Introduction: Food-induced anaphylaxis among infants shows an increasing prevalence; however, the prescription of epinephrine auto-injectors (EAIs) for children weighing <15 kg is associated with issues of the needle length and the epinephrine dose. Several studies have shown age-related differences in food-induced anaphylaxis, although little is known about the weight-related differences in food-induced anaphylaxis. This study aimed to reveal the incidence, clinical characteristics, and management of food-induced anaphylaxis in children weighing <15 kg. Methods: This chart review included children who visited the pediatric emergency department (ED) of the National Center for Child Health and Development (Tokyo, Japan) from January 2014 to December 2016 and were diagnosed with food-induced anaphylaxis. The severity of anaphylaxis was evaluated using the Sampson Grading Scale. Results: Of 89,232 ED visits, 444 visits included patients with food-induced anaphylaxis, after excluding cases of food-induced anaphylaxis related to oral desensitization therapy. The incidence was 4.98 per 1,000 visits. More than half of the children (n = 247/444, 55.6%) weighed <15 kg. The proportion of grade 3 and higher severity anaphylactic symptoms was 74.5% (184/247) in children weighing <15 kg and 79.2% (156/197) in children weighing 15 kg or more. The recurrence rate of food-induced anaphylaxis was 22.3% (55/247) in children weighing <15 kg and 48.7% (96/197) in children weighing 15 kg or more. Among the children weighing <15 kg, the proportion of those with recurrent food-induced anaphylaxis was 4 times higher in children weighing 10–15 kg than in those weighing <10 kg (32.2% [47/146] vs. 7.9% [8/101]). The proportion of patients who were prescribed EAIs before each visit was 25.5% (14/55) in children weighing <15 kg with a history of food-induced anaphylaxis. Conclusion: Food-induced anaphylaxis among children weighing <15 kg occurred as frequently and was as severe as that among children weighing 15 kg or more. However, the proportion of patients prescribed EAIs was very low in children weighing <15 kg with food-induced anaphylaxis. The potential need for EAIs is suggested among children weighing <15 kg, especially among children weighing 10 kg or more but <15 kg.

1.
Greenhawt M, Gupta RS, Meadows JA, Pistiner M, Spergel JM, Camargo CA Jr, et al. Guiding principles for the recognition, diagnosis, and management of infants with anaphylaxis: an expert panel consensus.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract
. 2019;7(4):1148–56.
2.
Motosue MS, Bellolio MF, Van Houten HK, Shah ND, Campbell RL. National trends in emergency department visits and hospitalizations for food-induced anaphylaxis in US children.
Pediatr Allergy Immunol
. 2018;29(5):538–44.
3.
Parrish CP, Kim H. Food-induced anaphylaxis: an update.
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep
. 2018;18(8):41.
4.
Shaker MS, Wallace DV, Golden DBK, Oppenheimer J, Bernstein JA, Campbell RL, et al. Anaphylaxis-a 2020 practice parameter update, systematic review, and grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) analysis.
J Allergy Clin Immunol
. 2020;145(4):1082–123.
5.
Muraro A, Roberts G, Worm M, Bilò MB, Brockow K, Fernández Rivas M, et al. Anaphylaxis: guidelines from the European academy of allergy and clinical immunology.
Allergy
. 2014;69(8):1026–45.
6.
Posner LS, Camargo CA Jr. Update on the usage and safety of epinephrine auto-injectors, 2017.
Drug Healthc Patient Saf
. 2017;9:9–18.
7.
Sicherer SH, Simons FER; Section On Allergy And Immunology. Epinephrine for first-aid management of anaphylaxis.
Pediatrics
. 2017;139(3):e20164006.
8.
Simons FE, Ebisawa M, Sanchez-Borges M, Thong BY, Worm M, Tanno LK, et al. Update of the evidence base: world allergy organization anaphylaxis guidelines.
World Allergy Organ J
. 2015;8(1):32.
9.
Halbrich M, Mack DP, Carr S, Watson W, Kim H. CSACI position statement: epinephrine auto-injectors and children <15 kg. Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology.
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol
. 2015;11(1):20.
10.
Dreborg S, Tsai G, Kim H. Epinephrine auto-injector needle length: The impact of winter clothing.
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol
. 2020;16:24.
11.
Dreborg S, Wen X, Kim L, Tsai G, Nevis I, Potts R, et al. Do epinephrine auto-injectors have an unsuitable needle length in children and adolescents at risk for anaphylaxis from food allergy?
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol
. 2016;12:11.
12.
Dreborg S, Kim L, Tsai G, Kim H. Epinephrine auto-injector needle lengths: Can both subcutaneous and periosteal/intraosseous injection be avoided?
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol
. 2018;120(6):648–e1.
13.
Dreborg S, Tsai G, Kim H. Implications of variation of epinephrine auto-injector needle length.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol
. 2019;123(1):89–94.
14.
Kim L, Nevis IF, Tsai G, Dominic A, Potts R, Chiu J, et al. Children under 15 kg with food allergy may be at risk of having epinephrine auto-injectors administered into bone.
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol
. 2014;10(1):40.
15.
Simons FE, Gu X, Silver NA, Simons KJ. EpiPen JR versus EpiPen in young children weighing 15 to 30 kg at risk for anaphylaxis.
J Allergy Clin Immunol
. 2002;109(1):171–5.
