Background: Mites are the most common aeroallergen in human allergic asthma. However, no animal model of mite-induced allergic airway inflammation has been reported before. In this study, an animal model of mite-induced allergic airway inflammation in guinea pigs was developed. Methods: Firstly, we found that two intraperitoneal injections of 100 μg crude mite extract (CME), but not multiple aerosol inhalations of 10 mg/ml CME, can cause sensitization in guinea pigs. The sensitization to mites was confirmed by the measurement of serum antimite antibody titer and the detection of anaphylactic bronchoconstriction after intravenous injection of CME solution. Then, single or multiple aerosol challenges with different concentrations (8, 4 or 1 mg/ml) of CME in these sensitized animals were performed. The total white cell and differential counts in the bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluids were studied at different time intervals after challenge in different animals, and tracheal pathology was performed to detect the allergic airway inflammation. For comparison with the study in animals treated with CME, a BAL study in animals treated with ovalbumin was also performed. Results: The inhalation challenge of CME aerosol in sensitized animals caused prolonged eosinophilia in BAL fluid which persisted for at least 7 days after single challenge. Neither inhalation challenge at higher concentrations of CME aerosol nor repeated inhalation challenges increased the degree of eosinophilia in BAL fluid compared to a single challenge. Using the same procedures, we also found that the mite model caused more eosinophilia in BAL fluid than did ovalbumin. Conclusion: This is the first report of an animal model of mite-induced allergic airway inflammation in guinea pigs which can provide us with a useful model to study airway inflammation of mite-induced asthma in humans.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.