Background: Patients with pollinosis develop symptoms after intake of plant food more often than the general population. In order to study the prevalence of the presentation of allergic symptoms to plant foods in pollinosis, we selected a representative sample of the population from our Mediterranean area. Methods: All patients completed a questionnaire, provided a blood sample and underwent a battery of skin and other complementary tests (prick-prick, oral challenge test) when necessary. The pollen counts were obtained from the Elche pollen station. In addition, sera from a subgroup of patients were checked with an allergen molecule panel on an Advia Centaur XP platform. Results: Of the final sample (n = 233), 39.9% of the patients with pollinosis were sensitized and 30.9% had clinical allergy to at least one of the plant foods studied. Regression analysis showed that age and sensitization to the extracts of Platanus acerifolia and Artemisia vulgaris were the most important variables for discriminating between groups. Patients with pollinosis at a risk of allergy to plant foods had significantly higher Pru p 3 values [odds ratio (OR) 3.3; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 2.3–4.8], and the value increased according to the number of plant food sensitizations. Conclusion: Plant food allergy is more common in patients with pollinosis than in the general population. The use of the London plain tree (P. acerifolia) and mugwort (A. vulgaris) in the skin tests may help identify such patients in our Mediterranean area, but determination of rPru p 3 could also be very useful in patients suspected of having plant food allergy.

1.
Bircher AJ, Van Melle G, Haller E, Curty B, Frei PC: IgE to food allergens are highly prevalent in patients allergic to pollen, with and without symptoms of food allergy. Clin Exp Allergy 1994;24:367–374.
2.
Ghunaim N, Grönlund H, Kronqvist M, et al: Antibody profiles and self-reported symptoms to pollen-related food allergens in grass pollen-allergic patients from northern Europe. Allergy 2005;60:185–191.
3.
Eriksson NE, Formgren H, Svenonius E: Food hypersensitivity in patients with pollen allergy. Allergy 1982;37:437–443.
4.
Bousquet J, Van Cauwenberge P, Khaltaev N, Aria Workshop Group; World Health Organization: allergic rhinitis and its impact on asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2001;108:147–334.
5.
Fernandez Rivas M: Food allergy in Alergológica-2005. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2009;19(suppl 2):37–44.
6.
Ostblom E, Egmar AC, Gardulf A, Lilja G, Wickman M: The impact of food hypersensitivity reported in 9-year-old children by their parents on health-related quality of life. Allergy 2008;63:211–218.
7.
Flabbee J, Petit N, Jay, et al: The economic costs of severe anaphylaxis in France: an inquiry carried out by the Allergy Vigilance Network. Allergy 2008;63:360–365.
8.
de Blok BM, Vlieg-Boerstra BJ, Oude Elberink JN, et al: A framework for measuring the social impact of food allergy across Europe: a EuroPrevall state of the art paper. Allergy 2007;62:733–737.
9.
Karisola P, Kotovuori A, Poikonen S, et al: Isolated hevein-like domains, but not 31-kd endochitinases, are responsible for IgE-mediated in vitro and in vivo reactions in latex-fruit syndrome. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2005;115:598–605.
10.
Midoro-Horiuti T, Brooks EG, Goldblum RM: Pathogenesis-related proteins of plants as allergens. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2001;87:261–271.
11.
Bublin M, Pfister M, Radauer C, et al: Component-resolved diagnosis of kiwifruit allergy with purified natural and recombinant kiwifruit allergens. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2010;8.
12.
Fernandez-Rivas M, Bolhar S, González-Mancebo E, et al: Apple allergy across Europe: how allergen sensitization profiles determine the clinical expression of allergies to plant foods. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2006;118:481–488.
13.
Aleman A, Sastre J, Quirce S, et al: Allergy to kiwi: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, food challenge study in patients from a birch-free area. J Allergy Clinical Immunol 2004;113:543–550.
14.
Dreborg S, Sub-Committee on Skin Test of the European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology. Methods for skin testing. Allergy 1989;44(suppl 10):22–30.
15.
Dreborg S, Sub-Committee on Skin Test of the European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology. 6. Skin tests used for epidemiological studies. Allergy 1989;44:52–59.
16.
EAACI: Skin tests used in type I allergy testing. Position paper. Sub-Committee on Skin Tests of the European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology. Allergy 1989;44:1–59.
17.
Ortolani C, Ispano M, Pastorello EA, Ansaloni R, Magri GC: Comparison of results of skin pricks test (with fresh foods and commercial food extracts) and RAST in 100 patients with oral allergy syndrome. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1989;83:683–690.
18.
Ibañez MD, Alonso E, Blasco C, et al: Comite de Reacciones Adversas a Alimentos de la Sociedad Española de Alergología e Inmunología Clínica. Metodología diagnóstica en alergia a alimentos. Allergol Inmunol Clin 1999;14:50–62.
