Background: In previous studies, the major peanut allergen Ara h 1 was digested in vitro using pepsin and porcine gastric fluid. The results suggested that in vivo gastric digestion of allergen protein can be modeled accurately by peptic hydrolysis in vitro. In the current investigation, studies were designed to follow the gastrointestinal (GI) digestion of peanut allergens under true physiological conditions. In vitro digestion with porcine gastric fluid was compared with actual physiological digestion of peanut allergens in the porcine digestive tract in vivo. Methods: Analysis of physiologic digestion was performed in piglets administered a 20-gram bolus of peanut meal followed by periodic sampling and analysis of GI contents. The pH was monitored, and digesta were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analysis. Results: Peanut meal initially neutralized stomach contents to a pH of approximately 7, which was subsequently acidified by HCl secretion within 30 min. Acidification to pH 2–4 resulted in active pepsin digestion of soluble protein in the stomach. Soluble intact protein/allergens were rapidly degraded to pepsin-resistant peptides in the stomach followed by hydrolysis of these fragments in the small intestine. Particulate material was evident in both the stomach and small intestine that could contribute to continued release of peanut allergens Ara h 1, 2 and 3. Conclusions: Porcine gastric digestion of peanut proteins resembles true physiological digestion only under optimal physiologic conditions. Soluble proteins are rapidly digested and insoluble material continues to release IgE-reactive proteins throughout the GI tract. GI digestion of food allergens can play a prominent role when assessing allergens within the context of a food matrix or meal and during the sensitization phase of IgE-mediated allergy.

1.
Wal JM: Assessment of allergic potential of (novel) foods. Nahrung 1999;43:168–174.
2.
Astwood JD, Leach JN, Fuchs RL: Stability of food allergens to digestion in vitro. Nat Biotechnol 1996;14:1269–1273.
3.
Simulated Gastric Fluid and Simulated Intestinal Fluid. United States Pharmacopoeia 23, The National Formulary 18. Easton, The United States Pharmacopoeial Convention, Inc. Mack Printing Co., 1995, p 2053.
4.
Hefle SL: The chemistry and biology of food allergens. Food Technol 1996;50:86–92.
5.
Vieths S: Allergenic cross-reactivity, food allergy and pollen. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 1997;4:61–70.
6.
Vieths S, Hoffman A, Holzhauser T, Muller U, Reindl J, Haustein D: Factors influencing the quality of food extracts for in vitro and in vivo diagnosis. Allergy 1998;53(suppl 46):65–71.
7.
Yagami T, Hashima Y, Nakamura A, Osuna H, Ikezawa Z: Digestibility of allergens extracted from natural rubber latex and vegetable foods. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2000;106:752–762.
8.
Fu TJ, Upasana RA, Hatzos C: Digestibility of food allergens and nonallergenic proteins in simulated gastric fluid and simulated intestinal fluid – a comparative study. J Agric Food Chem 2002;50:7154–7160.
9.
Taylor SL: Comment on digestibility of food allergens and nonallergenic proteins in simulated gastric fluid and simulated intestinal fluid – a comparative study. J Agric Food Chem 2003;51:5183–5184.
10.
Taylor SL, Lehrer SB: Principles and characteristics of food allergens. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 1996;(suppl 36):S91–S118.
11.
Sampson HA: Update on food allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2004;113:805–819.
12.
Hourihane JO, Kilburn SA, Nordlee JA, Hefle, SL, Taylor SL, Warner JO: An evaluation of the sensitivity of subjects with peanut allergy to very low doses of peanut protein: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge study. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1997;100:596–600.
13.
Moneret-Vautrin DA, Rance F, Kanny G, Olsewski A, Gueant JL, Dutau G, Guerin L: Food allergy to peanuts in France – evaluation of 142 observations. Clin Exp Allergy 1998;28:1113–1119.
14.
Schimek EM, Zwolfer B, Briza P, Jahn-Schmid B, Vogel L, Vieths S, Ebner C, Bohle B: Gastrointestinal digestion of Bet v 1-homologous food allergens destroys their mediator-releasing, but not T cell-activating, capacity. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2005;116:1327–1333.
15.
Evaluation of allergenicity of genetically modified foods. Report of a joint Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations/World Health Organization (FAO/WHO) expert consultation on allergenicity of foods derived from biotechnology. FAO/WHO, 22–25 January, 2001. http://www.fao.org/documents/.
