Background: Pollen are monitored in Europe by a network of about 400 pollen traps, all operated manually. To date, automated pollen monitoring has only been feasible in areas with limited variability in pollen species. There is a need for rapid reporting of airborne pollen as well as for alleviating the workload of manual operation. We report our experience with a fully automated, image recognition-based pollen monitoring system, BAA500. Methods: The BAA500 sampled ambient air intermittently with a 3-stage virtual impactor at 60 m3/h in Munich, Germany. Pollen is deposited on a sticky surface that was regularly moved to a microscope equipped with a CCD camera. Images of the pollen were constructed and compared with a library of known samples. A Hirst-type pollen trap was operated simultaneously. Results: Over 480,000 particles sampled with the BAA500 were both manually and automatically identified, of which about 46,000 were pollen. Of the automatically reported pollen, 93.3% were correctly recognized. However, compared with manual identification, 27.8% of the captured pollen were missing in the automatic report, with most reported as unknown pollen. Salix pollen grains were not identified satisfactorily. The daily pollen concentrations reported by a Hirst-type pollen trap and the BAA500 were highly correlated (r = 0.98). Conclusions: The BAA500 is a functional automated pollen counter. Its software can be upgraded, and so we expected its performance to improve upon training. Automated pollen counting has great potential for workload reduction and rapid online pollen reporting.

Keywords:
Aerobiology, Air quality, Automation, Environmental monitoring, Pollen
1.
Mandrioli P, Ariatti A: Aerobiology: future course of action. Aerobiologia 2001;17:1-10.
2.
Barber D, de la Torre F, Feo F, Florido F, Guardia P, Moreno C, Quiralte J, Lombardero M, Villalba M, Salcedo G, Rodriguez R: Understanding patient sensitization profiles in complex pollen areas: a molecular epidemiological study. Allergy 2008;63:1550-1558.
3.
Pauling A, Gehrig R, Clot B: Toward optimized temperature sum parameterizations for forecasting the start of the pollen season. Aerobiologia 2014;30:45-57.
4.
García-Mozo H: The use of aerobiological data on agronomical studies. Ann Agric Environ Med 2011;18:1-6.
5.
Oteros J, Orlandi F, Garcia-Mozo H, Aguilera F, Ben Dhiab A, Bonofiglio T, Abichou M, Ruiz-Valenzuela L, Trigo MM, Díaz de la Guardia C, Dominguez-Vilches E, Msallem M, Fornaciari M, Galan C: Better prediction of Mediterranean olive production using pollen-based models. Agron Sustain Dev 2014;34:685-694.
6.
Bonofiglio T, Orlandi F, Sgromo C, Romano B, Fornaciari M: Evidences of olive pollination date variations in relation to spring temperature trends. Aerobiologia 2009;25:227-237.
7.
Smith M, Jager S, Berger U, Sikoparija B, Hallsdottir M, Sauliene I, Bergmann KC, Pashley CH, de Weger L, Majkowska-Wojciechowska B, Rybnicek O, Thibaudon M, Gehrig R, Bonini M, Yankova R, Damialis A, Vokou D, Gutierrez Bustillo AM, Hoffmann-Sommergruber K, van Ree R: Geographic and temporal variations in pollen exposure across Europe. Allergy 2014;69:913-923.
8.
Kwon Y, Kim D, Yim KO: Herbicide-resistant genetically modified crop: assessment and management of gene flow. Weed Biol Manag 2001;1:96-107.
9.
Ruga L, Bonofiglio T, Orlandi F, Romano B, Fornaciari M: Analysis of the potential fungal biodeteriogen effects in the ‘doctorate library' of the University of Perugia, Italy. Grana 2008;47:60-69.
10.
Hirst JM: An automatic volumetric spore trap. Ann App Biol 1952;39:257-265.
11.
Buters J: Pollen allergens and geographical factors; in Akdis C, Agache I (eds): Global Atlas of Allergy. Zurich, European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Inmunology, 2014, vol 1, pp 36-37.
12.
