Background: Dental workers often experience unwanted allergic and nonallergic skin reactions resulting in different contact dermatoses (e.g., contact urticaria, irritant and allergic contact dermatitis) that are often attributed to rubber gloves. Objective: To examine allergic and nonallergic contact dermatoses by different methods amongst dental professionals and dental students, more specifically, reactions to natural rubber latex (NRL), rubber additives, and other causative factors. Methods: In this cross-sectional study we surveyed a total of 444 subjects (dentists, assistants, technicians, and students); 200 agreed to be tested to latex by the standard skin prick test (SPT) and prick-by-prick test, of whom 107 were patch tested to rubber additives (mercapto mix, thiuram mix, carba mix, and N-isopropyl-N-phenyl-4-phenylenediamine [IPPD]). Results: Skin lesions appeared significantly more frequently with longer work experience (p = 0.002; V = 0.181), frequent glove changes (p < 0.001; V = 0.310), and hand washing (p < 0.001; V = 0.263), and in subjects with a history of allergies (atopic dermatitis, allergic rhinitis, allergic conjunctivitis, and others) (p < 0.001; V = 0.183). Positive SPTs to latex occurred in 14/200 subjects (7%), of whom 5/14 subjects (35.7%) were also positive in prick-by-prick tests. Patch tests were positive in 5/104 subjects (4.8%) (mercapto mix 1%, thiuram mix 1.9%, and carba mix 1.9%). Conclusion: Only a small number of our subjects were allergic to latex (7%) or rubber additives (4.8%). Thus, self-reported contact dermatoses (during NRL product use) in dental professionals and students are not commonly caused by allergies to latex and rubber additives, as is often assumed, but by other factors.

Keywords:
Dentists, Students, Contact dermatitis, Allergy, Latex gloves
1.
Hawkey S, Abdul Ghaffar S: Glove-related hand urticaria: an increasing occupational problem amongst health care workers. Br J Dermatol. 2016; 174: 1137–1140.
2.
Risenga SM, Shivambu GP, Rakgole MP, Makwela ML, Nthuli S, Malatji TA, at al: Latex allergy and its clinical features among healthcare workers at Mankweng Hospital, Limpopo Province, South Africa. S Afr Med J 2013; 103: 390–394.
3.
Sheeran C, Cahill J, Nixon R: Glove-related hand urticaria caused by disposable gloves in healthcare workers. Contact Dermatitis 2014; 71: 115–116.
4.
Vodanović M, Sović S, Galić I: Occupational health problems among dentists in Croatia. Acta Stomatol Croat 2016; 50: 310–320.
5.
Lugović-Mihić L, Ferček I, Duvančić T, Bulat V, Ježovita J, Novak-Bilić G, et al: Occupational contact dermatitis amongst dentists and dental technicians. Acta Clin Croat 2016; 55: 293–300.
6.
Burkhart C, Schloemer J, Zirwas M: Differentiation of latex allergy from irritant contact dermatitis. Cutis 2015; 96: 369–371.
7.
Goldberg O, Johnston GA, Wilkinson M: Symptomatic dermographism mimicking latex allergy. Dermatitis 2014; 25: 101–102.
8.
Blaabjerg MS, Andersen KE, Bindslev-Jensen C, Mortz CG: Decrease in the rate of sensitization and clinical allergy to natural rubber latex. Contact Dermatitis 2015; 73: 21–28.
9.
Paul A, Chabaud M, Auber F, Peycelon M, Audry G: Latex-free hospitals: benefits and disadvantages. Arch Pediatr 2015; 22: 1182–1187.
10.
Lugović L, Lipozenčić J, Jakić-Razumović J: Prominent involvement of activated Th1-subset of T-cells and increased expression of receptor for IFN-γ on keratinocytes in atopic dermatitis acute skin lesions. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2005; 137: 125–133.
11.
Kurpiewska J, Liwkowicz J, Benczek K, Padlewska K: A survey of work-related skin diseases in different occupations in Poland. Int J Occup Saf Ergon 2011; 17: 207–214.
12.
Minamoto K, Watanabe T, Diepgen TL: Self-reported hand eczema among dental workers in Japan – a cross-sectional study. Contact Dermatitis 2016; 75: 230–239.
13.
Visser MJ, Landeck L, Campbell LE, McLean WH, Weidinger S, Calkoen F, et al: Impact of atopic dermatitis and loss-of-function mutations in the filaggrin gene on the development of occupational irritant contact dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 2013; 168: 326–332.
14.
Griffiths RLM, El-Shanawany T, Jolles SRA, Selwood C, Heaps AG, Carne EM, et al: Comparison of the performance of Skin Prick, ImmunoCAP, and ISAC tests in the diagnosis of patients with allergy. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2017; 172: 215–223.
15.
Unsel M, Mete N, Ardeniz O, Sin A, Gülbahar O, Kokuludağ A: Diagnostic value of specific IgE analysis in latex allergy. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2012; 158: 281–287.
16.
Japundžić I, Lugović-Mihić L: Skin reactions to latex in dental professionals – first Croatian data. Int J Occup Saf Ergon 2017; 14: 1–6.
17.
Johansen JD, Aalto-Korte K, Agner T, Andersen KE, Bircher A., Bruze M, et al: European Society of Contact Dermatitis guideline for diagnostic patch testing – recommendations on best practice. Contact Dermatitis 2015; 73: 195–221.
18.
Cohen J: Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences, ed 2. Hillsdale, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988.
19.
Hamann CP, Turjanmaa K, Rietschel R, Siew C, Owensby D, Gruninger SE, et al: Natural rubber latex hypersensitivity: incidence and prevalence of type I allergy in the dental professional. J Am Dent Assoc 1998; 129: 43–54.
20.
Vangveeravong M, Sirikul J, Daengsuwan T: Latex allergy in dental students: a cross-sectional study. J Med Assoc Thai. 2011; 94(suppl 3):S1–S8.
21.
Prodi A, Rui F, Fortina AB, Corradin MT, Filon FL: Health care workers and skin sensitization: north-eastern Italian database. Occup Med (Lond) 2016; 66: 72–74.
22.
Schwensen JF, Menné T, Johansen JD, Thyssen JP: Contact allergy to rubber accelerators remains prevalent: retrospective results from a tertiary clinic suggesting an association with facial dermatitis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2016; 30: 1768–1773.
23.
Sinclair NA, Thomson WM: Prevalence of self-reported hand dermatoses in New Zealand dentists. NZ Dent J 2004; 100: 38–41.
24.
Richters RJ, Uzunbajakava NE, Hendriks JC, Bikker JW, van Erp PE, van de Kerkhof PC: A model for perception-based identification of sensitive skin. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2017; 31: 267–273.
25.
Crepy MN, Lecuen J, Ratour-Bigot C, Stocks J, Bensefa-Colas L: Accelerator-free gloves as alternatives in cases of glove allergy in healthcare workers. Contact Dermatitis 2018; 78: 28–32.
© 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel
2018
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.