16.
Simons FE, Peterson S, Black CD. Epinephrine dispensing for the out-of-hospital treatment of anaphylaxis in infants and children: a population-based study.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol
. 2001;86(6):622–6.
17.
Rudders SA, Banerji A, Clark S, Camargo CA Jr. Age-related differences in the clinical presentation of food-induced anaphylaxis.
J Pediatr
. 2011;158(2):326–8.
18.
Goh SH, Soh JY, Loh W, Lee KP, Tan SC, Heng WJK, et al. Cause and clinical presentation of anaphylaxis in Singapore: from infancy to old age.
Int Arch Allergy Immunol
. 2018;175(1–2):91–8.
19.
Vetander M, Helander D, Flodström C, Ostblom E, Alfvén T, Ly DH, et al. Anaphylaxis and reactions to foods in children: a population-based case study of emergency department visits.
Clin Exp Allergy
. 2012;42(4):568–77.
20.
Grabenhenrich LB, Dölle S, Moneret-Vautrin A, Köhli A, Lange L, Spindler T, et al. Anaphylaxis in children and adolescents: the European anaphylaxis registry.
J Allergy Clin Immunol
. 2016;137(4):1128–37.
21.
Sampson HA. Anaphylaxis and emergency treatment.
Pediatrics
. 2003;111(33):1601–8.
22.
Urisu A, Ebisawa M, Ito K, Aihara Y, Ito S, Mayumi M, et al. Japanese guideline for food Allergy 2014.
Allergol Int
. 2014;63(3):399–419.
23.
Megan M, Tschudy KMA.
The Harriet Lane Handbook 19th (nineteenth) Edition
; Elsevier Inc.; 2011.
24.
Hochstadter E, Clarke A, De Schryver S, LaVieille S, Alizadehfar R, Joseph L, et al. Increasing visits for anaphylaxis and the benefits of early epinephrine administration: a 4-year study at a pediatric emergency department in Montreal, Canada.
J Allergy Clin Immunol
. 2016;137(6):1888–90.
25.
Choi B, Kim SH, Lee H. Missed registration of disease codes for pediatric anaphylaxis at the emergency department.
Emerg Med Int
. 2019;2019:4198630.
26.
Dyer AA, Lau CH, Smith TL, Smith BM, Gupta RS. Pediatric emergency department visits and hospitalizations due to food-induced anaphylaxis in Illinois.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol
. 2015;115(1):56–62.
27.
Wikland KA, Luo ZC, Niklasson A, Karlberg J. Swedish population-based longitudinal reference values from birth to 18 years of age for height, weight and head circumference.
Acta paediatrNorway
. 2002;91(7):739–54.
28.
Kuczmarski RJ, Ogden CL, Guo SS, Grummer-Strawn LM, Flegal KM, Mei Z, et al. CDC growth charts for the United States: methods and development.
Vital Health Stat
. 2000;11246(246):1–190.
29.
Berry MJ, Adams J, Voutilainen H, Feustel PJ, Celestin J, Järvinen KM. Impact of elimination diets on growth and nutritional status in children with multiple food allergies.
Pediatr Allergy Immunol
. 2015;26(2):133–8.
30.
Dupont C, Chouraqui JP, Linglart A, Bocquet A, Darmaun D, Feillet F, et al. Nutritional management of cow’s milk allergy in children: an update.
Arch Pediatr
. 2018;25(3):236–43.
31.
Simons FE, Sampson HA. Anaphylaxis: unique aspects of clinical diagnosis and management in infants (birth to age 2 years).
J Allergy Clin Immunol
. 2015;135(5):1125–31.
32.
Pouessel G, Antoine M, Lejeune S, Dubos F, Pierache A, Deschildre A, et al. The time course of anaphylaxis manifestations in children is diverse and unpredictable.
Clin Exp Allergy
. 2020;50(1):117–20.
33.
Topal E, Bakirtas A, Yilmaz O, Ertoy Karagol IH, Arga M, Demirsoy MS, et al. Anaphylaxis in infancy compared with older children.
Allergy Asthma Proc
. 2013;34(3):233–8.
34.
Muraro A, Roberts G, Clark A, Eigenmann PA, Halken S, Lack G, et al. The management of anaphylaxis in childhood: position paper of the European academy of allergology and clinical immunology.
Allergy
. 2007;62(8):857–71.
35.
Robinson M, Greenhawt M, Stukus DR. Factors associated with epinephrine administration for anaphylaxis in children before arrival to the emergency department.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol
. 2017;119(2):164–9.
36.
O’Keefe A, Clarke A, St Pierre Y, Mill J, Asai Y, Eisman H, et al. The risk of recurrent anaphylaxis.
J Pediatr
. 2017;180:217–21.
37.
Kilger M, Range U, Vogelberg C. Acute and preventive management of anaphylaxis in German primary school and kindergarten children.
BMC Pediatr
. 2015;15:159.
38.
Diwakar L, Cummins C, Ryan R, Marshall T, Roberts T. Prescription rates of adrenaline auto-injectors for children in UK general practice: a retrospective cohort study.
Br J Gen Pract
. 2017;67(657):e300.
39.
Shaker M, Greenhawt M. Association of fatality risk with value-based drug pricing of epinephrine autoinjectors for children with peanut allergy: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
JAMA Netw Open
. 2018;21(7):e184728.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.