal application of Sephadex; these findings were not observed in the saline group. None of these changes in the rats pretreated with Sephadex manifested themselves in increased bronchial reactivity to acetylcholine aerosol. It is uncertain if the Sephadex-induced increase in the eosinophil count is accompanied by an activation of this cell population, which appears to be of importance for the occurrence of bronchial hyperreactivity. It is clear from this animal model that the presence of inflammatory cells in the BALF and lung tissue of rats does not in itself result in increased reactivity of the airways.

Keywords:
Bronchial hyperreactivity, Pulmonary eosinophilia, Asthma, Sephadex, Animal model
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1992 S. Karger AG, Basel
1992
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.