19.
Petersen AB, Gudmann P, Milvang-Grønager P, et al: Performance evaluation of a specific IgE assay developed for the ADVIA Centaur immunoassay system. Clin Biochem 2004;37:882–892.
20.
Cuesta-Herranz J, Barber D, Blanco C, et al: Differences among pollen-allergic patients with and without plant food allergy. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2010;153:182–192.
21.
Sociedad Española de Alergología e Inmunología clínica (Internet). Madrid (Reference made on 10th October, 2007). Available on http://www.polenes.com/.
22.
Alvarado MI, Pérez M: Study of food allergy in the Spanish population. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) 2006;34:185–193.
23.
Rona RJ, Keil T, Summers C, et al: The prevalence of food allergy: a meta-analysis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2007;120:638–646.
24.
Zuidmeer L, Goldhahn K, Rona RJ, et al: The prevalence of plant food allergies: a systematic review. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2008;121:1210–1218.
25.
Burney P, Summers C, Chinn S, Hooper R, van Ree R, Lidholm J: Prevalence and distribution of sensitization to foods in the European Community Respiratory Health Survey: a EuroPrevall analysis. Allergy 2010;65:1182–1188.
26.
Cruz NV, Wilson BG, Fiocchi A, Bahna SL; American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology Adverse Reactions to Food Committee.Survey of physicians’ approach to food allergy. 1. Prevalence and manifestations. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2007;99:325–333.
27.
Subiza J, Feo Brito F, Pola J, Moral A, Fernández J, Jerez M: Polenes alergénicos y polinosis en 12 ciudades españolas. Rev Esp Alergol Inmunol Clin 1998;13:45–58.
28.
Fernández Sánchez J, García Más F, Esteban A, Miralles A: Incidencia de granos de polen y polinosis en la ciudad de Elche, 1995. Rev Esp Alergol Inmunol Clín 1998;13:88–91.
29.
Carrasquer Moya C, Peláez Hernández A, Durá Calatayud M, Burchés Baixauli E, Bertó Salom JM, Sastre Sastre A: Allergy to peach. Allergy 2002;57:756–757.
30.
Martínez San Ireneo M, Ibáñez MD, Fernández-Caldas E, Carnés J: In vitro and in vivo cross-reactivity studies of legume allergy in a Mediterranean population. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2008;147:222–230.
31.
Asero R, Mistrello G, Roncarolo D, et al: Immunological cross-reactivity between lipid transfer proteins from botanically unrelated plant-derived foods: a clinical study. Allergy 2002;57:900–906.
32.
Rossi RE, Monasterolo G, Canonica GW, Passalacqua G: Systemic reactions to peach are associated with high levels of specific IgE to Pru p 3. Allergy 2009;64:1795–1796.
33.
Bohle B: The impact of pollen-related food allergens on pollen allergy. Allergy 2007;62:3–10.
34.
Palomares O, Villalba M, Quiralte J, Polo F, Rodriguez R: 1,3-Beta-glucanases as candidates in latex-pollen-vegetable food cross-reactivity. Clin Exp Allergy 2005;35:345–351.
35.
Jahn-Schimd B, Harwanegg C, Hiller R, et al: Allergen microarray: comparison of microarray using recombinant allergens with conventional diagnostic methods to detect allergen-specific serum immunoglobulin E. Clin Exp Allergy 2003;33:1443–1449.
36.
Scala E, Alessandri C, Bernardi ML, et al: Cross-sectional survey on immunoglobulin E reactivity in 23,077 subjects using an allergenic molecule-based microarray detection system. Clin Exp Allergy 2010;40:911–921.
37.
Enrique E, Cisteró-Bahíma A, Bartolomé B, et al: Platanus acerifolia pollinosis and food allergy. Allergy 2002;57:351–356.
38.
Pastorello EA, Pravettoni V, Farioli L, et al: Hypersensitivity to mugwort (Artemisia vulgaris) in patients with peach allergy is due to a common lipid transfer protein allergen and is often without clinical expression. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2002;110:310–317.
39.
Lombardero M, Garcia-Selles FJ, Polo F, et al: Prevalence of sensitization to Artemisia allergens Art v 1, Art v 3 and Art v 60 kDa. Cross-reactivity among Art v 3 and other relevant lipid-transfer protein allergens. Clin Exp Allergy 2004;34:1415–1421.
40.
Lauer I, Miguel-Moncin MS, Abel T, Foetisch K, Hartz C, Fortunato D, Cistero-Bahima A, Vieths S, Scheurer S: Identification of a plane pollen lipid transfer protein (Pla a 3) and its immunological relation to the peach lipid-transfer protein, Pru p 3. Clin Exp Allergy 2007;37:261–269.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.