Galán C, Smith M, Thibaudon M, Frenguelli G, Oteros J, Gehrig R, Berger U, Clot B, Brandao R: Pollen monitoring: minimum requirements and reproducibility of analysis. Aerobiologia 2014;30:385-395.
13.
Belmonte J, Canela M, Guàrdia R-A: Comparison between categorical pollen data obtained by Hirst and Cour sampling methods. Aerobiologia 2000;16:177-185.
14.
Frenz DA: The effect of windspeed on pollen and spore counts collected with the Rotorod sampler and Burkard spore trap. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2000;85:392-394.
15.
Okamoto Y, Horiguchi S, Yamamoto H, Yonekura S, Hanazawa T: Present situation of cedar pollinosis in Japan and its immune responses. Allergol Int 2009;58:155-162.
16.
Orlandi F, Oteros J, Aguilera F, Ben Dhiab A, Msallem M, Fornaciari M: Design of a downscaling method to estimate continuous data from discrete pollen monitoring in Tunisia. Environ Sci Process Impacts 2014;16:1716-1725.
17.
Berger U, Karatzas K, Jaeger S, Voukantsis D, Sofiev M, Brandt O, Zuberbier T, Bergmann KC: Personalized pollen-related symptom-forecast information services for allergic rhinitis patients in Europe. Allergy 2013;68:963-965.
18.
Vezey EL, Skvarla JJ: Computerized feature analysis of exine sculpture patterns. Rev Palaeobot Palyno 1990;64:187-196.
19.
Boucher A, Hidalgo PJ, Thonnat M, Belmonte J, Galan C, Bonton P, Tomczak R: Development of a semi-automatic system for pollen recognition. Aerobiologia 2002;18:195-201.
20.
Holt K, Allen G, Hodgson R, Marsland S, Flenley J: Progress towards an automated trainable pollen location and classifier system for use in the palynology laboratory. Rev Palaeobot Palyno 2011;167:175-183.
21.
Lagerstrom R, Holt K, Arzhaeva Y, Bischof L, Haberle S, Hopf F, Lovell D: Pollen image classification using the classifynder system: algorithm comparison and a case study on New Zealand honey; in Sun C, Bednarz T, Pham TD, Vallotton P, Wang D (eds): Signal and Image Analysis for Biomedical and Life Sciences. Berlin, Springer, 2015, vol 823, pp 207-226.
22.
Marcos JV, Nava R, Cristobal G, Redondo R, Escalante-Ramirez B, Bueno G, Deniz O, Gonzalez-Porto A, Pardo C, Chung F, Rodriguez T: Automated pollen identification using microscopic imaging and texture analysis. Micron 2015;68:36-46.
23.
Kraaijeveld K, de Weger LA, Ventayol Garcia M, Buermans H, Frank J, Hiemstra PS, den Dunnen JT: Efficient and sensitive identification and quantification of airborne pollen using next-generation DNA sequencing. Mol Ecol Resour 2015;15:8-16.
24.
Buters JTM, Thibaudon M, Smith M, Kennedy R, Rantio-Lehtimaki A, Albertini R, Reese G, Weber B, Galan C, Brandao R, Antunes CM, Jager S, Berger U, Celenk S, Grewling L, Jackowiak B, Sauliene I, Weichenmeier I, Pusch G, Sarioglu H, Ueffing M, Behrendt H, Prank M, Sofiev M, Cecchi L, Grp HW: Release of Bet v 1 from birch pollen from 5 European countries. Results from the HIALINE study. Atmos Environ 2012;55:496-505.
25.
Yamada T, Saito H, Fujieda S: Present state of Japanese cedar pollinosis: the national affliction. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2014;133:632-639.
26.
O'Connor DJ, Healy DA, Hellebust S, Buters JT, Sodeau JR: Using the WIBS-4 (waveband integrated bioaerosol sensor) technique for the on-line detection of pollen grains. Aerosol Sci Technol 2014;48:341-349.
27.
Kawashima S, Clot B, Fujita T, Takahashi Y, Nakamura K: An algorithm and a device for counting airborne pollen automatically using laser optics. Atmos Environ 2007;41:7987-7993.