16.
Thomas K, Aalbers M, Bannon GA, Bartels M, Dearman RJ, Esdaile DJ, Fu TJ, Glatt CM, Thomas K, Aalbers M, Bannon GA, Bartels M, Dearman RJ, Esdaile DJ, Fu TJ, Glatt CM, Hadfield N, Hatzos C, Hefle SL, Heylings JR, Goodman RE, Henry B, Herouet C, Holsapple M, Ladics GS, Landry TD, MacIntosh SC, Rice EA, Privalle LS, Steiner HY, Teshima R, Van Ree R, Woolhiser M, Zawodny J: A multi-laboratory evaluation of a common in vitro pepsin digestion assay protocol used in assessing the safety of novel proteins. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2004;39:87–98.
17.
Burnett GR, Wickham M, Fillery-Travis A, Robertson JA, Belton PS, Gilbert SM, Tatham AS, Shewry PR, Mills EN: Interaction between protein allergens and model gastric emulsions. Biochem Soc Trans 2002;30:916–918.
18.
Kopper RA, Odum NJ, Sen M, Helm RM, Stanley SJ, Burks AW: Peanut protein allergens: gastric digestion is carried out exclusively by pepsin. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2004;114:614–618.
19.
Yunginger JW, Sweeney KG, Sturner WQ, Giannandrea LA, Teigland JD, Bray M, Benson PA, York JA, Biedrzycki L, Squilace DL, Helm RM: Fatal food-induced anaphylaxis. JAMA 1988;260:1450–1452.
20.
Sampson HA, Mendelson L, Rosen JP: Fatal and near-fatal anaphylactic reactions to food in children and adolescents. N Engl J Med 1992;327:380–384.
21.
Hourihane JO, Kilburn SA, Dean P, Warner JO: Clinical characteristics of peanut allergy. Clin Exp Allergy 1997;27:634–639.
22.
Bock SA, Atkins FM: The natural history of peanut allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1989;83:900–904.
23.
Moughan PJ, Birtles MJ, Cranwell PD, Smith WC, Pedraza M: The piglet as a model animal for studying aspects of digestion and absorption in milk-fed human infants. World Rev Nutr Diet 1992;67:40–113.
24.
Rowan AM, Moughan PJ, Wilson MN, Maher K, Tasman-Jones C: Comparison of the ileal and faecal digestibility of dietary amino acids in adult humans and evaluation of the pig as a model animal for digestion studies in man. Br J Nutr 1994;71:29–42.
25.
Darragh AJ, Moughan PJ: The three-week-old piglet as a model animal for studying protein digestion in human infants. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1995;21:387–393.
26.
Helm RM, Burks AW: Animal models of food allergy. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2002;2:541–546.
27.
Helm, RM: Food allergy animal models. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2002;964:139–150.
28.
Maleki SJ, Kopper RA, Shin DS, Park CW, Compadre CM, Sampson H, Burks AW, Bannon GA: Structure of the major peanut allergen Ara h 1 may protect IgE-binding epitopes from degradation. J Immunol 2000;164:5844–5849.
29.
Sen M, Kopper R, Pons L, Abraham EC, Burks AW, Bannon GA: Protein structure plays a critical role in peanut allergen stability and may determine immunodominant IgE-binding epitopes. J Immunol 2002;169:882–887.
30.
Untersmayr E, Scholl I, Swoboda I, Beil WJ, Forster-Waldl E, Walter F, Reimer A, Kramer G, Kinicyanin T, Spitzauer B, Boltz- Nitulescu G, Scheiner O, Jensen-Jarolim E: Antacid medication inhibits digestion of dietary proteins and causes food allergy: a fish allergy model in Balb/c mice. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2003;112:616–623.
31.
Brandtzaeg P: Current understanding of gastrointestinal immunoregulation and its relation to food allergy. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2002;964:13–45.
32.
Chambers SJ, Wickham MSJ, Regoli M, Bertelli E, Gunning PA, Nicoletti C: Rapid in vivo transport of proteins from digested allergen across pre-sensitized gut. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2004;325:1258–1263.
33.
Kopper RA, Odum NJ, Sen M, Helm RM, Stanley SJ, Burks AW: Peanut protein allergens: the effect of roasting on solubility and allergenicity. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2005;136:16–22.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.