We investigated whether or not antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs; antiphosphadidylserine antibody, aPS; antiphosphatididylinositol antibody, aPI; antiphosphatidic acid antibody, aPA, and antiphosphadidylethanolamine antibody, aPE) were β2-glycoprotein-I (GPI)-dependent antibodies like anticardiolipin antibody (aCL) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). None of the patients with syphilis or healthy controls was positive for any GPI-dependent aPL. By contrast, GPI-dependent aCL (40%), aPS (20%), aPI (18%), aPA (12%) and aPE (8%) were detected in patients with SLE. Among these, 4 patients were negative for aCL, but positive for aPS. Those who were positive for more than 2 types of aPL, along with lupus anticoagulant, had a high incidence of arteriovenous thrombosis, fetal loss, thrombocytopenia and biological false-positive reaction to syphilis. From these findings we conclude that GPI-dependent aPLs, other than aCL, are present in patients with SLE, and we should examine more than 2 types of aPL, such as a combination of aCL and aPS, to avoid overlooking aPL. Furthermore, we confirmed that GPI-independent aPL was not rare in SLE patients, but the clinical significance of this type of aPL in this clinical setting is unclear.

Keywords:
Antiphospholipid antibody, β2-Glycoprotein I, Lupus anticoagulant, Systemic lupus erythematosus
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1994 S. Karger AG, Basel
1994
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.