28.
O'Connor DJ, Iacopino D, Healy DA, O'Sullivan D, Sodeau JR: The intrinsic fluorescence spectra of selected pollen and fungal spores. Atmos Environ 2011;45:6451-6458.
29.
DWD: Deutscher Wetterdienst. 2014, http://www.dwd.de/.
30.
Rantio-Lehtimaki A, Viander M, Koivikko A: Airborne birch pollen antigens in different particle sizes. Clin Exp Allergy 1994;24:23-28.
31.
Winkler H, Ostrowski R, Wilhelm M, Bergmann KC: Pollenbestimmungsbuch der Stiftung Deutscher Polleninformationsdienst. Berlin, Takt, 2001.
32.
Fawcett T: An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognit Lett 2006;27:861-874.
33.
Galan C, Antunes C, Brandao R, Torres C, Garcia-Mozo H, Caeiro E, Ferro R, Prank M, Sofiev M, Albertini R, Berger U, Cecchi L, Celenk S, Grewling L, Jackowiak B, Jager S, Kennedy R, Rantio-Lehtimaki A, Reese G, Sauliene I, Smith M, Thibaudon M, Weber B, Weichenmeier I, Pusch G, Buters JT: Airborne olive pollen counts are not representative of exposure to the major olive allergen Ole e 1. Allergy 2013;68:809-812.
34.
Buters JTM, Prank M, Sofiev M, Pusch G, Albertini R, Annesi-Maesano I, Antunes C, Behrendt H, Berger U, Brandao R, Celenk S, Galan C, Grewling L, Jackowiak B, Kennedy R, Rantio-Lehtimaki A, Reese G, Sauliene I, Smith M, Thibaudon M, Weber B, Cecchi L: Variation of the group 5 grass pollen allergen content of airborne pollen in relation to geographical location and time in season. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2015;136:87-95.
35.
Gottardini E, Cristofolini F, Cristofori A, Vannini A, Ferretti M: Sampling bias and sampling errors in pollen counting in aerobiological monitoring in Italy. J Environ Monitor 2009;11:751-755.
36.
Sikoparija B, Pejak-Sikoparija T, Radisic P, Smith M, Soldevilla CG: The effect of changes to the method of estimating the pollen count from aerobiological samples. J Environ Monit 2011;13:384-390.
37.
Oteros J, Galan C, Alcazar P, Dominguez-Vilches E: Quality control in bio-monitoring networks, Spanish Aerobiology Network. Sci Total Environ 2013;443:559-565.
38.
Comtois P, Alcazar P, Néron D: Pollen counts statistics and its relevance to precision. Aerobiologia 1999;15:19-28.
39.
Dell'Anna R, Cristofori A, Gottardini E, Monti F: A critical presentation of innovative techniques for automated pollen identification in aerobiological monitoring networks; in Kaiser B (ed): Pollen: Structure, Types and Effects. New York, Nova Science, 2010, vol 1, pp 273-288.
40.
Holt KA, Bennett KD: Principles and methods for automated palynology. New Phytol 2014;203:735-742.
41.
Bonton P, Boucher A, Thonnat M, Tomczak R, Hidalgo PJ, Belmonte J, Galan C: Colour image in 2D and 3D microscopy for the automation of pollen rate measurement. Image Anal Stereol 2001;20:527-532.
42.
Peel RG, Kennedy R, Smith M, Hertel O: Relative efficiencies of the Burkard 7-day, Rotorod and Burkard personal samplers for Poaceae and Urticaceae pollen under field conditions. Ann Agric Environ Med 2013;21:745-752.
43.
Pedersen BV, Moseholm L: Precision of the daily pollen count. Identifying sources of variation using variance component models. Aerobiologia 1993;9:15-26.
44.
Tormo Molina R, Maya Manzano JM, Fernandez Rodriguez S, Gonzalo Garijo Á, Silva Palacios I: Influence of environmental factors on measurements with Hirst spore traps. Grana 2013;52:59-70.
© 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel
2015
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.